School Board — June 6, 2026
The meeting was a standard administrative review of goals and principles with spirited discussion on specific policy directions.
Public impact
Technology Procurement and Use
See more
The board debated the necessity and cost of one-to-one device programs for younger students. Concerns were raised about the budget required for hardware replacement versus the educational efficacy for K-4 students.
The board kept the technology principle but ordered an administrative presentation to study the effectiveness and scope of technology in elementary schools.
The administration will prepare a presentation on elementary technology use effectiveness.
Decisions logged
Topics discussed
▶ 02:50 Guiding Principles Review
The board reviewed six established guiding principles to determine if they should be retained, revised, or removed for the 2026-2027 year.
See more
The board went through principles regarding instruction, safety, technology, community engagement, personnel retention, and capital improvements. Discussion arose regarding the clarity of roles for behavior coaches, the strategic vs. excessive use of technology in elementary schools, and the need for better planning in capital improvements.
The board agreed to retain most principles as written, with one specific amendment to the capital improvements principle to include 'establishing plans' for improvements.
▶ 12:46 Technology Use and Effectiveness
Board members discussed the balance between technological infusion and the cost/efficacy of one-to-one device programs, particularly for younger students.
See more
Kelly Moss expressed concern over the budget required to replace devices from the one-to-one program. Michael Carney, Jr. suggested re-evaluating technology use for K-3/K-4, while Pamela Berryela Berry cautioned against backstepping from digital progress.
The board decided to keep the technology principle but create a new goal to study the effectiveness and appropriate scope of technology use in elementary schools.
The administration will prepare a presentation on the effectiveness and scope of elementary technology use.
▶ 37:09 Landscaping and Grounds Maintenance
The board discussed the existing non-capital goal regarding a comprehensive maintenance plan for grounds and landscaping.
See more
There was a debate over whether the current landscaping efforts are meeting expectations, with members noting improvements in some schools but weeds in others. The board discussed the role of PTAs in funding playgrounds and whether the district should take more responsibility.
The board decided to retain the goal for another year to ensure progress is made, noting that the current plan has not yet been presented to them.
The administration is expected to provide a multi-year maintenance plan including costs.
▶ 53:06 Energy Audit and Alternative Energy
The board reviewed the goal of conducting an energy audit and exploring alternative energy sources like solar.
See more
Michael Carney, Jr. noted that electricity costs continue to rise and expressed interest in solar energy solutions. The board noted that a consultant (Access Group) has already been hired, making the original goal to 'hire' an expert outdated.
The board decided to retain the topic but agreed the language must be reworded to reflect that a consultant is already engaged and to focus on working with them.
Pamela Berryela Berry will draft new wording for the goal.
▶ 57:44 Outdoor Facilities and Playground Equity
The board discussed dropping the goal related to assessing outdoor facilities and playgrounds.
See more
Michael Carney, Jr. argued that the goal was largely being met by PTAs funding playgrounds, making a formal district goal redundant. Kelly Moss noted that if the district wants to take over responsibility, it must be reflected in the budget.
The board decided to drop this goal from the list.
▶ 1:00:12 Review of Previous Non-Capital Goals
The Board reviewed and updated existing non-capital goals, including curriculum analysis at Woodbury School and family engagement strategies.
See more
The Board debated whether to keep or drop goals regarding Woodbury School analysis and parent engagement. Discussion focused on the need for continuous progress rather than 'one and done' goals and the implementation of regular feedback loops via surveys.
The Woodbury School goal will be kept but rewritten to reflect ongoing progress; the parent engagement goal will also be kept and revised to include survey language.
Rewrites to be submitted for review by the next meeting.
▶ 1:01:04 Establishment of Trust Funds
Discussion regarding the creation of trust funds to offset variable costs such as athletics, technology, and special education.
See more
a speaker proposed establishing trust funds to manage unpredictable expenses like special education costs and capital maintenance. The Board discussed how legislative changes regarding retained funds might impact their ability to use such funds.
The Board discussed this as a potential new goal to stabilize long-term budgeting.
The Board will look into the legality and structure of these funds.
▶ 1:22:20 Superintendent Appraisal Rubric
A proposal to revise the evaluation tool used for the Superintendent to better suit an experienced administrator.
See more
The Chairman proposed updating the rubric because the current tool lacks the nuance required for an 'accomplished' or 'distinguished' administrator. Some members argued this should be a Board development priority rather than a formal District goal.
The proposal was not adopted as a formal District goal, but the Chairman committed to pursuing it as a personal priority.
The Chairman will continue investigating guidance from the NH School Board Association.
▶ 1:29:00 Legislative Advocacy and Transparency
Discussion on the Board's role in advocating for public education and improving digital transparency of meeting materials.
See more
Members discussed whether the Board should more actively voice opinions on state bills and suggested improving website visibility by posting full PDF agenda packets. Concerns were raised about protecting employee privacy when making materials public.
Agreement that the Board should be more proactive and that meeting materials should be more accessible online.
Staff may be tasked with ensuring agenda packets are available as single PDFs online prior to meetings.
▶ 1:37:40 Staff CPR Certification
A discussion regarding the need for increased CPR and AED certification levels among district staff.
See more
Concerns were raised by parents about a lack of CPR certification at the elementary level. The Board discussed the logistical challenges of mandatory training, costs, and recertification processes.
The Board decided to look into establishing a baseline of current certification rates and developing a multi-year plan.
Investigation into the legality of mandates and potential training costs/methods.
Controversy & dissent
Potentially controversial issues
Elementary Technology Use
Staff CPR Certification
Community vs. board tension
Action items
Notable statements
We need to consider alternative energy... I would like to work with the town and say, what can we do for solar? — Michael Carney, Jr. · Discussing the ongoing energy audit and cost-saving measures. ▶ 55:00
I don't want to see us taking back steps rather than forward steps [regarding technology]. — Pamela Berryela Berry · Responding to concerns about reducing technology use in younger grades. ▶ 16:00
Any information is better than no information [regarding survey turnout]. — Unidentified speaker · Discussing the potential low turnout of parent surveys. ▶ 1:10:12
I think we need to be very careful with what we are looking at and what our expectations are [regarding public surveys]... we can redact the teacher's names. — Unidentified speaker · Expressing concern about potential liability and privacy if derogatory comments about staff are made public in surveys. ▶ 2:02:00
Member positions
Positions marked ~ are inferred from context and may not reflect the member's explicitly stated position. UNCLEAR means the vote was split but the record did not name how this member voted — it is not a “yes.”
Public comment
Creating this report cost real money.
MeetingWatch attended, transcribed, and analyzed this meeting on its own dime. If this work is valuable to you, chip in to keep covering Salem.
Follow Salem
One email when a new report is published from the School Board — or one weekly digest.
grok-4.3, gemma-4-26b, grok-4.20-0309-reasoning, grok-4-fast · analyzed 2026-06-22.