Your area Not set — showing everywhere
Meeting report · Planning Board
Creating this report cost real money. Help fund coverage →

Planning Board — May 12, 2026

The meeting featured spirited public testimony regarding density, traffic, and environmental protections, particularly during the Solemi and Willow's Park hearings.

Date Tuesday, May 12, 2026 Duration 3.1h Speakers 66 Public comments 18 Decisions 11 Spirited
Site plan overview for Morningside Court II development Video still
Site plan overview for Morningside Court II development Frame from meeting video ▶ 13:29

Public ⁠impact

Issues from this meeting with documented community impact.
01

Solemi Multi-Family Residential Development

Construction of 22 townhouse units in a split-zoned area. Affected: Residents of Main Street, Granite Avenue, and Park Avenue.
See more
What was discussed

The discussion focused on traffic density, the impact of raising the site grade by eight feet, the removal of mature trees, and whether the site can accommodate necessary services like trash collection and emergency vehicle turnaround.

What happened

The application was accepted as complete, but the hearing was continued for further engineering and traffic analysis.

What's next

The applicant must provide a detailed impact study and explore a retaining wall to preserve trees; a third-party engineering review is pending.

zoning change

Decisions ⁠logged

Every recorded vote, with timestamps and dissents.
Acceptance of April 14, 2026, meeting minutes.
Approved as written.
6-0-1
Acceptance of April 28, 2026, meeting minutes.
Approved as written.
6-0-1
Granting of one conditional Certificate of Occupancy for the existing Willow's Park units, while holding the second until wetland mitigation is complete.
One CO granted at applicant's choice; the other held pending remediation.
4-3
Conditional approval of Willow's Park site plan for 9 Hampshire Street with eight specific conditions.
Includes requirements for wetland restoration, impact fees, deed restrictions, and a 3-year monitoring period.
6-2
Approval of Tuscan Village Block 1300 Whole Foods conditional use permit for temporary signage and site plan.
Subject to four conditions including time limits on banners and flags.
Unanimous
Grant conditional approval for the Quick Stop Properties site plan at 282 North Broadway.
Approval is subject to eight conditions: 1) Incorporate staff/planning notes into site plan; 2) Pay road impact fee ($5,150.80) and public safety fee ($63.20) prior to occupancy; 3) Correct setback to 25 feet during parking lot reconstruction; 4) Provide certified as-built site plan; 5) Construct improvements per approved plan; 6) Approval is for retail cigar sales only (no lounge); 7) Do not exceed parking capacity; 8) Incorporate all applicant representations and plan notes.
Unanimous
Accept the Solemi site plan (177 Main Street) as complete.
The plan for 22 townhouse-style residential units was accepted as complete for the purpose of proceeding with the review process.
Unanimous
Motion to continue the hearing for the 22-unit multi-family residential development.
The board voted to continue the matter to allow for further study and applicant responses.
Approved
Approval of site plan exemption for 1 Northeastern Drive.
Approved with the caveat that sidewalk removal in the right-of-way requires consultation with Municipal Services.
Approved
Approval of temporary food truck service (with tables) at 357 South Broadway.
Permitted on a temporary basis until the certificate of occupancy is obtained.
Approved
Adjournment of the meeting
Motion to adjourn made by Speaker S64 and seconded by Speaker S65.
Passed

Topics ⁠discussed

Click a topic to expand quotes and full context.
▶ 00:00 Agenda Review and Continuances

The Chairman presented the agenda, noting several items were withdrawn or requested a continuance.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
See more
What was discussed

The board was informed that PR Sports, LLC withdrew their application pending a ZBA variance regarding sound and outdoor courts. The Clark subdivision and Main Street 401 LC site plans also requested continuances.

What happened

The agenda was adjusted to reflect withdrawals and continuances.

What's next

PR Sports, LLC likely to be heard by the ZBA on June 2nd or in July; Main Street 401 LC continued to June 23, 2026.

▶ 49:01 Quick Stop Properties LLC Site Plan (282 North Broadway)

Public hearing for a change of use to include a cigar shop and a car rental agency with service bays.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
See more
What was discussed

The proposal involves converting a vacant retail space into a cigar shop (no lounge) and a car rental agency. A technical issue was discussed regarding a pavement setback that is 23.6 feet instead of the required 25 feet. The board discussed whether to treat this as a pre-existing non-conforming use. The board discussed various site conditions including the accommodation of vehicle sizes (no tractor-trailers), parking for display and rental vehicles, and maintaining landscaping. The board ultimately decided to rely on previously accepted as-built plans to avoid unnecessary 'red tape' for the applicant while requiring a correction to a 25-foot setback during future parking lot reconstruction.

What happened

The board reached a consensus to allow the setback to remain as a non-conforming use, with a note to correct it during future parking lot redevelopments. The board granted conditional approval for the change of use subject to eight specific conditions.

What's next

The applicant must comply with conditions including paying impact fees and providing a certified as-built site plan.

▶ 05:07 Willow's Park Site Plan (9 Hampshire Street)
Site plan overview for Morningside Court II development Video still
Site plan overview for Morningside Court II development ▶ 15:57

Public hearing regarding a site plan for an additional single-family rental dwelling and remediation of a wetland encroachment.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
See more
What was discussed

The applicant proposed removing a long-standing paved encroachment into a wetland buffer and restoring the area with specific plantings. Abutters raised concerns regarding historical drainage issues and flooding, while the board debated whether to withhold Certificates of Occupancy (CO) for existing units until remediation is complete. The developer argued that releasing one CO would provide capital for the work.

What happened

The board granted conditional approval for the new unit and a compromise on the existing units.

What's next

Applicant to perform wetland remediation and submit monitoring reports for three growing seasons.

▶ 38:00 Tuscan Village Block 1300 Whole Foods Site Plan

Public hearing for a conditional use permit for temporary signage (banners and flags) to promote the upcoming Whole Foods opening.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
See more
What was discussed

The applicant requested permission for three banners and several flags to build awareness for the store's anticipated mid-July opening. The planning department confirmed the request is within reasonable sign ratios and emphasized that the permit is for one-time use only.

What happened

The request for temporary signage and the site plan were unanimously approved.

▶ 1:13:00 Solemi Site Plan (177 Main Street) / Multi-Family Residential Development (22 Units)

A public hearing for a proposed 22-unit townhouse development featuring four buildings on a split-zoned lot.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
See more
What was discussed

The proposal includes 22 townhouses with a boulevard entrance and a small recreation area. Abutters raised intense concerns regarding a lack of proper notification during the initial zoning process, potential traffic congestion on Main Street, the removal of mature trees, and the need for privacy fencing. The applicant proposed a six-foot fence and a commitment to keep the recreation area as grass only (no pickleball/basketball). The board debated whether individual trash service is feasible due to tight site constraints, suggesting a central dumpster instead. Significant debate occurred regarding the removal of mature trees due to necessary grade changes for height compliance, as well as concerns from neighbors regarding traffic density, drainage adequacy, and the loss of green space.

What happened

The plan was accepted as complete, but the meeting was continued to allow for further review. The board decided to continue the hearing to allow the applicant to address several concerns.

What's next

The application is pending a third-party engineering review and a traffic consultant's review. The applicant must explore a retaining wall to preserve trees, provide a detailed impact study (public safety, roads, schools, etc.), and the applicant's representative has committed to an in-person meeting with abutters.

▶ 2:50:00 Site Plan Exemption: 1 Northeastern Drive

A request for site plan exemption to make minor improvements including patio relocation and sidewalk removal.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
See more
What was discussed

The applicant proposed relocating a patio, removing certain sidewalks and ADA spaces, and infilling mulch beds to facilitate snow removal. The board expressed caution regarding the removal of sidewalks in the public right-of-way and the impact on pedestrian connectivity.

What happened

The board expressed general comfort with the proposal, provided changes are memorialized in an as-built plan, but noted that sidewalk removal requires consultation with Municipal Services.

▶ 2:52:00 357 South Broadway Food Truck Request

Request to formalize temporary food truck service at a site under construction.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
See more
What was discussed

The applicant, managing an event center under construction, requested to add tables for their previously approved food truck service.

What happened

The board approved the temporary setup on a food truck basis until the certificate of occupancy is issued.

▶ 2:54:00 15 Trolley Lane As-Built Review / Site Vegetation and Tree Line Remediation

Review of discrepancies between the approved plan and the actual completed site conditions, including unapproved signage and removal of a proposed tree line.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
See more
What was discussed

The board reviewed unapproved signage and a discrepancy regarding the tree line, where mature vegetation was cleared despite the approved plan showing a proposed tree line. Members noted that the applicant cleared mature vegetation that was supposed to be retained per the site plan. The applicant claimed they could not plant new trees due to a septic leach field, but Board members observed there appears to be sufficient room for a new tree line.

What happened

The board noted the discrepancies, including the unpermitted signage and the loss of the tree line, for the record. The Board determined that the applicant must be required to implement a new tree line to remediate the loss of mature vegetation.

What's next

Staff will communicate the requirement for a new tree line to the property owner.

▶ 3:20:02 Certificate of Occupancy (CO) and Site Striping

Discussion regarding whether the applicant can receive a Certificate of Occupancy for units before the site has been striped.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
See more
What was discussed

The applicant is seeking a CO for a portion of the units but has not yet striped the site due to recent site modifications. There was a question of whether the Board could accept a bond or letter of credit for such items.

What happened

The Board clarified that they are not comfortable issuing a CO before the site has been striped and that the plan must be adhered to.

▶ 3:31:29 Town Master Plan Award and ADU Seminar

Recognition of the town receiving 'Plant of the Year' for its Master Plan and an announcement for an upcoming ADU seminar.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
See more
What was discussed

The speaker acknowledged the New Hampshire Planning Association award, citing public participation and implementation as key factors. They also announced an Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) seminar scheduled for May 27th.

What happened

Formal acknowledgement of the award and announcement of the seminar.

What's next

ADU Seminar on May 27th at 5:00 PM.

Controversy & ⁠dissent

Where the board, the community, or the agenda diverged.

Potentially controversial issues

01

Solemi Site Plan (177 Main Street) Townhouse Development

The proposal for 22 townhouses faced strong opposition from neighbors regarding traffic congestion, density, privacy, and the removal of mature trees. There were also allegations of inadequate public notification during the zoning phase.
Board position: The board accepted the application as complete but deferred a decision to allow for extensive third-party engineering and traffic reviews.
high concern
02

Willow's Park Site Plan (9 Hampshire Street)

The project involves wetland remediation and a new dwelling, sparking debate over historical drainage issues and the potential for flooding neighboring properties.
Board position: The board granted conditional approval but sought a compromise on Certificate of Occupancy for existing units.
Internal dissent
The board was split 4-3 on whether to grant one Certificate of Occupancy for existing units prior to the completion of wetland remediation.
high concern

Split votes

Granting of one conditional Certificate of Occupancy for existing Willow's Park units while withholding the second until wetland mitigation is complete.
4-3
Conditional approval of Willow's Park site plan for 9 Hampshire Street.
6-2

Community vs. board tension

Action ⁠items

Who owes what, by when.
Remove pre-existing paved encroachments and restore wetland buffer area.
Assigned: Willow's Park Applicant · Due: Imminent (slated within next 1-2 weeks per engineer)
Submit monitoring reports from a qualified wetland scientist for three growing seasons.
Assigned: Willow's Park Applicant · Due: Per wetland ordinance
Add a note to the site plan regarding the requirement to revise the pavement setback to 25 feet during future parking lot redevelopments.
Assigned: Quick Stop Properties Applicant · Due: Prior to final approval/occupancy
Pay road and public safety impact fees prior to occupancy.
Assigned: Quick Stop Properties Applicant · Due: Prior to occupancy
Provide materials and colors for the buildings; address the need for a turnaround/maneuvering space and potential central dumpster location.
Assigned: Solemi Applicant · Due: Not specified
Flag property lines and notify neighbors before commencing any tree clearing.
Assigned: Solemi Applicant · Due: Prior to tree clearing
Explore a retaining wall option to preserve mature trees and present at the next meeting.
Assigned: Applicant (Aaron Orso) · Due: Next Planning Board meeting
Conduct an in-person meeting with abutters to discuss mitigation and site boundaries.
Assigned: Applicant (Aaron Orso) · Due: Not specified
Provide a detailed impact study (public safety, roads, traffic, schools, sewage, water) with a board-approved scope.
Assigned: Applicant · Due: Next Planning Board meeting
Post aerial renderings and site images to the town website.
Assigned: Staff (Jacob) · Due: Immediate
Develop a scope for the required detailed impact study.
Assigned: Staff (Jacob) · Due: Not specified
Communicate the requirement for a new tree line to the property owner.
Assigned: Speaker S58 (Staff)

Notable ⁠statements

I don't think that the occupant has earned those CEOs. And once the work is done, if it's two weeks out, then he's only two weeks away from getting it. — Unidentified speaker · Arguing against granting occupancy certificates before wetland remediation is finished. ▶ 37:55
I'm just asking for one CO out of the five... The state or the town knew about it in 2010? And then it gets put on my lap. — Unidentified speaker · The applicant expressing frustration regarding the delay in resolving the encroachment issue. ▶ 46:48
There was no justice in this process for the abutters... The public's trust in this process has been badly shaken. — Charlie Appelstein · Arguing that neighbors were not properly notified of the initial zoning approval for the 177 Main Street project. ▶ 1:31:05
While the notification issue was problematic, it is a zoning board matter that isn't within the purview of this [Planning] board. — Damon Norcross · Addressing concerns raised by neighbors regarding the legality of the initial notification process. ▶ 1:52:16
I personally feel twenty-two units is too much for this, for this amount of space. — Unidentified speaker · Expressing concerns regarding density and runoff from the proposed development. ▶ 2:07:40
All representations made are considered part of the approval... if the applicant makes a representation... that is binding. — Unidentified speaker · Clarifying to an abutter that verbal commitments made during the meeting (like fencing or tree flagging) carry legal weight. ▶ 2:35:40
I'd like to see a detailed impact study here from the applicant... not just fiscal, not just environmental, a full impact study here. — Unidentified speaker · Demanding a comprehensive study before being comfortable voting on a multi-family development. ▶ 2:56:40
If we can find out if they had completed and submitted the intent to cut report with the state... I would like to know if they had done that... we should put some sort of a process in place where it makes its way to planning before it goes to town council for signature. — Unidentified speaker · Discussing the lack of coordination regarding the clearing of trees on the site. ▶ 2:57:02
There's also a planning board that would like to see the plan adhered to. — Unidentified speaker · Addressing the applicant's request for a CO before completing site striping. ▶ 3:24:49

Member ⁠positions

12 issues · 1 explicit · 54 inferred · 24 unclear
A split vote in this meeting was recorded without naming the dissenter (e.g. a voice vote). Members whose individual vote could not be confirmed are marked UNCLEAR below — this is not the same as a “yes.” Named votes will be filled in if official minutes record them.
Joseph Feole
Chair
Present
Acceptance of April 14, 2026, meeting minutes UNCLEAR
Acceptance of April 28, 2026, meeting minutes UNCLEAR
Granting of one conditional Certificate of Occupancy for the existing Willow's Park units UNCLEAR
Conditional approval of Willow's Park site plan for 9 Hampshire Street UNCLEAR
Approval of Tuscan Village Block 1300 Whole Foods conditional use permit YES ~
Grant conditional approval for the Quick Stop Properties site plan YES ~
Accept the Solemi site plan (177 Main Street) as complete YES ~
Motion to continue the hearing for the 22-unit multi-family residential development YES ~
Approval of site plan exemption for 1 Northeastern Drive YES ~
Approval of temporary food truck service at 357 South Broadway YES ~
Sean Lewis
Vice Chair
Present
Acceptance of April 14, 2026, meeting minutes UNCLEAR
Acceptance of April 28, 2026, meeting minutes UNCLEAR
Granting of one conditional Certificate of Occupancy for the existing Willow's Park units UNCLEAR
Conditional approval of Willow's Park site plan for 9 Hampshire Street UNCLEAR
Approval of Tuscan Village Block 1300 Whole Foods conditional use permit YES ~
Grant conditional approval for the Quick Stop Properties site plan YES ~
Accept the Solemi site plan (177 Main Street) as complete YES ~
Motion to continue the hearing for the 22-unit multi-family residential development YES ~
Approval of site plan exemption for 1 Northeastern Drive YES ~
Approval of temporary food truck service at 357 South Broadway YES ~
Damon Norcross
Secretary
Present
Solemi Site Plan (177 Main Street) / Multi-Family Residential Development (22 Units)
Noted notification issues were a Zoning Board matter, not Planning Board purview.
Acceptance of April 14, 2026, meeting minutes UNCLEAR
Acceptance of April 28, 2026, meeting minutes UNCLEAR
Granting of one conditional Certificate of Occupancy for the existing Willow's Park units UNCLEAR
Conditional approval of Willow's Park site plan for 9 Hampshire Street UNCLEAR
Approval of Tuscan Village Block 1300 Whole Foods conditional use permit YES ~
Grant conditional approval for the Quick Stop Properties site plan YES ~
Accept the Solemi site plan (177 Main Street) as complete YES ~
Motion to continue the hearing for the 22-unit multi-family residential development YES ~
Approval of site plan exemption for 1 Northeastern Drive YES ~
Approval of temporary food truck service at 357 South Broadway YES ~
Jim Harvey
Member
Present
Acceptance of April 14, 2026, meeting minutes UNCLEAR
Acceptance of April 28, 2026, meeting minutes UNCLEAR
Granting of one conditional Certificate of Occupancy for the existing Willow's Park units UNCLEAR
Conditional approval of Willow's Park site plan for 9 Hampshire Street UNCLEAR
Approval of Tuscan Village Block 1300 Whole Foods conditional use permit YES ~
Grant conditional approval for the Quick Stop Properties site plan YES ~
Accept the Solemi site plan (177 Main Street) as complete YES ~
Motion to continue the hearing for the 22-unit multi-family residential development YES ~
Approval of site plan exemption for 1 Northeastern Drive YES ~
Approval of temporary food truck service at 357 South Broadway YES ~
Present
Acceptance of April 14, 2026, meeting minutes UNCLEAR
Acceptance of April 28, 2026, meeting minutes UNCLEAR
Granting of one conditional Certificate of Occupancy for the existing Willow's Park units UNCLEAR
Conditional approval of Willow's Park site plan for 9 Hampshire Street UNCLEAR
Approval of Tuscan Village Block 1300 Whole Foods conditional use permit YES ~
Grant conditional approval for the Quick Stop Properties site plan YES ~
Accept the Solemi site plan (177 Main Street) as complete YES ~
Motion to continue the hearing for the 22-unit multi-family residential development YES ~
Approval of site plan exemption for 1 Northeastern Drive YES ~
Approval of temporary food truck service at 357 South Broadway YES ~
Chuck Saba
Member
Present
Acceptance of April 14, 2026, meeting minutes UNCLEAR
Acceptance of April 28, 2026, meeting minutes UNCLEAR
Granting of one conditional Certificate of Occupancy for the existing Willow's Park units UNCLEAR
Conditional approval of Willow's Park site plan for 9 Hampshire Street UNCLEAR
Approval of Tuscan Village Block 130

Positions marked ~ are inferred from context and may not reflect the member's explicitly stated position. UNCLEAR means the vote was split but the record did not name how this member voted — it is not a “yes.”

Public ⁠comment

What residents said — verbatim, with timestamps.
18
Total speakers
13
Addressed
3
Partial
2
Not addressed
Fred Foss
Addressed
The speaker is seeking clarification on the timeline for drainage work at the Hampshire Street property. He expressed concern that runoff has not been well maintained and has been a problem since 2008. Key concern
Drainage maintenance and work timeline
Board response
The Board chair asked if the speaker had a specific question and noted the engineer had addressed drainage previously; the applicant then clarified the work was imminent.
The applicant provided a timeline (within a week or two) and explained the scope of the work.
Steve Gullace
Addressed
The speaker expressed concern regarding historical flooding and debris on the property. He noted that previous attempts to fix the drainage failed and fears the current infill will cause water to flood his land. Key concern
Flooding and loss of privacy due to overgrowth
Board response
The Board directed the applicant to address the concerns; the applicant stated that removing the pavement and restoring the area should resolve the issue.
The applicant provided an explanation of how the remediation work is intended to resolve the flooding.
Chuck Saba
Addressed
The speaker expressed concerns regarding the size of the vehicle turnaround at the end of Morningstar Court. He questioned if the area was large enough for cars to turn around without backing out onto the street. Key concern
Inadequate vehicle turnaround space
Board response
The Planning Director informed the speaker that the fire department had reviewed the plan and determined the turnaround was sufficient.
The board provided a technical justification from the fire department regarding the design's sufficiency.
Unidentified speaker
Addressed
The speaker inquired about the speed of water runoff once the pavement is removed. He expressed concern that the water might pool in the newly dug area and spread to neighboring properties. Key concern
Rate of water runoff and potential pooling
Board response
The applicant explained that the wetland area is wide enough to handle the runoff and that they are restoring it to its pre-encroachment state.
The applicant addressed the hydrological concerns by explaining the capacity of the wetland buffer.
Joe Arlechance
Addressed
The speaker requested the release of at least one of the two remaining certificates of occupancy (CO). He argued that he is being unfairly penalized for an encroachment issue that the town has known about for years without taking action. Key concern
Request for partial release of Certificates of Occupancy
Board response
The Board debated the issue and ultimately voted to grant one conditional CO while withholding the other until remediation is complete.
The board reached a compromise that partially met the speaker's request.
Bill Nolan
Not addressed
The speaker shared his history with local flooding and noted the importance of maintaining drains to prevent cellar flooding. He clarified that he did not fill the land, but placed a hot tub on it. Key concern
Drainage and elevation management
Board response
The speaker's comments were heard as part of the public hearing regarding the Hampshire Street site plan.
The speaker provided testimony regarding his own property's history, but the board did not issue a specific directive or response to his personal history.
Unidentified speaker
Addressed
The speaker expressed appreciation that the Tuscan Village developer came for approval before installing banners, noting previous issues with unapproved signage. Key concern
Compliance with signage approval processes
Board response
The speaker's comment was an expression of support/appreciation and did not require a formal response.
The board acknowledged the comment by continuing the hearing.
Unidentified speaker
Addressed
The speaker asked whether the Epicurean signs are still up and if there would be an overlap in signage on the building with the proposed Whole Foods banners. Key concern
Signage overlap and location
Board response
The applicant stated they would clarify the installation timeline and potential overlap once more details are available from the tenant.
The applicant provided a response regarding the timeline and coordination of signs.
Sean Lewis
Addressed
The speaker thanked the planning department for providing the sign ratio analysis and noted that the signage was highly anticipated by the community. Key concern
Appreciation for staff technical analysis
Board response
The speaker's comment was an expression of appreciation and did not require a formal response.
The comment was acknowledged during the meeting.
Charlie Appelstein
Partial
The speaker raised serious concerns regarding the lack of proper notification to abutters during the initial zoning approval. He also requested a reduction in the number of proposed units due to traffic concerns and requested mandatory fencing and tree protection. Key concern
Lack of proper notification, traffic congestion, unit density, and landscaping/fencing protections
Board response
The board and staff discussed the notification process (noting it was a Zoning Board issue) and addressed the fencing and landscaping through various comments, but the plan was continued for further review rather than a decision on unit reduction.
The board addressed the notification issue (by delegating it to the ZBA's purview) and discussed the landscaping/fencing, but did not address the request to reduce unit count.
Unidentified speaker
Addressed
The speaker echoed concerns about landscaping, privacy, and fencing. She expressed concern about potential privacy issues due to the height of the new buildings and the proximity to her pool. Key concern
Privacy, landscaping, and fencing
Board response
The Board directed the applicant to address the setback, fencing, and landscaping in their presentation.
The applicant agreed to address these specific concerns in the subsequent discussion.
Peter Moen
Not addressed
The speaker argued that the lot size is too small for 22 units and expressed concern that traffic on Granite and Park Avenues will worsen significantly. Key concern
Traffic congestion and density
Board response
The speaker's comments were noted; the board later moved to continue the application for further study.
The speaker's specific concerns about density and local traffic were heard, but no immediate decision or mitigation was applied to the plan during this session.
Corey Garibian
Addressed
The speaker expressed concern about protecting his commercial grandfathered use at 179 Main Street. He requested a significant buffer or fence to protect his interests from the new development. Key concern
Protection of commercial interest/buffer requirements
Board response
The applicant and board discussed the need for buffers and the responsibilities of the developer to mitigate impacts.
The issue of buffering was discussed as a requirement for the project.
Unidentified speaker
Addressed
The speaker expressed significant anxiety regarding the cutting of trees near the property border. He requested to be notified before any tree clearing occurs to ensure no boundary disputes. Key concern
Tree removal notification and boundary protection
Board response
The applicant agreed to flag the property lines and notify the abutters before any tree clearing begins.
The applicant provided a direct commitment to the requested notification process.
Peter Malin
Addressed
The speaker questioned how the development would function without a turnaround for vehicles, specifically noting the difficulty for trash trucks and emergency services. Key concern
Lack of vehicle turnaround/maneuverability
Board response
The applicant and board discussed potential ways to enhance the turnaround area and the necessity of reviewing the plan with the fire department.
The board and applicant discussed potential design enhancements for maneuverability.
Unidentified speaker
Addressed
The speaker inquired about the specific plans for landscaping and fencing on the side of the property bordering her land. Key concern
Landscaping and fencing details
Board response
The staff and applicant discussed the potential for a fence and landscaping to provide a buffer.
The discussion included addressing the need for a visual and physical buffer.
Unidentified speaker
Partial
The speaker expressed skepticism regarding the traffic study, arguing that 22 three-bedroom units will generate much more traffic than the one car every five minutes estimated in the memo. Key concern
Inaccuracy of traffic generation estimates
Board response
The applicant explained the use of the ITE manual for estimations, and the board noted that a third-party analysis would be reviewed.
The applicant provided a technical explanation for their numbers, but the board's decision was to continue the application for further review.
Kendrick Dunn
Addressed
The speaker raised concerns about the impact of raising the site grade by eight feet, specifically fearing that it would cause his yard to flood. Key concern
Flooding due to grade changes
Board response
The applicant explained the drainage design, including stormwater chambers and the direction of water flow, noting it had been peer-reviewed.
The applicant provided technical drainage information to alleviate the fear of flooding.
Support coverage

Creating this report cost ⁠real money.

MeetingWatch attended, transcribed, and analyzed this meeting on its own dime. If this work is valuable to you, chip in to keep covering Salem.

Report composed by grok-4.3, gemma-4-26b, grok-4.20-0309-reasoning, grok-4-fast · analyzed 2026-06-22.