Your area Not set — showing everywhere
Meeting report · Planning Board
Creating this report cost real money. Help fund coverage →

Planning Board — June 11, 2026

The meeting was professional and administrative, with resident concerns being addressed directly and resolved without escalation.

Date Thursday, June 11, 2026 Duration 0.3h Speakers 15 Public comments 2 Decisions 2 Routine

Public ⁠impact

Issues from this meeting with documented community impact.
01

Eversource Wetlands Work

Utility infrastructure work involving wetlands monitoring and construction staging. Affected: Local residents near Watson Road and the Bloveyboro area.
See more
What was discussed

The board reviewed requirements for 85% revegetation coverage and the use of the Watson Road parking lot for staging. Discussion also touched on preventing the spread of Japanese knotweed via equipment.

What happened

The board approved the conditional use permit.

other high impact

Decisions ⁠logged

Every recorded vote, with timestamps and dissents.
Approval of Eversource Planning Board case number 26-6 for a wetlands conditional use permit.
Motion made by a speaker and seconded by a speaker after reviewing criteria.
Approved (Hand vote)
Approval of Planning Board Case Number 26-8 for a lot line adjustment between JAG-4 Portsmouth Ave LLC and Reba Abuja.
Approved with two conditions: 1) Submission of a subdivision plan as a shape/CAD file in NH state plan coordinates, and 2) All monumentation must be set per section 9.25 of the Exeter regulations.
Approved (Hand vote)

Topics ⁠discussed

Click a topic to expand quotes and full context.
▶ 00:00 Eversource Wetlands Conditional Use Permit

The board reviewed a request for a conditional use permit for Eversource involving wetlands work and revegetation monitoring.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
See more
What was discussed

The discussion included monitoring requirements for revegetation (targeting 85% coverage) and the use of the Watson Road parking lot as a staging area. There was also mention of the Conservation Commission's efforts to manage Japanese knotweed to prevent it from being tracked into the site by equipment.

What happened

The board approved the request for the conditional use permit after reviewing the criteria.

▶ 01:24 Public Comment: Josh Bauer (102 Watson Road)

A resident raised concerns regarding construction staging and access routes near his property.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
See more
What was discussed

Josh Bauer inquired about the availability of project drawings and expressed concern about the direction of the access route and staging near his driveway. Board members clarified that the project activities are located north of Watson Road toward Bloveyboro and would not impact his property directly.

What happened

The resident's concerns were addressed, and he expressed satisfaction with the clarification.

What's next

The board offered to collect contact information to provide the resident with construction updates.

▶ 06:32 Lot Line Adjustment: Portsmouth Ave (Case 26-8)

A request to adjust a property line between two lots on Portsmouth Avenue to resolve a building encroachment and match existing fence lines.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
See more
What was discussed

The applicant, owner of 4 Portsmouth Ave, explained that the adjustment transfers 400 square feet from lot 8 to lot 9 to correct a long-standing building and fence encroachment. The board discussed the history of the encroachment and the potential for adverse possession, noting the adjustment is a responsible way to clean up the property title for future sale or refinancing.

What happened

The board approved the lot line adjustment subject to two standard conditions regarding CAD file submission and monumentation.

What's next

The applicant must submit a shape/CAD file and ensure all survey monuments are set according to regulations.

▶ 18:19 Field Modification: Rose Farm Development

An administrative approval for the installation of a mail kiosk at the Rose Farm development.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
See more
What was discussed

The town planner reported that a mail kiosk was approved to be located on Sunflower Lane (private property) rather than a public roadway. This change was suggested to avoid a more complex Planning Board process and complies with new postal delivery policies for new subdivisions.

What happened

The modification was administratively approved with the condition that the sidewalk be extended approximately 20 feet to the kiosk.

Controversy & ⁠dissent

Where the board, the community, or the agenda diverged.

Potentially controversial issues

01

Eversource Wetlands Conditional Use Permit

The project involves utility work in wetlands and requires significant construction staging, which raised immediate concerns from a nearby resident regarding property access and site management.
Board position: The board supported the permit after reviewing the monitoring requirements and staging plans.
medium concern

Community vs. board tension

Action ⁠items

Who owes what, by when.
Collect contact information from Josh Bauer to provide construction updates.
Assigned: Planning Board
Submit a shape file or CAD file in NH state plan coordinates and set survey monuments.
Assigned: Applicant (Portsmouth Ave Lot Line Adjustment)

Notable ⁠statements

The subdivision plan shall be submitted as a shape file or a CAD file in New Hampshire state plan coordinates to the satisfaction of the town planner. — Unidentified speaker · Stating the first condition for the lot line adjustment approval. ▶ 15:24
All monumentation shall be set in accordance with section 9.25 of the Exeter site plan review and subdivision regulations. — Unidentified speaker · Stating the second condition for the lot line adjustment approval. ▶ 15:43

Member ⁠positions

2 issues · 0 explicit · 16 inferred
Present
Eversource Wetlands Conditional Use Permit YES ~
Lot Line Adjustment: Portsmouth Ave (Case 26-8) YES ~
Aaron Brown
Vice-Chair
Present
Eversource Wetlands Conditional Use Permit YES ~
Lot Line Adjustment: Portsmouth Ave (Case 26-8) YES ~
John Grueter
Clerk
Present
Eversource Wetlands Conditional Use Permit YES ~
Lot Line Adjustment: Portsmouth Ave (Case 26-8) YES ~
Marty Kennedy
Member
Present
Eversource Wetlands Conditional Use Permit YES ~
Lot Line Adjustment: Portsmouth Ave (Case 26-8) YES ~
Present
Eversource Wetlands Conditional Use Permit YES ~
Lot Line Adjustment: Portsmouth Ave (Case 26-8) YES ~
Gwen English
Member
Present
Eversource Wetlands Conditional Use Permit YES ~
Lot Line Adjustment: Portsmouth Ave (Case 26-8) YES ~
Nancy Belanger
Select Board Representative
Present
Eversource Wetlands Conditional Use Permit YES ~
Lot Line Adjustment: Portsmouth Ave (Case 26-8) YES ~
Present
Eversource Wetlands Conditional Use Permit YES ~
Lot Line Adjustment: Portsmouth Ave (Case 26-8) YES ~

Positions marked ~ are inferred from context and may not reflect the member's explicitly stated position. UNCLEAR means the vote was split but the record did not name how this member voted — it is not a “yes.”

Public ⁠comment

What residents said — verbatim, with timestamps.
2
Total speakers
2
Addressed
0
Partial
0
Not addressed
Josh Bauer
Addressed
Mr. Bauer, a resident of 102 Watson Road, expressed concerns regarding the impact of construction staging and access routes on his property. He requested access to the project drawings to understand the scope of the work. Key concern
Understanding the impact of construction staging and the specific direction of the access route on his adjacent property.
Board response
The board directed him to the online meeting packets for the Conservation Commission and Planning Board. A board member also used the site drawings to clarify that the work would not be occurring on his property and offered to collect his contact info for construction updates.
The board provided the requested information (where to find drawings) and clarified the project scope to ease the speaker's specific concerns about his property.
Unidentified speaker
Addressed
The speaker presented a request for a lot line adjustment to resolve a long-standing building and fence encroachment. He explained that the adjustment is necessary to clear up the property record for potential sale or refinancing. Key concern
Seeking approval for a lot line adjustment to correct a historical encroachment issue.
Board response
The board engaged in a discussion regarding the history of the encroachment and the legality of the adjustment. They ultimately approved the request with two standard conditions regarding CAD files and monumentation.
The speaker's request was the primary agenda item, and the board provided a formal decision and addressed his questions regarding the conditions.
Support coverage

Creating this report cost ⁠real money.

MeetingWatch attended, transcribed, and analyzed this meeting on its own dime. If this work is valuable to you, chip in to keep covering Exeter.

Report composed by grok-4.3, gemma-4-26b, grok-4.20-0309-reasoning, grok-4-fast · analyzed 2026-06-12.