Your area Not set — showing everywhere
Issue · Salem, NH

Zoning Ordinance Amendments

Sweeping changes to permitted use tables, mixed-use standards, proximity restrictions, and definitions (including nightclubs) affect town-wide land use, business siting, and residential compatibility, with repeated public hearings and tabling.

Overview

The Planning Board has advanced five zoning ordinance amendments through staged reviews and public hearings, focusing on permitted uses, mixed-use standards, and proximity restrictions. Debate centered on whether to add a nightclub definition, with continuation to August 11 for further discussion.

Background

Zoning ordinance amendments first surfaced for formal review at the June 23, 2026 Planning Board meeting, where staff presented updates to the permitted use table, mixed-use development standards, personal services in business districts, and proximity rules for cigar bars and kennels.

The board debated height and density standards with reference to existing projects and the master plan, then agreed to notice the amendments for public hearing on July 14 while awaiting related state legislation.

At the July 14 public hearing, a resident requested that Amendment 5 add 'nightclubs' to address noise and late-night traffic concerns; staff noted the draft focused on post-10 p.m. operations, and board members discussed the difficulty of defining nightclubs without triggering excessive variances.

The hearing closed with discussion continued to the July 28 meeting.

On July 28 the board opened another public hearing on the five amendments, which now included consolidating educational and general uses, allowing mixed-use in commercial districts, and establishing proximity restrictions between kennels, cigar bars, and recreational districts, but no public testimony was offered.

The hearing closed after no speakers came forward, and the board voted unanimously to continue discussion to August 11, 2026.

How it unfolded
Board reviewed updates to permitted use table, mixed-use standards, personal services, and proximity rules; agreed to notice amendments for July 14 public hearing.
2026-06-23Planning Board
Opened public hearing on five zoning amendments; resident requested adding 'nightclubs' to Amendment 5; discussion continued to July 28 after debate on defining nightclubs.
2026-07-14Planning Board
Opened public hearing on five zoning amendments but closed it with no testimony; voted to continue discussion to August 11, 2026.
2026-07-28Planning Board
Arguments against
Adding a broad 'nightclub' definition could inadvertently impact existing businesses or residential neighbors on Route 28.
planning-board 2026-07-14
Against
Focusing on size or primary purpose (entertainment vs. alcohol sales) is preferable to a formal definition that triggers excessive variances.
planning-board 2026-07-14
Against
The draft already addresses businesses operating after 10 p.m. without needing to single out nightclubs.
planning-board 2026-07-14
Against
Key voices
“Requested that Amendment 5 include 'nightclubs' alongside cigar bars and kennels to address community concerns regarding noise and late-night traffic.”
Residentplanning-board 2026-07-14
What's next

Discussion will continue at the August 11, 2026 Planning Board meeting.

zoning amendmentspermitted usesmixed-use developmentproximity rulesnightclubscommercial districts