Your area Not set — showing everywhere
Issue · Falmouth, MA

Fall 2026 Duplex Zoning Amendments

Proposal to allow duplexes by right in residential and agricultural districts raises concerns over neighborhood character, infrastructure strain, and loss of site-plan review.

Overview

A five-duplex co-living proposal at 538 North Falmouth Highway was introduced to the Planning Board on June 2, 2026, prompting immediate concerns over traffic, parking, and neighborhood scale. The board continued the hearing unanimously to July 7, 2026, requiring a traffic study and engineering responses. No decision on the special permit or site plan has been reached.

Background

The co-living development proposal at 538 North Falmouth Highway first appeared before the Planning Board on June 2, 2026, during a combined Special Permit and Site Plan Review hearing.

Applicant Anthony Amaru, represented by Kevin Clower, presented a plan for five duplex townhouses configured as ten dwelling units under a co-living model that includes shared kitchens and living spaces, along with front-yard parking.

Board members and members of the public immediately raised questions about traffic safety at the busy intersection, whether the 43 proposed parking spaces would suffice for up to 50 occupants, and whether the scale and height of the buildings would fit the surrounding residential neighborhood.

The board determined that additional information was required, including a traffic study and an itemized response to the engineering referral, before any decision could be made.

No vote on the merits occurred; instead, a motion to continue the hearing was approved unanimously so the applicant could address the outstanding concerns.

The hearing was rescheduled for July 7, 2026, establishing the next formal opportunity for the board to review updated materials.

How it unfolded
The proposal for five duplex townhouses with a 'co-living' model and front-yard parking was introduced. Board members and the public raised concerns regarding traffic safety at the busy intersection, the adequacy of the 43 proposed parking spaces for potentially 50 occupants, and the scale and height of the buildings relative to the neighborhood. The hearing was continued to July 7, 2026, to allow the applicant to conduct a traffic study and provide an itemized response to the engineering referral.
2026-06-02Planning Board
Arguments against
Traffic safety concerns at the busy intersection
planning-board 2026-06-02
Against
Adequacy of 43 proposed parking spaces for potentially 50 occupants
planning-board 2026-06-02
Against
Scale and height of the buildings relative to the residential neighborhood
planning-board 2026-06-02
Against
Key voices
“Proposed ten dwelling units featuring a shared kitchen/living model”
Anthony Amaru (represented by Kevin Clower)planning-board 2026-06-02
What's next

The hearing is scheduled for July 7, 2026, after the applicant completes a traffic study and responds to engineering/staff concerns.

duplexzoningby rightresidential districtsagricultural