Your area Not set — showing everywhere
Meeting report · Selectboard
Creating this report cost real money. Help fund coverage →

Selectboard — February 12, 2026

The meeting was generally routine, but the temperature rose during public comments regarding tax burdens and the loss of local authority over road development.

Date Thursday, February 12, 2026 Duration 2.4h Speakers 15 Public comments 6 Decisions 11 Lively

Questions about this meeting? ⁠Just ask.

Ask MeetingWatch answers from this meeting’s report, transcript, and records — with linked sources.

Summary AI-generated to surface controversy & community impact without bias — always verify against the actual meeting before relying on it.

At the February 12 Selectboard meeting, several high-stakes issues were discussed that directly impact the long-term stability and safety of Sunapee residents.

First, the financial pressure on our community is mounting. During public comment, a resident pointed out that town tax increases have significantly outpaced inflation, a trend that disproportionately affects seniors and families on fixed incomes. While the Selectboard acknowledged these pressures, the meeting concluded without a specific proposal or policy to address how the town will manage this growing economic burden on its residents.

Second, Sunapee is losing local authority over land development. Due to state legislation (SB 281), the town can no longer review building permits on Class 6 (unmaintained) roads. This creates new challenges for emergency services and stormwater management. The Board has tasked staff with drafting new policies to try to mitigate these risks, but the loss of direct oversight is a significant shift.

Finally, the 2024 municipal audit raised concerns about our internal structure. Despite improvements, the audit noted that Sunapee lacks the robust, full-time staffing required to properly manage a $25 million organization, specifically regarding the segregation of financial duties. As the town continues to grow, these structural gaps remain a risk to fiscal accountability.

Feb 12, 2026 2.4h long 15 speakers 6 public comments 11 decisions Lively
Notable statements Drag to browse

“The state has taken away that first step... there's no longer a requirement that the planning board review it and offer comment, and there's no longer a requirement that the Select Board say that it's okay to build on that Class 6 road.”

— Unidentified speaker · Explaining the impact of SB 281 on town oversight of Class 6 road development. 10:01

“I want pro-building and pro-environment. You can use the roads, do what you want to do, but don't mess it up for everybody else.”

— Unidentified speaker · Summarizing the board's stance on potential road maintenance policies. 30:57

“Time is muscle. Once heart muscle dies, it's pretty much gone.”

— Unidentified speaker · Emphasizing the medical necessity of the new cardiac monitor for rapid response. 45:03

“I think the state of New Hampshire should be paying the town of Sunapee for basically supplementing their lack of providing marine patrol in the way that they used to.”

— Unidentified speaker · Commenting on the town's increased role in lake safety due to reduced state presence. 52:48

“Between 2023 and 2024, you outpaced inflation five times... The town is asking for $200... Seniors are going to get about $650 [from Social Security].”

— Unidentified speaker · Public comment criticizing the town's tax increases relative to inflation and their impact on senior citizens. 1:39:30

“We want to make sure that we are best supporting our residents... but we also need to be realistic about... the tools and resources that we need to get that thing that we say we want.”

— Unidentified speaker · Discussing the tension between the desire for improved financial/communication systems and the reality of limited staffing budgets. 1:58:04

“We just don't have the staffing capacity to do a lot of this stuff, and especially because we've been slow on hiring...”

— Unidentified speaker · Discussing the reasons for needing external help with communications and digital tasks. 2:11:47

“I think personally... one of the things when you talk about concern for families of modest incomes being able to live here in town. That also supports our school system.”

— Unidentified speaker · Reflecting on the importance of budget considerations regarding housing and community sustainability. 2:22:36
This meeting — choose a section

Public ⁠impact

Issues from this meeting with documented community impact.
What was discussed

Loss of municipal oversight on building permits and liability for unmaintained roads.

What happened

The board did not make an immediate decision but tasked staff with drafting policy language.

What was discussed

Significant impairment of water quality due to phosphorus and stormwater runoff.

What happened

The board received the report for informational purposes.

What was discussed

Ongoing risks identified in the 2024 audit regarding inadequate staffing and segregation of duties.

What happened

The board approved continuing with the current auditing firm.

Topics ⁠discussed

Each topic expands to quotes and full context.
Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

The board reviewed and approved the January 5th minutes, budget public hearing minutes, and various municipal fund expenditures.

What happened

All minutes and expenditures were approved by the board.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

The Town Planner and Land Use Administrator briefed the board on recent state legislative changes (SB 281) regarding Class 6 roads.

What happened

The board expressed interest in developing a formal policy but did not make an immediate decision on zoning amendments.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

The Fire Department Association proposed the donation of a new Zoll X model cardiac monitor to replace an aging unit.

What happened

The board voted to accept the donation.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

The Fire Department Association provided an update on a planned dock extension for emergency services.

What happened

The board voted to accept the donation for the project.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

The Perkins Pond Protective Association presented a report on water quality impairment and the ongoing watershed management plan, highlighting the critical need to address phosphorus levels and stormwater runoff to prevent eutrophication.

What happened

The presentation was for informational purposes to update the board on the status of the pond; the board received the final plan.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

Discussion of the 2024 municipal audit, noting improvements in financial controls despite ongoing structural staffing challenges.

What happened

The board approved continuing with the current auditing firm, Plodzik and Saunderson, PA.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

An analysis of the town's need for better, more diverse communication strategies to inform residents about infrastructure projects and mitigate spam; discussion of outsourcing and library partnership for digital literacy.

What happened

The board discussed the pros and cons of outsourcing communication design and acknowledged the need to improve reach of town communications.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

An update on the transition to new accounting software and its impact on departmental workflows.

What happened

Department heads have been supportive of the transition despite the temporary slowdown in financial processing.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

The board reviewed the decision to stay with Health Trust and the potential impact of upcoming state legislation.

What happened

The board will continue to monitor the progress of the bill.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

Preliminary discussion on community engagement for the town's upcoming 250th anniversary.

What happened

The town will seek to form a planning committee and solicit community ideas.

Controversy & ⁠dissent

Where the board, the community, or the agenda diverged.

Potentially controversial issues

01

Class 6 Road Legislation (SB 281)

New state law removes the town's authority to review building permits on unmaintained roads, creating potential risks for emergency access, stormwater management, and town liability.
Board position: The board signaled a need to create new local policies or zoning amendments to regain some level of oversight and protect town interests.
medium concern
02

Municipal Tax Rate vs. Inflation

A resident challenged the board regarding tax increases that significantly outpace inflation, specifically noting the burden on seniors and low-income residents.
Board position: The board acknowledged the difficulty of rising fixed costs but did not propose a specific solution to mitigate the tax burden.
high concern

Community vs. board tension

Public ⁠comment

What residents said — verbatim, with timestamps.
6
Total speakers
2
Addressed
3
Partial
1
Not addressed
Mayor Keyes
05:15
Partial
The Town Planner presented an update regarding Class 6 roads and recent legislative changes. They explained that the state has removed the requirement for the Planning Board and Selectboard to review building permits on these roads, which could impact town liability and emergency access. Key concern
How the town should handle policies regarding building on Class 6 roads and managing private roads to ensure emergency access and town protection.
Board response
The board engaged in a lengthy discussion regarding zoning amendments, driveway regulations, and the potential for new policies or liability waivers.
The board did not immediately implement a policy, but they committed to having the town team (Police, Fire, Highway) provide input to create draft language for a future policy.
Steve Marshall
32:45
Addressed
Representing the Police and Fire Association, he proposed donating a new Zoll X model cardiac monitor to the town. He explained the technical advantages over the current 15-year-old model and how it would improve pediatric care and data transmission during emergencies. Key concern
Requesting permission for the town to accept a donation of $44,802.02 (net of trade-in) for a new cardiac monitor.
Board response
The board discussed the implications of the donation, including maintenance costs and training, and then formally voted to accept the donation.
The board held a discussion and then passed a motion to accept the donation.
Tim White
1:17:41
Addressed
Representing the Fire Department Association, he provided an update on plans to extend the safety services dock by 15 feet. He noted that the extension is fully funded by donated money and is necessary to prevent boats from running aground during droughts. Key concern
Informing the board of the plan to use donated funds to extend the emergency services dock to ensure reliable water response.
Board response
The board expressed appreciation for the support and then formally voted to accept the donation of $6,715 for the project.
The board accepted the information and formally voted to accept the donation.
Suzanne Graves
1:35:43
Partial
The President of the Perkins Pond Protective Association presented a watershed management plan to address water quality impairment. She highlighted issues like stormwater runoff, sediment infill, and cyanobacteria blooms, and proposed conservation and zoning strategies. Key concern
Communicating the need for watershed protection and seeking cooperation for future conservation, drainage improvements, and potential zoning ordinances.
Board response
The board asked several questions regarding dredging, the impact of development, and the potential for the town to assist with drainage projects.
The board listened and engaged in discussion, but the presentation was primarily an update on a completed plan rather than a direct request for immediate action, though the board discussed the feasibility of future collaboration.
Chris
1:36:52
Partial
He argued that the town's tax increases have significantly outpaced inflation over the last several years. He expressed concern that these high taxes are placing an undue burden on seniors and residents living below the poverty line. Key concern
The rapid increase in the municipal tax rate relative to inflation and its impact on vulnerable populations.
Board response
The board members (specifically Frederick Gallup and Jeremy Hathorn) responded by acknowledging the difficulty of rising fixed costs and the importance of supporting those on fixed incomes.
The board acknowledged the validity of the concern regarding fixed costs and the difficulty of managing budgets, but they did not offer a solution to the tax rate issue.
Speaker SPEAKER_04
1:40:40
Not addressed
The speaker criticized the town's management of tax increases, noting they have consistently outpaced inflation by 4 to 6 times. He questioned whether the Selectboard represents the taxpayers or the government. Key concern
Taxation rates outpacing inflation and the representation of taxpayers.
Board response
The board did not provide a direct rebuttal to this specific speaker's comments during his turn, though members addressed the general topic of budget pressures later.
There was no direct response to the speaker's question regarding who the board represents.

Decisions ⁠logged

Every recorded vote, with timestamps and dissents.
01:11
Approval of January 5th, 2025 minutes.
Motion made and seconded; all in favor.
Passed
01:57
Approval of budget public hearing minutes.
Motion made and seconded; all in favor.
Passed
02:27
Approval of veterans credits, blind exemptions, and solar exemptions.
Motion made and seconded; all in favor.
Passed
03:39
Approval of municipal fund expenditures (General, Hydro, Water, Special Rec, and Grants).
Motion made and seconded; all in favor.
Passed
45:42
Acceptance of cardiac monitor donation in the amount of $44,802.02.
Motion made and seconded; all in favor.
Passed
54:08
Acceptance of dock extension donation in the amount of $6,715.
Motion made and seconded; all in favor.
Passed
1:42:56
Approval of the agreement for the Town of Sunapee to allow Springfield's participation in the Transfer Station/Recycling Center.
The agreement maintains the existing 25% charge to Springfield and includes standard notification protocols for changes in the relationship.
Unanimous (Aye)
1:45:46
Acceptance of unanticipated revenue in the amount of $195 in the form of gift cards for the Sunapee Food Pantry.
The board voted to accept the donation to the Food Pantry.
Unanimous (Aye)
1:47:04
Approval of the Eversource Temporary Stonewall Agreement.
Allows Eversource to destroy and rebuild a stone wall for power line maintenance, requiring before-and-after photos for the record.
Unanimous (Aye)
1:49:42
Engagement of Plodzik and Saunderson, PA for the annual municipal audit.
The board chose to stay with the current firm to maintain the established relationship.
Unanimous (Aye)
2:25:51
Motion to enter non-public session under RSA 91:2(c).
The motion was made by a speaker and seconded by an unnamed speaker. The roll call resulted in three affirmative votes.
Passed (3-0)

Share ⁠this report

Drafts ready to post — click any block to copy.

X / Twitter — by angle

Community concerns dismissed/unaddressed
At the Feb 12 Selectboard meeting, residents raised a critical alarm: Sunapee's tax increases are outpacing inflation, hitting seniors and those on fixed incomes hardest. The Board acknowledged the pressure but offered no... https://meetingwatch.org/nh/sunapee/selectboard/2026-02-12/ #MeetingWatch #SunapeeNH
309/280 chars
Loss of municipal oversight/impact on infrastructure
New state law SB 281 has stripped Sunapee of its power to review building permits on Class 6 roads. The Selectboard is now tasked with drafting new policies to manage the resulting risks to emergency access and stormwater runoff. https://meetingwatch.org/nh/sunapee/selectboard/2026-02-12/ #MeetingWatch #SunapeeNH
314/280 chars
Fiscal responsibility and structural staffing risks
Sunapee's 2024 audit confirms a recurring risk: the town lacks the robust staffing needed to manage a $25M organization, relying heavily on part-time consultants. This creates ongoing risks in financial segregation of duties. https://meetingwatch.org/nh/sunapee/selectboard/2026-02-12/ #MeetingWatch #SunapeeNH
310/280 chars

X thread

1
Sunapee is facing a perfect storm of rising costs, loss of local control, and staffing risks. Here is what happened at the Feb 12 Selectboard meeting. 🧵 #MeetingWatch #SunapeeNH
177/280
2
1/ TAX BURDEN: Residents pointed out that town tax increases have outpaced inflation fivefold since 2023. For seniors on fixed incomes, this is unsustainable. While the Board acknowledged the difficulty, there was no plan presented to mitigate this burden.
256/280
3
2/ LOSS OF CONTROL: Due to state law SB 281, the Town can no longer review building permits on Class 6 roads. This removes our ability to oversee development that affects emergency access and stormwater. The Board is now looking for ways to regain some oversight.
263/280
4
3/ STAFFING RISKS: The 2024 audit highlighted that Sunapee’s $25M budget is being managed with inadequate staffing and a reliance on part-time consultants. This creates structural risks in financial oversight that the town must address to ensure... https://meetingwatch.org/nh/sunapee/selectboard/2026-02-12/
272/280

Facebook — long form

At the February 12 Selectboard meeting, several high-stakes issues were discussed that directly impact the long-term stability and safety of Sunapee residents.

First, the financial pressure on our community is mounting. During public comment, a resident pointed out that town tax increases have significantly outpaced inflation, a trend that disproportionately affects seniors and families on fixed incomes. While the Selectboard acknowledged these pressures, the meeting concluded without a specific proposal or policy to address how the town will manage this growing economic burden on its residents.

Second, Sunapee is losing local authority over land development. Due to state legislation (SB 281), the town can no longer review building permits on Class 6 (unmaintained) roads. This creates new challenges for emergency services and stormwater management. The Board has tasked staff with drafting new policies to try to mitigate these risks, but the loss of direct oversight is a significant shift.

Finally, the 2024 municipal audit raised concerns about our internal structure. Despite improvements, the audit noted that Sunapee lacks the robust, full-time staffing required to properly manage a $25 million organization, specifically regarding the segregation of financial duties. As the town continues to grow, these structural gaps remain a risk to fiscal accountability. https://meetingwatch.org/nh/sunapee/selectboard/2026-02-12/ #MeetingWatch #SunapeeNH

Action ⁠items

Who owes what, by when.
Draft language for a policy regarding building on Class 6 roads, including input from Highway, Police, and Fire departments.
Assigned: Select Board Staff
Research best practices for audit firm rotation cycles.
Assigned: Town Manager · Due: Next meeting
Prepare an RFP for communication/educational material support.
Assigned: Town Manager
Talk to Sean regarding student involvement for the 250th anniversary planning.
Assigned: a speaker
Fix the non-working camera used for meetings.
Assigned: Town Staff

Member ⁠positions

11 issues · 1 explicit · 33 inferred
Present
Approval of January 5th, 2025 minutes. YES ~
Approval of budget public hearing minutes. YES ~
Approval of veterans credits, blind exemptions, and solar exemptions. YES ~
Approval of municipal fund expenditures (General, Hydro, Water, Special Rec, and Grants). YES ~
Acceptance of cardiac monitor donation in the amount of $44,802.02. YES ~
Acceptance of dock extension donation in the amount of $6,715. YES ~
Approval of the agreement for the Town of Sunapee to allow Springfield's participation in the Transfer Station/Recycling Center. YES ~
Acceptance of unanticipated revenue in the amount of $195 in the form of gift cards for the Sunapee Food Pantry. YES ~
Approval of the Eversource Temporary Stonewall Agreement. YES ~
Engagement of Plodzik and Saunderson, PA for the annual municipal audit. YES ~
Motion to enter non-public session under RSA 91:2(c). YES ~
Jeremy Hathorn
Vice Chair
Present
Approval of January 5th, 2025 minutes. YES ~
Approval of budget public hearing minutes. YES ~
Approval of veterans credits, blind exemptions, and solar exemptions. YES ~
Approval of municipal fund expenditures (General, Hydro, Water, Special Rec, and Grants). YES ~
Acceptance of cardiac monitor donation in the amount of $44,802.02. YES ~
Acceptance of dock extension donation in the amount of $6,715. YES ~
Approval of the agreement for the Town of Sunapee to allow Springfield's participation in the Transfer Station/Recycling Center. YES ~
Acceptance of unanticipated revenue in the amount of $195 in the form of gift cards for the Sunapee Food Pantry. YES ~
Approval of the Eversource Temporary Stonewall Agreement. YES ~
Engagement of Plodzik and Saunderson, PA for the annual municipal audit. YES ~
Motion to enter non-public session under RSA 91:2(c). YES ~
Present
Approval of January 5th, 2025 minutes. YES ~
Approval of budget public hearing minutes. YES ~
Approval of veterans credits, blind exemptions, and solar exemptions. YES ~
Approval of municipal fund expenditures (General, Hydro, Water, Special Rec, and Grants). YES ~
Acceptance of cardiac monitor donation in the amount of $44,802.02. YES ~
Acceptance of dock extension donation in the amount of $6,715. YES ~
Approval of the agreement for the Town of Sunapee to allow Springfield's participation in the Transfer Station/Recycling Center. YES ~
Acceptance of unanticipated revenue in the amount of $195 in the form of gift cards for the Sunapee Food Pantry. YES ~
Approval of the Eversource Temporary Stonewall Agreement. YES ~
Engagement of Plodzik and Saunderson, PA for the annual municipal audit. YES ~
Motion to enter non-public session under RSA 91:2(c). YES ~

Positions marked ~ are inferred from context and may not reflect the member's explicitly stated position. UNCLEAR means the vote was split but the record did not name how this member voted — it is not a “yes.”

Support coverage

Creating this report cost ⁠real money.

MeetingWatch attended, transcribed, and analyzed this meeting on its own dime. If this work is valuable to you, chip in to keep covering Sunapee.

Report composed by grok-4.3, gemma-4-26b, grok-4-fast, grok-4.20-0309-reasoning · analyzed 2026-06-24.