Planning Board — June 2, 2026
The meeting was characterized by rigorous questioning of applicants and skepticism regarding parking and zoning compliance, though it remained professional and procedural.
Public impact
Co-living development at 538 North Falmouth Highway
Outerland Holdings LLC Yard Expansion
Decisions logged
Topics discussed
▶ 07:36 Board Reorganization and Introductions
The board introduced new member Eric Krunjavec and addressed the postponement of the reorganization due to a member absence.
▶ 09:22 Approval Not Required (A&R): 499 Old Barnstable Road
Review of a plan to divide one lot into two lots at 499 Old Barnstable Road.
▶ 11:33 Special Permit and Site Plan Review: 538 North Falmouth Highway
An application for a proposed co-living development consisting of five duplex townhouses (10 units) with associated parking, including a request for front-yard parking.
▶ 1:09:00 Special Permit and Site Plan Review: 348 & 350 Old Meeting House Road (Outerland Holdings LLC)
An application to expand an existing contractor's yard and construct a 4,000-square-foot commercial building for offices and training. The applicant, represented by Kevin Clower, requested to merge lots 348 and 350 Old Meetinghouse Road to expand a contractor's yard, add a 4,000 sq. ft. commercial building for offices/training, and modify an existing special permit.
Controversy & dissent
Potentially controversial issues
538 North Falmouth Highway Co-living Development
348 & 350 Old Meetinghouse Road Expansion
Community vs. board tension
Action items
Notable statements
When these things come up, we get to comment whether we endorse it or not... we don't go into any things [like zoning or buildability]. — Unidentified speaker · Clarifying the scope of the Planning Board's role regarding 'Approval Not Required' applications. ▶ 10:22
I think strongly believe you have to have fifty parking spaces [for the 538 North Falmouth Hwy proposal] because they're not gonna traverse in the winter on a bicycle. — Unidentified speaker · Commenting on the sufficiency of the proposed 43 parking spaces for a 50-bedroom co-living facility. ▶ 18:46
The likelihood of the buffer of trees that you're thinking would last any longer than the state rebuilding of that intersection, not particularly good. — Unidentified speaker · Questioning the effectiveness of the proposed landscaping buffer given planned state roadwork. ▶ 23:57
This kind of housing is actually called out for in our local comprehensive plan. — Unidentified speaker · Supporting the concept of the proposed co-living housing model. ▶ 1:03:01
I am requesting a waiver of the lighting plan... all the lighting on the building would be proposed as dark sky compliant. — Unidentified speaker · Responding to board inquiries about lighting requirements for the new office building. ▶ 1:21:07
Our bylaw does say that the only way a dwelling can be within 300 feet of a contractor's yard is if it's owned by the same entity that owns the contractor's. — Unidentified speaker · Clarifying the zoning legality of the proximity between the proposed yard and the residential dwelling at 356 Old Meetinghouse. ▶ 1:24:43
The intent is for the tree farm largely to remain in its condition. If anything, it's gonna be improved. — Unidentified speaker · Addressing a resident's concern about whether the tree farm (348 Old Meetinghouse) would be removed during the expansion. ▶ 1:32:50
Public comment
Creating this report cost real money.
MeetingWatch attended, transcribed, and analyzed this meeting on its own dime. If this work is valuable to you, chip in to keep covering Falmouth.
Follow Falmouth
One email when a new report is published from the Planning Board — or one weekly digest.
grok-4.3, gemma-4-26b, grok-4-fast, grok-4.20-0309-reasoning · analyzed 2026-06-03.