Your area Not set — showing everywhere
Meeting report · Planning Board
Creating this report cost real money. Help fund coverage →

Planning Board — June 11, 2026

The meeting featured lively discussions regarding regulatory compliance and the balance between developer requests and town standards.

Date Thursday, June 11, 2026 Duration 1.8h Speakers 15 Public comments 1 Decisions 9 Lively

Public ⁠impact

Issues from this meeting with documented community impact.
01

Development Regulation Updates

Broad changes to land use and development standards Affected: All residents and property owners in Goffstown
See more
What was discussed

The board discussed the timeline and review process for the new Development Regulations, focusing on ensuring all members have time to review the text.

What happened

The board decided to email the updated regulations to members for review before a scheduled vote.

What's next

A vote on the regulations is aimed for the July 9th meeting.

zoning change
02

Blackbrook Road Wetland Buffer Relief

Approval to build within a 50-foot wetland buffer Affected: Property owners near wetlands and environmental conservation groups
See more
What was discussed

The board reviewed a proposal to convert living space and add structures that would impact a wetland buffer, including discussions on stormwater management and protecting the Blanding's turtle.

What happened

The board granted relief from the wetland buffer subject to strict environmental conditions and updated plans.

What's next

The applicant must submit updated plans with specific conservation and stormwater details by July 9th.

zoning change

Decisions ⁠logged

Every recorded vote, with timestamps and dissents.
Motion to find New Business 2962 (Residential Duplex) complete, ready for review, no regional impact, and containing three waivers for discussion only.
The motion included a determination of completeness despite initial missing items like architectural renderings and drainage studies.
Passed unanimously
Motion to continue New Business 2962 to August 13, 2026.
Required due to the 45-day waiting period for Historic District Commission review.
Passed
Motion to find the West Union Street application complete, ready for review, no regional impact, and containing two waivers for discussion only.
The application involves a driveway and parking expansion.
Passed
Motion to continue the West Union Street application to August 13, 2026.
The extension allows the applicant time to work with the DPW on an alternative design.
Passed
Continue the driveway application until July 9th.
To allow time for DPW coordination and sketch preparation.
Passed (Motion by Joshua, Second by Bill DeVanza)
Find the Blackbrook Road application complete and ready for review.
Found complete with no regional impact and no waivers.
Passed (Motion by a speaker, Second by a speaker)
Grant relief from the outer 50-foot wetland buffer for the Blackbrook Road project.
Approval is subject to conditions: updated gable/drip line details, Blanding's turtle flyer note, chain link fence retention note, and standard staff report conditions (excluding AutoCAD files).
Passed (Motion by Tim Redmond, Second by Joshua Douglas)
Approve the Rules of Procedure.
Approved with an amendment to Article 14 regarding the wording of land use courts.
Passed (Motion by a speaker, Second by a speaker)
Accept the bond for TMS Diesel for outstanding items.
Bond amount of $94,324.43.
Passed (Motion by Phil, Second by a speaker)

Topics ⁠discussed

Click a topic to expand quotes and full context.
▶ 01:36 New Business 2962: Residential Duplex Site Plan

Review of a proposal to add a residential duplex to a property in the RSB01 zone, involving waivers for drainage, landscaping, and fire truck turnaround.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
See more
What was discussed

The board discussed the completeness of the application, noting that updated architectural renderings and a drainage study were recently provided. Significant debate occurred regarding the request for a landscaping plan waiver, with some members wanting a formal plan and others noting existing heavy vegetation. There was also concern regarding the fire truck turnaround and driveway width requirements.

What happened

The board found the application complete and ready for review, but deferred a final vote pending a review by the Historic District Commission and additional information from the fire department and applicant.

What's next

The application will return for a hearing on August 13, 2026, following the 45-day mandatory waiting period and input from the Historic District Commission.

▶ 56:10 New Business: West Union Street Parking and Driveway

An application to incorporate two additional parking spaces into an existing driveway on West Union Street, requiring waivers for driveway width and property line setbacks.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
See more
What was discussed

The applicant (Richard Plant) requested to widen his driveway to accommodate two parking spaces, a need driven by upcoming town sidewalk installations. The Chair expressed strong opposition to the 30-foot wide driveway opening, suggesting the applicant seek an alternative design that meets the 22-foot maximum width to avoid needing a waiver. The applicant needs to determine if widening the driveway will require relief regarding the 10-foot setback from the neighbor's property. The board suggested working with the DPW and using paint/tape to visualize the layout on-site.

What happened

The board decided to continue the application rather than deny it, allowing the applicant time to work with the DPW on a compliant design.

What's next

The application is continued to allow the applicant to coordinate with the DPW and potentially submit an alternative plan.

▶ 1:17:24 Blackbrook Road Residential Structure Revision

A review of a proposal to convert a deck into living space and add a screened porch and deck, which would impact a wetland buffer.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
See more
What was discussed

The applicant (Bob Stewart of RCS Designs) requested relief from the outer 50-foot wetland buffer. Discussion focused on stormwater management (drip line trenches vs. gutter drywalls), protecting the Blanding's turtle (using chain link fencing), and ensuring maintenance of erosion controls.

What happened

The board granted relief from the wetland buffer subject to several conditions, including updated plans for stormwater treatment and specific conservation notes.

What's next

The applicant must submit updated plans including the gable end detail, relocated drip line trench/gutter drywall details, the Blanding's turtle identification flyer, and a note regarding the retention of the chain link fence.

▶ 1:42:00 Rules of Procedure Review

The board reviewed and moved to adopt the updated Rules of Procedure.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
See more
What was discussed

The board reviewed a redline version of the rules. A minor correction was noted regarding Article 14 to clarify the wording 'of the' in relation to land use courts.

What happened

The board approved the Rules of Procedure with the specified amendment.

▶ 1:44:00 TMS Diesel Bond Approval

The board reviewed a request to accept a bond from TMS Diesel for outstanding items to facilitate a Certificate of Occupancy.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
See more
What was discussed

TMS Diesel is posting a bond of $94,324.43 to cover items like striping, fencing, and plantings that will be completed after they seek their Certificate of Occupancy.

What happened

The board approved the acceptance of the bond.

▶ 1:46:00 Development Regulations Update

Discussion regarding the timeline and review process for the new Development Regulations.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
See more
What was discussed

The board discussed whether to hold a meeting for the regulations or wait until a larger group (specifically member Barbara) is present. They decided to email the cleaned-up copy to members for review before a scheduled vote.

What happened

The board will aim to discuss and vote on the regulations at the July 9th meeting.

What's next

Staff will email the updated regulations to board members for review prior to the next meeting.

Controversy & ⁠dissent

Where the board, the community, or the agenda diverged.

Potentially controversial issues

01

West Union Street Parking and Driveway Expansion

The applicant seeks to widen a driveway to 30 feet to accommodate parking necessitated by town sidewalk projects, which clashes with established width regulations and setback requirements.
Board position: The Chair and board expressed strong opposition to the proposed 30-foot width, favoring a design that adheres to the 22-foot maximum.
low concern
02

Residential Duplex Site Plan (New Business 2962)

The project involves multiple waivers for landscaping, drainage, and fire safety (turnaround), leading to debate over whether the board is being too lenient with requirements.
Board position: The board found the application complete but deferred the vote to seek more rigorous input from the Fire Department and the Historic District Commission.
Internal dissent
There was significant debate between members regarding the landscaping waiver, with some pushing for a formal plan and others accepting the existing vegetation.
medium concern

Community vs. board tension

Action ⁠items

Who owes what, by when.
Submit updated drainage study and review landscaping requirements/appendix F.
Assigned: Mike Dahlberg (Applicant) · Due: August 13, 2026
Seek specific feedback from the Fire Department regarding the fire truck turnaround waiver.
Assigned: Board/Staff · Due: August 13, 2026
Work with DPW to develop an alternative driveway/parking design that meets the 22-foot width regulation.
Assigned: Richard Plant (Applicant) · Due: August 13, 2026
Coordinate with DPW and submit revised plans for the Blackbrook Road project including stormwater and turtle conservation details.
Assigned: Applicant (Bob Stewart) · Due: July 9th
Email the cleaned-up version of the Development Regulations to all board members for review.
Assigned: Joanne (Staff) · Due: Before July 9th
Administratively handle the addition of specific conditions to the Blackbrook Road approval.
Assigned: Joanne (Staff) · Due: Immediately

Notable ⁠statements

The existing driveway is 62 feet from the nearest driveway, and the proposal pushes it closer to that driveway at approximately 38 feet. — Unidentified speaker · Discussing driveway separation requirements on arterial roads. ▶ 12:24
I personally don't like this, because you're creating this massive frontage, which we don't allow. — Unidentified speaker · Expressing opposition to the proposed 30-foot wide driveway opening on West Union Street. ▶ 1:09:59
I just feel like we're doing a lot of bending over backwards to try to fit something that's just part of our requirements. — Unidentified speaker · Regarding the request for a landscaping plan waiver for the duplex project. ▶ 7:21:40
The biggest thing that we found was the data check from NHB... Blanding's turtle pit... it wasn't on this property. — Bob Stewart (RCS Designs) · Discussing environmental concerns and the presence of endangered species during construction. ▶ 1:25:11
As long as the homeowners take care of it, that's the main function [of stormwater management]. — Unidentified speaker · Responding to concerns about the maintenance of the proposed gutter drywall/drip line trench. ▶ 1:31:33

Member ⁠positions

1 issues · 1 explicit · 0 inferred
Present
Blackbrook Road Residential Structure Revision YES
Moved to grant relief from the wetland buffer subject to conditions.

Positions marked ~ are inferred from context and may not reflect the member's explicitly stated position. UNCLEAR means the vote was split but the record did not name how this member voted — it is not a “yes.”

Public ⁠comment

What residents said — verbatim, with timestamps.
1
Total speakers
0
Addressed
1
Partial
0
Not addressed
Mike Dahlberg
Partial
As a representative/surveyor for the applicant, he discussed compliance with the RSB District, building coverage, and the completion of drainage studies. He requested waivers for the landscaping plan and the fire truck turnaround, arguing the site is already heavily landscaped and the driveway is too small for a turnaround. Key concern
Requesting waivers for a full landscaping plan and a fire truck turnaround requirement.
Board response
The board discussed the requests, noted the need for Fire Department comments regarding the driveway/turnaround, and suggested that providing a more detailed landscaping plan might be a better path than a full waiver.
The board did not grant or deny the waivers; instead, they deferred the decision, requested further information (Fire Dept. input and a potential landscaping plan), and instructed the applicant to review specific ordinances.

Accountability ⁠flags

Documented procedural gaps. Each item links to its source.

Topics discussed — not on agenda

Support coverage

Creating this report cost ⁠real money.

MeetingWatch attended, transcribed, and analyzed this meeting on its own dime. If this work is valuable to you, chip in to keep covering Goffstown.

Report composed by gemma-4-26b, grok-4.20-0309-reasoning, grok-4-fast · analyzed 2026-06-12.