Your area Not set — showing everywhere
Issue · Holderness, NH

Master Plan Survey Bias and Re-Survey

Initial survey results questioned because postcards may have reached only non-resident property owners, prompting a more expensive re-survey via first-class mailing.

Overview

The issue arose when the initial Master Plan survey appeared to exclude residents by mailing only to non-resident property owners, prompting calls for a re-survey. The Select Board approved resending costs on 2026-04-20, after which the Planning Board voted twice to conduct a first-class mailing to 1,133 addresses and pause the Land Use chapter.

Background

The Master Plan Survey Bias and Re-Survey issue originated at the Select Board meeting on 2026-04-20 when Mike Salmon requested funding to resend postcards after the initial mailing was lost by USPS, noting a disparity in resident versus non-resident participation.

This request led directly to the Planning Board meeting on 2026-04-21, where members debated that the original survey sent postcards only to non-resident property owners, excluding residents and skewing results toward non-resident input.

M. Salmon and others argued the approach lacked credibility and fairness, prompting a vote to re-open the survey with a first-class saturation mailing to 1,133 addresses and to place the Land Use chapter on hold pending new results.

The same concerns were revisited at the Planning Board meeting on 2026-05-19, where the board again voted to conduct the re-survey with a three-week response window via mailed QR code or link to ensure broader resident participation.

Tara Bamforth countered that response patterns aligned with professional expectations, but the board prioritized inclusivity over the initial data.

The re-survey decision means the Land Use chapter remains paused until the new results are analyzed for meaningful differences.

All residents are affected because the Master Plan sets long-term land use and infrastructure priorities.

How it unfolded
Mike Salmon requested approval for funding to resend Master Plan survey postcards, citing USPS loss of prior mailing and disparity in resident versus non-resident responses; board approved expense of $946.54.
2026-04-20Select Board
Board debated initial survey's exclusion of residents via non-resident-only postcards; voted 7 – Yes, 0 – No to re-open survey via first-class saturation mailing to 1,133 addresses and hold Land Use chapter.
2026-04-21Planning Board
Board revisited survey validity concerns over lack of resident input; voted 7 – Yes, 0 – No to re-open via first-class mailing to 1,133 addresses with three-week QR code response window and hold Land Use chapter.
2026-05-19Planning Board
Arguments in favor
Initial survey lacked resident input because postcards were sent only to non-resident property owners.
planning-board 2026-04-21
For
The mailing process may have excluded residents, undermining credibility and fairness of results.
planning-board 2026-05-19
For
A full re-survey via first-class saturation mailing is needed to capture resident views accurately.
planning-board 2026-04-21
For
Arguments against
Response patterns remained consistent with professional expectations despite the mailing method.
planning-board 2026-04-21
Against
Patterns were consistent with professional expectations, so re-survey may not be necessary.
planning-board 2026-05-19
Against
Key voices
“Requested approval to resend postcards because previous mailing lost by USPS and current responses show disparity between resident and non-resident participation.”
Mike Salmonselect-board 2026-04-20
“Suggested the patterns were consistent with professional expectations.”
Tara Bamforthplanning-board 2026-05-19
What's next

A new survey period will occur, giving residents approximately three weeks to respond via a mailed QR code/link; the Land Use chapter remains on hold until results are analyzed.