Your area Not set — showing everywhere
Meeting report · Select Board
Creating this report cost real money. Help fund coverage →

Select Board — May 5, 2026

The meeting was characterized by serious debate over fiscal management and public skepticism regarding budget accuracy, though it remained professional and collaborative.

Date Tuesday, May 5, 2026 Duration 1.6h Speakers 37 Public comments 9 Decisions 2 Lively

Questions about this meeting? ⁠Just ask.

Ask MeetingWatch answers from this meeting’s report, transcript, and records — with linked sources.

Summary AI-generated to surface controversy & community impact without bias — always verify against the actual meeting before relying on it.

During the May 5 Select Board meeting, several critical fiscal issues were discussed that will directly impact Goffstown taxpayers.

One of the most significant points of tension involved the accuracy of our town budget. There is growing concern—raised during the meeting—that department heads may be 'inflating' line items to ensure they have enough funding to cover unexpected costs. While the Board provided technical explanations for their process, this practice directly impacts the 'default budget.' For residents, a higher default budget means a higher baseline for taxes if the town fails to pass an operating budget.

Additionally, the Board is exploring new revenue models to bridge the gap between Goffstown and wealthier neighboring towns. This includes the potential implementation of 'directed fees' to fund specific municipal services. This shift could change how residents pay for the services they use.

Finally, the Board addressed rising costs in the Fire Department. Officials noted that Goffstown is often used as a 'training ground,' where firefighters gain experience before moving to larger municipalities, leading to high overtime costs to fill vacancies. We will continue to monitor how the Board balances these service needs with the need for fiscal responsibility.

May 5, 2026 1.6h long 37 speakers 9 public comments 2 decisions Lively
Notable statements Drag to browse

“I would like us all to feel comfortable enough to say whatever you want to say... if you have some suggestions on how we can make it better.”

— Jim Craig · Setting the tone for a collaborative joint meeting. ▶ 02:14

“I would like to make the suggestion that we have a meeting like this every quarter, not just one meeting and move on.”

— Mark Lemay · Proposing a way to prevent future disjointedness. ▶ 06:25

“I'll be on record as saying I think we should come in at a, not a zero percent increase... I'm in favor of being consistent with the CPI.”

— Mark Lemay · Expressing a policy position on sustainable tax increases. ▶ 33:50

“I would like to see... what is the average raise of the person, not for the town, in the state of New Hampshire?”

— Richard Manzo · Suggesting a benchmark to help citizens understand the reality of budget increases. ▶ 1:00:08

“Goffstown is a poor town... the difference between us and Bedford is gonna continue to expand.”

— Unidentified speaker · Discussing the impact of declining state and federal funding on municipal revenue. ▶ 1:01:02

“I believe that the budget is inflated... department heads... make these lines higher just so they can cover this line.”

— Unidentified speaker · Questioning the accuracy of line-item budgeting and its effect on the default budget. ▶ 1:04:25

“Goffstown sounds known as a breeding ground for firefighters... [it is] a training ground or a stepping stone.”

— Unidentified speaker · Explaining why the fire department faces high overtime due to personnel leaving for larger towns after being trained. ▶ 1:15:59
This meeting — choose a section

Public ⁠impact

Issues from this meeting with documented community impact.
What was discussed

Debate over whether increases should track with CPI or zero-based budgeting, directly affecting the town operating budget and default budget levels.

What was discussed

The board is exploring the implementation of directed fees to fund specific services to offset the lack of general revenue compared to wealthier neighbors.

Topics ⁠discussed

Each topic expands to quotes and full context.
Speakers: Jim Craig
What was discussed

The Select Board and Budget Committee held a joint meeting to improve collaboration and prevent the 'us vs. them' mentality experienced during the previous budget cycle.

Speakers: Elizabeth DeBroy, Peter Gregorikakis, Mark Lemay, Joshua Douglas
What was discussed

Members discussed why the previous budget faced challenges, citing issues with inflation, lack of prioritization in the CIP process, and public misinformation.

Speakers: Elizabeth DeBroy, Laura Stevens, Derek Horntine, Joshua Douglas
What was discussed

Discussion on better utilizing CRFs, improving the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) vetting process, and addressing the funding of large equipment purchases.

Speakers: James Piercy, Richard Manzo, Mark Lemay, Peter Gregorikakis
What was discussed

Board members debated different approaches, including 'zero-based budgeting' versus setting a percentage target (e.g., 3% over default) to maintain sustainability.

Speakers: Allison DeCesare, Laura Stevens, Mark Lemay
What was discussed

Discussion on how to combat social media misinformation and improve transparency regarding the impact of budget cuts and default budgets.

Speakers: Peter Gregorikakis, Allison DeCesare, Joshua Douglas
What was discussed

A review of recent warrant articles, noting that while union contracts and certain capital reserves passed, the town operating budget failed.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

Discussion regarding how budget increase percentages compare to average state raises and how this affects public perception of sustainability.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

Discussion on Goffstown's lack of revenue sources compared to neighboring towns like Bedford, the potential need to reduce operating expenses, and the exploration of directed fees to fund specific services.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

Debate over whether the budget is inflated due to department heads overestimating line items, and a discussion on how these practices affect the 'default budget.'

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

A discussion on how firefighter retention issues (the town acting as a 'training ground' for larger municipalities) are driving up overtime costs.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

Discussion on the rising costs of capital equipment (fire trucks, ambulances) and whether the town should implement policy guardrails regarding the ratio of capital to operating expenses.

Controversy & ⁠dissent

Where the board, the community, or the agenda diverged.

Potentially controversial issues

01

Budget Philosophy and Inflation Concerns

There is a fundamental disagreement on whether to use zero-based budgeting or set specific percentage targets. Residents expressed concern that the budget is being 'inflated' by department heads, while the board must balance service needs against taxpayer sustainability.
Board position: The board is divided between members advocating for strict percentage targets (CPI-aligned) and those discussing the nuances of departmental needs and zero-based approaches.
Internal dissent
Mark Lemay explicitly advocated for a policy of consistency with CPI rather than zero-percent increases, while others debated the mechanics of line-item accuracy.
high concern
02

Fire Department Overtime and Staffing

Public questioning of whether a 24/7 fire department is necessary and whether overtime can be cut directly impacts public safety costs and resident tax rates.
Board position: The board signaled that overtime is a systemic symptom of a 'retention problem' (staff leaving for larger towns) rather than a lack of necessity, making direct cuts difficult.
medium concern

Community vs. board tension

Public ⁠comment

What residents said — verbatim, with timestamps.
9
Total speakers
6
Addressed
2
Partial
1
Not addressed
Unidentified speaker
Partial
The speaker reflected on the difficulty of communicating the budget committee's hard work and openness to cuts during the previous budget cycle. They expressed a desire for better ways to convey to constituents that the committee is willing to discuss any proposed cuts on their merits. Key concern
Improving communication regarding the budget committee's transparency and willingness to consider cuts.
Board response
The discussion moved into suggestions for anonymous suggestion boxes and direct constituent engagement.
The board and other speakers engaged in a dialogue about how to receive feedback, suggesting digital methods and direct outreach, though no specific formal policy was immediately adopted.
Jessica
Partial
The speaker suggested creating an online suggestion box or general mailbox where constituents can submit comments or questions anonymously. This would allow the board and committees to share these concerns on social media to encourage more public engagement. Key concern
A request for an anonymous online suggestion box to facilitate constituent communication.
Board response
The board discussed the feasibility of anonymity regarding 'right to know' laws.
The board engaged with the idea, discussing the legalities of anonymity and the goal of getting more questions from the public.
Unidentified speaker
Not addressed
The speaker argued that budget percentage increases should be contextualized by comparing them to the average wage increases in New Hampshire. They noted that a 5% budget increase feels unsustainable to residents if their own raises are only around 3%. Key concern
The need to present budget percentages in the context of state-wide wage growth for better public understanding.
Board response
The board did not directly address the specific request for wage comparison data in the immediate response, though they discussed budgeting mechanics later.
The board moved into discussions regarding revenue, capital investment, and budget inflation without specifically addressing the request to use state wage averages as a comparison tool.
Elizabeth
Addressed
The speaker noted that Goffstown lacks the revenue sources of wealthier towns and faces increasing inequities as state/federal funding declines. They suggested that while capital investment is important, the town must look at reducing operating expenses and exploring specific service fees to manage costs. Key concern
Addressing revenue inequities and finding ways to reduce operating expenses through service fees and revenue adjustments.
Board response
The board agreed that they need to 'dig deeper' and acknowledged the discrepancy between Goffstown and towns like Bedford.
The board acknowledged the economic reality described and agreed on the need to look for efficiencies and revenue opportunities.
Josh
Addressed
The speaker encouraged constituents to provide ideas for efficiency and noted the differences in property values and services between Goffstown and Bedford. They emphasized the need for non-partisan cooperation and urged members to work together rather than through external articles or studies. Key concern
Promoting collaborative, non-partisan problem solving and direct communication of efficiency ideas.
Board response
The speaker is a member of the board/committee engaging in the discussion; the response was to call for unity.
As a board member, the speaker addressed the community's need for collaboration and direct feedback.
Izzy
Addressed
The speaker expressed a belief that the budget is inflated because department heads may over-budget certain lines to ensure coverage. They argued this practice skews the 'default budget' and makes financial adjustments more difficult. Key concern
Budget inflation caused by department heads over-budgeting line items.
Board response
The board explained their process of reviewing actual spends vs. budgets and mentioned using spreadsheets to flag and adjust lines.
The board provided a detailed technical explanation of how they verify line items against actual spending to prevent inflation.
Unidentified speaker
Addressed
The speaker asked for clarification on whether budget adjustments are based on the previous year's actual spending or the budgeted amounts. They wanted to know how the town calculates projections for the following year. Key concern
Clarification of the methodology used for budget line-item adjustments.
Board response
A board member explained that they look at both actual spending and historical averages (3-5 years) to project needs.
The board provided a thorough explanation of their projection methodology.
Unidentified speaker
Addressed
The speaker raised concerns about budget transfers and specifically asked if fire department overtime is an expense that could be cut. They questioned if a 24/7 fire department is necessary given social media discussions regarding overtime. Key concern
Controlling fire department overtime and reducing budget transfers.
Board response
The board explained that overtime is driven by a retention problem (staff leaving for other towns) rather than a lack of need, making it hard to cut directly.
The board addressed the overtime issue by explaining the underlying cause (staff retention) and the difficulty of cutting emergency response costs.
Unidentified speaker
Addressed
The speaker commented on the nature of budget transfers, noting that in other municipalities, they are used as a tool for reprioritization. They suggested that the current 'bottom line' budget system makes transfers necessary for flexibility. Key concern
The utility and perception of budget transfers.
Board response
The board agreed that transfers are a tool for reprioritization but acknowledged the concern regarding continuous transfers from the same lines.
The board engaged with the perspective on transfers and discussed how to manage them.

Decisions ⁠logged

Every recorded vote, with timestamps and dissents.
Establishment of regular joint meetings.
The board agreed to hold joint meetings every few months (suggested quarterly or bi-monthly) to maintain collaboration.
Agreed
Adoption of a new quarterly budget review process.
The board agreed to conduct quarterly reviews of existing expenses, potentially by attending existing quarterly department head reviews to save time.
Unanimous/Consensus

Share ⁠this report

Drafts ready to post — click any block to copy.

X / Twitter — by angle

potential new fees for municipal services
At the May 5 Select Board meeting, officials discussed moving toward 'directed fees' to fund specific services. This explores charging residents for services to offset the town's lack of revenue. Keep an eye on how this... https://meetingwatch.org/nh/goffstown/select-board/2026-05-05/ #MeetingWatch #GoffstownNH
312/280 chars
budget inflation and its impact on the default budget
During the 5/5 Select Board meeting, members debated whether department heads 'inflate' budget line items to ensure coverage. This practice impacts the 'default budget,' which sets the baseline for your taxes if the budget fails. https://meetingwatch.org/nh/goffstown/select-board/2026-05-05/ #MeetingWatch #GoffstownNH
319/280 chars
fire department retention and overtime costs
Goffstown's fire department is facing high overtime costs because it's being used as a 'training ground' for larger towns. The Select Board is looking for ways to manage these costs without compromising public safety. https://meetingwatch.org/nh/goffstown/select-board/2026-05-05/ #MeetingWatch #GoffstownNH
307/280 chars

X thread

1
Is your town budget being 'inflated'? At the May 5 Select Board meeting, a major debate broke out over whether department heads overestimate line items to ensure they have extra coverage. Here is why that matters for your taxes. 🧵 #MeetingWatch #GoffstownNH
257/280
2
When departments overestimate costs, it pushes up the 'default budget.' If the town fails to pass a budget, the default budget kicks in. This creates a higher baseline for spending and, ultimately, your property tax burden.
223/280
3
The Board is also exploring new ways to fund the town. Because Goffstown lacks the revenue of neighbors like Bedford, officials discussed implementing 'directed fees' to pay for specific services. This could mean more out-of-pocket costs for residents.
252/280
4
From fire department overtime driven by staff turnover to disagreements over 'zero-based budgeting,' the Select Board is at a crossroads on fiscal management. We will continue to track how these decisions impact Goffstown taxpayers. https://meetingwatch.org/nh/goffstown/select-board/2026-05-05/
256/280

Facebook — long form

During the May 5 Select Board meeting, several critical fiscal issues were discussed that will directly impact Goffstown taxpayers. 

One of the most significant points of tension involved the accuracy of our town budget. There is growing concern—raised during the meeting—that department heads may be 'inflating' line items to ensure they have enough funding to cover unexpected costs. While the Board provided technical explanations for their process, this practice directly impacts the 'default budget.' For residents, a higher default budget means a higher baseline for taxes if the town fails to pass an operating budget.

Additionally, the Board is exploring new revenue models to bridge the gap between Goffstown and wealthier neighboring towns. This includes the potential implementation of 'directed fees' to fund specific municipal services. This shift could change how residents pay for the services they use.

Finally, the Board addressed rising costs in the Fire Department. Officials noted that Goffstown is often used as a 'training ground,' where firefighters gain experience before moving to larger municipalities, leading to high overtime costs to fill vacancies. We will continue to monitor how the Board balances these service needs with the need for fiscal responsibility. https://meetingwatch.org/nh/goffstown/select-board/2026-05-05/ #MeetingWatch #GoffstownNH

Action ⁠items

Who owes what, by when.
Provide CRF projections and details regarding leasing, financing, and capital purchases for equipment/vehicles.
Assigned: Department Heads · Due: June
Schedule regular joint meetings to coordinate on budget targets and priorities.
Assigned: Select Board and Budget Committee · Due: Ongoing
Provide a deadline for Capital Reserve Fund (CRF) submissions at the next meeting.
Assigned: Select Board · Due: Next meeting
Send a notice to the Budget Committee regarding which Select Board meetings will serve as quarterly reviews and schedule a joint planning meeting.
Assigned: Derek (Staff) · Due: TBD
Hold a joint meeting for budget planning purposes.
Assigned: Select Board and Budget Committee · Due: September (estimated)
Support coverage

Creating this report cost ⁠real money.

MeetingWatch attended, transcribed, and analyzed this meeting on its own dime. If this work is valuable to you, chip in to keep covering Goffstown.

Report composed by grok-4.3, gemma-4-26b, grok-4.20-0309-reasoning · analyzed 2026-06-01.