Zoning Board of Adjustment — June 16, 2026
The meeting addressed a single variance request through standard discussion and closed with unanimous approval and no public opposition.
Decisions logged
Topics discussed
▶ 00:03 Variance Application for Otter Pond Beach Access Steps
Otter Pond Protective Association seeks variance to install four infiltration steps instead of the single permanent pathway allowed by ordinance, to reduce erosion and stormwater runoff into Otter Pond while maintaining public access.
See more
The board first addressed Steven Root's potential conflict due to his role with Ausmus Sargent Land Preservation Trust holding a conservation easement on the property; Root disclosed no pecuniary interest and declined to recuse, and the board accepted this. Stu Greer then presented the project details, noting 13 existing informal paths causing erosion on the 700-ft beach parcel, the use of NH DES-designed infiltration steps, water quality benefits for Otter Pond and Lake Sunapee, and arguments addressing the four variance criteria (public interest, ordinance spirit, substantial justice, and hardship due to the parcel's unique dimensions and unrestricted public access). Board members questioned the number of steps, maintenance, ADA compliance, and right-of-way issues.
Board confirmed all four variance criteria were met, particularly noting the project's alignment with water quality goals in the master plan and Clean Water Act. Variance approved without conditions after rejecting proposed conditions on right-of-way, maintenance risk, and ADA.
Controversy & dissent
Notable statements
The variance will not be contrary to public interest... not going to change the fundamental character of the neighborhood. — Chair · Confirming first variance criterion during discussion with applicant ▶ 12:15
The hardship criteria is met... easily satisfied by the unique nature of this parcel of property and its location. — Steven Root · Board discussion of variance criteria ▶ 34:45
Member positions
Positions marked ~ are inferred from context and may not reflect the member's explicitly stated position. UNCLEAR means the vote was split but the record did not name how this member voted — it is not a “yes.”
Public comment
Creating this report cost real money.
MeetingWatch attended, transcribed, and analyzed this meeting on its own dime. If this work is valuable to you, chip in to keep covering New London.
Follow New London
One email when a new report is published from the Zoning Board of Adjustment — or one weekly digest.
grok-4.3, grok-4.20-0309-reasoning · analyzed 2026-06-22.