Your area Not set — showing everywhere
Meeting report · Selectboard
Creating this report cost real money. Help fund coverage →

Selectboard — February 9, 2026

The meeting carried underlying tension from an urgent environmental crisis, a stark and unanswered public grievance about taxation, a state law stripping local development oversight, recurring audit failures, and multiple significant off-agenda discussions — all against a backdrop of unanimous votes that masked real policy disagreements.

Date Monday, February 9, 2026 Duration 2.4h Speakers 10 Public comments 1 Decisions 11 Lively

Questions about this meeting? ⁠Just ask.

Ask MeetingWatch answers from this meeting’s report, transcript, and records — with linked sources.

Summary AI-generated to surface controversy & community impact without bias — always verify against the actual meeting before relying on it.

📋 SUNAPEE SELECTBOARD — February 9, 2026: What you may have missed

Three significant items were discussed or decided at the February 9th Selectboard meeting without appearing on the public agenda. That matters because residents had no way to know these topics would come up — and no opportunity to prepare or show up specifically to weigh in.

First: The board reviewed the town's 2024 audit, which found recurring internal control weaknesses in the finance department — the same issues flagged in prior years. The town manager stated plainly that Sunapee is "not running our business well" for a $25 million organization that has only one person managing its finances. At the same meeting, the board unanimously re-engaged the same auditing firm for 2025 without any public discussion of auditor rotation. None of this was listed on the public agenda.

Second: The board discussed restricting public access to virtual meeting links (Zoom/Teams) due to security disruptions. No formal decision was reached, but the conversation about limiting who can access public meeting links happened without public notice — an irony that shouldn't be lost on anyone concerned about open government.

Third: Senate Bill 661 in Concord could eliminate the NH Health Trust, which covers town employee health insurance. The board briefly acknowledged the risk and identified a backup provider, but the cost implications remain unknown. Again, not on the agenda.

Separately: A resident named Chris Whitehouse used public comment to argue that Sunapee's tax increases have run 4 to 6 times the rate of inflation over recent years, that 30% of residents are seniors and 16.1% live below the poverty line, and that effectively $535 of every $650 Social Security cost-of-living increase is being consumed by local taxes. The board gave no response — not an acknowledgment, not a rebuttal, not a commitment to look into it. That public comment is also absent from the official meeting minutes.

Meanwhile, the town still has no adopted policy to manage development on Class 6 roads after state law SB281 removed planning board and selectboard review authority — even as the board heard a separate, urgent presentation about Perkins Pond losing 35% of its depth and recording its first cyanobacteria blooms in 2025, with potential new development in the watershed cited as a major threat. The two issues were never formally connected in the meeting's deliberations.

Official minutes from this meeting have been published. Residents are encouraged to review them and attend the next Selectboard meeting to ask questions.

Feb 9, 2026 2.4h long 10 speakers 1 public comments 11 decisions Lively
Notable statements Drag to browse

“I don't see why they can't build on Class 6 road. They just need to make it passable... what's the difference between that and a driveway?”

— Board Member C · Discussion about allowing development on Class 6 roads without restrictive policies ▶ 14:05

“I'm all for developing something, but I don't... I'm not a fan of restricting the development, but more to, you know, manage stormwater and have some sort of a standard”

— Board Member B · Position on balancing development rights with environmental protection for Class 6 roads ▶ 28:20

“I have this feeling that the state of New Hampshire should be paying the town of Sunapee for basically supplementing their marine patrol... it's really wrong”

— Board Member F · Criticism of state reducing marine patrol while towns fill the gap with local resources ▶ 52:45

“We are reaching the point of no return. This is not the natural way that ponds go - yes, that's true in a millennium, not in less than 100 years, and not in less than 15 years.”

— Speaker E (Perkins Pond Association) · Describing urgency of Perkins Pond water quality crisis ▶ 1:06:07

“It's a million dollars an acre to dredge, and we have 175 acres. So not going to happen.”

— Speaker E (Perkins Pond Association) · Explaining why dredging is not a viable solution for the pond ▶ 1:18:49

“Out of the $650 a senior citizen is going to get in their Social Security, the town of Sunapee wants $535 of it for taxation.”

— Speaker G (Public Comment) · Criticizing tax increases that outpace inflation and impact on seniors ▶ 1:40:35

“We should have never been in a place where we're approximately a 25 million dollar company where we only have one person running our finances because it's not good financial management.”

— Speaker A (Town Manager) · Explaining structural issues contributing to audit findings ▶ 1:54:56

“We're not running our business well. We're not following best practices in terms of communication. But my point is we should at least aspire to do a little bit of a better job.”

— Unidentified speaker · Discussing town communication challenges and need for improvement ▶ 2:05:21

“All of these things require sustained effort, and we tend to be like a one and done... because we don't have the staffing capacity and we don't in large part have the budgets to do the things that we need to do.”

— Unidentified speaker · Explaining limitations in town communication and outreach efforts ▶ 2:04:49

“You're putting pressure on me for maintaining my perfect attendance record. It's a lot of pressure.”

— Unidentified speaker · Commenting on Sue's upcoming retirement celebration ▶ 2:17:24
This meeting — choose a section

Public ⁠impact

Issues from this meeting with documented community impact.
What was discussed

State law (SB281) has removed planning board and selectboard review for building permits on Class 6 roads; up to 30 new lots potentially developable without prior local oversight

What was discussed

Pond has lost 35% of its depth since 1939; first cyanobacteria blooms in 2025; potential 100 additional homes could double bloom days to 70/year with no viable remediation option at $175M dredging cost

What was discussed

Recurring audit findings of internal control weaknesses; single-person finance department managing $25M budget; same auditing firm re-engaged without rotation

What was discussed

Tax increases cited as running 4–6 times the rate of inflation over recent years; resident cited $535 in taxes against a $650 Social Security cost-of-living increase

What was discussed

Potential forced transition to alternative health insurance provider if state legislation eliminates the Health Trust; cost impact not yet quantified

Topics ⁠discussed

Each topic expands to quotes and full context.
Speakers: Michael Marquise, Allison, Board members
What was discussed

Town planner Michael Marquise and land use administrator Allison presented changes to state law (SB281) that removed planning board and selectboard review requirements for building permits on Class 6 roads. The town has approximately 30 potential building lots on eight Class 6 roads, with only liability waiver and insurability statement requirements remaining.

Speakers: Steve Marshall
What was discussed

Fire Association Captain Steve Marshall requested acceptance of a $44,802 donation to purchase a Zoll X cardiac monitor to replace a 15-year-old unit that is no longer supported. The new monitor is compatible with New London Ambulance equipment and can handle both adult and pediatric patients.

Speakers: Tim White, John Gosselm
What was discussed

Fire Department Lieutenant Tim White and Safety Officer John Gosselm updated the board on a $6,715 dock extension project fully funded by the Fire Department Association. The extension adds 15 feet to address drought-related grounding issues that prevented emergency boat responses.

Speakers: Suzanne Graves
What was discussed

Perkins Pond Protective Association President Suzanne Graves presented their watershed management plan, showing the pond has deteriorated from mesotrophic to eutrophic status with 51% of pollution coming from stormwater runoff. The pond depth has decreased from 15 feet (1939) to 9.8 feet currently, with first cyanobacteria blooms in 2025.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

Detailed plan for 14 watershed survey sites requiring improvement, with 51% of pollution coming from stormwater runoff, focusing on partnerships between association and town for implementation.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

Discussion of potential 100 additional homes in watershed that could increase phosphorus by 20kg annually and double cyanobacteria bloom days to 70 per year.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

Citizen complaint about tax increases outpacing inflation by 4-6 times over recent years, citing impact on senior citizens and poverty rates in town.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

Approval of continuing agreement for Springfield's use of Sunapee transfer station at 25% cost share, same rate as previous years.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

Motion to accept $195 in gift card donations for Centipede Food Pantry, with note that future warrant article would streamline this process.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

Approval of agreement allowing Eversource to temporarily remove stone wall for transmission line work with restoration requirements and photo documentation.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

Review of 2024 audit results showing ongoing internal control weaknesses and approval of same auditing firm for 2025, with discussion of staffing challenges in finance department.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

Extended discussion on improving town communication through various methods including email lists, text messaging, QR codes, and potentially outsourcing communication work overseas.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

Board discussed challenges with Zoom/Teams meetings due to security breaches and disruptions, exploring limited distribution of meeting links versus public access.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

New microphones have been installed, but the meeting camera is currently not working and needs repair.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

Town is implementing new accounting software with initial manifest distributed, though reporting format is still being refined and processing is temporarily slower.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

Town stayed with Health Trust this year, but Senate Bill 661 could potentially eliminate Health Trust, requiring potential pivot to previously identified alternative provider (CGI).

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

Sue will retire after 15+ years of service, with her last meeting in early March and a community celebration planned.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

Town seeking community volunteers for 250th anniversary planning committee, with limited budget requiring focus on manageable activities.

Controversy & ⁠dissent

Where the board, the community, or the agenda diverged.

Potentially controversial issues

01

Class 6 Road Development Policy — State Law Removes Local Oversight

SB281 eliminated planning board and selectboard review for building permits on Class 6 roads, stripping the town of meaningful control over development on roughly 30 potential lots across eight roads. This intersects directly with stormwater runoff, emergency access, and environmental concerns raised at the same meeting about Perkins Pond. Board members expressed divergent philosophies — one dismissing concerns entirely, another wanting environmental standards — without reaching a coherent policy position.
Board position: Directed town manager to draft a policy with input from highway, police, and fire departments, and referred the matter to the planning board — no protective measures adopted yet.
Internal dissent
Board Member C expressed a permissive view ('I don't see why they can't build on Class 6 road... what's the difference between that and a driveway?'), while Board Member B stated a preference for development standards focused on stormwater management rather than outright restriction. No unified policy position was reached.
high concern
02

Perkins Pond Environmental Crisis and Development Threat

The pond has degraded from mesotrophic to eutrophic in under 100 years, lost 35% of its depth, and recorded its first cyanobacteria blooms in 2025. Potential development of 100 additional homes in the watershed could add 20kg of phosphorus annually and double bloom days to 70 per year. With dredging costing a prohibitive $175 million, the window for intervention is closing. The issue directly links to the Class 6 road development question and raises stakes for the entire watershed community.
Board position: Receptive to the presentation and supportive of partnership, but no binding commitments or protective measures were adopted. The board did not connect the Perkins Pond crisis explicitly to its Class 6 road policy deliberations.
high concern
03

Tax Burden on Seniors and Low-Income Residents

Resident Chris Whitehouse presented a pointed critique that tax increases have run 4–6 times the rate of inflation over recent years, arguing that with 30% of residents being seniors and 16.1% living below the poverty line, the board is effectively taxing vulnerable residents out of town. His specific figure — $535 in taxes out of a $650 Social Security increase — was stark and unrefuted. The board made no response, and the comment was omitted entirely from the official meeting minutes.
Board position: No response given. The board moved directly to the next agenda item after the public comment. The criticism was also excluded from the official minutes, representing a transparency gap.
high concern
04

Recurring Audit Internal Control Weaknesses — Off-Agenda

The 2024 audit revealed ongoing internal control weaknesses in the finance department, and the town manager acknowledged the town is 'not running our business well' for a $25 million organization with only one person handling finances. This is a structural governance risk with direct implications for taxpayer funds. The discussion and re-engagement of the same auditing firm occurred without this item appearing on the public agenda, constituting an aggravated transparency concern — residents had no opportunity to prepare or attend with this issue in mind.
Board position: Approved re-engagement of the same auditing firm (Plodzik and Sanderson) unanimously and directed the town manager to research best practices for auditor rotation. Acknowledged the structural staffing problem but took no immediate corrective action.
medium concern
05

Virtual Meeting Security Breaches and Restricted Public Access — Off-Agenda

The board discussed security disruptions to Zoom/Teams public meetings and explored limiting distribution of meeting links — a move that could reduce public access to government proceedings. This discussion occurred off-agenda, denying residents the ability to weigh in on a policy that directly affects their access to public meetings.
Board position: No formal decision reached; the board explored options including restricted link distribution. The tension between security and open government access was noted but unresolved.
medium concern
06

Health Trust Elimination Risk Under SB661 — Off-Agenda

Senate Bill 661 could eliminate the NH Health Trust, which covers town employee health insurance. This would force the town to pivot to an alternative provider (CGI), with potential cost implications for the municipal budget and employee benefits. The discussion occurred off-agenda, limiting public awareness of a potentially significant fiscal and employee relations issue.
Board position: Acknowledged the risk and identified CGI as a contingency. No formal action taken.
medium concern

Community vs. board tension

Public ⁠comment

What residents said — verbatim, with timestamps.
1
Total speakers
0
Addressed
0
Partial
1
Not addressed
Chris Whitehouse
Not addressed
Criticized the board for tax increases that significantly outpace inflation over multiple years (5-6 times inflation rates). Argued that with 30% of town being senior citizens and 16.1% living below poverty line, the board is taxing poor people out of town. Key concern
Tax increases are excessive compared to inflation and are disproportionately burdening seniors and low-income residents
The board did not respond to his specific concerns about tax rates vs. inflation or the impact on seniors/low-income residents. They moved directly to the next agenda item.

Decisions ⁠logged

Every recorded vote, with timestamps and dissents.
Approved January 5, 2025 meeting minutes
Motion made and seconded with no discussion or changes
Approved unanimously
Approved budget public hearing minutes
Motion made and seconded with no comments or changes
Approved unanimously
Approved veterans credits, blind exemptions, and solar exemptions
Motion to approve all credits and exemptions
Approved unanimously
Approved general fund manifests totaling $7,183,262.40 plus additional department expenditures
Included hydro fund ($6,184.85), water department ($676.28), special rec fund ($707.75), grants ($9,205), and general fund expenditures ($175,210.71)
Approved unanimously
Accepted cardiac monitor donation of $44,802.02
Donation from Sunapee Fire Association for Zoll X cardiac monitor with $3,000 trade-in credit for existing equipment
Approved unanimously
Accepted dock extension donation of $6,715
Donation from Fire Department Association for 15-foot safety services dock extension
Approved unanimously
Approved Springfield Transfer Station Agreement
Motion to approve agreement for Springfield's continued use of Sunapee transfer station at 25% cost share
Unanimous approval
Approved acceptance of food pantry donations
Motion to accept and expend $195 in gift card donations to Centipede Food Pantry
Unanimous approval
Approved Eversource stone wall agreement
Motion to approve temporary stone wall removal agreement with restoration requirements
Unanimous approval
Approved auditing firm engagement
Motion to engage Plodzik and Sanderson for annual municipal audit
Unanimous approval
Motion to enter non-public session under RSA 91-A:3, 2C
Motion made by Aaron (a speaker), seconded by Anthony (a speaker), all voted yes
Approved

Share ⁠this report

Drafts ready to post — click any block to copy.

X / Twitter — by angle

State law removed local development oversight on Class 6 roads; board divided and unprepared
At the 2/9 Sunapee Selectboard meeting, state law SB281 stripped local review of building permits on ~30 lots along 8 Class 6 roads — and the board has NO protective policy in place yet. One member: "What's the difference between that and a driveway?"
251/280 chars
Off-agenda audit discussion; recurring financial control failures; no auditor rotation
Sunapee's 2024 audit found recurring internal control weaknesses. The town manager said it plainly: "We're not running our business well." A $25M town with one person running finances. The audit discussion and re-engagement of the same firm happened OFF-AGENDA on 2/9.
268/280 chars
Public tax burden criticism dismissed by board and omitted from official minutes
At the 2/9 Sunapee Selectboard meeting, a resident said seniors are paying $535 in new taxes for every $650 Social Security increase. The board said nothing. No acknowledgment, no rebuttal. The comment was also left out of the official minutes entirely.
253/280 chars
Perkins Pond environmental crisis with no protective action taken
Perkins Pond has lost 35% of its depth since 1939. First cyanobacteria blooms hit in 2025. 100 new homes in the watershed could double bloom days to 70/year. Dredging would cost $175M. At 2/9 meeting: no binding commitments, no connection made to Class 6 road policy.
267/280 chars

X thread

1
🧵 Sunapee Selectboard — Feb. 9, 2026. A lot happened that wasn't on the public agenda, and at least one serious public concern was ignored and then left out of the official minutes. A thread.
191/280
2
1/ State law SB281 eliminated planning board and selectboard review for building permits on Class 6 roads. Sunapee has ~30 potential building lots across 8 such roads. The town has NO protective policy in place. The board directed staff to draft one — but nothing is adopted yet.
279/280
3
2/ One board member on Class 6 development: "I don't see why they can't build on Class 6 road... what's the difference between that and a driveway?" Another wanted stormwater standards. No unified position. No timeline. The planning board hasn't weighed in yet either.
268/280
4
3/ At the SAME meeting, the Perkins Pond Protective Association warned that 100 additional homes in the watershed could add 20kg of phosphorus/year and double cyanobacteria bloom days to 70. The pond has already lost 35% of its depth. Dredging would cost $175 million. "Point of no return."
290/280
5
4/ The board heard both issues — the Class 6 road development question AND the Perkins Pond crisis — but never formally connected them. No development pause, no protective zoning, no stated link between the two discussions.
223/280
6
5/ OFF-AGENDA: The board reviewed the 2024 municipal audit, which showed ONGOING internal control weaknesses. The town manager acknowledged Sunapee is "not running our business well" — a $25M organization with one person in finance. The same auditing firm was re-engaged. Residents had no notice this was being decided.
319/280
7
6/ OFF-AGENDA: The board discussed restricting public access to virtual meeting links due to security breaches — a policy that directly affects residents' ability to attend public meetings. No formal decision, but the discussion happened without public notice.
260/280
8
7/ OFF-AGENDA: Senate Bill 661 could eliminate the NH Health Trust, which covers town employee health insurance. The board briefly discussed a potential pivot to an alternative provider. Cost impact: unknown. Residents had no notice this was on the table.
255/280
9
8/ During public comment, resident Chris Whitehouse said tax increases have run 4–6 times the rate of inflation, and that seniors are effectively paying $535 of every $650 Social Security increase to the town. The board made NO response. The comment is also absent from the official minutes.
291/280
10
9/ The good news: the Fire Association donated a $44,802 cardiac monitor and funded a $6,715 dock extension for emergency boat access. All on their own dime. Those were unanimous approvals and deserve recognition.
213/280
11
10/ Bottom line: three significant off-agenda items were discussed or decided on 2/9 (audit/auditor, meeting access policy, health insurance risk). A public tax grievance was ignored and erased from the record. And the town has no policy to manage development on Class 6 roads — yet. /end
288/280

Facebook — long form

📋 SUNAPEE SELECTBOARD — February 9, 2026: What you may have missed

Three significant items were discussed or decided at the February 9th Selectboard meeting without appearing on the public agenda. That matters because residents had no way to know these topics would come up — and no opportunity to prepare or show up specifically to weigh in.

First: The board reviewed the town's 2024 audit, which found recurring internal control weaknesses in the finance department — the same issues flagged in prior years. The town manager stated plainly that Sunapee is "not running our business well" for a $25 million organization that has only one person managing its finances. At the same meeting, the board unanimously re-engaged the same auditing firm for 2025 without any public discussion of auditor rotation. None of this was listed on the public agenda.

Second: The board discussed restricting public access to virtual meeting links (Zoom/Teams) due to security disruptions. No formal decision was reached, but the conversation about limiting who can access public meeting links happened without public notice — an irony that shouldn't be lost on anyone concerned about open government.

Third: Senate Bill 661 in Concord could eliminate the NH Health Trust, which covers town employee health insurance. The board briefly acknowledged the risk and identified a backup provider, but the cost implications remain unknown. Again, not on the agenda.

Separately: A resident named Chris Whitehouse used public comment to argue that Sunapee's tax increases have run 4 to 6 times the rate of inflation over recent years, that 30% of residents are seniors and 16.1% live below the poverty line, and that effectively $535 of every $650 Social Security cost-of-living increase is being consumed by local taxes. The board gave no response — not an acknowledgment, not a rebuttal, not a commitment to look into it. That public comment is also absent from the official meeting minutes.

Meanwhile, the town still has no adopted policy to manage development on Class 6 roads after state law SB281 removed planning board and selectboard review authority — even as the board heard a separate, urgent presentation about Perkins Pond losing 35% of its depth and recording its first cyanobacteria blooms in 2025, with potential new development in the watershed cited as a major threat. The two issues were never formally connected in the meeting's deliberations.

Official minutes from this meeting have been published. Residents are encouraged to review them and attend the next Selectboard meeting to ask questions.

Action ⁠items

Who owes what, by when.
Develop draft policy language for Class 6 road development with input from highway, police, and fire departments
Assigned: Town Manager Shannon · Due: Not specified
Present Class 6 road policy discussion to planning board for their input
Assigned: Michael Marquise · Due: Not specified
Order cardiac monitor equipment after board approval
Assigned: Steve Marshall · Due: End of February 2026
Research best practices for auditing firm rotation cycles and report back
Assigned: Town Manager · Due: Next meeting
Develop RFP for communications support to improve resident outreach materials
Assigned: Town Manager · Due: Not specified
Close out watershed management plan and ensure ADA accessibility at state level
Assigned: Perkins Pond Association · Due: Not specified
Return interest payment owed to town once plan is finalized
Assigned: Perkins Pond Association · Due: After plan completion
Talk to Sean about engaging school students in 250th anniversary planning
Assigned: a speaker (Town Manager) · Due: Not specified
Send out communications for Sue's retirement celebration at first March meeting
Assigned: Town staff · Due: Before first March meeting
Fix the meeting camera that is currently not working
Assigned: Town staff · Due: Not specified

Member ⁠positions

18 issues · 1 explicit · 30 inferred
Present
Approved January 5, 2025 meeting minutes YES ~
Approved budget public hearing minutes YES ~
Approved veterans credits, blind exemptions, and solar exemptions YES ~
Approved general fund manifests YES ~
Accepted cardiac monitor donation of $44,802.02 YES ~
Accepted dock extension donation of $6,715 YES ~
Approved Springfield Transfer Station Agreement YES ~
Approved acceptance of food pantry donations YES ~
Approved Eversource stone wall agreement YES ~
Approved auditing firm engagement YES ~
Motion to enter non-public session under RSA 91-A:3, 2C YES ~
Anthony Dolan
Board Member
Present
Class 6 Roads Development Policy
Prefers development standards for stormwater management over outright restriction.
Approved January 5, 2025 meeting minutes YES ~
Accepted cardiac monitor donation of $44,802.02 YES ~
Accepted dock extension donation of $6,715 YES ~
Motion to enter non-public session under RSA 91-A:3, 2C YES
Frederick Gallup
Board Member
Present
Safety Services Dock Extension
Criticized state for reducing marine patrol while towns bear the cost gap.
Approved Springfield Transfer Station Agreement YES
Approved acceptance of food pantry donations YES
Approved Eversource stone wall agreement YES
Approved auditing firm engagement YES
Virtual Meeting Participation and Security Issues
Participated in discussion exploring restricted link distribution to address security breaches.
Sue's Retirement and Community Celebration
Humorously noted pressure of maintaining perfect attendance for retirement celebration.
Motion to enter non-public session under RSA 91-A:3, 2C YES ~
Aaron Whipple
Board Member
Present
Class 6 Roads Development Policy
Permissive view — questioned why building on Class 6 roads should be restricted at all.
Approved Springfield Transfer Station Agreement YES
Approved Eversource stone wall agreement YES
Virtual Meeting Participation and Security Issues
Participated in discussion on security breaches and restricted public meeting link access.
Communication and Public Outreach Strategies
Engaged in discussion on improving town outreach through email, text, QR codes, and outsourcing.
250th Anniversary Planning
Supported seeking community volunteers with realistic budget constraints.
Motion to enter non-public session under RSA 91-A:3, 2C YES

Positions marked ~ are inferred from context and may not reflect the member's explicitly stated position. UNCLEAR means the vote was split but the record did not name how this member voted — it is not a “yes.”

Accountability ⁠flags

Documented procedural gaps. Each item links to its source.

Transcript vs. official minutes

Support coverage

Creating this report cost ⁠real money.

MeetingWatch attended, transcribed, and analyzed this meeting on its own dime. If this work is valuable to you, chip in to keep covering Sunapee.

Report composed by claude-sonnet-4-20250514, claude-sonnet-4-6, claude-opus-4-6 · analyzed 2026-05-19.