Your area Not set — showing everywhere
Meeting report · Town Council
Creating this report cost real money. Help fund coverage →

Town Council — April 20, 2026

The meeting included a failed investigation motion, a heated exchange regarding public comments on governance, and significant public testimony regarding the skate park.

Date Monday, April 20, 2026 Duration 4.3h Speakers 1 Public comments 5 Decisions 13 Lively

Questions about this meeting? ⁠Just ask.

Ask MeetingWatch answers from this meeting’s report, transcript, and records — with linked sources.

Summary AI-generated to surface controversy & community impact without bias — always verify against the actual meeting before relying on it.

At the April 20th Londonderry Town Council meeting, several issues surfaced that highlight a disconnect between resident concerns and council action.

First, the Council addressed social media conduct. Following reports of issues regarding how officials use social media, a motion to investigate an anonymous case was brought forward. The motion failed, with the Council opting for 'social media training' rather than a formal investigation into the reported conduct.

Second, the future of the local skate park is in jeopardy. Despite a significant turnout of residents arguing for the park's importance to youth mental health and community connection, the Council agreed that the current structures must be removed by the DPW due to safety and liability concerns. While the Recreation Department will report on future options, the immediate result is the loss of a community space.

Lastly, an amendment to previous minutes revealed concerns over financial transparency. Councilman Dan Bouchard noted he had previously voted against a tax collector contract because the 11.9% pay increase was not fully disclosed at the time of the vote, as only 5% had been suggested.

Stay tuned as we continue to track these developments and the upcoming PUD ordinance public hearing on May 18th.

Apr 20, 2026 4.3h long 1 speakers 5 public comments 13 decisions Lively
Notable statements Drag to browse

“Providing only one signature on letters that should be administrative is essentially an election nullification.”

— Paul Skelark · Regarding the Council's handling of citizen petition correspondence. ▶ 29:55

“The voters of Londonderry were clear... they want the oversight provided by the town treasurer and they want it to be independent.”

— John Farrell · Commenting on the Town Treasurer charter change. ▶ 17:02

“The structures have been determined to be unsafe by our insurer Primex... we have a risk pool that does that work.”

— Town Manager/Staff · Explaining why the skate park must be closed and dismantled. ▶ 1:21:48

“I think the community has to spend the money to do this right... we shouldn't take care of our town property that way.”

— Council Member (Art/Ted) · Discussing the need for long-term maintenance planning and funding for recreational facilities. ▶ 1:40:46

“The more detailed you are and in the more places you have what is expected of someone, the easier things flow.”

— Deb · Arguing that protections should be written into the ordinance rather than just in individual site plans. ▶ 2:10:40

“A PUD ordinance is only as strong as its definitions, requirements, and enforcement mechanisms.”

— Kelly · Presenting the necessity for the proposed ordinance overhaul. ▶ 2:34:20

“If we have to take a long time to press pause for more PUDs to be added so that the new ones we get are done correctly, let's get it right.”

— Kelly · Concluding remarks on the importance of the ordinance reform. ▶ 3:01:19

“The town should prefer development agreements to ensure developers, not taxpayers, are responsible for infrastructure like roads and drainage.”

— Tony Di Francesco · Discussing the advantages of PUDs over standard zoning. ▶ 3:17:05

“Disagreed with the March 30th vote on the tax collector contract because the approved 11.9% was not fully disclosed compared to the proposed 5%.”

— Dan · Requesting an amendment to the minutes. ▶ 3:58:14

“With those worst case scenarios, we fall $52,000 short of the entire revenue.”

— Town Manager · Clarifying the actual projected deficit versus the $4 million figure mentioned earlier. ▶ 4:05:12

“I do not sign things that I do not fully understand.”

— Council Member (unnamed in transcript, likely responding to petition) · Explaining why they had previously declined to sign certain documents/petitions. ▶ 4:17:53
This meeting — choose a section

Public ⁠impact

Issues from this meeting with documented community impact.
What was discussed

Significant changes to how planned unit developments are regulated and how infrastructure costs are allocated.

What happened

The council reached a consensus to move forward with the current draft rather than sending it back for further revisions.

What was discussed

Removal of current facilities due to safety and liability concerns.

What happened

The council agreed that the current unsafe structures must be removed by the DPW.

Topics ⁠discussed

Each topic expands to quotes and full context.
Speakers: Unidentified speaker, Ted Holmes, Ron Dunn, Dan Bouchard, Deb Paul
What was discussed

The Council discussed providing social media training for elected officials and a motion was brought to investigate an anonymous case.

What happened

The motion to move forward with the investigation failed following a roll call vote.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker, Mr. Combs
What was discussed

The Council held a proclamation to recognize National Small Business Week and a local business owner.

What happened

The proclamation was read to the Council and public.

Speakers: Captain Patrick Cheetham, Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

Captain Patrick Cheetham provided an update on the success of the second annual Bring Back the Trades Skills Expo.

What happened

The event was recognized as a success; Council members discussed potential future logistics like reserving additional parking lots.

Speakers: Kevin Smith
What was discussed

A resident expressed concern regarding potential public confusion over warrant articles related to the Meeting House and the Morrison House.

What happened

The comment was received during the public comment period.

Speakers: Tyler Vickery, Drew Hubbell, Christine Perez, Mark Daniel Bigger Jr., Martha Smith, Stephen Shepherd, Nick Halsoledo
What was discussed

Multiple residents spoke in support of preserving the local skate park, citing its community and mental health benefits.

What happened

A request was made for the Recreation Director to speak on the matter, which the Chair noted was on the agenda.

Speakers: Paul Skelark
What was discussed

A resident criticized the Council for not properly administering letters related to citizen petitions.

What happened

The resident requested further clarification on why the Council did not sign the letters.

Speakers: Linda Lampkin, Maryam Malik (via statement), Russell Legue, Hendrix (Library Board Chair)
What was discussed

The Council conducted interviews for several candidates for the Leach Library Board of Trustees.

What happened

The Council voted to nominate Miriam Malik to the Board of Trustees.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker, Leonardo Maya
What was discussed

The Council interviewed several candidates for various town boards and commissions.

What happened

Several candidates were successfully appointed to their respective boards.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

The Council held a public hearing to discuss and accept unanticipated revenue from New England HIDTA for the NIBIN program.

What happened

The Council approved the acceptance of the funds following a public hearing.

Speakers: Lynn Wiles, Marcus Smith
What was discussed

The Utilities Committee provided an update on the successful launch of the town's energy aggregation program.

What happened

The Council received the status update and was briefed on how residents can opt in or out.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker, Drew Appold, Doug
What was discussed

A resident presented a request for skate park renovations, leading to a discussion on safety and liability.

What happened

The Council agreed that the current unsafe structures must be removed by the DPW. They discussed the possibility of a future recreational complex or a new skate park, noting that a project of this scale ($400k-$800k) would likely require a warrant article.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

The council reviewed a report from the utilities committee regarding energy and water, noting the high number of solar homes in town.

What happened

The discussion concluded with thanks to the utilities committee members.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker, Ms. Karen, Deb, Shawn
What was discussed

Discussion regarding an MOU with Pillsbury Realty to address infrastructure and traffic issues caused by town growth.

What happened

The council voted 5-0 to authorize the MOU.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker, Chief, Ted, Dan
What was discussed

Request for funds to purchase a 3D imaging machine to replace an outdated system.

What happened

The council voted 5-0 to approve the expenditure from the police technology capital reserve fund.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker, Sean, Ted
What was discussed

Request to withdraw funds for upgrading video, audio, and live-streaming equipment in the council chambers.

What happened

The council voted 5-0 to approve the withdrawal of $33,872.76 (noted as a slight discrepancy from the $33,870.76 mentioned in the motion).

Speakers: Unidentified speaker, Justin, Kelly, Joe
What was discussed

A high-level review of town revenues and expenditures for the current fiscal year.

What happened

The update was presented and discussed; no formal vote was required.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker, Kelly, Deb, Shawn, Ron, Mr. Mulholland, Greg Carson, Ann Shampa, Tony Di Francesco, Jake, Sean
What was discussed

A detailed presentation on proposed revisions to the Planned Unit Development (PUD) ordinance and discussion of development agreements.

What happened

The discussion was part of a review process; no formal vote on the ordinance changes was recorded in this segment. The council reached a consensus to move forward with the new draft document.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker, Dan, Shawn, Ted
What was discussed

Review and amendment of the previous meeting's minutes and approval of the consent agenda.

What happened

The consent agenda was approved as amended.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

Reports from various community organizations including Londonderry Arts Council, Beautify Londonderry, and the Old Home Day committee.

What happened

Information shared for community awareness; no formal votes taken.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

The Town Manager addressed concerns regarding a potential revenue shortfall, clarifying the actual projected deficit.

What happened

The manager clarified the fiscal health of the town to prevent public panic.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

The Town Manager outlined the schedule for upcoming strategic plan workshops, public hearings, and budget discussions.

What happened

The council was briefed on the heavy schedule for May.

Speakers: Christine Perez, Tony DiFrancesco, Pascal Lark, Ron, Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

Citizens expressed frustration regarding transparency, civil liberties, and the conduct of council members on social media.

What happened

The council engaged in a heated exchange; one member stated they would address social media issues through education.

Controversy & ⁠dissent

Where the board, the community, or the agenda diverged.

Potentially controversial issues

01

Skate Park Preservation vs. Safety Liability

A group of residents argued the skate park is a vital community asset for youth mental health and social connection, while town administration and insurers cited safety risks due to rotting wood and rusted metal.
Board position: The board agreed that unsafe structures must be removed but acknowledged the community value and discussed potential future sites or a new complex.
high concern
02

Social Media Investigation

A motion was brought to investigate an anonymous case regarding social media usage, which suggests underlying concerns regarding how elected officials conduct themselves online.
Board position: The board declined to move forward with the investigation.
Internal dissent
The motion failed following a roll call vote with Ron Dunn voting 'Yes' and Dan Bouchard and Deb Paul voting 'No'.
medium concern
03

PUD Ordinance Revisions

Proposed changes aim to close 'loopholes' in development agreements, with debate over whether protections should be hardcoded into the ordinance or handled via individual site plans.
Board position: The council reached a consensus to move forward with the new draft document.
medium concern

Split votes

Motion to move forward with an investigation regarding an anonymous case received on 1/13/26.
Failed

Community vs. board tension

Public ⁠comment

What residents said — verbatim, with timestamps.
6
Speakers
6
Comments
0
Addressed
1
Partial
5
Not addressed
Unidentified speaker
Partial
The speaker questioned why a recent letter sent to the governor or state legislators only contained one signature. They requested clarification from Town Manager Mulholland on whether it is standard practice for such letters to lack the signatures of all councilors or selectmen. Key concern
Request for clarification on why a town letter to state officials only featured one signature and whether this is standard municipal practice.
Board response
A board member stated they would personally get back to the speaker with an answer.
The board did not answer the question immediately during the session, but a member committed to following up with the speaker personally.
Christine Perez
Not addressed
The speaker clarified that signing the town letter was a way to move it forward as a representative rather than an indication of personal agreement with its contents. They also commended young people for stepping up and taking ownership of their requests. Key concern
Clarifying the intent behind signing the town letter and supporting the youth involved in the skate park request.
The board did not provide a response to this comment.
Mark Daniel Bigger Jr.
Not addressed
The speaker shared personal stories about how the skate park provided a vital creative outlet and community space throughout his life. He urged the town to keep the skate park, noting its importance for children and community building. Key concern
Request to maintain the skate park due to its significant community and personal value.
The board did not provide a response to this comment.
Martha Smith
Not addressed
The speaker echoed previous comments regarding the intent of the town letter, suggesting it should represent the full spectrum of votes rather than just one. She also voiced her support for maintaining the skate park for the town's youth. Key concern
Support for the skate park and concern regarding the lack of signatures on the town's letter to state officials.
The board did not provide a response to this comment.
Stephen Shepherd
Not addressed
The speaker spoke in support of the skate park, highlighting how it provides a social outlet for kids who may not be interested in traditional sports. He expressed that removing the park would be upsetting to the community. Key concern
Support for keeping the skate park as a necessary outlet for diverse groups of children.
The board did not provide a response to this comment.
Nick Halsoledo
Not addressed
The speaker described how the skate park helped him build lifelong friendships and provided community for all walks of life. He suggested that if the park is to be removed, there should at least be a call to action or fundraising efforts first. Key concern
Request to avoid removing the skate park without community engagement or fundraising efforts.
The board did not provide a response to this comment.

Decisions ⁠logged

Every recorded vote, with timestamps and dissents.
Motion to move forward with an investigation regarding an anonymous case received on 1/13/26.
Roll call vote: Ted Holmes (Abstain), Ron Dunn (Yes), Dan Bouchard (No), Deb Paul (No). The motion failed.
Failed
Nomination of Miriam Malik to the Leach Library Board of Trustees.
A motion was made by Ted Holmes and seconded by Shawn Mulholland. The vote was 5-0.
Approved (5-0)
Appointment of Ariana Macquarrie to the Zoning Board of Adjustment (ZBA).
Motion by Shawn, seconded by Dan.
5-0
Appointment of Bob Corning to the Recreation Commission.
Motion by Dan, seconded by Deb. Bob was noted as being unable to attend the meeting.
5-0
Appointment of Jennifer and Karen to Beautify Londonderry positions.
Motion by Dan, seconded by Shawn.
5-0
Acceptance of unanticipated revenue from New England HIDTA for the NIBIN program.
Following the opening and closing of the public hearing, the motion to receive funds was approved.
4-0
Authorize the Town Manager to execute a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with Pillsbury Realty.
The MOU provides a framework for addressing infrastructure and traffic issues in the Pillsbury Road corridor.
5-0 (Affirmative)
Approve Order 2026-08: Expenditure of $53,504.69 from the Police Equipment and Technology Capital Reserve Fund for a Faro 3D imaging machine.
Funds are used to replace an outdated 14-year-old system.
5-0 (Affirmative)
Approve Order 2026-09: Withdrawal of $33,872.76 from the Cable Equipment Reserve Fund for control room/AV equipment.
Funds are sourced from franchise fee money to improve video and audio quality for town meetings.
5-0 (Affirmative)
Approval of March 30th minutes as amended by Dan regarding the tax collector contract vote.
The amendment ensures the record reflects Dan's dissent regarding the disclosure and terms of the contract.
5-0 (Affirmative)
Approval of the consent agenda.
Approved as amended.
5-0 (Affirmative)
Approval of an amended motion.
A motion made by Shawn and seconded by Ted was passed as amended.
5-0
Motion to adjourn the meeting.
A roll call vote was taken to adjourn pursuant to 91A:3.
Unanimous (5-0)

Share ⁠this report

Drafts ready to post — click any block to copy.

X / Twitter — by angle

Board decision to avoid investigation of official conduct
At the 4/20 Town Council meeting, a motion to investigate an anonymous case regarding social media conduct failed. While one member supported the investigation, the Council chose to address the issue through 'education'... https://meetingwatch.org/nh/londonderry/town-council/2026-04-20/ #MeetingWatch #LondonderryNH
316/280 chars
Dismissal of community concerns regarding youth assets
Londonderry's skate park is being dismantled. Despite heavy resident testimony on its mental health benefits for youth, the Council agreed to remove the structures due to safety/liability concerns. A report on future... https://meetingwatch.org/nh/londonderry/town-council/2026-04-20/ #MeetingWatch #LondonderryNH
313/280 chars
Internal lack of disclosure regarding financial contracts
Transparency check: Councilman Dan Bouchard requested an amendment to the 3/30 minutes to clarify he voted against a tax collector contract because the actual 11.9% pay increase was not fully disclosed to the board... https://meetingwatch.org/nh/londonderry/town-council/2026-04-20/ #MeetingWatch #LondonderryNH
311/280 chars

X thread

1
Londonderry Town Council meeting recap (4/20): Tension rose as residents challenged the Council on governance, transparency, and the future of local community assets. Here is what you missed. 🧵 #MeetingWatch #LondonderryNH
222/280
2
First, the Council declined to investigate an anonymous report regarding social media issues. Rather than a formal inquiry, the response was to focus on 'training' and 'education' for elected officials. #Londonderry
215/280
3
Second, the skate park is going away. Residents argued the park is vital for youth, but the Council agreed to have the DPW remove the structures due to insurance/safety risks. The town is now looking into much more expensive future options.
240/280
4
Finally, transparency concerns surfaced regarding a past vote. Councilman Bouchard moved to amend minutes to show he dissented from a tax collector contract specifically because the 11.9% pay increase wasn't fully disclosed during the vote. 🧵 https://meetingwatch.org/nh/londonderry/town-council/2026-04-20/
266/280

Facebook — long form

At the April 20th Londonderry Town Council meeting, several issues surfaced that highlight a disconnect between resident concerns and council action.

First, the Council addressed social media conduct. Following reports of issues regarding how officials use social media, a motion to investigate an anonymous case was brought forward. The motion failed, with the Council opting for 'social media training' rather than a formal investigation into the reported conduct.

Second, the future of the local skate park is in jeopardy. Despite a significant turnout of residents arguing for the park's importance to youth mental health and community connection, the Council agreed that the current structures must be removed by the DPW due to safety and liability concerns. While the Recreation Department will report on future options, the immediate result is the loss of a community space.

Lastly, an amendment to previous minutes revealed concerns over financial transparency. Councilman Dan Bouchard noted he had previously voted against a tax collector contract because the 11.9% pay increase was not fully disclosed at the time of the vote, as only 5% had been suggested. 

Stay tuned as we continue to track these developments and the upcoming PUD ordinance public hearing on May 18th. https://meetingwatch.org/nh/londonderry/town-council/2026-04-20/ #MeetingWatch #LondonderryNH

Action ⁠items

Who owes what, by when.
Provide follow-up regarding the citizen petition letter signatures and administrative procedures.
Assigned: Town Manager Shawn Mulholland · Due: Next meeting/end of public session
Conduct social media training for elected officials.
Assigned: Council/Administration
Begin removal of unsafe skate park structures once scheduled.
Assigned: DPW · Due: As soon as possible
Assess existing property and produce a report on recreational options/plans.
Assigned: Recreation Department
Execute the MOU for Pillsbury Realty.
Assigned: Town Manager
Complete the scope and pricing for the Pillsbury Road corridor study.
Assigned: HTA / Engineers
Send the Supreme Court ruling regarding MOUs and development agreements to Deb.
Assigned: Shawn
Schedule and notice the public hearing for the PUD ordinance draft.
Assigned: Town Staff · Due: May 18th
Meet with the Chairman of the Budget Committee and staff to look at a combined schedule for the FY 2026 budget process.
Assigned: Town Manager and Chairman Dunn · Due: Not specified
Support coverage

Creating this report cost ⁠real money.

MeetingWatch attended, transcribed, and analyzed this meeting on its own dime. If this work is valuable to you, chip in to keep covering Londonderry.

Report composed by grok-4.3, gemma-4-26b, grok-4-fast, grok-4.20-0309-reasoning · analyzed 2026-07-10.