Planning Board — April 28, 2026
The meeting was professional and focused on technical administrative details and zoning compliance.
Public impact
Above the Bar Site Plan Change of Use
See more
The board discussed the necessity of reinstalling six ADA parking spaces to match approved standards and debated the correct zoning classification for impact fee purposes. There was a specific focus on whether the studio should be categorized as a 'health and fitness club' to ensure regulatory consistency.
The board accepted the site plan as complete, pending conditions regarding ADA compliance and parking.
The board will likely include specific conditions for occupancy related to lighting, parking, and ADA requirements.
Decisions logged
Topics discussed
▶ 03:04 Appointment of Planning Board Alternate
The board considered the appointment of Bob Gibbs to an alternate position on the Planning Board.
See more
The board discussed the term length for the alternate position. Member Bianca Carlson inquired if the position was limited to a two-year term, which Chairman Norcross confirmed.
The appointment of Bob Gibbs as an alternate for a two-year term was approved unanimously.
Mr. Gibbs will be sworn in to join the pool for future meetings.
▶ 04:48 Above the Bar Site Plan Public Hearing
A public hearing regarding a proposed change of use for a 4,125 square foot children's dance studio at 50A Northwestern Drive, Unit 4.
See more
The applicant, represented by Tara Aquilina, proposed converting an existing office/warehouse space into a dance studio with minimal exterior changes. Staff raised concerns regarding ADA compliance (reinstalling 6 spaces instead of the current 2), parking space dimensions, and site lighting for evening classes. There was also a discussion regarding the classification of the use for impact fee purposes (studio vs. health/fitness club) to ensure consistency with zoning ordinances.
The plan was accepted as complete. The board reviewed the proposal and staff recommendations regarding conditions for occupancy.
The board will likely include conditions for ADA compliance, site lighting, and parking specifications prior to occupancy.
Controversy & dissent
Potentially controversial issues
Above the Bar Site Plan Change of Use
Action items
Notable statements
Staff recommendation would be, certainly to reinstall the ADA spaces... if the board would act favorably on the plan, recommendation would be that that be addressed prior to occupancy. — Jacob LaFontaine · Discussing the discrepancy between the 1988 approved plan and current site conditions regarding ADA compliance. ▶ 08:08
I just want to make sure that we're being consistent... I just want to make sure that we're not putting ourselves in a position that we're calling it one thing in one application and in a different application. — Bianca Carlson · Questioning the classification of the dance studio as a 'health and fitness club' for impact fee purposes to avoid conflict with zoning permitted use tables. ▶ 14:02
Member positions
Positions marked ~ are inferred from context and may not reflect the member's explicitly stated position. UNCLEAR means the vote was split but the record did not name how this member voted — it is not a “yes.”
Public comment
Creating this report cost real money.
MeetingWatch attended, transcribed, and analyzed this meeting on its own dime. If this work is valuable to you, chip in to keep covering Salem.
Follow Salem
One email when a new report is published from the Planning Board — or one weekly digest.
grok-4.3, gemma-4-26b, grok-4.20-0309-reasoning, grok-4-fast · analyzed 2026-06-22.