Your area Not set — showing everywhere
How it works Support this town
Meeting report · Board of Selectmen
Creating this report cost real money. Help fund coverage →

Board of Selectmen — August 11, 2025

Amherst board held a wide-ranging FY27 budget session on Aug. 11 — covering a potential $10M bond and $250K chemical lake project — with none of it on the public agenda.

The meeting was largely collegial and procedural, but was elevated above routine by a significant off-agenda budget work session touching millions in potential commitments, explicit board-level warnings about tax impacts, environmental liability concerns over lake treatment, and a pattern of failed past initiatives — all without any public notice or community input.

Date Monday, August 11, 2025 Duration 1.2h Speakers 10 Decisions 3 Lively
📄 Agenda

Questions about this meeting? ⁠Just ask.

Ask MeetingWatch answers from this meeting’s report, transcript, and records — with linked sources.

Summary AI-generated to surface controversy & community impact without bias — always verify against the actual meeting before relying on it.

AMHERST ACCOUNTABILITY | Board of Selectmen Meeting — August 11, 2025

Most of Monday's Board of Selectmen meeting was consumed by a detailed FY27 budget work session — covering department spending requests, capital reserve funds, a potential multi-million dollar conservation bond, and a controversial lake treatment project. None of these topics appeared on the published public agenda. Residents who rely on the agenda to decide whether to attend had no way of knowing any of this would be discussed.

Here's what was on the table: The preliminary FY27 town budget stands at $18.74 million — a 5% increase over FY26. The board has a stated goal of holding budget growth to 3%. The Town Administrator warned directly that proposed new initiatives and capital reserve requests will push the budget "well above" that 3% target. No requests were cut during the session, and no firm commitment was made to hold the line.

Also discussed: a Conservation Commission proposal for a new $5–10 million open space bond. Unlike the previous $6 million bond — which was offset by expiring road bond debt — this one would come with no such relief. One board member flagged it plainly: a new bond at this scale, with no debt offset, means a "fairly substantial" property tax increase for Amherst residents. The Commission was asked to develop financial impact projections before the board goes further.

Separately, the board debated whether to commit town funds to a roughly $250,000 chemical (alum) lake treatment project currently being pursued by a private lake association — a project whose permit application was previously denied and which still requires additional studies. One board member raised concerns about long-term environmental and public health liability. The board wisely deferred any financial commitment and directed the Town Administrator to gather more information first. But the fact that a potential $250,000 public expenditure on a project with unresolved permits is being discussed without public notice is itself a concern worth raising.

Residents deserve the chance to show up when decisions of this magnitude are being shaped. Strategic budget work sessions that cover millions in potential commitments should be publicly noticed — clearly and in advance.

Aug 11, 2025 1.2h long 10 speakers 3 decisions Lively
❝ Notable statements ↔ Drag to browse

“We are fortunate to have had him for that price for so long. He's been probably woefully underpaid for several years.”

— Speaker B (Board Chair) · Supporting the videographer contract rate increase for Joe Cummings 05:07

“We have attempted to do this three different times since I was on the board... I just don't want to start a fourth time and fail again.”

— Speaker E (Board Member) · Expressing concern about previous failed document digitization attempts and need for proper planning 16:39

“If we go with a brand new $10 million bond, there is no offsetting bonds expiring. So we're going to end up raising people's taxes by a fairly substantial amount.”

— Speaker E (Board Member) · Cautioning about tax impact of potential conservation bond without debt offset like previous bond had 43:32

“If we include again the initiatives and this CRFs alone will be well above that 3% increase... This will be a challenge for us to meet that 3% goal.”

— Speaker D (Town Administrator) · Warning that proposed budget initiatives and capital reserve funds will exceed target 3% budget increase 59:22

“I don't want to allocate money if a solution's already be in the works”

— Unidentified speaker · Expressing caution about committing town funds without full information about the lake association's project status 1:06:34

“The money we're talking about is on the order of a quarter million dollars”

— Unidentified speaker · Discussing the cost of the lake treatment project 1:08:08

“I just don't want to be a hook for something... in 20 years, you know, all of a sudden we find out that this is not a good chemical. It's polluting lakes and making people sick”

— Unidentified speaker · Expressing concerns about potential long-term environmental and health risks of chemical lake treatment 1:09:02
This meeting — choose a section

Public ⁠impact

Issues from this meeting with documented community impact.
What was discussed

Preliminary budget of $18.74 million represents a 5% ($445,000) increase over FY26; Town Administrator warned that new initiatives and capital reserve funds will push well above a 3% budget growth target

What was discussed

Potential $5–10 million bond with no offsetting debt expiry, described by a board member as likely to raise taxes by a 'fairly substantial amount'

What was discussed

Fills a previously identified vacancy; restores full-time code enforcement capacity at $84,884/year

What was discussed

Proposed additions include $45,000 part-time paralegal, $30,000 part-time communications officer (20 hrs/week), and $60,000 portable radio replacement — totaling $135,000 in new police budget requests

What was discussed

Potential town contribution toward a ~$250,000 alum treatment project with unresolved permit status, denied application history, and disputed long-term safety profile

Topics ⁠discussed

Each topic expands to quotes and full context.
Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

Community Development Director requested approval to hire Jamie Ramsey as a full-time building inspector and code enforcement officer at grade 15, step 5, starting at $40.81/hour ($84,884 annually). Ramsey is an Amherst resident with experience in both private and public sectors.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

Town Administrator requested approval to increase Joe Cummings' hourly rate from $20 to $28.50 for managing Amherst Community Television (ACTV). Cummings has provided services since 2017 and was described as 'woefully underpaid' for several years.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

Initial budget work session presenting a preliminary 5% increase over FY26 adopted budget ($445,000 increase to $18.74 million). Discussion included the benefit of paying off road bond debt ($400,000), providing opportunity for new initiatives.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

Three requests: $25,000 for document retention/digitization system, $10,000 for large format plotter replacement (13-year-old unit no longer has parts available), and funds for part-time/on-call building inspector coverage.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

Three initiatives: $5,000 for temporary pickleball courts at Davis Lane, $50,000 for water quality improvements at Baboosic Lake beach, and $42,000 to convert administrative position from part-time (29.5 hours) to full-time (40 hours) with 75/25 funding split.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

Board discussed potential town financial involvement in a lake treatment project currently being pursued by a lake association. The project involves chemical treatment costing approximately $250,000, with the association's application previously denied and requiring additional studies.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

Police requests: $45,000 for part-time clerical/paralegal position, $30,000 for part-time communications position (20 hours/week), $60,000 for portable radio replacement. Public Works requests: $97,000 for full-time transfer attendant, $100,000 increase for road work (to reach $1.7M total), $32,350 for part-time DPW laborer.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

Conservation Commission proposed another open space acquisition warrant article, potentially $5-10 million, following success of previous $6 million bond (passed with nearly 70% approval). Seeking board temperature check before proceeding with specific amount.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

Review of existing capital reserve funds totaling approximately $1.7 million impact, including computer systems ($15,000), fire equipment ($257,000), bridge repair ($300,000), DPW facility ($55,000), and others. Some funds are new requests, others are level-funded from previous year.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

Discussion about the need for a designated person to coordinate and track various aspects of the lake project including grants, permits, and solutions.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

Board confirmed upcoming strategic planning sessions scheduled for September 8 and 9, with department head presentations to determine budget priorities.

Controversy & ⁠dissent

Where the board, the community, or the agenda diverged.

Potentially controversial issues

01

FY27 Budget Exceeding 3% Target — Tax Impact Warning

The Town Administrator explicitly warned that proposed initiatives and capital reserve funds will push the budget well above a 3% increase target, raising concern about property tax burdens. This was discussed in a budget work session not listed on the public agenda, meaning residents had no opportunity to attend and engage on proposals totaling hundreds of thousands in new spending.
Board position: Board acknowledged the challenge but continued reviewing requests without cutting any; no firm commitment to hold to 3% was made.
medium concern
02

Conservation Commission Open Space Bond — Potential $5–10 Million Tax Impact

A new $5–10 million open space bond would impose a significant new tax burden with no offsetting debt expiring, unlike the prior $6 million bond. a speaker specifically flagged this as a 'fairly substantial' tax increase for residents. The scale of the ask and its direct tax impact make it a high-stakes decision for all Amherst property taxpayers.
Board position: Board gave a cautious temperature check — supportive in principle of open space acquisition but signaling concern about the tax impact and requesting financial projections before proceeding.
Internal dissent
a speaker raised a pointed objection about the tax impact of a new bond without a debt offset, distinguishing it unfavorably from the prior bond, effectively urging restraint on the amount.
medium concern
03

Chemical Lake Treatment — Town Financial Exposure and Environmental Risk

The board discussed whether the town should contribute to a ~$250,000 chemical treatment project for a lake currently pursued by a private lake association. a speaker explicitly raised long-term environmental and public health concerns ('I don't want to be on a hook for something… we find out this is not a good chemical, it's polluting lakes and making people sick'). Committing public funds to a project with unresolved permit status and uncertain science is both a financial and safety issue.
Board position: Board deferred any financial commitment, directing the Town Administrator to first meet with the lake association and gather information on the application's status.
Internal dissent
a speaker voiced clear reluctance based on long-term liability and environmental risk, distinguishing their position from others more open to participation.
medium concern
04

Extensive Off-Agenda Budget Work Session — Transparency Concern

The majority of the meeting consisted of a detailed FY27 budget work session covering Community Development, Recreation, Police, Public Works, capital reserve funds, a conservation bond, and a lake treatment project — none of which appeared on the published public agenda. Residents had no notice these significant fiscal matters would be discussed or decided. This represents a meaningful transparency gap for a meeting that touched on millions of dollars in potential commitments.
Board position: Board proceeded through all budget topics without apparent acknowledgment that they were not publicly noticed.
medium concern
05

Document Digitization — Repeated Failure to Execute

a speaker noted that the town has attempted a document retention and digitization initiative at least three times without success, calling out the risk of a fourth failed attempt. This signals a governance and execution problem within the Community Development Department and erodes confidence in administrative follow-through.
Board position: Board approved moving forward with planning but conditioned it on a proper specification and cost estimate process before any commitment.
Internal dissent
a speaker expressed clear skepticism and frustration, pushing back on a straightforward approval and demanding a more structured approach before funds are allocated.
low concern

Community vs. board tension

Public ⁠comment

What residents said — verbatim, with timestamps.
No public comments were identified in this meeting.

Decisions ⁠logged

Every recorded vote, with timestamps and dissents.
03:48
Approved hiring of Jamie Ramsey as building inspector and code enforcement officer
Full-time position at grade 15, step 5 ($40.81/hour, $84,884 annually), contingent on background check and driving record. After probationary period, increases to step 6 ($41.62/hour, $86,569.60 annually).
Unanimous (4-0)
06:41
Approved videographer contract rate increase for Cummings Media LLC
Increased hourly rate from $20 to $28.50 for ACTV management services, with annual contract renewal terms. Town Administrator authorized to execute contract.
Unanimous (4-0)
1:11:39
Motion to enter non-public session under RSA 91-A:3(II)(b) for hiring of public employee
Board Chair made motion to go into non-public session to discuss personnel hiring matters
Motion made, awaiting roll call vote

Share ⁠this report

Drafts ready to post — click a block to copy, or use Share to post it.

X / Twitter — by angle

Off-agenda budget work session covering high-significance fiscal matters without public notice
On 8/11, Amherst's Board of Selectmen spent most of their meeting on FY27 budget discussions covering millions in new spending — none of it was on the public agenda. Residents had no notice and no chance to show up.
215/280 chars
Budget exceeding stated tax target with no corrective action taken
Amherst's FY27 budget is already at a preliminary 5% increase. The Town Administrator warned on 8/11 that new initiatives will push it even further past the board's own 3% target. No items were cut. No firm commitment was made.
227/280 chars
Conservation bond tax impact raised by board member, discussed without public notice
At the 8/11 meeting, Amherst discussed a potential $5–10M open space bond with NO offsetting debt expiring. One board member flagged it would raise property taxes by a 'fairly substantial amount.' This was not on the public agenda.
231/280 chars
Chemical lake treatment financial and environmental risk with unresolved permit status
Amherst's board discussed whether to put town money toward a ~$250K chemical lake treatment on 8/11 — a project with a previously denied permit application. One member warned of long-term environmental liability. No decision yet, but it's in the budget pipeline.
262/280 chars

X thread

1
🧵 Amherst Board of Selectmen met on 8/11. Most of the meeting was a budget work session covering millions in potential new spending — FY27 departments, a possible $5–10M bond, and a $250K lake treatment project. None of it was on the public agenda. Thread:
256/280
2
The published agenda listed routine items. What actually happened: detailed FY27 budget reviews for Community Development, Recreation, Police, and Public Works — plus a conservation bond discussion and a lake treatment debate. Residents had zero notice to attend or comment.
274/280
3
The preliminary FY27 budget sits at $18.74M — a 5% increase over FY26. The board has a stated 3% growth target. The Town Administrator explicitly warned on 8/11 that proposed initiatives will push it 'well above' that target. No requests were cut.
247/280
4
Conservation Commission floated a NEW $5–10M open space bond. Unlike the prior $6M bond, there's no offsetting debt expiring. Board member: this will raise taxes by a 'fairly substantial amount.' The Commission was asked for financial projections before proceeding.
265/280
5
The board also discussed town funding for a ~$250K chemical lake treatment project run by a private lake association — one whose permit application was previously DENIED. One board member raised long-term health/environmental liability. No town funds committed yet.
265/280
6
The board deferred the lake decision, directing the Town Admin to first meet with the lake association. That's the right call — but the question of whether public money should back a project with an unresolved permit and disputed science deserves a public conversation, not a back-channel one.
293/280
7
Bottom line: Amherst residents had no notice that their Aug. 11 board meeting would touch a preliminary budget with a 5% increase, a potential $10M bond, and a controversial chemical treatment project. That's information the public is entitled to know is on the table. /end
273/280

Facebook — long form

AMHERST ACCOUNTABILITY | Board of Selectmen Meeting — August 11, 2025

Most of Monday's Board of Selectmen meeting was consumed by a detailed FY27 budget work session — covering department spending requests, capital reserve funds, a potential multi-million dollar conservation bond, and a controversial lake treatment project. None of these topics appeared on the published public agenda. Residents who rely on the agenda to decide whether to attend had no way of knowing any of this would be discussed.

Here's what was on the table: The preliminary FY27 town budget stands at $18.74 million — a 5% increase over FY26. The board has a stated goal of holding budget growth to 3%. The Town Administrator warned directly that proposed new initiatives and capital reserve requests will push the budget "well above" that 3% target. No requests were cut during the session, and no firm commitment was made to hold the line.

Also discussed: a Conservation Commission proposal for a new $5–10 million open space bond. Unlike the previous $6 million bond — which was offset by expiring road bond debt — this one would come with no such relief. One board member flagged it plainly: a new bond at this scale, with no debt offset, means a "fairly substantial" property tax increase for Amherst residents. The Commission was asked to develop financial impact projections before the board goes further.

Separately, the board debated whether to commit town funds to a roughly $250,000 chemical (alum) lake treatment project currently being pursued by a private lake association — a project whose permit application was previously denied and which still requires additional studies. One board member raised concerns about long-term environmental and public health liability. The board wisely deferred any financial commitment and directed the Town Administrator to gather more information first. But the fact that a potential $250,000 public expenditure on a project with unresolved permits is being discussed without public notice is itself a concern worth raising.

Residents deserve the chance to show up when decisions of this magnitude are being shaped. Strategic budget work sessions that cover millions in potential commitments should be publicly noticed — clearly and in advance.

Action ⁠items

Who owes what, by when.
Develop comprehensive document retention/digitization plan with specifications and cost estimates
Assigned: Community Development Director (a speaker) · Due: Before strategic planning presentations
Meet with Baboosic Lake Association to determine status of alum application and potential town collaboration
Assigned: Town Administrator (Lincoln Daly) · Due: Soon
Research field construction costs from other communities and work with Town Administrator on Buck Meadow cost estimates
Assigned: Recreation Director (Arena) · Due: During budget process
Develop financial impact projections for potential open space warrant article amounts
Assigned: Conservation Commission · Due: Before strategic planning presentation
Obtain more information from lake association on status of their application before making financial commitment decisions
Assigned: Board/Town · Due: Before budget discussions
Attend strategic planning sessions with department head presentations
Assigned: Board · Due: September 8 and 9, 2025 (September 8 at 3:00 PM)

Accountability ⁠flags

Documented procedural gaps. Each item links to its source.

Agenda items not discussed

Topics discussed — not on agenda

Support coverage

Creating this report cost ⁠real money.

MeetingWatch attended, transcribed, and analyzed this meeting on its own dime. If this work is valuable to you, chip in to keep covering Amherst.

Report composed by claude-sonnet-4-20250514, claude-sonnet-4-6, claude-opus-4-6 · analyzed 2026-06-01.