Your area Not set — showing everywhere
Meeting report · Planning Board
Creating this report cost real money. Help fund coverage →

Planning Board — July 9, 2026

The meeting was routine, consisting of procedural approvals and the processing of a single application withdrawal with no public comment.

Date Thursday, July 9, 2026 Duration 0.1h Speakers 1 Decisions 3 Routine

Questions about this meeting? ⁠Just ask.

Ask MeetingWatch answers from this meeting’s report, transcript, and records — with linked sources.

Summary AI-generated to surface controversy & community impact without bias — always verify against the actual meeting before relying on it.

Attention Goffstown residents: A discrepancy was noted during the July 9 Planning Board meeting regarding the properties being discussed versus what was publicly advertised on the agenda.

The official agenda included a hearing for 'Old Business' concerning Map 34, Lot 59 (Richard & Kathleen Plante, 18 West Union) regarding driveway width and parking setbacks. However, according to the meeting record, there was no discussion of the 18 West Union property at all.

Instead, the Board processed the withdrawal of a waiver request for a different location: Map 32, Lot 59.

This raises a fundamental question of transparency: Was the wrong property discussed, or was the public agenda incorrect? When property identifiers are swapped, residents who intended to speak on the 18 West Union matter may have been effectively excluded from the process. We are looking for clarification on whether this was a clerical error or a failure to address the scheduled business.

Jul 9, 2026 0.1h long 1 speakers 3 decisions Routine
Notable statements Drag to browse

“The next meeting will be held on July 23rd, 2026, and will focus on development regulations.”

— Kimberly Pease · Closing remarks regarding the upcoming meeting schedule. ▶ 00:10
This meeting — choose a section

Topics ⁠discussed

Each topic expands to quotes and full context.
Speakers: Kimberly Pease, Bill, Joshua Douglas, Barbara Griffin
What was discussed

The Board reviewed and approved the meeting minutes from May 28, 2026, and June 11, 2026.

What happened

Both sets of minutes were approved by the board.

Speakers: Kimberly Pease, Joanne Duffy, Bill, Joshua Douglas
What was discussed

The Board processed the formal withdrawal of a Goffstown Development Regulation Review waiver application for Map 32, Lot 59.

What happened

The Board voted to accept the application withdrawal.

Controversy & ⁠dissent

Where the board, the community, or the agenda diverged.

Public ⁠comment

What residents said — verbatim, with timestamps.
No public comments were identified in this meeting.

Decisions ⁠logged

Every recorded vote, with timestamps and dissents.
Approval of May 28, 2026, meeting minutes
Motion made by Bill, seconded by Joshua Douglas. Barbara Griffin abstained due to absence.
Motion carried
Approval of June 11, 2026, meeting minutes
Motion made by Bill, seconded by Joshua Douglas.
Motion carried
Acceptance of application withdrawal for Map 32, Lot 59 waiver request
Motion made by Bill, seconded by Joshua Douglas. A public hearing was opened and closed to record no public comment.
Motion carried

Agenda ⁠brief

What the posted agenda said before the meeting — a preview, not a record of what happened. See the other tabs for the actual report.

Board continues review of driveway and parking setback waivers for 18 West Union.

The board will continue discussing a request from property owners Richard and Kathleen Plante regarding Map 34, Lot 59. The owners are seeking waivers from the Goffstown Development Regulations to allow for a 30-foot-wide driveway, which exceeds the 22-foot maximum width permitted at the right-of-way line.

Additionally, the applicants are requesting a waiver to place two parking spaces within 2 feet of the side property line, despite a required 10-foot side setback per Section 8.C.5 of the regulations. This item is a continuation of the discussion from the June 11, 2026, meeting.

Key items

  • Waiver request for 30 ft. driveway width at 18 West Union
  • Waiver request for 2 ft. parking space side setback at 18 West Union
  • Review of Section 8.C.7 and Section 8.C.5 of the Goffstown Development Regulations

Why this matters

The board must decide whether to grant exceptions to existing zoning regulations for this residential property. Residents may be interested in how these setbacks and driveway widths are enforced and if these waivers set a precedent for future development in residential zones.

Brief generated by litellm::gemma-4-26b on 2026-06-28. Not a substitute for attending or watching the meeting.

Share ⁠this report

Drafts ready to post — click any block to copy.

X / Twitter — by angle

Agenda discrepancy and potential error in property identification
At the July 9 Planning Board meeting, the board processed a waiver withdrawal for Map 32, Lot 59. However, the official agenda listed Map 34, Lot 59 (18 West Union) for discussion. Was the wrong property discussed, or was the... https://meetingwatch.org/nh/goffstown/planning-board/2026-07-09/ #MeetingWatch #GoffstownNH
320/280 chars
Transparency regarding what was actually heard versus what was scheduled
Goffstown Planning Board Alert: The July 9 meeting agenda included a hearing for Map 34, Lot 59 (18 West Union), but no discussion of this property occurred. Instead, the board voted on Map 32, Lot 59. We need to know if the... https://meetingwatch.org/nh/goffstown/planning-board/2026-07-09/ #MeetingWatch #GoffstownNH
319/280 chars

X thread

1
Why did the Goffstown Planning Board vote on a property that wasn't correctly listed on the July 9 meeting agenda? 🧵 #MeetingWatch #GoffstownNH
143/280
2
The agenda scheduled a hearing for Map 34, Lot 59 (18 West Union) regarding driveway and parking setbacks. But the transcript shows zero discussion on that property. Instead, the board voted on the withdrawal of a request for Map 32, Lot 59.
241/280
3
This discrepancy raises a serious question: Did the board discuss the wrong property, or was the agenda published with the wrong information? When the agenda doesn't match the action, residents can't know what to expect or how to participate... https://meetingwatch.org/nh/goffstown/planning-board/2026-07-09/
268/280

Facebook — long form

Attention Goffstown residents: A discrepancy was noted during the July 9 Planning Board meeting regarding the properties being discussed versus what was publicly advertised on the agenda.

The official agenda included a hearing for 'Old Business' concerning Map 34, Lot 59 (Richard & Kathleen Plante, 18 West Union) regarding driveway width and parking setbacks. However, according to the meeting record, there was no discussion of the 18 West Union property at all.

Instead, the Board processed the withdrawal of a waiver request for a different location: Map 32, Lot 59. 

This raises a fundamental question of transparency: Was the wrong property discussed, or was the public agenda incorrect? When property identifiers are swapped, residents who intended to speak on the 18 West Union matter may have been effectively excluded from the process. We are looking for clarification on whether this was a clerical error or a failure to address the scheduled business. https://meetingwatch.org/nh/goffstown/planning-board/2026-07-09/ #MeetingWatch #GoffstownNH

Member ⁠positions

0 issues · 0 explicit · 0 inferred
Absent
Absent

Positions marked ~ are inferred from context and may not reflect the member's explicitly stated position. UNCLEAR means the vote was split but the record did not name how this member voted — it is not a “yes.”

Accountability ⁠flags

Documented procedural gaps. Each item links to its source.

Agenda items not discussed

Topics discussed — not on agenda

Support coverage

Creating this report cost ⁠real money.

MeetingWatch attended, transcribed, and analyzed this meeting on its own dime. If this work is valuable to you, chip in to keep covering Goffstown.

Report composed by gemma-4-26b, grok-4.20-0309-reasoning, grok-4.3, grok-4-fast · analyzed 2026-07-11.