Select Board — May 4, 2026
The meeting was largely administrative and cooperative, focusing on policy adoption, departmental updates, and routine proclamations.
Questions about this meeting? Just ask.
Ask MeetingWatch answers from this meeting’s report, transcript, and records — with linked sources.
Exeter Select Board Meeting Summary: May 4, 2026
Several key decisions were made during last night's meeting that will impact Exeter’s infrastructure and budget. The Select Board voted unanimously to adopt the 'Complete Streets Policy' (Policy No. 2026-02). This policy establishes a new framework for how the town approaches transportation and infrastructure planning, affecting how pedestrians, cyclists, and motorists navigate our community moving forward.
On the fiscal front, the Board discussed rising municipal electricity costs driven by increased rates and building usage. Amidst these rising costs, the town is moving to claim a solar return credit of approximately $1 million. Residents should keep a close eye on how these significant funds are allocated in upcoming budget cycles.
Finally, the Board took a stand on regional environmental issues, authorizing a formal letter of opposition to the proposed Epping solid waste transfer facility due to potential impacts on the Great Bay watershed. Additionally, Public Works confirmed that Level 4 water restrictions will remain in effect due to ongoing drought conditions. Stay informed on how these decisions shape our town.
Public impact
Adoption of Policy No. 2026-02 which will guide future town infrastructure and transportation planning.
Maintenance of Level 4 water restrictions due to ongoing drought conditions.
Rising electricity costs due to rate changes and building usage, partially offset by a pending $1 million solar return credit.
Topics discussed
The Select Board entered a non-public session under RSA 91-A:32(l).
A community news segment covering amphibian migration/vernal pools, America 250 celebrations, the Exeter Run for Hope 5K, SAU 16 PTO updates, and Fire Department vehicle extrication training.
A resident introduced the RecReady New Hampshire toolkit as a framework for coordinated recreation and connectivity planning.
The Board read a proclamation recognizing May 11th–17th, 2026, as Affordable Housing Week in Exeter, following a presentation by the Home for All Coalition.
The Board discussed and voted on the adoption of the Town of Exeter Complete Streets Policy (Policy No. 2026-02).
The Conservation and Sustainability Planner requested support for a letter opposing a proposed solid waste transfer facility in Epping due to potential impacts on the Great Bay watershed.
Public Works reported on ongoing drought conditions and recommended maintaining Level 4 water restrictions.
An update on municipal energy consumption showing increased electricity costs due to rising rates and changes in building usage.
Review of the transition from 32 Court Street to 10 Hampton Road, noting the success of the Park and Rec department and the impact of electrification/heat pumps on electricity usage.
Discussion regarding the solar array fund, debt service coverage by the general fund, and a pending one-time tax return filing for a solar return credit of approximately $1 million.
The Board reviewed and voted on two property tax abatements for the 2025 tax year.
Updates on a resident furnace issue on Westside Drive, resident inquiries regarding 11 Chestnut Street, and a report on a structure fire on Robin Hood Drive requiring mutual aid.
Selectwoman Gilman provided updates on upcoming legislative session days and potential amendments to Senate and House bills.
Announcements for the ALY Festival on May 9th and the birch tree celebration at Swayze Parkway on May 16th.
Controversy & dissent
Potentially controversial issues
Epping Waste Transfer Facility Opposition
Affordable Housing Proclamation
Public comment
Decisions logged
Action items
Member positions
Positions marked ~ are inferred from context and may not reflect the member's explicitly stated position. UNCLEAR means the vote was split but the record did not name how this member voted — it is not a “yes.”
Creating this report cost real money.
MeetingWatch attended, transcribed, and analyzed this meeting on its own dime. If this work is valuable to you, chip in to keep covering Exeter.
Follow Exeter
One email when a new report is published from the Select Board — or one weekly digest.
grok-4.3, grok-4.20-0309-reasoning, gemma-4-26b, grok-4-fast · analyzed 2026-05-31.
Members feature
Ask questions. Get answers with receipts.
Ask about anything covered on this page and get a plain-English answer that links to the report, the official records, and the exact moment in the meeting video.
Create a free accountFree with a MeetingWatch account — no card, no spam.
Already a member? Sign in
Ask questions about any meeting
Open a community, board, issue, or meeting and I can answer from its records — with links to the report, official documents, and the exact moment in the video.
Then reopen this button to start asking.
AI-generated from meeting records — verify against the linked sources. Conversations are stored (privacy).