Planning Board — July 17, 2024
No public comments, no split votes, and all agenda items were standard administrative or permitting matters with no evident conflict.
Decisions logged
Topics discussed
00:03 DPW Scenic Road Tree Removal Hearing
DPW requested approval to remove specific dead or hazardous trees on scenic roads (Austin, Chestnut Hill, Green, Eaton, Mac Hill) due to safety and maintenance issues; discussion covered flagging, wood removal, and stump handling.
10:41 Eversource Scenic Road Trimming/Removal Hearing
Eversource presented plans for tree trimming and removals along 23x5 lines in Amherst and surrounding towns to improve reliability after recent storms; topics included hazard tree criteria, homeowner consent, wood disposal, and distinction between trimming vs. removals.
32:13 Bond Delosa Properties Applications
Board addressed two subdivision cases (PZ18273120523 and PZ18272120523); first continued to October due to pending third-party reviews; second involved discussion of common driveway design, private road classification, stormwater BMPs, and need for fire/DPW input.
58:52 Nine-lot subdivision continuation (Cricket Corner/common driveway)
Applicant representative addressed fire department review, common driveway design (20 ft wide, NFPA compliant), lot count rationale (started at 10, settled on 9), frontage access rules under section 303, and need for no waivers on current design. Board discussed regulatory ambiguities on driveways vs. private roads and frontage access.
1:19:02 Cavaney 82 Lake Road subdivision and CUP completeness/public hearing
Two-lot subdivision of tax map 6 lot 30 plus conditional use permit for driveway in 25 ft wetland buffer. Applicant presented revised plan with contiguous 200 ft frontage, wetland buffer mitigation via placarding and naturalization, and requested waivers for studies (210.3) and stormwater. Public comment from abutter on wetland conditions and driveway proximity. Later discussion of net track area requirements, waivers for stormwater and driveway regulations, and conditions. Board debated and set markers for active and substantial development (driveway clearing) and substantial completion (foundation installation) to limit grandfathering of approvals. Motions to waive stormwater and driveway requirements and approve the subdivision and CUP with conditions including placarding, impact fees, and stormwater plan filing with building permit. Adoption of findings of fact for both applications.
2:13:58 Lot Consolidation
Approval of voluntary merger of Map 2 Lots 49 and 53 for the Subaru dealer site plan.
2:15:59 Minutes and Future Business
Approval of June 19 minutes and discussion of drafting a warrant article on landscaper/contractor home businesses.
Controversy & dissent
Action items
Notable statements
Supportive of DPW tree removal; believes scenic character would improve by exposing stone walls — Unidentified speaker · DPW hearing 05:13
Requested stumps be removed where visible to avoid detracting from road appearance — Unidentified speaker · DPW hearing 08:34
Questioned whether common driveway serving three lots should be classified as private road requiring waivers and emergency access standards — Unidentified speaker · Bond Delosa discussion 49:29
We need a completed package before meaningful review or decisions; prefer first September meeting over mid-August — Unidentified speaker · Nine-lot subdivision discussion 1:07:28
Driveway serving three or more units should be treated as private road; waiver may be needed but board can address at decision time — Unidentified speaker · Regulatory discussion on first application 1:13:24
Construction of the driveway along its entire length should be the active and substantial development marker; if not done within five years, new regulations apply. — Unidentified speaker · Defining conditions to prevent perpetual grandfathering 1:59:06
Five-year timeline for driveway construction is reasonable to ensure changes in regulations are not ignored. — Unidentified speaker · Supporting the development marker proposal 2:00:29
Public comment
Accountability flags
Topics discussed — not on agenda
Creating this report cost real money.
MeetingWatch attended, transcribed, and analyzed this meeting on its own dime. If this work is valuable to you, chip in to keep covering Amherst.
Follow Amherst
One email when a new report is published from the Planning Board — or one weekly digest.
grok-4.3, claude-opus-4-7 · analyzed 2026-05-27.