Your area Not set — showing everywhere
Meeting report · Conservation Commission
Creating this report cost real money. Help fund coverage →

Conservation Commission — May 27, 2026

The meeting featured spirited public testimony regarding environmental violations and a sense of frustration regarding the efficacy of Commission oversight.

Date Wednesday, May 27, 2026 Duration 0.7h Speakers 9 Public comments 4 Decisions 3 Lively
Wetland Delineation Plan site map on easel Video still
Wetland Delineation Plan site map on easel Frame from meeting video ▶ 06:27

Questions about this meeting? ⁠Just ask.

Ask MeetingWatch answers from this meeting’s report, transcript, and records — with linked sources.

Summary AI-generated to surface controversy & community impact without bias — always verify against the actual meeting before relying on it.

During the Goffstown Conservation Commission meeting on May 27, a serious issue was brought to the floor regarding environmental enforcement: potential unauthorized construction at Mountain Base Pond Road.

Members reported that a developer—at a site the Commission had previously rejected—appears to be clearing trees and installing septic systems and wells in direct violation of approved plans. This unauthorized work is reportedly causing significant runoff into local streams. This highlights a frustrating pattern where the Commission’s expertise and decisions appear to be bypassed by developers and other town boards.

In fact, the discussion revealed a concerning shift in how the Commission operates. Members admitted that because they feel their opposition to certain projects is often ignored, they have moved toward a 'more constructive' approach rather than a strictly protective one.

While the Commission has committed to sending an official letter of concern and consulting with the DPW, this situation raises a fundamental question for Goffstown residents: If the Conservation Commission's guidance can be ignored without consequence, what real protection do our natural resources actually have?

May 27, 2026 0.7h long 9 speakers 4 public comments 3 decisions Lively
Notable statements Drag to browse

“If we can do anything to save some money for the town, I think we should do that... there's no reason to not open up a PDF instead of wasting all the paper and money.”

— Unidentified speaker · Arguing for digital correspondence to reduce postage costs. ▶ 13:04

“We've been more concerned about projects getting finished than have been about getting some of these other things [Open Space Committee tasks] done.”

— Unidentified speaker · Discussing the inactivity of the Open Space Committee. ▶ 28:12

“We know that when we say [the site is not suitable], it's going to be ignored, so we try to be more constructive.”

— Unidentified speaker · Explaining the commission's shift in approach toward controversial development applications. ▶ 40:25
This meeting — choose a section

Public ⁠impact

Issues from this meeting with documented community impact.
What was discussed

Potential for increased stormwater runoff and erosion from new multi-family and single-family developments.

What happened

The board recommended approvals for both but emphasized the necessity of strict drainage maintenance and mitigation measures.

Topics ⁠discussed

Each topic expands to quotes and full context.
Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

The commission reviewed a request for relief from the outer 50-foot wetland buffer to build a screened porch and open deck.

What happened

The commission recommended the project to the Planning Board, noting it is a reasonable change with appropriate impact minimization measures.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

Review and acceptance of the previous meeting's minutes.

What happened

The minutes were accepted.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

A discussion regarding the mailing of correspondence and ways to reduce town postage costs.

What happened

Members agreed that digital copies are acceptable and physical copies can be picked up in person.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

Review of a proposal to add a detached duplex to an existing single-family property.

What happened

The commission decided to recommend approval with specific comments regarding drainage and landscaping.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

Discussion of committee vacancies and future stewardship activities.

What happened

Julie Grandgeorge was reappointed; Charlie Bazaar's status remains pending contact.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

The commission discussed a potential violation involving unauthorized clearing and improper runoff management near Mountain Base Pond Road.

What happened

The commission agreed to send an official letter of concern/complaint regarding the deviation from approved plans and the environmental impact.

Controversy & ⁠dissent

Where the board, the community, or the agenda diverged.

Potentially controversial issues

01

Alleged environmental violations at Mountain Base Pond Road

Public members reported unauthorized tree clearing, improper septic/well installation, and ineffective silt fencing, leading to erosion into a stream. This follows a previous instance where the Commission's opposition to the project was reportedly ignored by the Planning Board.
Board position: The board acknowledged the severity of the situation and committed to sending an official letter of concern/complaint.
high concern
02

12 South Mast Street LLC Duplex Proposal

The proposal to add a multi-family duplex to a single-family property raised concerns regarding increased impervious surfaces and potential runoff impacts on neighbors.
Board position: Recommended approval with strict conditions regarding drainage maintenance and landscaping.
medium concern

Split votes

Relief from Outer 50-Foot Wetland Buffer (355 Black Brook Road)
Aye (with one abstention)
Approval of April 22nd Minutes
Aye (with one abstention)

Community vs. board tension

Public ⁠comment

What residents said — verbatim, with timestamps.
4
Total speakers
4
Addressed
0
Partial
0
Not addressed
Rick Martin
Addressed
The speaker presented a project for a screened porch and open deck at 355 Black Brook Road. He explained the mitigation strategies, including the use of compost silt socks and a drip edge trench for stormwater management. Key concern
Explaining the project impacts to the wetland buffer and demonstrating mitigation measures.
Board response
The board asked clarifying questions about construction access, the nature of the porch/deck, and the conversion of existing space.
The board engaged with the applicant through questions and subsequently voted to recommend the project to the planning board.
David Neiman
Addressed
The speaker noted that the proposed site is currently lawn rather than forest soil, suggesting the impact on permeability is not drastic. Later, he raised concerns regarding a budget item for postage and suggested using PDFs to save money. He also raised concerns about runoff from a multi-family project and the importance of maintaining infiltration areas. Key concern
Cost-saving measures for the town (digital correspondence) and runoff management for new developments.
Board response
The board discussed the postage issue and reached an agreement to notify members via text for pick-up options. Regarding the development, the board incorporated his concerns into their formal recommendation.
The board addressed both the administrative concern (postage/PDFs) and the environmental concern (runoff/infiltration maintenance) through discussion and board action.
Evelyn Miller
Addressed
The speaker expressed concern regarding a property on Mountain Base Pond Road where the buffer was allegedly cut and silt fences were ineffective. She noted that the site appears to be eroding into the stream and requested that someone inspect the damage. Key concern
Alleged environmental violations and improper construction practices at a site on Mountain Base Pond Road.
Board response
The board (via the Planning/Zoning Assistant) instructed her to send photos and agreed that the commission should send an official letter of concern/complaint regarding the deviations from the approved plan.
The board accepted the report of a violation and established a course of action (sending an official letter and requesting photos).
Susan Becker
Addressed
The speaker commented on the egregious damage at the Mountain Base Pond Road site, noting that trees were cleared and fill was placed too close to the stream. She expressed frustration that the Planning Board previously allowed the project despite the Commission's opposition. Key concern
Environmental degradation and lack of oversight at the Mountain Base Pond Road construction site.
Board response
The board agreed the situation was serious and decided to escalate the issue by sending an official letter of concern to the appropriate parties.
The board acknowledged the severity of the situation and moved toward formal action via a letter of concern.

Decisions ⁠logged

Every recorded vote, with timestamps and dissents.
Recommend relief from the outer 50-foot buffer for 355 Black Brook Road to the Planning Board.
The commission found the project to be a reasonable change with appropriate mitigation measures.
Aye (with one abstention)
Acceptance of the April 22nd meeting minutes.
Minutes were accepted as presented.
Aye (with one abstention)
Reappointment of Julie Grandgeorge to the Open Space Committee.
Motion to reappoint Julie Grandgeorge.
Aye

Share ⁠this report

Drafts ready to post — click any block to copy.

X / Twitter — by angle

Reported environmental violations and enforcement failures
At the 5/27 Conservation Commission meeting, members reported that a developer at Mountain Base Pond Road is allegedly ignoring approved plans—clearing trees and installing septic/wells unauthorized, causing runoff into local... https://meetingwatch.org/nh/goffstown/conservation-commission/2026-05-27/ #MeetingWatch #GoffstownNH
329/280 chars
The Commission's perceived lack of actual authority/influence
The Goffstown Conservation Commission admitted a difficult reality at the 5/27 meeting: they often feel their opposition to certain developments is ignored by other boards, leading them to shift toward a 'more constructive'... https://meetingwatch.org/nh/goffstown/conservation-commission/2026-05-27/ #MeetingWatch #GoffstownNH
327/280 chars
Development oversight and runoff concerns
The Conservation Commission recommended approval for a new duplex at 12 South Mast Street LLC on 5/27. While they noted concerns over increased runoff and impervious surfaces, they are moving forward with conditions rather... https://meetingwatch.org/nh/goffstown/conservation-commission/2026-05-27/ #MeetingWatch #GoffstownNH
326/280 chars

X thread

1
Is the Goffstown Conservation Commission actually able to protect our environment, or are they just going through the motions? Evidence from the 5/27 meeting suggests a growing gap between Commission oversight and real-world enforcement. 🧵 #MeetingWatch #GoffstownNH
266/280
2
At the May 27 meeting, members raised alarms about Mountain Base Pond Road. A builder is allegedly clearing trees and installing septic/wells in violation of previously approved plans, causing runoff into streams. This follows a project the Commission previously rejected.
272/280
3
The frustration was palpable. One member noted that because the Commission's denials are often ignored by the Planning Board, they have shifted to being 'more constructive' rather than strictly opposing bad projects. This changes the very nature of their oversight.
265/280
4
With unauthorized clearing happening in real-time at Mountain Base Pond Road, the Commission is now forced to draft formal complaint letters to the DPW. We need to ask: if the Commission’s decisions can be bypassed, how are our wetlands actually being protected?
262/280
5
Stay tuned as we follow the fallout of the Mountain Base Pond Road violation and how the Town responds to these reported environmental breaches. #Goffstown #Accountability https://meetingwatch.org/nh/goffstown/conservation-commission/2026-05-27/
195/280

Facebook — long form

During the Goffstown Conservation Commission meeting on May 27, a serious issue was brought to the floor regarding environmental enforcement: potential unauthorized construction at Mountain Base Pond Road.

Members reported that a developer—at a site the Commission had previously rejected—appears to be clearing trees and installing septic systems and wells in direct violation of approved plans. This unauthorized work is reportedly causing significant runoff into local streams. This highlights a frustrating pattern where the Commission’s expertise and decisions appear to be bypassed by developers and other town boards.

In fact, the discussion revealed a concerning shift in how the Commission operates. Members admitted that because they feel their opposition to certain projects is often ignored, they have moved toward a 'more constructive' approach rather than a strictly protective one. 

While the Commission has committed to sending an official letter of concern and consulting with the DPW, this situation raises a fundamental question for Goffstown residents: If the Conservation Commission's guidance can be ignored without consequence, what real protection do our natural resources actually have? https://meetingwatch.org/nh/goffstown/conservation-commission/2026-05-27/ #MeetingWatch #GoffstownNH

Action ⁠items

Who owes what, by when.
Forward comments regarding 355 Black Brook Road and 12 South Mast Street to the Planning Board.
Assigned: Patty (a speaker)
Reach out to a previous applicant (Jacqueline Cohen) regarding interest in the Open Space Committee and/or draft a letter regarding her status.
Assigned: Patty (a speaker)
Email photos of the Mountain Base Pond Road site violation to Patty.
Assigned: Susan (a speaker)
Consult with Scott (DPW) regarding the Mountain Base Pond Road site and draft an official complaint letter.
Assigned: Patty (a speaker)
Support coverage

Creating this report cost ⁠real money.

MeetingWatch attended, transcribed, and analyzed this meeting on its own dime. If this work is valuable to you, chip in to keep covering Goffstown.

Report composed by grok-4.3, gemma-4-26b, grok-4.20-0309-reasoning, grok-4-fast · analyzed 2026-06-07.