Your area Not set — showing everywhere
Meeting report · Zoning Board of Adjustment
Creating this report cost real money. Help fund coverage →

Zoning Board of Adjustment — May 20, 2026

The meeting featured spirited testimony from neighbors opposing a specific variance, though the board remained unified in its decisions.

Date Wednesday, May 20, 2026 Duration 1.3h Speakers 1 Public comments 6 Decisions 6 Lively

Questions about this meeting? ⁠Just ask.

Ask MeetingWatch answers from this meeting’s report, transcript, and records — with linked sources.

Summary AI-generated to surface controversy & community impact without bias — always verify against the actual meeting before relying on it.

During the May 20 Zoning Board of Adjustment meeting, the Londonderry ZBA approved several variance requests that have neighbors raising questions about how 'hardship' is being defined in our community.

The most contentious decision involved 18 Racine Road. The Board voted to allow an 18-foot above-ground pool and deck to encroach 14 feet into the required 15-foot rear setback. Local neighbors spoke out in strong opposition, arguing that the request was based on personal convenience rather than a unique property hardship. Neighbors also pointed to a history of unauthorized terrain leveling at the property, which had previously resulted in a cease and desist order.

Despite these concerns regarding privacy, property values, and the applicant's history, the Board determined that the legal requirements for a variance were met and granted the request.

Additionally, the Board approved two 6-foot fence variances for 35 Sanborn Road and 2 Overlook Avenue, allowing them to encroach into front setbacks. While neighbors supported these for child safety reasons, it marks another instance of the Board adjusting established setback rules to accommodate specific resident needs.

May 20, 2026 1.3h long 1 speakers 6 public comments 6 decisions Lively
Notable statements Drag to browse

“The applicant has not demonstrated that the property cannot be reasonably used without the variance, nor that the request stems from conditions unique to the property rather than a general desire for convenience.”

— Mark Heggie · Formal opposition to the 18 Racine Road variance request. ▶ 23:23

“Having a fence would be very nice... [it is] for the safety of basically everyone... there's zero issues with the sightline because there's already... a tiny little forest of trees and some wetland.”

— Samantha Elliott · Testifying in favor of the applicant's fence request. ▶ 1:08:51

“Make sure we don't cut it too close because I'd rather have it so that [we don't] say the wrong dimension here.”

— Speaker A (Chair) · Discussing the difficulty of specifying exact foot measurements in the decision due to the presence of a tree near the proposed line. ▶ 1:14:18

“I ride a motorcycle... Getting out on that road is dangerous... [The fence] would be nice... because my dog's not as well-behaved.”

— Douglas · Testimony in favor of the 35 Sanborn Road fence variance. ▶ 1:17:27
This meeting — choose a section

Topics ⁠discussed

Each topic expands to quotes and full context.
Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

The Board Chair outlined the evening's meeting procedures and introduced the board members and staff.

What happened

The meeting was formally called to order and procedures were established.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker, Nick Cardner
What was discussed

The board reviewed and approved the minutes from the previous month and accepted the staff report regarding regional impacts.

What happened

Minutes were approved and the regional impact determination was accepted by motion.

Speakers: Raymond Blevins, Mark Heggie, Lori Heggie, Nick Cardner
What was discussed

A request for a variance to allow an 18-ft above-ground pool and associated deck to encroach 14 ft into the 15-ft rear setback.

What happened

The board deliberated on the five points of law and voted to grant the variance.

Speakers: Mike Kelly
What was discussed

A request for a variance to allow a 6-ft high fence to encroach 11 ft into the 40-ft front setback.

What happened

The board voted to grant the variance request.

Speakers: Danielle Courtemanche, Douglas, Samantha Elliott, Speaker A (Chair), Applicant
What was discussed

A request for a variance to allow a 6-ft fence in the 40-ft front setback.

What happened

The board deliberated on the five criteria for granting a variance and found that the request did not conflict with public interest, would not diminish surrounding properties, and would address a hardship. The motion to grant the variance was made and seconded, with all board members in favor.

Controversy & ⁠dissent

Where the board, the community, or the agenda diverged.

Potentially controversial issues

01

18 Racine Road Variance (Pool and Deck)

The request involves a significant setback encroachment (14 ft) and is opposed by neighbors who cite concerns over privacy, property values, and the applicant's history of unauthorized terrain leveling.
Board position: The board granted the variance, finding that the applicant met the five points of law.
high concern

Community vs. board tension

Public ⁠comment

What residents said — verbatim, with timestamps.
6
Total speakers
3
Addressed
1
Partial
2
Not addressed
Raymond Blevins
Addressed
The applicant is requesting a variance to install a permanent 18-ft above-ground pool and deck that would encroach 14 feet into the rear setback. He argues that the unique lot layout, existing house placement, and septic system make any other location on the property impossible. Key concern
Request for a variance to allow a pool/deck encroachment due to lot constraints and hardship.
Board response
The board asked several clarifying questions regarding the house's age, the property layout, the septic location, and whether a front-yard installation was possible.
The board engaged in a thorough Q&A regarding his specific hardships and technical constraints before deliberating and granting the request.
Mark and Lori Heggie
Partial
The neighbors formally oppose the variance, claiming it violates neighborhood character and lacks evidence of undue hardship. They also noted a prior history of encroachment by the applicant that resulted in a cease and desist order. Key concern
Opposition to the variance based on privacy, property value, and a pattern of prior encroachment.
Board response
The board did not respond directly to the letter's authors, but addressed the content during deliberations, specifically noting there was no evidence the property value would be diminished.
While the board didn't speak to the Heggies, they explicitly weighed their arguments (specifically regarding property value and hardship) during their formal deliberation.
Michael Kelly
Addressed
The applicant is requesting a variance to install a 6-foot high vinyl fence in the front yard setback to increase privacy and safety. He cited the need to protect his young children from heavy foot traffic from a nearby rail trail and apartment complexes. Key concern
Request for a 6-ft fence variance for family safety and privacy.
Board response
The board asked about the location of the apartment complexes and whether the fence would obstruct traffic visibility.
The board queried the specifics of his safety concerns and the impact on the right-of-way before granting the request.
Douglas
Not addressed
A neighbor expressed support for the fence, noting the dangerous nature of the road and the benefit of privacy for pets and residents. He also commented on the applicant's positive maintenance of the home. Key concern
Support for the fence due to road safety and privacy benefits.
The board did not directly respond to his specific comments, though they moved straight to deliberations.
Samantha Elliott
Not addressed
The applicant's sister spoke in favor, emphasizing the safety of her young children who play in the yard and the danger of speeding vehicles on the road. She also noted that the existing tree line would minimize the visual impact of the fence. Key concern
Support for the fence for child safety and noise/traffic reduction.
The board did not respond to her specific testimony.
Danielle Courtemanche
Addressed
The applicant is requesting a variance for a 6-foot fence in the front setback of a corner lot. She argued that current setback requirements would leave no usable yard due to her septic system and the presence of a large hill. Key concern
Request for a fence variance to allow usable yard space and privacy due to corner lot/septic constraints.
Board response
The board asked about the visibility/sightlines at the corner and the specific distance of the fence from the intersection.
The board addressed her concerns regarding public safety and visibility before granting the variance.

Decisions ⁠logged

Every recorded vote, with timestamps and dissents.
Approval of previous meeting minutes.
Motion made and seconded to approve last month's minutes.
Approved
Acceptance of Regional Impact Determinations.
Motion to accept the determination that none of the cases have regional impact.
Accepted
Case 5202026-1: Variance for 18 Racine Road (Pool/Deck).
Variance granted to allow an 18-ft above-ground pool and deck to encroach into the rear setback.
Granted
Case 5202026-2: Variance for 35 Sanborn Road (Fence).
Variance granted to allow a 6-ft high fence to encroach into the front setback.
Granted
Adjournment of the meeting.
Motion to adjourn was made, seconded, and passed unanimously.
Approved
Granting of variance request for case number 5202026-3.
The motion to grant the variance was made and seconded, with all board members in favor.
Approved

Share ⁠this report

Drafts ready to post — click a block to copy, or use Share to post it.

X / Twitter — by angle

Community concerns raised but dismissed
At the May 20 ZBA meeting, the Londonderry Board granted a variance for 18 Racine Road despite neighbor opposition citing privacy concerns and a prior cease and desist order for unauthorized terrain leveling on the... https://meetingwatch.org/nh/londonderry/zoning-board-of-adjustment/2026-05-20/ #MeetingWatch #LondonderryNH
325/280 chars
Prioritizing applicant convenience over neighbor testimony
Neighbors at the May 20 ZBA meeting argued that the 18 Racine Road pool request was about convenience, not legal hardship. The Board disagreed and granted the 14-ft setback encroachment anyway. #LocalGovernment #Accountability https://meetingwatch.org/nh/londonderry/zoning-board-of-adjustment/2026-05-20/ #MeetingWatch #LondonderryNH
334/280 chars
Summary of approved variances
Londonderry ZBA approved two 6-ft fence variances on May 20 (35 Sanborn Rd & 2 Overlook Ave), allowing them to encroach into front setbacks. Neighbors cited child safety and high traffic as the primary drivers for these... https://meetingwatch.org/nh/londonderry/zoning-board-of-adjustment/2026-05-20/ #MeetingWatch #LondonderryNH
330/280 chars

X thread

1
At the May 20 Londonderry ZBA meeting, the Board made several decisions that prioritized applicant requests over significant neighbor concerns—most notably regarding 18 Racine Road. 🧵 #MeetingWatch #LondonderryNH
212/280
2
Regarding 18 Racine Road: The Board granted a variance for a pool/deck to encroach 14 ft into the rear setback. Neighbors formally opposed this, citing property value concerns and a prior cease and desist order for unauthorized work on the lot.
244/280
3
The core of the tension: Neighbors argued the applicant failed to prove 'hardship' and was simply seeking convenience. The Board ultimately ruled the applicant met the legal criteria and granted the request regardless. #Londonderry https://meetingwatch.org/nh/londonderry/zoning-board-of-adjustment/2026-05-20/
255/280

Facebook — long form

During the May 20 Zoning Board of Adjustment meeting, the Londonderry ZBA approved several variance requests that have neighbors raising questions about how 'hardship' is being defined in our community.

The most contentious decision involved 18 Racine Road. The Board voted to allow an 18-foot above-ground pool and deck to encroach 14 feet into the required 15-foot rear setback. Local neighbors spoke out in strong opposition, arguing that the request was based on personal convenience rather than a unique property hardship. Neighbors also pointed to a history of unauthorized terrain leveling at the property, which had previously resulted in a cease and desist order.

Despite these concerns regarding privacy, property values, and the applicant's history, the Board determined that the legal requirements for a variance were met and granted the request. 

Additionally, the Board approved two 6-foot fence variances for 35 Sanborn Road and 2 Overlook Avenue, allowing them to encroach into front setbacks. While neighbors supported these for child safety reasons, it marks another instance of the Board adjusting established setback rules to accommodate specific resident needs. https://meetingwatch.org/nh/londonderry/zoning-board-of-adjustment/2026-05-20/ #MeetingWatch #LondonderryNH
Support coverage

Creating this report cost ⁠real money.

MeetingWatch attended, transcribed, and analyzed this meeting on its own dime. If this work is valuable to you, chip in to keep covering Londonderry.

Report composed by grok-4.3, gemma-4-26b, grok-4-fast, grok-4.20-0309-reasoning · analyzed 2026-06-07.