Planning Board — May 12, 2026
The meeting featured spirited public testimony regarding density, traffic, and environmental protections, particularly during the Solemi and Willow's Park hearings.
Video still
Public impact
Solemi Multi-Family Residential Development
See more
The discussion focused on traffic density, the impact of raising the site grade by eight feet, the removal of mature trees, and whether the site can accommodate necessary services like trash collection and emergency vehicle turnaround.
The application was accepted as complete, but the hearing was continued for further engineering and traffic analysis.
The applicant must provide a detailed impact study and explore a retaining wall to preserve trees; a third-party engineering review is pending.
Decisions logged
Topics discussed
▶ 00:00 Agenda Review and Continuances
The Chairman presented the agenda, noting several items were withdrawn or requested a continuance.
See more
The board was informed that PR Sports, LLC withdrew their application pending a ZBA variance regarding sound and outdoor courts. The Clark subdivision and Main Street 401 LC site plans also requested continuances.
The agenda was adjusted to reflect withdrawals and continuances.
PR Sports, LLC likely to be heard by the ZBA on June 2nd or in July; Main Street 401 LC continued to June 23, 2026.
▶ 49:01 Quick Stop Properties LLC Site Plan (282 North Broadway)
Public hearing for a change of use to include a cigar shop and a car rental agency with service bays.
See more
The proposal involves converting a vacant retail space into a cigar shop (no lounge) and a car rental agency. A technical issue was discussed regarding a pavement setback that is 23.6 feet instead of the required 25 feet. The board discussed whether to treat this as a pre-existing non-conforming use. The board discussed various site conditions including the accommodation of vehicle sizes (no tractor-trailers), parking for display and rental vehicles, and maintaining landscaping. The board ultimately decided to rely on previously accepted as-built plans to avoid unnecessary 'red tape' for the applicant while requiring a correction to a 25-foot setback during future parking lot reconstruction.
The board reached a consensus to allow the setback to remain as a non-conforming use, with a note to correct it during future parking lot redevelopments. The board granted conditional approval for the change of use subject to eight specific conditions.
The applicant must comply with conditions including paying impact fees and providing a certified as-built site plan.
▶ 05:07 Willow's Park Site Plan (9 Hampshire Street)
Video still
Public hearing regarding a site plan for an additional single-family rental dwelling and remediation of a wetland encroachment.
See more
The applicant proposed removing a long-standing paved encroachment into a wetland buffer and restoring the area with specific plantings. Abutters raised concerns regarding historical drainage issues and flooding, while the board debated whether to withhold Certificates of Occupancy (CO) for existing units until remediation is complete. The developer argued that releasing one CO would provide capital for the work.
The board granted conditional approval for the new unit and a compromise on the existing units.
Applicant to perform wetland remediation and submit monitoring reports for three growing seasons.
▶ 38:00 Tuscan Village Block 1300 Whole Foods Site Plan
Public hearing for a conditional use permit for temporary signage (banners and flags) to promote the upcoming Whole Foods opening.
See more
The applicant requested permission for three banners and several flags to build awareness for the store's anticipated mid-July opening. The planning department confirmed the request is within reasonable sign ratios and emphasized that the permit is for one-time use only.
The request for temporary signage and the site plan were unanimously approved.
▶ 1:13:00 Solemi Site Plan (177 Main Street) / Multi-Family Residential Development (22 Units)
A public hearing for a proposed 22-unit townhouse development featuring four buildings on a split-zoned lot.
See more
The proposal includes 22 townhouses with a boulevard entrance and a small recreation area. Abutters raised intense concerns regarding a lack of proper notification during the initial zoning process, potential traffic congestion on Main Street, the removal of mature trees, and the need for privacy fencing. The applicant proposed a six-foot fence and a commitment to keep the recreation area as grass only (no pickleball/basketball). The board debated whether individual trash service is feasible due to tight site constraints, suggesting a central dumpster instead. Significant debate occurred regarding the removal of mature trees due to necessary grade changes for height compliance, as well as concerns from neighbors regarding traffic density, drainage adequacy, and the loss of green space.
The plan was accepted as complete, but the meeting was continued to allow for further review. The board decided to continue the hearing to allow the applicant to address several concerns.
The application is pending a third-party engineering review and a traffic consultant's review. The applicant must explore a retaining wall to preserve trees, provide a detailed impact study (public safety, roads, schools, etc.), and the applicant's representative has committed to an in-person meeting with abutters.
▶ 2:50:00 Site Plan Exemption: 1 Northeastern Drive
A request for site plan exemption to make minor improvements including patio relocation and sidewalk removal.
See more
The applicant proposed relocating a patio, removing certain sidewalks and ADA spaces, and infilling mulch beds to facilitate snow removal. The board expressed caution regarding the removal of sidewalks in the public right-of-way and the impact on pedestrian connectivity.
The board expressed general comfort with the proposal, provided changes are memorialized in an as-built plan, but noted that sidewalk removal requires consultation with Municipal Services.
▶ 2:52:00 357 South Broadway Food Truck Request
Request to formalize temporary food truck service at a site under construction.
See more
The applicant, managing an event center under construction, requested to add tables for their previously approved food truck service.
The board approved the temporary setup on a food truck basis until the certificate of occupancy is issued.
▶ 2:54:00 15 Trolley Lane As-Built Review / Site Vegetation and Tree Line Remediation
Review of discrepancies between the approved plan and the actual completed site conditions, including unapproved signage and removal of a proposed tree line.
See more
The board reviewed unapproved signage and a discrepancy regarding the tree line, where mature vegetation was cleared despite the approved plan showing a proposed tree line. Members noted that the applicant cleared mature vegetation that was supposed to be retained per the site plan. The applicant claimed they could not plant new trees due to a septic leach field, but Board members observed there appears to be sufficient room for a new tree line.
The board noted the discrepancies, including the unpermitted signage and the loss of the tree line, for the record. The Board determined that the applicant must be required to implement a new tree line to remediate the loss of mature vegetation.
Staff will communicate the requirement for a new tree line to the property owner.
▶ 3:20:02 Certificate of Occupancy (CO) and Site Striping
Discussion regarding whether the applicant can receive a Certificate of Occupancy for units before the site has been striped.
See more
The applicant is seeking a CO for a portion of the units but has not yet striped the site due to recent site modifications. There was a question of whether the Board could accept a bond or letter of credit for such items.
The Board clarified that they are not comfortable issuing a CO before the site has been striped and that the plan must be adhered to.
▶ 3:31:29 Town Master Plan Award and ADU Seminar
Recognition of the town receiving 'Plant of the Year' for its Master Plan and an announcement for an upcoming ADU seminar.
See more
The speaker acknowledged the New Hampshire Planning Association award, citing public participation and implementation as key factors. They also announced an Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) seminar scheduled for May 27th.
Formal acknowledgement of the award and announcement of the seminar.
ADU Seminar on May 27th at 5:00 PM.
Controversy & dissent
Potentially controversial issues
Solemi Site Plan (177 Main Street) Townhouse Development
Willow's Park Site Plan (9 Hampshire Street)
Split votes
Community vs. board tension
Action items
Notable statements
I don't think that the occupant has earned those CEOs. And once the work is done, if it's two weeks out, then he's only two weeks away from getting it. — Unidentified speaker · Arguing against granting occupancy certificates before wetland remediation is finished. ▶ 37:55
I'm just asking for one CO out of the five... The state or the town knew about it in 2010? And then it gets put on my lap. — Unidentified speaker · The applicant expressing frustration regarding the delay in resolving the encroachment issue. ▶ 46:48
There was no justice in this process for the abutters... The public's trust in this process has been badly shaken. — Charlie Appelstein · Arguing that neighbors were not properly notified of the initial zoning approval for the 177 Main Street project. ▶ 1:31:05
While the notification issue was problematic, it is a zoning board matter that isn't within the purview of this [Planning] board. — Damon Norcross · Addressing concerns raised by neighbors regarding the legality of the initial notification process. ▶ 1:52:16
I personally feel twenty-two units is too much for this, for this amount of space. — Unidentified speaker · Expressing concerns regarding density and runoff from the proposed development. ▶ 2:07:40
All representations made are considered part of the approval... if the applicant makes a representation... that is binding. — Unidentified speaker · Clarifying to an abutter that verbal commitments made during the meeting (like fencing or tree flagging) carry legal weight. ▶ 2:35:40
I'd like to see a detailed impact study here from the applicant... not just fiscal, not just environmental, a full impact study here. — Unidentified speaker · Demanding a comprehensive study before being comfortable voting on a multi-family development. ▶ 2:56:40
If we can find out if they had completed and submitted the intent to cut report with the state... I would like to know if they had done that... we should put some sort of a process in place where it makes its way to planning before it goes to town council for signature. — Unidentified speaker · Discussing the lack of coordination regarding the clearing of trees on the site. ▶ 2:57:02
There's also a planning board that would like to see the plan adhered to. — Unidentified speaker · Addressing the applicant's request for a CO before completing site striping. ▶ 3:24:49
Member positions
Positions marked ~ are inferred from context and may not reflect the member's explicitly stated position. UNCLEAR means the vote was split but the record did not name how this member voted — it is not a “yes.”
Public comment
Creating this report cost real money.
MeetingWatch attended, transcribed, and analyzed this meeting on its own dime. If this work is valuable to you, chip in to keep covering Salem.
Follow Salem
One email when a new report is published from the Planning Board — or one weekly digest.
grok-4.3, gemma-4-26b, grok-4.20-0309-reasoning, grok-4-fast · analyzed 2026-06-22.