Accountability posts
Drafts ready to share. Click to copy, then post. Planning Board · Amherst, NH · December 18, 2024.
X / Twitter
Citizen zoning petition heading to public hearing with limited review time
Amherst Planning Board (12/18): A citizen zoning petition with enough signatures was accepted and goes to PUBLIC HEARING on Jan 6. The board can't change the language — it goes to ballot as written. Find out what it proposes before the hearing.
Hearsay allegation about reviewer impartiality in an active property dispute
At the 12/18 Amherst Planning Board meeting, the appellants' attorney alleged that third-party reviewer Steve Keach previously said he'd 'never grant this over his dead body.' The board granted a continuance pending Keach's review without addressing the claim.
Appellant objection overruled; delay granted in contested property appeal
Amherst Planning Board (12/18): The driveway permit appeal has been continued to Feb 19. The appellants' attorney objected on the record, calling further delay prejudicial. The board granted it anyway to await a third-party review.
Short timeline for public review of citizen-initiated zoning petition
Amherst Planning Board (12/18): A citizen zoning petition was validated and scheduled for a Jan 6 public hearing. Town Counsel has until then to review it for legal issues. That's roughly 3 weeks for public awareness and preparation.
X thread
🧵 Amherst Planning Board met 12/18/24. A mostly procedural agenda included a contested property dispute and a citizen zoning petition heading to a public hearing. Here's what happened. (1/6)
A citizen zoning petition was received, validated, and scheduled for a Jan 6 public hearing. The board confirmed it was timely and had the required signatures. The board cannot change the petition language — it goes to ballot as written. Town Counsel will review for legal issues. (2/6)
The substance of the proposed zoning change was not detailed in the meeting discussion. A citizen-initiated amendment could affect land use rights across Amherst. The public hearing is Jan 6 — roughly three weeks for residents to review what's being proposed. (3/6)
Separately: The driveway permit appeal was continued to Feb 19. The appellants' attorney objected on the record, calling the delay prejudicial and arguing there's already enough evidence to decide. The board granted the continuance to allow a complete record. (4/6)
The appellants' attorney also alleged that Steve Keach — the third-party reviewer the board is waiting on — previously pre-judged the application, saying he'd 'never grant this over his dead body.' This was characterized as hearsay. The board did not publicly address the claim before granting the continuance. (5/6)
What to watch: ➤ Jan 6 Planning Board hearing — citizen zoning petition ➤ Feb 19 — Driveway permit appeal decision ➤ Will the Keach impartiality allegation be addressed before his review is used to decide the case? Attend or watch. (6/6)
📋 AMHERST PLANNING BOARD — December 18, 2024 Meeting Recap The December 18th Planning Board meeting was mostly procedural, but two items deserve closer public attention before the new year. **Citizen Zoning Petition Heading to January 6 Public Hearing** A citizen-initiated zoning petition — carrying the required number of signatures — was received and accepted at this meeting. The board confirmed it was timely and properly filed, and scheduled it for a public hearing on January 6. The board noted it cannot alter the petition language — whatever the citizens submitted goes to ballot as written. Town Counsel has been asked to review it for legal issues before January 6. The specific substance of the proposed zoning change was not detailed during the meeting discussion. That gives the public roughly three weeks to learn what the petition proposes, review it, and prepare to attend the hearing. If you care about zoning in Amherst, find out what this petition says before January 6. **Driveway Permit Appeal: Continued to February 19 With an Unresolved Impartiality Question** The driveway permit appeal was continued to February 19, 2025 — at the request of the permit holder's attorney, who wants time to revise plans based on recommendations from third-party reviewer Steve Keach. The appellants' attorney objected on the record, arguing the delay was prejudicial and that there is already sufficient evidence to decide the case. The board granted the continuance, with the chair reasoning that this is a de novo proceeding and the board should consider all available facts and analysis. During the discussion, the appellants' attorney made a hearsay allegation: that Steve Keach — the reviewer whose analysis the board is now waiting on — had previously stated he would 'never grant this over his dead body.' This is an unverified claim made in an adversarial proceeding and should be weighed accordingly. However, it is a direct challenge to the neutrality of the review process, and the board did not publicly address the allegation before voting to continue the case. **Other Business:** — The Vinderosa Properties subdivision application was continued to February 19, with the applicant extending all statutory deadlines. — No regional impact was determined for a 2,500 sq ft addition at 9 Columbia Drive and an accessory dwelling unit at 22 Founders Way. — December 4th meeting minutes were approved with minor corrections (one abstention). **What to watch next:** — January 6, 2025: Planning Board public hearing on the zoning petition. — February 19, 2025: Driveway permit appeal and Vinderosa Properties subdivision. — Will the board address the Keach impartiality allegation before his review is used to decide the appeal?