Your area Not set — showing everywhere
Meeting report · Planning Board
Creating this report cost real money. Help fund coverage →

Planning Board — June 16, 2026

While residents raised specific environmental and safety concerns, the board remained unified and engaged in constructive technical discussions with applicants.

Date Tuesday, June 16, 2026 Duration 1.8h Speakers 26 Public comments 3 Decisions 7 Routine
Site plan map displayed on projector screen Video still
Site plan map displayed on projector screen Frame from meeting video ▶ 06:20

Questions about this meeting? ⁠Just ask.

Ask MeetingWatch answers from this meeting’s report, transcript, and records — with linked sources.

Summary AI-generated to surface controversy & community impact without bias — always verify against the actual meeting before relying on it.

Transparency Alert: At the June 16 Hollis Planning Board meeting, officials moved into discussions regarding significant updates to town ordinances that were not included on the public agenda.

Specifically, the Board discussed potential changes to open space and woodland preservation ordinances, including how the town handles tree preservation and clear-cutting. Because these topics were not listed on the agenda, residents were not given the opportunity to prepare for or participate in a discussion that could fundamentally change the rural character of our community.

Furthermore, concerns regarding the Ridge Road Minor Subdivision remain a point of tension. During the meeting, neighbors expressed serious fears regarding PFAS contamination, septic runoff into drinking wells, and the protection of local wildlife like Blanding's turtles. While the Board accepted the application for further processing, they did not mandate the specific test pits requested by residents to verify soil-to-bedrock depth before the next meeting on July 21.

We will continue to monitor how these ordinance changes are proposed and whether the Board will address the specific environmental safety requests made by the community.

Jun 16, 2026 1.8h long 26 speakers 3 public comments 7 decisions Routine
Notable statements Drag to browse

“I'm sure the Carbet Lane situation will be very on every member's mind when we do get into the hydrologic study.”

— Bill Moseley · Warning the applicant/board about potential local water concerns during the review of the Tidy Brook Estates well tests. ▶ 11:22

“It looks like a whole bunch of hot tub filters jammed inside the hole there.”

— Julie Mook · Describing the appearance of the 'jellyfish' proprietary stormwater filter manhole proposed for the Lone Pine Lane project. ▶ 43:26

“Expressed concern that septic drainage from the proposed site could contaminate his potable well due to the site's granite geology and slope.”

— Dr. Peter Zemek · Public comment from an abutter regarding the Ridge Road subdivision. ▶ 1:16:53

“Emphasized that the best way to ensure compliance is to have requirements (like tree locations) explicitly documented on the official plans.”

— Kevin Anderson · Discussing how to prevent developers from clear-cutting before or during development. ▶ 1:43:00
This meeting — choose a section

Public ⁠impact

Issues from this meeting with documented community impact.
What was discussed

Potential changes to tree preservation, clear-cutting, and rural character protections.

What happened

The board agreed to seek staff guidance on how to approach potential ordinance changes.

Topics ⁠discussed

Each topic expands to quotes and full context.
Speakers: Bill Moseley, Doug Cleveland, Aurelia Perry, Virginia Mills, Rick Hardy, Ben Ming, Mike Leavitt, Julie Mook, David Petry
What was discussed

The board reviewed and approved the minutes from the May 19, 2026, meeting.

What happened

The minutes were approved by a unanimous roll call vote.

Speakers: Bill Moseley, Kevin Anderson, Chad Brannon
What was discussed

A continued discussion regarding a proposed 36-acre development of affordable housing for older persons on Silver Lake Road.

What happened

The board voted to continue the case to the July 21st meeting.

Speakers: Bill Moseley, Kevin Anderson, Chad Brannon, Roy Tillsley
What was discussed

A continued discussion regarding a 35-home residential subdivision connecting Deacon Lane and Proctor Hill.

What happened

The board voted to continue the case to the July 21st meeting.

Projector screen displaying site layout map Video still
Projector screen displaying site layout map ▶ 51:51
Speakers: Bill Moseley, Kevin Anderson, Brad Casperson, Julie Mook
What was discussed

A design review for a 10-lot subdivision on a portion of a 93.6-acre site.

What happened

The board agreed to a site walk to better understand the terrain and requested the applicant explore more conventional stormwater methods.

Site plan diagram shown on meeting room screen Video still
Site plan diagram shown on meeting room screen ▶ 47:07
Speakers: Bill Moseley, Kevin Anderson, Michael Seckles, Jeff Owen
What was discussed

An application acceptance and public hearing for a ground-mount solar array at 6 Broad Street.

What happened

The application was approved with a stipulation that staff verify the Historic District Commission (HDC) has reviewed and approved the project. The board reached consensus that a sidewalk is not required.

Detailed site plan map on projector screen Video still
Detailed site plan map on projector screen ▶ 1:21:13
Speakers: Bill Moseley, Kevin Anderson, Brad Casperson
What was discussed

An application for acceptance and final review of a three-lot minor subdivision on Ridge Road by Cutter Place Properties LLC.

What happened

The application was accepted for further processing but continued to allow submission of additional details.

Speakers: Kevin Anderson, Julie Mook
What was discussed

Planning staff provided updates on vacant parcel analysis and initiated discussions on potential updates to the open space and woodland preservation ordinances.

What happened

The board agreed to look for guidance from staff on how to approach ordinance changes.

Speakers: Kevin Anderson, Doug Cleveland
What was discussed

A brief update regarding the finalization of a pending subdivision matter.

What happened

The process is nearing completion pending DPW consultation.

Controversy & ⁠dissent

Where the board, the community, or the agenda diverged.

Potentially controversial issues

01

Ridge Road Minor Subdivision Environmental and Safety Concerns

Abutters raised significant concerns regarding groundwater contamination (PFAS), septic runoff into potable wells, wildlife (vernal pools/Blanding's turtles), and traffic safety.
Board position: The board accepted the application for further processing but continued the case to allow for more detailed submissions regarding landscaping and driveway profiles.
high concern
02

Lone Pine Lane Subdivision Stormwater Management

The board questioned the use of a proprietary 'jellyfish' filter versus more conventional stormwater methods, such as utilizing a cul-de-sac as a pond.
Board position: The board requested the applicant explore more conventional methods and scheduled a site walk to inspect the terrain.
medium concern

Community vs. board tension

Public ⁠comment

What residents said — verbatim, with timestamps.
3
Speakers
3
Comments
1
Addressed
2
Partial
0
Not addressed
Jeff Owen
Addressed
The speaker expressed confusion regarding the visual scale and layout of the proposed solar array. He noted that the information available on the town and planning board websites was not clear enough to determine what the project would look like. Key concern
Request for clearer visual information/sketches regarding the size and layout of the solar panels.
Board response
The Board Chair requested the applicant to provide more specific details. The staff then provided specific dimensions (40ft x 15ft), height (11.2ft), and an explanation of the A-frame slope to clarify the layout.
The board and staff directly addressed the need for clarity by providing specific dimensions and explaining the orientation and height of the panels.
Dr. Peter Zemek
Partial
The speaker raised concerns about the unique topography of the site, noting that it sits on a granite outcrop with shallow soil. He expressed fear that septic runoff, potentially containing PFAS, could flow downhill into his pond and potable well. Key concern
Request for test pits to be dug to determine soil-to-bedrock depth and ensuring proper septic treatment to prevent groundwater contamination.
Board response
The board did not provide a direct ruling on the request for test pits during this session, but the application was accepted with a stipulation that staff verify HDC review. The concern was noted during the discussion of the case.
While the board acknowledged the comment and the applicant provided a rebuttal regarding existing test pits, the board did not mandate new test pits as requested by the speaker before approving the application acceptance.
Catherine McConaill
Partial
The speaker highlighted the presence of vernal pools and potential Blanding's turtle habitat on the site. She also expressed concern regarding traffic safety, suggesting that the 85th percentile speed rule should be considered for the common driveway due to high speeds on the road. Key concern
Concerns regarding wildlife habitat (vernal pools/turtles) and the need for a traffic study that accounts for actual driving speeds.
Board response
The applicant provided a rebuttal stating that wildlife studies had been conducted and found no vernal pools. The board moved to approve the application acceptance with a stipulation regarding HDC verification.
The applicant addressed the wildlife concerns with study results, and the board accepted the application, but the specific request for a traffic study adhering to the 85th percentile rule was not explicitly resolved in the board's decision to accept the application.

Decisions ⁠logged

Every recorded vote, with timestamps and dissents.
Approval of the Planning Board minutes from May 19, 2026.
The minutes were approved as presented.
Unanimous (Aye)
Continuation of case PB2022-015 (Tidy Brook Estates) to July 21, 2026.
The case is extended to the next regular meeting.
Unanimous (Aye)
Continuation of case PB2025-011 (Abbott Hill Estates) to July 21, 2026.
The case is extended to the next regular meeting.
Unanimous (Aye)
Continuation of case PB2026-005 (Lone Pine Lane) to July 21, 2026.
The case is extended to the next regular meeting.
Unanimous (Aye)
Approval of case PB2026-007 (Congregational Church Solar Array) with stipulation.
Approved with the stipulation that staff verify the Historic District Commission (HDC) has adequately reviewed/approved the project. The board also reached consensus that a sidewalk is not required.
Unanimous (Aye)
Acceptance of application PB2026-008 (Ridge Road Subdivision).
The application was accepted, but the hearing was continued to July 21, 2026.
Unanimous (Aye)
Continuation of PB2026-008 to July 21, 2026.
The case is continued to allow for the submission of the common driveway profile and landscaping plans.
Unanimous (Aye)

Share ⁠this report

Drafts ready to post — click any block to copy.

X / Twitter — by angle

OFF-AGENDA CONTROVERSIAL DECISIONS
At the June 16 Planning Board meeting, officials discussed potential updates to open space and woodland preservation ordinances. These changes weren't on the public agenda, yet they could impact how Hollis manages tree... https://meetingwatch.org/nh/hollis/planning-board/2026-06-16/ #MeetingWatch #HollisNH
307/280 chars
Community concerns raised but dismissed or ignored
Ridge Road Subdivision: Residents raised serious concerns at the June 16 meeting regarding PFAS contamination, septic runoff into wells, and wildlife impact. The Board accepted the application but has not yet mandated the soil... https://meetingwatch.org/nh/hollis/planning-board/2026-06-16/ #MeetingWatch #HollisNH
315/280 chars
OFF-AGENDA CONTROVERSIAL DECISIONS
Hollis Planning Board Update (6/16): The Board is considering new ordinance language for tree preservation and clear-cutting. While analyzing 240 vacant parcels, they moved to discuss zoning changes that weren't listed on the... https://meetingwatch.org/nh/hollis/planning-board/2026-06-16/ #MeetingWatch #HollisNH
314/280 chars

X thread

1
Hollis Planning Board transparency alert: At the June 16 meeting, significant discussions occurred regarding zoning ordinance updates and woodland preservation that were not listed on the public agenda. 🧵 #MeetingWatch #HollisNH
228/280
2
The Board discussed potential changes to how Hollis handles tree preservation, clear-cutting, and rural character. These decisions affect every property owner in town, yet residents weren't given prior notice to prepare for this specific discussion.
249/280
3
Additionally, during the Ridge Road Subdivision review, neighbors raised alarms about PFAS contamination and septic runoff hitting potable wells. The Board accepted the application for processing but did not mandate the soil-to-bedrock test pits requested by residents.
269/280
4
When the rules governing our town's landscape are discussed off-agenda, residents lose their ability to participate effectively. Stay tuned as we track these ordinance changes. https://meetingwatch.org/nh/hollis/planning-board/2026-06-16/
200/280

Facebook — long form

Transparency Alert: At the June 16 Hollis Planning Board meeting, officials moved into discussions regarding significant updates to town ordinances that were not included on the public agenda. 

Specifically, the Board discussed potential changes to open space and woodland preservation ordinances, including how the town handles tree preservation and clear-cutting. Because these topics were not listed on the agenda, residents were not given the opportunity to prepare for or participate in a discussion that could fundamentally change the rural character of our community.

Furthermore, concerns regarding the Ridge Road Minor Subdivision remain a point of tension. During the meeting, neighbors expressed serious fears regarding PFAS contamination, septic runoff into drinking wells, and the protection of local wildlife like Blanding's turtles. While the Board accepted the application for further processing, they did not mandate the specific test pits requested by residents to verify soil-to-bedrock depth before the next meeting on July 21.

We will continue to monitor how these ordinance changes are proposed and whether the Board will address the specific environmental safety requests made by the community. https://meetingwatch.org/nh/hollis/planning-board/2026-06-16/ #MeetingWatch #HollisNH

Action ⁠items

Who owes what, by when.
Submit landscaping plan, address drainage/catch basin comments, and coordinate with fire/police departments regarding department memos for Abbott Hill Estates.
Assigned: Chad Brannon (Fieldstone Land Consultants) · Due: July 21, 2026
Stake out the center line of the road, lot corners, remediation area, and right-of-way homestead for the Lone Pine Lane site walk.
Assigned: Brad Casperson (Mergian Land Services) · Due: July 21, 2026
Verify HDC approval for the Congregational Church solar array.
Assigned: Planning Department Staff
Notice the site walk for Lone Pine Lane.
Assigned: Planning Department Staff · Due: July 21, 2026
Submit complete plan and profile for the common driveway and detailed landscaping plans for Ridge Road subdivision.
Assigned: Brad Casperson (Applicant) · Due: 2026-07-21
Draft a memo to the Planning Board regarding ZBA concerns for a potential joint session.
Assigned: Julie Mook · Due: Next ZBA meeting
Provide guidance/recommendations to the board on approaching zoning ordinance changes.
Assigned: Kevin Anderson

Member ⁠positions

8 issues · 1 explicit · 7 inferred
Bill Moseley
Chairman
Present
Approval of Meeting Minutes YES ~
PB2022-015: Tidy Brook Estates Final Review YES ~
PB2025-011: Abbott Hill Estates Final Review YES ~
PB2026-005: Lone Pine Lane Subdivision Design Review YES ~
PB2026-007: Congregational Church Solar Array Final Review YES ~
PB2026-008: Ridge Road Minor Subdivision YES ~
Doug Cleveland
Vice Chairman
Present
Approval of Meeting Minutes YES ~
Subdivision Update
Present
Approval of Meeting Minutes YES ~
Present
Approval of Meeting Minutes YES ~
Present
Approval of Meeting Minutes YES ~
PB2026-005: Lone Pine Lane Subdivision Design Review YES
Questioned the 'jellyfish' filter, comparing it to hot tub filters.
Master Plan and Zoning Ordinance Updates
Discussed potential updates to open space and woodland preservation ordinances.
Present
Approval of Meeting Minutes YES ~
David Petry
Ex-Officio (Select Board Rep)
Present
Approval of Meeting Minutes YES ~
Richard Hardy
Alternate
Present
Approval of Meeting Minutes YES ~
Victor Orlando
Alternate
Absent

Positions marked ~ are inferred from context and may not reflect the member's explicitly stated position. UNCLEAR means the vote was split but the record did not name how this member voted — it is not a “yes.”

Accountability ⁠flags

Documented procedural gaps. Each item links to its source.

Agenda items not discussed

Topics discussed — not on agenda

Support coverage

Creating this report cost ⁠real money.

MeetingWatch attended, transcribed, and analyzed this meeting on its own dime. If this work is valuable to you, chip in to keep covering Hollis.

Report composed by grok-4.3, gemma-4-26b, grok-4-fast, grok-4.20-0309-reasoning · analyzed 2026-07-08.