MeetingWatch
Your area Not set — showing everywhere
Planning Board member

David Andrews

Active member
15
Meetings tracked
53%
Attendance
20
Votes on record
33
Positions tracked
Vote breakdown: 18 YES 2 ABSTAIN

Meeting ⁠history

Every recorded vote and position, oldest to newest.
Present
Case SPR-26-5: Veterans Field Playground and Scoreboard YES ~
Approved with lighting and advertising conditions.
Case SPR-26-6: Clark Holdings, LLC Amended Site Plan YES ~
Approved change of use to restaurant with five specific conditions.
Appointment of Alternate Board Members YES ~
Approved the appointment of two new alternate members.
Present
Board Reorganization After Election
Vacated planning board seat after winning selectboard election
Housing Development Regional Context
Participated in discussion about regional housing pressures and demographic trends
Regional Housing Development Challenges
Engaged in discussion about failed density increases in neighboring communities
Present
Motion to accept site plan application as complete YES
Seconded the motion.
Motion to continue alcohol service expansion case until after hearing Quack Shack consultation case YES ~
Condominium Conversion Process and Regulations
Questioned board authority and raised forward-looking concerns about future use changes.
Decision to seek legal consultation before proceeding
Supported seeking attorney opinion on board authority.
Approved site plan for boat/RV storage facility with conditions YES ~
Approved Fenton's Landing site plan with communal area and taco operation move YES ~
Present
Site Plan Review Application SPR26-1 YES
Present
Application Completeness Review - Beekeeping Unlimited YES ~
Voted in favor of accepting application as complete.
Final approval of site plan review SPR 2509 YES ~
Voted to approve beekeeping retail store site plan.
Meeting Minutes Approval - November 20th YES
Seconded motion to approve November 20th minutes as amended.
Meeting Minutes Approval - December 18th YES
Seconded motion to approve December 18th minutes as presented.
Housing Density and Cluster Development ~
Participated in cluster development discussion; engaged on density and zoning changes.
Unknown
Present
Board member recusal from Amendment #1 ABSTAIN
Recused as a founding board member of related entity, leaving 6 voting members
Zoning Amendment #7 - Appeals Timeline YES
Moved to recommend appeals timeline amendment to ballot
Short-Term Rental Policy Debate
Appeared to favor short-term rental restrictions based on community character concerns
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Present
Waterfront Zoning District Proposal ABSTAIN
Recused from voting due to his role as facilitator of the committee that created the proposal.
Dimensional Controls and Density Changes
Presented the proposal including reducing density from 10,000 to 4,800 sq ft per unit as committee facilitator.
Permitted Uses Modifications
Presented proposed permitted use changes including parking lots, food vendor carts, and retail size limits.
Sign Regulations Adjustments
Presented proposed sign regulation modifications as part of the waterfront district package.
Waterfront District Proposal - Setback Requirements and Building Heights
Acknowledged proposal does not fully solve affordability but argued it is a positive first step.
Unknown
Present
Site Plan Review Application Completeness YES ~
Approved Proctor site plan with multiple conditions YES ~
Supported approval with conditions including additional screening trees and site oversight.
Third-Party Building Inspector Requirement for Proctor Development
Supported limiting third-party oversight to site work, water, and sewer—not building construction.
Accepted Smerald subdivision application as complete with waivers YES ~
Approved Smerald two-lot minor subdivision YES ~
Board agreed to move forward with master plan for public hearing YES
Expressed readiness to proceed; emphasized lake protection in shoreline discussion.
Shoreline Protection Path Clarification
Strongly supports protecting lake; favors clarifying ambiguous ordinance language.
Unknown
Unknown

Positions marked ~ are inferred from context and may not reflect the member's explicitly stated position. Positions marked ✓ are from recorded votes or direct statements.