Your area Not set — showing everywhere
Meeting report · Energy Aggregation Committee
Creating this report cost real money. Help fund coverage →

Energy Aggregation Committee — January 15, 2026

This was a collegial, planning-focused meeting with no public dissent, no split votes, and no adversarial exchanges — the only forward-looking tension is external, in the form of anticipated voter resistance to the solar bond at town meeting.

Date Thursday, January 15, 2026 Duration 1.5h Speakers 7 Decisions 3 Routine

Questions about this meeting? ⁠Just ask.

Ask MeetingWatch answers from this meeting’s report, transcript, and records — with linked sources.

Summary AI-generated to surface controversy & community impact without bias — always verify against the actual meeting before relying on it.

📋 Sunapee Energy Aggregation Committee – Meeting Recap: January 15, 2026

Three items discussed at this meeting have direct financial consequences for Sunapee and New London residents. No members of the public attended. Here's what you need to know before the February 3rd deliberative session.

💡 COMMUNITY POWER RATES ARE UP — AND HERE'S WHY

Community Power Coalition rates are currently 14–14.9¢/kWh. According to committee member Doug Cogan, the coalition made a deliberate decision to raise rates to rebuild its fund balance after losses caused by prior under-billing. In plain terms: current enrollees are paying to cover a financial shortfall they didn't create. To make matters more complicated, Eversource comparison rates are delayed due to a PUC-mandated 6-month reconciliation cycle, so residents don't yet have the full picture needed to decide whether Community Power still saves them money. The committee is waiting on updated Eversource numbers before refreshing public-facing materials.

🏗️ $1.3 MILLION SOLAR BOND — KNOW THE DETAILS BEFORE YOU VOTE

The Water and Sewer Commission is asking voters to approve a $1.3 million bond for a solar array at the wastewater treatment plant. The project comes with $250,000 in pre-approved loan forgiveness from the NH DES Clean Water State Revolving Fund, and repayment is projected to come from energy savings and sewer user fees — not property taxes. Sixteen other NH towns have done similar projects. That's the case for it. But here's what deserves more public discussion: over 60% of sewer fees are paid by New London customers, meaning the majority of the financial burden falls on residents of a neighboring town who have no vote on this bond. The committee acknowledged this fact and discussed whether to include it in public materials — which tells you they know it's politically sensitive.

⚠️ ADVISORY COMMITTEE OR ADVOCACY CAMPAIGN?

The committee voted to hold public 'information sessions' before town meeting to build support for the bond. One member specifically asked how to identify venues that would reach voters who are 'most resistant.' A municipal advisory committee has every right to educate the public — but when the stated goal is overcoming resistance to a specific ballot outcome, the line between education and advocacy gets blurry. Residents deserve to know that distinction going in.

📅 WHAT'S NEXT: The deliberative session is February 3rd. The committee also changed its regular meeting schedule to the LAST Wednesday of each month at 5:30 PM. Mark your calendars and show up — these decisions affect your energy bills and your tax district whether you're in the room or not.

Jan 15, 2026 1.5h long 7 speakers 3 decisions Routine
Notable statements Drag to browse

“CPCNH made a conscious decision that they want to try to recover restore the fund balance that they lost a year ago... and are kind of willing to take their lumps at least through this next rate period”

— Doug Cogan · Explaining why Community Power Coalition rates are higher than expected 12:16

“This ordinance does not allow solar farms. It doesn't allow the building or adding of solar for the purpose of commerce to make money off the solar”

— Katherine Buchoyev · Clarifying that the solar ordinance only permits accessory use, not commercial solar farms 20:20

“The Water and Sewer Commission is an entity of the town, but operates separately... This is not paid for by all the taxpayers”

— Betty · Explaining that wastewater plant solar project costs will be covered by sewer user fees, not general taxes 58:51

“Repayment of bonds or notes is expected to be through energy savings and sewer user fees and therefore will not impact will have no impact on the tax rate”

— Shannon Martinez · Reading warrant article language for wastewater treatment plant solar project 1:03:11

“There are 16 other towns in New Hampshire that already have put solar installations at their wastewater treatment plants because it's the biggest energy bill in most of these towns and the most affordable way to cut that energy bill”

— Unidentified speaker · Discussing precedent for solar at wastewater treatment facilities 1:15:10

“Over 60% of the sewer fees are paid by New London customers”

— Unidentified speaker · Explaining the financial partnership with New London 1:00:02

“What would be the best venue to reach people who might be most resistant?”

— Unidentified speaker · Strategizing about public outreach for the solar bond 1:18:27
This meeting — choose a section

Topics ⁠discussed

Each topic expands to quotes and full context.
Speakers: Katherine Buchoyev, Doug Cogan, Sue Gotlin
What was discussed

Coalition announced rates between 14-14.9 cents per kilowatt hour for basic service. Eversource rates delayed due to PUC ruling requiring 6-month reconciliation cycle for under-billing issues.

Speakers: Katherine Buchoyev, Shannon Martinez, Sue Gotlin, Doug Cogan
What was discussed

Planning board proposed Amendment 4 to define residential and commercial solar energy systems with site plan review requirements. Does not allow solar farms but permits accessory solar use for homes and businesses.

Speakers: Katherine Buchoyev, Shannon Martinez, Doug Cogan
What was discussed

Discussion of committee's potential role in educating public about both solar ordinance and wastewater plant project, including possible information sessions beyond deliberative session.

Speakers: Betty, Katherine Buchoyev, Doug Cogan, Shannon Martinez
What was discussed

Water and Sewer Commission project seeking $1.3 million bond for solar array installation. Pre-approved for $250,000 loan forgiveness from NH DES Clean Water State Revolving Fund.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

Discussion about New London's role in the wastewater treatment system, with over 60% of sewer fees paid by New London customers. Committee considered whether to include this information in public materials.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

Extensive discussion about organizing public information sessions to educate voters about the solar array bond proposal, including potential venues like the library and timing around the deliberative session.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

Discussion about whether to include a statement of support from the Water and Sewer Commission for the solar array bond proposal. Committee discussed verifying the commission's support through Teddy (the chair).

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

a speaker reported that 16 other New Hampshire towns have already installed solar arrays at wastewater treatment plants, positioning this as a proven, low-risk approach.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

Discussion about changing the committee's regular meeting schedule from the second Wednesday to the last Wednesday of each month due to a speaker's conflict.

Controversy & ⁠dissent

Where the board, the community, or the agenda diverged.

Potentially controversial issues

01

$1.3 Million Wastewater Treatment Plant Solar Bond

A $1.3 million bond requires voter approval and represents a significant financial commitment. While framed as cost-neutral (repaid via energy savings and sewer fees), voters may question the debt, the projections, or the prioritization. The committee's explicit strategizing about how to reach 'resistant' voters signals anticipated public opposition.
Board position: Strongly supportive; actively planning public education campaign to build voter approval ahead of town meeting
medium concern
02

Community Power Coalition Rates Higher Than Expected

CPC rates of 14–14.9 cents/kWh reflect a deliberate decision to rebuild the coalition's fund balance after losses, meaning current customers are absorbing costs from prior under-billing. Eversource rate comparison is also delayed due to a PUC-mandated 6-month reconciliation cycle, leaving residents without full comparative data to make informed opt-out/stay decisions.
Board position: Informational and explanatory; committee is awaiting Eversource rates before updating public-facing materials
medium concern
03

Solar Zoning Ordinance (Planning Board Amendment 4)

Zoning amendments directly affect property rights. While the ordinance explicitly prohibits solar farms and limits solar to accessory use, some residents may object to new site plan review requirements for residential or commercial solar installations, potentially viewing them as bureaucratic barriers to adoption.
Board position: Informational and supportive of the planning board's proposed amendment; committee discussed providing public education
low concern
04

New London Cost-Sharing in Wastewater Solar Project

Over 60% of sewer fees are paid by New London customers, meaning a majority of the financial burden for a Sunapee-governed project falls on residents of a neighboring town. It is unclear whether New London customers have equivalent representation or input in the bond decision, raising inter-municipal equity concerns.
Board position: Committee acknowledged the fact and discussed whether to include it in public materials, suggesting awareness of its political sensitivity
medium concern
05

Committee Acting as Advocacy Body for Solar Bond

The committee explicitly strategized about public outreach to persuade voters to support the solar bond, including identifying venues to reach 'resistant' residents. A municipal advisory committee organizing persuasion campaigns for a ballot measure raises questions about the appropriate role of government bodies in influencing voters, even on ostensibly beneficial projects.
Board position: Committee consensus to hold public information sessions framed as education but clearly oriented toward building support for the bond
low concern

Community vs. board tension

Public ⁠comment

What residents said — verbatim, with timestamps.
No public comments were identified in this meeting.

Decisions ⁠logged

Every recorded vote, with timestamps and dissents.
00:26
Approved minutes from November 12th meeting
Motion made by Shannon Martinez, all voting members in favor
Approved unanimously
1:21:51
Committee agreed to hold public information meeting after deliberative session and before town meeting
Meeting to be scheduled for late February, likely at the library
Consensus agreement
1:26:12
Committee agreed to change regular meeting schedule from second Wednesday to last Wednesday of each month at 5:30 PM
Change takes effect for 2026 meetings, town website will be updated
Consensus agreement

Share ⁠this report

Drafts ready to post — click any block to copy.

X / Twitter — by angle

CPC customers paying elevated rates to cover coalition's prior financial losses, without full comparative data to make opt-out decisions
Sunapee Energy Committee (1/15/26): Your Community Power rate is 14–14.9¢/kWh partly because the coalition is recovering money it lost on prior under-billing. Current customers are absorbing that cost. Eversource comparison rates still unavailable.
248/280 chars
Municipal advisory committee organizing advocacy for a ballot measure, blurring the line between public education and voter persuasion
Sunapee voters: A $1.3M wastewater plant solar bond will be on your ballot. At the 1/15/26 Energy Committee meeting, members explicitly strategized about reaching 'resistant' voters. That's a government advisory body running a persuasion campaign.
247/280 chars
Inter-municipal equity concern: New London customers bear the majority of cost for a Sunapee-governed bond decision
Over 60% of Sunapee's sewer fees are paid by New London customers. A $1.3M solar bond governed by Sunapee will largely be repaid by New London ratepayers. Do they have equal say? This was flagged at the 1/15/26 Energy Committee meeting — quietly.
246/280 chars
No public participation at a meeting covering three items with direct financial impact on residents
Sunapee Energy Committee met 1/15/26 to discuss a $1.3M bond, a solar zoning change, and rising energy rates. Zero residents attended. The committee then planned a public outreach campaign. Public input before decisions — not after — is how this is supposed to work.
266/280 chars

X thread

1
THREAD: Sunapee Energy Aggregation Committee met 1/15/26. Three items with direct financial impact on residents. Zero members of the public attended. Here's what was decided and what you should know. 🧵
201/280
2
1/ ENERGY RATES: Community Power Coalition rates are now 14–14.9¢/kWh. Why higher than expected? The coalition is deliberately rebuilding its fund balance after prior losses from under-billing. Current enrollees are absorbing that cost — a trade-off they weren't told about upfront.
282/280
3
2/ Eversource comparison rates are also delayed — the PUC ordered a 6-month reconciliation cycle. So right now, residents don't have the side-by-side data needed to decide whether to stay in Community Power or opt out. The committee is waiting on updated numbers.
263/280
4
3/ $1.3M SOLAR BOND: The Water & Sewer Commission is seeking a $1.3M bond to install solar at the wastewater treatment plant. It comes with $250K in pre-approved loan forgiveness from NH DES. Repayment is projected through energy savings and sewer user fees — not property taxes.
279/280
5
4/ That framing matters, but so does this: over 60% of sewer fees are paid by New London customers. They'll shoulder the majority of repayment for a bond voted on and governed by Sunapee. Whether New London ratepayers have meaningful input is an open question no one answered.
276/280
6
5/ The committee plans public 'information sessions' before town meeting to build support for the bond. One member explicitly asked how to reach voters who are 'most resistant.' That's not neutral education — that's a government advisory body strategizing to pass a ballot measure.
281/280
7
6/ SOLAR ZONING: The Planning Board proposed Amendment 4 defining residential and commercial solar use. No solar farms permitted — only accessory use. New site plan review requirements will apply. This will also be on the February 3rd deliberative session agenda.
263/280
8
7/ MEETING SCHEDULE: The committee quietly changed its regular meeting time from the 2nd Wednesday to the LAST Wednesday of each month at 5:30 PM. If you follow this committee, update your calendar. The town website will be updated.
232/280
9
8/ Bottom line: Significant decisions are moving forward. Residents weren't in the room on 1/15. Deliberative session is February 3rd. That is your next real opportunity to ask questions and be heard before these items go to a vote.
232/280

Facebook — long form

📋 Sunapee Energy Aggregation Committee – Meeting Recap: January 15, 2026

Three items discussed at this meeting have direct financial consequences for Sunapee and New London residents. No members of the public attended. Here's what you need to know before the February 3rd deliberative session.

💡 COMMUNITY POWER RATES ARE UP — AND HERE'S WHY
Community Power Coalition rates are currently 14–14.9¢/kWh. According to committee member Doug Cogan, the coalition made a deliberate decision to raise rates to rebuild its fund balance after losses caused by prior under-billing. In plain terms: current enrollees are paying to cover a financial shortfall they didn't create. To make matters more complicated, Eversource comparison rates are delayed due to a PUC-mandated 6-month reconciliation cycle, so residents don't yet have the full picture needed to decide whether Community Power still saves them money. The committee is waiting on updated Eversource numbers before refreshing public-facing materials.

🏗️ $1.3 MILLION SOLAR BOND — KNOW THE DETAILS BEFORE YOU VOTE
The Water and Sewer Commission is asking voters to approve a $1.3 million bond for a solar array at the wastewater treatment plant. The project comes with $250,000 in pre-approved loan forgiveness from the NH DES Clean Water State Revolving Fund, and repayment is projected to come from energy savings and sewer user fees — not property taxes. Sixteen other NH towns have done similar projects. That's the case for it. But here's what deserves more public discussion: over 60% of sewer fees are paid by New London customers, meaning the majority of the financial burden falls on residents of a neighboring town who have no vote on this bond. The committee acknowledged this fact and discussed whether to include it in public materials — which tells you they know it's politically sensitive.

⚠️ ADVISORY COMMITTEE OR ADVOCACY CAMPAIGN?
The committee voted to hold public 'information sessions' before town meeting to build support for the bond. One member specifically asked how to identify venues that would reach voters who are 'most resistant.' A municipal advisory committee has every right to educate the public — but when the stated goal is overcoming resistance to a specific ballot outcome, the line between education and advocacy gets blurry. Residents deserve to know that distinction going in.

📅 WHAT'S NEXT: The deliberative session is February 3rd. The committee also changed its regular meeting schedule to the LAST Wednesday of each month at 5:30 PM. Mark your calendars and show up — these decisions affect your energy bills and your tax district whether you're in the room or not.

Action ⁠items

Who owes what, by when.
Contact Andrew Hatch for updated Eversource rate information
Assigned: Katherine Buchoyev · Due: As soon as available
Update committee webpage with new rate information
Assigned: Katherine Buchoyev · Due: After rate announcements received
Finalize warrant article booklet language and post online
Assigned: Shannon Martinez · Due: By Friday (after legal review)
Consider holding public information sessions on solar ordinance and wastewater project
Assigned: Committee · Due: Before February 3rd deliberative session
Contact Dave or Holly about Water and Sewer Commission participation in public information meeting
Assigned: Betty (a speaker) · Due: Before scheduling meeting
Send new meeting schedule to town to update website
Assigned: a speaker · Due: Soon
Follow up with Doug from Clean Energy for educational materials and resources
Assigned: a speaker · Due: Before deliberative session
Contact Jamie Hess, chairman of New England Energy Committee, for project implementation advice
Assigned: a speaker · Due: Not specified
Support coverage

Creating this report cost ⁠real money.

MeetingWatch attended, transcribed, and analyzed this meeting on its own dime. If this work is valuable to you, chip in to keep covering Sunapee.

Report composed by claude-sonnet-4-20250514, claude-sonnet-4-6, claude-opus-4-6 · analyzed 2026-06-24.