Your area Not set — showing everywhere
Issue · Burlington, MA

Eversource Substation Project

Major utility infrastructure raises concerns over visual impact, noise, wetlands, and construction access in residential areas.

Overview

The Eversource Substation Project addresses an undersized local substation through new infrastructure whose design and impacts are under review by town boards. Discussions have centered on reliability gains versus visual, noise, environmental, and construction concerns. No final approvals have occurred.

Background

The Eversource Substation Project arose from recognition that the current substation is undersized and capacity-constrained.

At the planning board meeting on 2026-06-04 the chair noted the need for expansion to address these issues and indicated that Eversource would present an update at a subsequent meeting.

This set up the detailed select board session on 2026-06-08 where Eversource representatives addressed long-term forecasting, reliability improvements under a four-substation model, visual and noise mitigation measures, vegetation removal and stormwater controls, construction access via an existing road, and inter-departmental coordination.

Board members expressed a supervisory stance, stating they would not rubber stamp the project and must ask hard questions at every stage.

Eversource explained use of customer applications for forecasting, ongoing noise modeling with consultants, incorporation of a stormwater basin, monthly meetings with the conservation agent, and multi-channel community engagement including mailers and a project website.

Public comments at the meeting raised questions on data center impacts, visual integration in winter, wetland effects, and notification of abutters.

The project is advancing toward an EFSB filing that will include renderings, noise results, and permits.

At the conservation commission meeting on 2026-06-25, members discussed the shift to state-level EFSB permitting under the 2024 Climate Act for the substation off Mill Street, noting that this process consolidates permits and limits local Conservation Commission authority. A geotechnical NOI is expected in August, with blasting not permitted but alternative rock-breaking methods under consideration; the commission will receive an Eversource presentation and may provide input on conditions during pre-filing stages though final decisions rest with the EFSB.

How it unfolded
The chair noted the current substation is undersized and capacity-constrained; Eversource is expected to present an update at the next meeting, with emphasis on community notification.
2026-06-04Planning Board
Eversource presented on power forecasting, visual and noise mitigation, environmental impacts and stormwater, project access, and inter-departmental roles; board raised concerns and Eversource outlined mitigation plans and upcoming public meeting.
2026-06-08Select Board
Eversource presentation to the board was deferred due to need for additional preparation time; coordination with staff ongoing and public meeting announced for June 24 at Grand View.
2026-06-18Planning Board
An announcement was made regarding a public forum scheduled for Wednesday, June 24th, at Grandview Farm to discuss the proposed Eversource substation in the Winn Street area; community members were encouraged to attend.
2026-06-22Select Board
Commission discussed the proposed substation under the new EFSB consolidated permitting process, which limits local authority; geotechnical NOI expected in August with no blasting permitted; Eversource to present to the commission for input on conditions.
2026-06-25Conservation Commission
Arguments in favor
New distribution lines and simulations are designed to improve local reliability and reduce power outages.
select-board 2026-06-08
For
Eversource uses actual customer applications for forecasting long-term needs including electrification and data centers.
select-board 2026-06-08
For
Noise consultants will model levels using background data and equipment specs to determine if mitigation such as fencing is needed.
select-board 2026-06-08
For
Arguments against
Large towers and fencing will create visual impact especially in winter when trees are bare.
select-board 2026-06-08
Against
Removal of over two acres of vegetation will alter stormwater runoff and affect wetlands.
select-board 2026-06-08
Against
Transport of 125-foot towers and construction equipment risks blocking residential driveways and disrupting neighborhoods.
select-board 2026-06-08
Against
Key voices
“The board would not rubber stamp the project and must ask hard questions at every stage.”
Board memberselect-board 2026-06-08
“Questioned how power resources are forecasted to avoid future shortages from large-scale additions like data centers and whether the model would reduce outages.”
Residentselect-board 2026-06-08
“Asked if the project team had been in contact with the local conservation department regarding vegetation removal and wetland work.”
Residentselect-board 2026-06-08
What's next

Eversource to present to the conservation commission; members encouraged to review MACC lunch-and-learn materials on the new EFSB process.

EversourcesubstationMill Street