Town Administrator hiring process and role review
Year-long vacancy in a key leadership position despite prior town vote to fill it, raising questions about hiring process, transparency, and whether the role is needed.
The Town Administrator position became contentious after public demands for Kathy Frenette's reinstatement following audit findings and an ongoing investigation. The board declined to reinstate her and later shifted to a deliberate hiring process open to public input while residents debate the role's necessity and methodology.
The Town Administrator issue first surfaced publicly at the March 17, 2026 Select Board meeting when residents presented a 30-signature resolution demanding reinstatement of Kathy Frenette along with fulfillment of RSA 91-A requests and action on 2024 audit findings such as welfare list leaks and duplicate payments.
The board refused substantive comment citing legal counsel and an ongoing Merrimack County Sheriff's investigation, taking no action on the resolution.
At the April 14, 2026 meeting residents continued to express conflicting views on Frenette's employment status and fitness for office, with some citing policy failures and others criticizing the board's investigation handling and potential conflicts of interest; the board voted not to reinstate her.
By the May 12, 2026 meeting the focus had shifted to the process for filling the now-vacant position, with the board expressing a desire to move slowly and seek public input while residents questioned the use of outside services, the hiring methodology, and whether the position should exist at all.
The board stated its intent to gather feedback but had not yet established a concrete plan for doing so, leaving the leadership structure and hiring approach unresolved amid ongoing community division.
At the June 9, 2026 meeting, Mike Smith pressed for faster progress on the year-long Town Administrator vacancy, arguing that advertisement should have occurred months earlier given the town vote to fill the role, while repeatedly complaining about agendas and materials being delivered only one day in advance or not at all in violation of the three-day requirement; Alfred Hanson stated the posting is not yet ready and agreed to take the distribution complaints under advisement with no timeline or process change adopted. The board also voted to enter non-public session under RSA 91-A:3 II (b) to discuss hiring.
The board will seek public feedback on the Town Administrator hiring process.
Members feature
Ask questions. Get answers with receipts.
Ask about anything covered on this page and get a plain-English answer that links to the report, the official records, and the exact moment in the meeting video.
Create a free accountFree with a MeetingWatch account — no card, no spam.
Already a member? Sign in
Ask questions about any meeting
Open a community, board, issue, or meeting and I can answer from its records — with links to the report, official documents, and the exact moment in the video.
Then reopen this button to start asking.
AI-generated from meeting records — verify against the linked sources. Conversations are stored (privacy).