Meeting report · Conservation Commission
Creating this report cost real money.
Help fund coverage →
Conservation Commission — February 25, 2026
The meeting was characterized by technical inquiries and information-gathering rather than heated debate or confrontation.
Public impact
Issues from this meeting with documented community impact.
01
Eversource Energy Infrastructure Replacement
Replacement of 14 transmission structures and temporary wetland impacts. Affected: Residents near Roberts Road and the broader community relying on grid reliability.
other high impact
Controversy & dissent
Where the board, the community, or the agenda diverged.
Potentially controversial issues
01
Eversource Energy Conditional Use Permit
The project involves utility infrastructure work within a wetland buffer, raising concerns regarding aesthetic impacts (steel poles), environmental mitigation (wildlife protection), and ground protection (geotextile use).
Board position: Recommended approval to the Planning Board.
low concern
02
Havemeyer Falls Dam Removal
Dam removal projects often trigger anxiety regarding changes to water levels, flooding risks, and property values for adjacent lake/riverfront owners.
Board position: Provided updates and technical reassurance that river flow and property impacts would be negligible.
low concern
Split votes
Approval of January 28, 2026, Meeting Minutes
3-0 (with 3 abstentions)
Community vs. board tension
Ready to share? AI-written accountability posts about this meeting's controversies.
View posts →
Public comment
What residents said — verbatim, with timestamps.
4
Total speakers
3
Addressed
1
Partial
0
Not addressed
Unidentified speaker
09:25
Addressed
The speaker asked for clarification regarding the type of poles being used in the Eversource project. They specifically inquired about 'weathered steel' poles.
Key concern
Clarification on the aesthetics and nature of the weathered steel poles.
Board responseThe presenters explained that weathered steel has a rust patina that protects it naturally and is more aesthetically pleasing than painted poles.
The presenters provided a detailed explanation of the material and its benefits.
Evelyn Miller
11:49
Addressed
The speaker asked if geotextile fabric would be placed under the timber matting used for wetland access. They noted this was a common question from a previous member.
Key concern
Whether geotextile fabric would be used under the timber mats to protect the ground.
Board responseThe presenters stated they could do it if the commission preferred, but explained that it can create a 'housekeeping issue' by creating wet waste during removal and offers little additional BMP value.
The presenters answered the question directly and provided the pros and cons of the practice.
Unidentified speaker
19:29
Addressed
The speaker expressed support for the Eversource project, noting the importance of reliable electricity during storms. They also asked about potential impacts of the dam removal on lake properties.
Key concern
Inquiry about property impacts from dam removal and expression of project support.
Board responseA board member (a speaker) explained that the river flow remains the same and that the project will not impact lake properties.
The board member addressed the specific concern regarding property impact with technical reasoning.
Unidentified speaker
25:55
Partial
The speaker questioned a forestry statutory permit notification for Map 5, Lot 50. They expressed confusion because the notification suggested the permit didn't meet qualifications, yet no recent tree cutting had been observed.
Key concern
Clarification on why a forestry permit was disqualified and what work is actually being performed.
Board responseThe Planning and Zoning Assistant (a speaker) promised to seek clarification from the state regarding the discrepancy between the owner's email and the state notification.
The board member could not provide an immediate answer but committed to investigating and reporting back at the next meeting.
Support coverage
Creating this report cost real money.
MeetingWatch attended, transcribed, and analyzed this meeting on its own dime. If this work is valuable to you, chip in to keep covering Goffstown.
Follow Goffstown
One email when a new report is published from the Conservation Commission — or one weekly digest.
Report composed by
grok-4.3, gemma-4-26b, grok-4.20-0309-reasoning · analyzed 2026-06-01.