Your area Not set — showing everywhere
Meeting report · Zoning Board of Adjustment
Creating this report cost real money. Help fund coverage →

Zoning Board of Adjustment — July 7, 2026

While neighbors provided targeted input regarding specific applications, the board engaged constructively with concerns and the meeting proceeded without internal disagreement.

Date Tuesday, July 7, 2026 Duration 1.8h Speakers 15 Public comments 2 Decisions 6 Routine

Questions about this meeting? ⁠Just ask.

Ask MeetingWatch answers from this meeting’s report, transcript, and records — with linked sources.

Summary AI-generated to surface controversy & community impact without bias — always verify against the actual meeting before relying on it.

At the July 7 Zoning Board of Adjustment (ZBA) meeting, several decisions were made that directly impact Goffstown residents and the future of our local zoning enforcement.

First, the Board engaged in a substantive discussion regarding the need to clarify zoning definitions for multi-family housing, Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs), and home occupations. This discussion, which included plans for a joint meeting with the Planning Board to address 'gray areas' in the ordinance, was not listed on the public agenda. When the rules governing land use and housing are being re-evaluated, residents deserve prior notice so they can participate in the conversation.

Additionally, the Board approved a variance for ZAK LLC to allow overnight dog boarding at a commercial facility. While the Board moved forward with the approval, neighbors expressed specific concerns regarding trash management, odors, and light pollution. In a second case, the Board granted variances to Sarette Brothers Inc. to move a business from a residence to a detached structure on an agricultural lot, a move that effectively bypasses the stricter regulations typically applied to 'home occupations.'

We will continue to monitor how these decisions move through the Planning Board and how the proposed ordinance clarifications affect our community.

Jul 7, 2026 1.8h long 15 speakers 2 public comments 6 decisions Routine
Notable statements Drag to browse

“I am going to be recusing myself of this case as well.”

— Denise Langley · The Chair identified a conflict of interest upon seeing the applicants at the table. ▶ 05:06

“There's definitely a need for more dog training facilities, boarding, and doggy daycares.”

— Kristen Dawes · Discussing the community benefit and the utility of using vacant strip mall space. ▶ 50:58

“I just wanted to get the standing correct... [the home occupation] is gone once you move it out of the residence.”

— Unidentified speaker · Discussing whether the applicant's request constitutes a 'home occupation' or a different business classification. ▶ 1:19:00

“I'd prefer if they would just have it like a workshop, personally.”

— Unidentified speaker · Regarding the preference for how the Zoning Board and Planning Board interact on ordinance clarifications. ▶ 1:47:55
This meeting — choose a section

Public ⁠impact

Issues from this meeting with documented community impact.
What was discussed

Potential changes to definitions of multi-family use, ADUs, and home occupations.

What happened

The board agreed to compile a list of items to discuss with the Planning Board.

Topics ⁠discussed

Each topic expands to quotes and full context.
Speakers: Denise Langley, Jason Cody, John Beliveau
What was discussed

The Board reviewed and voted to approve the minutes from the previous meeting.

What happened

The motion to approve the minutes carried.

Speakers: Denise Langley, Brad Westgate, Scott Valancourt, Jay Hunter, Darrell Reuter, Bruce Buttrick, Jason Cody, John Beliveau, Kristen Dawes
What was discussed

An application for a variance to allow overnight dog boarding at a commercial kennel/daycare facility in the Goffstown Plaza.

What happened

The Board voted to grant the variance, with the intent to memorialize a 100-foot setback requirement in the decision to align with the spirit of supplemental regulations.

Speakers: Jason Cody, Maria Dolder, Maureen Sarette, Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

An application for two variances and a special exception to build a detached office/garage for an existing plumbing business on an agricultural lot.

What happened

The board granted two variances (lot size and side setbacks) and the special exception for the business use.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

Board members discussed the need to clarify various zoning definitions, such as multi-family use, Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs), and home occupations, to ensure consistent interpretations.

What happened

The board agreed to compile a list of items for discussion with the Planning Board, specifically mentioning Section 5.12.

Controversy & ⁠dissent

Where the board, the community, or the agenda diverged.

Potentially controversial issues

01

ZAK LLC Dog Daycare and Boarding Variance

Local neighbors raised concerns regarding waste management, odors, and light pollution resulting from the transition to overnight boarding at a commercial facility.
Board position: The board approved the variance but signaled an intent to impose specific setback requirements to mitigate impact.
medium concern
02

Sarette Brothers Inc. Business Relocation

The application involved a legal debate over whether moving a business from a residence to a detached structure changes its classification from a 'home occupation' to a more strictly regulated business type.
Board position: The board granted the variances and special exception, determining the move met the necessary criteria.
low concern

Community vs. board tension

Public ⁠comment

What residents said — verbatim, with timestamps.
2
Speakers
2
Comments
2
Addressed
1
Partial
0
Not addressed
Jay Hunter
Partial
Mr. Hunter expressed strong opposition to the dog daycare proposal, citing the property owner as a poor neighbor. He noted ongoing issues with trash blowing from the property into his yard and expressed concern about managing future waste. Key concern
The applicant's history of poor waste management and potential impact on neighbors.
Board response
The Vice Chairman acknowledged the point and stated the issue would likely fall under site plan review with the Planning Board, but promised to ask the applicant specifically about waste management.
The board acknowledged the concern and specifically followed up with the applicant regarding their waste management plan/policy during the discussion.
Darrell Reuter
Addressed
Mr. Reuter asked if there were plans for additional lighting, specifically floodlights, that would be on throughout the night near the fenced-in area. Key concern
Potential light pollution/nuisance from overnight floodlights.
Board response
The Vice Chairman noted that the application specifies daytime use for the outdoor area, but promised to explicitly ask the applicant that question.
The board captured the question and brought it back to the applicant for a direct response during the follow-up session.

Decisions ⁠logged

Every recorded vote, with timestamps and dissents.
Approval of meeting minutes.
Motion made by Jason Cody, seconded by John Beliveau. Davis Allen served as the voting member.
Approved
Determination of No Regional Impact for ZAK LLC application.
The Board re-voted on this item after the Chair recused herself to ensure the vote was valid with the alternates present.
Carried
Granting of variance for ZAK LLC to allow overnight dog boarding.
The Board found the use met the five criteria for a variance, specifically noting the reasonable use and the distinction from a traditional kennel.
Approved
Grant first variance: Two-acre lot size where five acres are required.
The board found that the five criteria for a variance were well-addressed in the application.
Motion carries
Grant second variance: 40-foot and 65-foot side setbacks where 100 feet is required.
The board noted the application well-addressed the five standards.
Motion carries
Grant special exception: Allowing the business to be used in the proposed detached structure.
The exception was granted following the approval of the two necessary variances.
Motion carries

Agenda ⁠brief

What the posted agenda said before the meeting — a preview, not a record of what happened. See the other tabs for the actual report.

Board considers variances for a dog daycare and a detached business structure.

Z.A.K. LLC and 553 Mast LLC are requesting a variance to operate a dog daycare business with long-term and overnight boarding at 553 Mast Road. This variance is necessary because commercial kennel uses are not currently permitted within the Commercial Zone.

The Wayne R. Sarette and Sandra R. Canada-Thistle Revocable Living Trusts are seeking two variances and a special exception for 294 Goffstown Back Road. The applicants want to build a 2,160 sq. ft. detached office/garage for W.W.W. Sarette Bros. Inc. Plumbing, Heating & HVAC. The requests involve a lot size deficiency and side setback requirements in an Agricultural Zone.

Key items

  • Variance for dog daycare and overnight boarding at 553 Mast Road
  • Special Exception for W.W.W. Sarette Bros. Inc. Plumbing, Heating & HVAC
  • Variance for lot size requirements at 294 Goffstown Back Road
  • Variance for side setback requirements at 294 Goffstown Back Road

Why this matters

The board will decide if specific business uses and building placements can bypass existing zoning rules regarding land use, lot size, and setbacks. Residents may be interested in the impact of overnight animal boarding in a commercial area or the expansion of a home-based business in an agricultural zone.

Brief generated by litellm::gemma-4-26b on 2026-06-24. Not a substitute for attending or watching the meeting.

Share ⁠this report

Drafts ready to post — click any block to copy.

X / Twitter — by angle

Off-agenda discussion regarding zoning ordinance clarifications
At the July 7 ZBA meeting, the Board discussed potential changes to zoning definitions for multi-family housing and ADUs—topics not listed on the public agenda. Residents should know when the rules governing their property... https://meetingwatch.org/nh/goffstown/zoning-board-of-adjustment/2026-07-07/ #MeetingWatch #GoffstownNH
329/280 chars
Board decision despite community concerns
The Goffstown ZBA granted a variance to ZAK LLC for overnight dog boarding despite neighbor concerns regarding trash management, odors, and light pollution. The Board is now deferring specific mitigation to the Planning Board. https://meetingwatch.org/nh/goffstown/zoning-board-of-adjustment/2026-07-07/ #MeetingWatch #GoffstownNH
330/280 chars
Prioritizing business expansion over strict zoning classifications
Goffstown ZBA granted variances to Sarette Brothers Inc. to move a business from a home to a detached structure, effectively bypassing stricter 'home occupation' regulations meant for agricultural lots. #Goffstown #Zoning https://meetingwatch.org/nh/goffstown/zoning-board-of-adjustment/2026-07-07/ #MeetingWatch #GoffstownNH
325/280 chars

X thread

1
At the July 7 Goffstown ZBA meeting, two major decisions were made that impact neighborhood character and local zoning rules. Here is what happened behind the dais. 🧵 #MeetingWatch #GoffstownNH
193/280
2
First, the Board discussed revising zoning definitions for multi-family use and ADUs. This wasn't on the public agenda. These definitions dictate how our town grows and how residents use their property.
202/280
3
Second, the ZBA approved overnight dog boarding for ZAK LLC. Neighbors raised specific concerns about odors, trash, and light pollution. The Board granted the variance, leaving the details to the Planning Board.
211/280
4
Finally, the Board granted variances for Sarette Brothers Inc. to build a detached business structure on an agricultural lot, navigating around stricter 'home occupation' rules. Stay informed on how Goffstown is changing. https://meetingwatch.org/nh/goffstown/zoning-board-of-adjustment/2026-07-07/
245/280

Facebook — long form

At the July 7 Zoning Board of Adjustment (ZBA) meeting, several decisions were made that directly impact Goffstown residents and the future of our local zoning enforcement.

First, the Board engaged in a substantive discussion regarding the need to clarify zoning definitions for multi-family housing, Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs), and home occupations. This discussion, which included plans for a joint meeting with the Planning Board to address 'gray areas' in the ordinance, was not listed on the public agenda. When the rules governing land use and housing are being re-evaluated, residents deserve prior notice so they can participate in the conversation.

Additionally, the Board approved a variance for ZAK LLC to allow overnight dog boarding at a commercial facility. While the Board moved forward with the approval, neighbors expressed specific concerns regarding trash management, odors, and light pollution. In a second case, the Board granted variances to Sarette Brothers Inc. to move a business from a residence to a detached structure on an agricultural lot, a move that effectively bypasses the stricter regulations typically applied to 'home occupations.'

We will continue to monitor how these decisions move through the Planning Board and how the proposed ordinance clarifications affect our community. https://meetingwatch.org/nh/goffstown/zoning-board-of-adjustment/2026-07-07/ #MeetingWatch #GoffstownNH

Action ⁠items

Who owes what, by when.
Address waste management, lighting, and site-specific details through the Planning Board site plan process.
Assigned: ZAK LLC / Applicant
Draft a list of zoning items/clarifications to present to the Planning Board.
Assigned: a speaker · Due: Next meeting
Email Patty, Jack, and Joanne regarding the Planning Board workshop/meeting coordination.
Assigned: a speaker

Member ⁠positions

0 issues · 0 explicit · 0 inferred

Positions marked ~ are inferred from context and may not reflect the member's explicitly stated position. UNCLEAR means the vote was split but the record did not name how this member voted — it is not a “yes.”

Accountability ⁠flags

Documented procedural gaps. Each item links to its source.

Topics discussed — not on agenda

Support coverage

Creating this report cost ⁠real money.

MeetingWatch attended, transcribed, and analyzed this meeting on its own dime. If this work is valuable to you, chip in to keep covering Goffstown.

Report composed by grok-4.3, gemma-4-26b, grok-4-fast, grok-4.20-0309-reasoning · analyzed 2026-07-09.