Your area Not set — showing everywhere
Meeting report · Conservation Commission
Creating this report cost real money. Help fund coverage →

Conservation Commission — May 20, 2026

The meeting was primarily administrative and focused on routine updates, with only moderate discussion surrounding new land-use proposals.

Date Wednesday, May 20, 2026 Duration 1.6h Speakers 1 Public comments 1 Decisions 5 Routine

Questions about this meeting? ⁠Just ask.

Ask MeetingWatch answers from this meeting’s report, transcript, and records — with linked sources.

Summary AI-generated to surface controversy & community impact without bias — always verify against the actual meeting before relying on it.

During the May 20th Conservation Commission meeting, a new proposal for recreational land use was discussed that warrants community attention.

A mountain bike group is proposing the installation of a pump track and a small trail loop on Parcel 101003 (near the old landfill). While the proposal is framed as a family-oriented recreational project, the discussion brought several significant concerns to the forefront.

First, there are environmental questions regarding potential groundwater pollution given the site's proximity to the old landfill. Second, the Commission noted that current easements on the land may specifically restrict 'wheeled recreation,' creating a potential legal conflict.

As of now, the Commission has not approved the project. They have instead moved to request a formal design proposal from the group, which will then undergo subcommittee review. Residents should keep a close eye on this development to ensure that environmental protections and land-use laws are strictly upheld.

May 20, 2026 1.6h long 1 speakers 1 public comments 5 decisions Routine
Notable statements Drag to browse

“In some cases, people are talking on top of somebody else. So, we have to really remember raise our hand.”

— Unidentified speaker · Addressing meeting recording issues. ▶ 01:50

“We're pretty frugal. We shop pretty hard. And it seems that we spend our money quite wisely.”

— Unidentified speaker · Discussing the commission's management of its budget. ▶ 53:20

“Leadership of the committee is voted on every year... it is a formal step that is taken.”

— Jim · Discussing the regularity of electing a Chairperson. ▶ 1:03:54

“I think we need to try to build that relationship [with the bike people].”

— Unidentified speaker · Discussing the potential partnership with the mountain bike group. ▶ 1:15:30

“It sounds like a lot of it [Fish and Game budget] is self-funded from license fees.”

— Unidentified speaker · Discussing the funding model of the state Fish and Game department. ▶ 1:31:44
This meeting — choose a section

Public ⁠impact

Issues from this meeting with documented community impact.
What was discussed

Potential change in land use and environmental monitoring requirements for a specific parcel.

What happened

The commission decided not to commit to an architectural plan yet, instead requesting a formal design proposal from the group.

Topics ⁠discussed

Each topic expands to quotes and full context.
Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

The Chair addressed concerns regarding audio and video recording quality, specifically regarding microphone distance and members speaking over one another.

What happened

Members were reminded to stay within approximately 12 inches of the microphone and to raise hands to avoid talking over others.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker, Don Ostler, Rob, Michael Kennedy
What was discussed

The Commission discussed the retirement of Michael Gelcius and the appointment of Don Ostler as a full member.

What happened

The board discussed recognizing Michael Gelcius's service, with a suggestion to provide a signed card.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

A summary of the successful completion of the pollinator garden project was provided.

What happened

The garden was successfully completed using compost provided by DPW and designs/flowers from the Garden Club.

Speakers: Rob
What was discussed

Rob provided an update on current permit processing, specifically an ADU project on Lakeshore View Road.

What happened

The permit process is proceeding normally.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker, Bob, Sue, Jim, Michael Kennedy, Rob, Mark, David, Don
What was discussed

The Commission reviewed and voted on several sets of meeting minutes ranging from January to April.

What happened

Minutes for January 21, February 18, April 15, and April 30 were approved with various corrections.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker, Mark, Don Ostler
What was discussed

An update was given regarding the summer intern, Parker, and the expected workload.

What happened

The intern will follow a tentative schedule, with tasks defined in advance to ensure comfort and safety.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker, Mark
What was discussed

The Commission discussed the budget for knotweed control and upcoming trail projects.

What happened

The knotweed project is planned for the end of June/beginning of July. Skunk Hollow Trail flagging is scheduled for the first week of June.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker, Don Ostler, Bob
What was discussed

Discussion regarding the Ashuwillticook Wildlife Management Area, new easements, and potential forestry projects.

What happened

The annual monitoring visit is set for June 4. The board is considering whether to pursue a new forestry project.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker, Don Ostler, Jim, Bob
What was discussed

The Chair outlined the upcoming process for electing a new Chairperson and Vice-Chair.

What happened

Members are to submit recommendations by May 26.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker, Dave, Don Ostler, Bob, Grant, Josh
What was discussed

The Commission discussed potential mountain bike usage on various parcels, specifically parcel 101003, including a proposal for a pump track and small trail loop.

What happened

The commission agreed to invite the group to submit a formal design proposal rather than committing to a full architectural plan immediately.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

Review of the management and potential distribution of American chestnut seed nuts held by the commission.

What happened

The board is open to supporting interest in raising these trees, provided they can monitor their survival.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

Discussion on how to properly thank and potentially reimburse the source of special plants used in a recent garden project.

What happened

The board decided to investigate the cost and source of the plants to offer appropriate reimbursement or a donation.

Controversy & ⁠dissent

Where the board, the community, or the agenda diverged.

Potentially controversial issues

01

Mountain Bike Group Proposal (Parcel 101003)

The proposal for a pump track and trail loop involves potential land use changes and raises environmental concerns regarding groundwater pollution from a nearby old landfill and the presence of historical debris.
Board position: The board opted for a cautious approach, requesting a formal design proposal for subcommittee review rather than committing to an architectural plan.
medium concern

Split votes

Approval of January 21 meeting minutes
7-0 (with 1 abstention)
Approval of February 18 meeting minutes
3-0 (with 3 abstentions)
Approval of April 15 meeting minutes
4-0 (with 1 abstention and 1 non-vote)

Public ⁠comment

What residents said — verbatim, with timestamps.
1
Total speakers
1
Addressed
0
Partial
0
Not addressed
Unidentified speaker
Addressed
The speaker provided an update regarding permit processing and specific ongoing projects. They mentioned that a project involving an ADU and septic system for a resident named Deborah Hoover appears to be proceeding well with professional oversight. Key concern
Providing a status update on permit processing and specific project developments (notably the Hoover property).
Board response
A board member (implied by context) thanked the speaker for providing the update.
The speaker was providing an update/report rather than raising a grievance, and the board acknowledged and thanked them for the information.

Decisions ⁠logged

Every recorded vote, with timestamps and dissents.
Approval of January 21, 2026, meeting minutes (with edits).
Roll call vote: Sue (Yes), Bob (Yes), Jim (Yes), Michael Kennedy (Yes), Rob (Abstain), Mark (Yes), David (Yes), Don (Yes).
Approved
Approval of February 18, 2026, meeting minutes (with edits).
Roll call vote: Sue (Abstain), Bob (Yes), Jim (Yes), Michael Kennedy (Abstain), Robert Prohl (Ex-), Mark (Yes), Don (Abstain).
Approved
Approval of April 15, 2026, meeting minutes (with edits).
Roll call vote: Mark (Yes), Sue (Abstain), Bob (Yes), Jim (Yes), Michael (Not voting), Don (Yes).
Approved
Approval of April 30, 2026, meeting minutes (with edits).
Roll call vote: All Yes (including Michael Kennedy, Rob, Mark, Don).
Approved
Motion to adjourn the meeting.
Motion made by Rob and seconded.
Approved (unanimous)

Share ⁠this report

Drafts ready to post — click any block to copy.

X / Twitter — by angle

Highlighting a new land-use proposal with potential environmental risks.
At the 5/20 Conservation Commission meeting, the board discussed a new proposal for a mountain bike pump track and trail loop on Parcel 101003. Concerns were raised about groundwater pollution from a nearby old landfill... https://meetingwatch.org/nh/new-london/conservation-commission/2026-05-20/ #MeetingWatch #NewLondonNH
324/280 chars
Specific details on the mountain bike proposal and environmental concerns.
New land-use proposal: The New London Conservation Commission is reviewing a request for a mountain bike pump track near the old landfill. The board is currently requesting a design proposal to review potential impacts on... https://meetingwatch.org/nh/new-london/conservation-commission/2026-05-20/ #MeetingWatch #NewLondonNH
326/280 chars
Focusing on the specific legal and environmental hurdles of the proposal.
The New London Conservation Commission is discussing a proposal for mountain bike trails on Parcel 101003. Key issues raised: potential groundwater pollution from the old landfill and restrictive 'wheeled recreation'... https://meetingwatch.org/nh/new-london/conservation-commission/2026-05-20/ #MeetingWatch #NewLondonNH
321/280 chars

X thread

1
New land-use proposal alert: The New London Conservation Commission is discussing a potential mountain bike pump track and trail loop on Parcel 101003. Here is what residents need to know about the 5/20 meeting. 🧵 #MeetingWatch #NewLondonNH
240/280
2
The proposal involves a family-oriented pump track on a recently harvested tree farm parcel. However, the discussion raised two major red flags: the risk of groundwater pollution due to proximity to the old landfill, and existing easements that restrict 'wheeled recreation.'
275/280
3
The Commission has not committed to a plan yet. Instead, they are requesting a formal design proposal from the group for subcommittee review. This is a critical moment for residents to monitor how environmental safety and land easements are... https://meetingwatch.org/nh/new-london/conservation-commission/2026-05-20/
267/280

Facebook — long form

During the May 20th Conservation Commission meeting, a new proposal for recreational land use was discussed that warrants community attention. 

A mountain bike group is proposing the installation of a pump track and a small trail loop on Parcel 101003 (near the old landfill). While the proposal is framed as a family-oriented recreational project, the discussion brought several significant concerns to the forefront.

First, there are environmental questions regarding potential groundwater pollution given the site's proximity to the old landfill. Second, the Commission noted that current easements on the land may specifically restrict 'wheeled recreation,' creating a potential legal conflict. 

As of now, the Commission has not approved the project. They have instead moved to request a formal design proposal from the group, which will then undergo subcommittee review. Residents should keep a close eye on this development to ensure that environmental protections and land-use laws are strictly upheld. https://meetingwatch.org/nh/new-london/conservation-commission/2026-05-20/ #MeetingWatch #NewLondonNH

Action ⁠items

Who owes what, by when.
Handle ballots for the roll call votes.
Assigned: Michael Kennedy
Provide hard copy edits of minutes to Linda.
Assigned: Members
Confirm intern task descriptions via email to Parker.
Assigned: Mark
Order knotweed ground cloth and stakes.
Assigned: Mark · Due: End of June
Contact Leo Mashlin for forestry management plan for parcel 101003.
Assigned: Mark
Email nominations for Chair and statement of willingness to serve to the Chair.
Assigned: All Members · Due: 2026-05-26
Draft a letter to the mountain bike group requesting a rough design proposal for subcommittee review.
Assigned: a speaker
Clarify with the American Chestnut Foundation if there are restrictions on selling seed nuts.
Assigned: a speaker
Contact Leslie McGregor regarding the plant project to arrange acknowledgment or reimbursement.
Assigned: a speaker
Take over the responsibility of writing formal thank-you letters to donors.
Assigned: Rob
Collect log sheets and money from the bog; obtain the key from Bob.
Assigned: a speaker

Member ⁠positions

5 issues · 23 explicit · 7 inferred · 5 unclear
A split vote in this meeting was recorded without naming the dissenter (e.g. a voice vote). Members whose individual vote could not be confirmed are marked UNCLEAR below — this is not the same as a “yes.” Named votes will be filled in if official minutes record them.
Robert Brown
Chair
Present
Approval of January 21, 2026, meeting minutes YES
Approval of February 18, 2026, meeting minutes YES
Approval of April 15, 2026, meeting minutes YES
Approval of April 30, 2026, meeting minutes YES ~
Motion to adjourn the meeting YES ~
Michael Gelcius
Vice-Chair
Present
Approval of February 18, 2026, meeting minutes UNCLEAR
Sue Andrews
Member
Present
Approval of January 21, 2026, meeting minutes YES
Approval of February 18, 2026, meeting minutes ABSTAIN
Approval of April 15, 2026, meeting minutes ABSTAIN
Approval of April 30, 2026, meeting minutes YES ~
Jim Dexter
Member
Present
Approval of January 21, 2026, meeting minutes YES
Approval of February 18, 2026, meeting minutes YES
Approval of April 15, 2026, meeting minutes YES
Approval of April 30, 2026, meeting minutes YES ~
Present
Approval of January 21, 2026, meeting minutes YES
Approval of February 18, 2026, meeting minutes ABSTAIN
Approval of April 15, 2026, meeting minutes UNCLEAR
Approval of April 30, 2026, meeting minutes YES
Robert Prohl
Member
Present
Approval of February 18, 2026, meeting minutes UNCLEAR
Mark Vernon
Member
Present
Approval of January 21, 2026, meeting minutes YES
Approval of February 18, 2026, meeting minutes YES
Approval of April 15, 2026, meeting minutes YES
Approval of April 30, 2026, meeting minutes YES
David Hollinger
Alternate
Present
Approval of January 21, 2026, meeting minutes YES
Approval of February 18, 2026, meeting minutes UNCLEAR
Approval of April 15, 2026, meeting minutes UNCLEAR
Don Ostler
Alternate
Present
Approval of January 21, 2026, meeting minutes YES
Approval of February 18, 2026, meeting minutes ABSTAIN
Approval of April 15, 2026, meeting minutes YES
Approval of April 30, 2026, meeting minutes YES

Positions marked ~ are inferred from context and may not reflect the member's explicitly stated position. UNCLEAR means the vote was split but the record did not name how this member voted — it is not a “yes.”

Support coverage

Creating this report cost ⁠real money.

MeetingWatch attended, transcribed, and analyzed this meeting on its own dime. If this work is valuable to you, chip in to keep covering New London.

Report composed by gemma-4-26b, grok-4.3, grok-4-fast, grok-4.20-0309-reasoning · analyzed 2026-06-07.