Your area Not set — showing everywhere
Meeting report · Select Board
Creating this report cost real money. Help fund coverage →

Select Board — June 22, 2026

The meeting featured spirited debate from both the board and the public regarding the legality and scope of a new bylaw, as well as a principled debate over board compensation policy.

Date Monday, June 22, 2026 Duration 1.5h Speakers 35 Public comments 17 Decisions 10 Lively

Questions about this meeting? ⁠Just ask.

Ask MeetingWatch answers from this meeting’s report, transcript, and records — with linked sources.

Summary AI-generated to surface controversy & community impact without bias — always verify against the actual meeting before relying on it.

During the June 22nd Select Board meeting, several decisions were made that will have a lasting impact on Brookline residents, ranging from land use to town ethics.

Most notably, the Board voted to adopt a new bylaw prohibiting target practice on all town-owned lands. This decision came after significant debate regarding the legal validity of such a ban under state law (RSA 159-26). While some argued the restriction should be limited specifically to conservation lands to avoid legal overreach, the Board opted for a broader application across all town property. Member Steve Dolfini was the lone dissenting vote on this matter.

The Board also faced a difficult ethical dilemma regarding the stipend for the family of the late board member, Mark Fesendon. Discussion centered on whether to strictly adhere to the policy of pro-rating stipends or to grant the full amount in recognition of his service. The Board has delayed a final decision to research how past resignations or deaths were handled.

Finally, the Board stood behind the town planner’s assessment of the Onyx gravel operations, authorizing a letter to the state that criticizes the adequacy of recent traffic studies used to justify the project. Residents should continue to monitor these developments as the Board moves toward final decisions on these items.

Jun 22, 2026 1.5h long 35 speakers 17 public comments 10 decisions Lively
Notable statements Drag to browse

“The RSA 159-26 prevents [target practice prohibition] from occurring if the town proceeds with this bylaw... it is null and void.”

— Ed Perryie · Arguing against the target shooting bylaw based on state law. ▶ 19:36

“Our lawyer said that it is legal, based on the, on the town police powers, because it is restricted just to town land and not private property.”

— Unidentified speaker · Responding to legal concerns regarding the target shooting bylaw. ▶ 20:35

“I would come back every two weeks and I'd say, 'Here are my available hours, here's my product, are you happy where you're going?'”

— John Schofield · Explaining his approach as a project manager during the bid unsealing. ▶ 55:08

“When we write these [policies], we're creating, binding documents. So when we leave something out, we're always gonna be held accountable.”

— Unidentified speaker · Discussing the importance of precise policy writing, specifically regarding the omission of death as a circumstance for stipend adjustment. ▶ 1:16:26

“The last memory of the town, I don't think, should be us sitting... counting beans.”

— Unidentified speaker · Expressing the desire not to let the town's legacy be defined by minor financial disputes during a time of mourning. ▶ 1:19:37
This meeting — choose a section

Public ⁠impact

Issues from this meeting with documented community impact.
What was discussed

Prohibition of target practice on all town-owned lands.

What happened

The board voted to adopt the broader version applying to all town-owned lands.

What was discussed

Authorization of significant funds for structural shoring and unsealing of project management bids.

What happened

Bids were recorded for review, and phase 1 funding was approved.

Topics ⁠discussed

Each topic expands to quotes and full context.
Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

The board reviewed and approved the public minutes from the June 8th meeting with a correction regarding attendance.

What happened

The public minutes were approved with the attendance amendment; Jerry Roche abstained from the vote.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

The board adopted a proclamation celebrating the 200th anniversary of the Brookline Fire Department and the 50th anniversary of the Brookline Ambulance Service.

What happened

The proclamation was officially adopted by the board.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

The board formally noticed the intention to appoint Buddy Doherty as the Fire Ward.

What happened

The intention to appoint Buddy Doherty was officially noticed.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

The board discussed and approved a recommendation to the state to extend Gathering Grounds' liquor license to include outdoor seating.

What happened

The board voted to send a letter to the state recommending the expansion.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

The board debated a proposed bylaw regarding prohibited target practice on town-owned lands, specifically considering whether to limit it to conservation lands or all town lands.

What happened

The board opted for the broader version applying the prohibition to all town-owned lands.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

The board discussed concerns regarding the Onyx company's gravel operations and the potential inadequacy of recent traffic studies.

What happened

The board authorized the Chair to sign the town planner's letter on behalf of the board.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

The board unsealed three bids for the Town Hall project management position.

What happened

Bids were unsealed and basic details (company name and price/rate) were recorded.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

The board discussed and approved funding for the first phase of structural work at Town Hall.

What happened

The board approved $9,115.00 to Warren Construction for the initial exploration and demolition phase.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

The board reviewed two bids submitted for the Pierce Pond dam removal project.

What happened

Bids were received and recorded.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

The Board discussed whether to pay the full annual stipend to the family of a recently deceased member (Mark Fesendon) or follow the existing policy of pro-rating it.

What happened

The board decided to delay a final decision to research past precedents and allow time to think about the matter.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

A report on the progress of the public health portal and coordination between the welfare and health officers.

What happened

The board noted the progress and 'closed the loop' on this item.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

Review of upcoming hearings regarding a zoning appeal and a variance request for Piper Investments LLC.

What happened

The board noted the upcoming hearing dates.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

Discussion regarding the upcoming Mason Planning Board decision on the annex application and the long-term implications of road maintenance and state responsibility.

What happened

The board reaffirmed their position of wanting specific conditions on any permits, including town input on renewals.

Controversy & ⁠dissent

Where the board, the community, or the agenda diverged.

Potentially controversial issues

01

Target Practice Bylaw

A proposed bylaw to prohibit target practice on town lands sparked debate regarding its legal validity under state law (RSA 159-26) and whether it should apply to all town lands or only conservation lands.
Board position: The board opted for a broad application of the prohibition to all town-owned lands.
Internal dissent
Steve Dolfini voted against the adoption of the bylaw.
high concern
02

Stipend for Deceased Board Member

The board debated whether to follow existing policy by pro-rating a stipend for a deceased member or to pay the full amount as a gesture of respect for his years of service.
Board position: The board deferred a decision to research past precedents and consider policy amendments.
Internal dissent
There was internal debate between members favoring ethical considerations and those favoring strict adherence to established policy.
medium concern
03

Onyx Gravel Operations

Concerns were raised regarding road safety and environmental quality, specifically criticizing a recent traffic study for using questionable data.
Board position: The board supported the town planner's critique of the traffic study.
medium concern

Split votes

Adoption of the bylaw prohibiting target shooting on all town-owned lands
Not explicitly numbered, but one 'No' vote recorded

Community vs. board tension

Public ⁠comment

What residents said — verbatim, with timestamps.
3
Speakers
16
Comments
14
Addressed
1
Partial
2
Not addressed
Unidentified speaker
Addressed
The speaker inquired whether the town's appointment policy had been made available to the public. Key concern
Transparency regarding the appointment process for the fire ward vacancy.
Board response
The board clarified that they announced the opening at the previous meeting two weeks prior.
The board directly answered the question about when the opening was announced.
Unidentified speaker
Addressed
The speaker suggested that the board should provide notice of the potential appointment at the current meeting and then vote at the following meeting to allow for a vetting process. Key concern
Ensuring proper procedural notice before making an appointment.
Board response
The board discussed the process, ultimately deciding to officially notice the intention to appoint the candidate at this meeting and finalize it in two weeks.
The board followed the spirit of the suggestion by using the meeting to 'notice' the intent rather than immediate appointment.
Unidentified speaker
Addressed
The speaker asked whether the liquor license extension for Gathering Grounds would be a new letter or an addendum to a previous one. They also requested to be notified when it is ready so they could submit it to the safety committee. Key concern
Clarification of the documentation type and coordination with the safety committee.
Board response
The board explained it is a new letter referencing the previous extension and promised the speaker could pick up a copy the following day.
The board provided the technical clarification requested and a timeline for delivery.
Unidentified speaker
Addressed
The speaker explained that while target practice was previously a conservation rule, it wasn't strictly enforceable. They noted that current issues involve people using trash as targets on town land and suggested a bylaw is needed for better enforcement. Key concern
The need for a formal bylaw to provide 'teeth' for enforcing rules against target practice on town land.
Board response
The board and Chief Hebert discussed the potential for a bylaw, including different versions (all town land vs. just conservation land) and legal implications.
The board engaged in a lengthy discussion and ultimately moved to adopt the bylaw as requested.
Unidentified speaker
Addressed
The speaker questioned how a new bylaw would help since shooting at insulators is already illegal. They also questioned the logic of applying the rule to only certain parts of town land. Key concern
The efficacy of the bylaw and the reasoning behind its specific geographic scope.
Board response
The board explained that a bylaw provides specific penalties (fines) and clearer enforcement authority than a conservation rule. They also discussed the pros and cons of restricting it to conservation land versus all town land.
The board addressed the questions regarding effectiveness and scope through debate and explanation.
Ed Perryie
Addressed
The speaker argued that the proposed bylaw is null and void based on RSA 159-26. They stated there is a lack of community support and urged the board to take no action. Key concern
Legal invalidity of the bylaw and lack of public support.
Board response
The board consulted their legal counsel, who advised that the town's 'police powers' allow them to regulate their own land, creating an exemption to the RSA mentioned.
The board addressed the legal concern by providing the legal counsel's interpretation of the law.
Unidentified speaker
Addressed
The speaker challenged the legal opinion regarding RSA 159, noting that the conservation commission already has a rule that is difficult to enforce. They advocated for 'more teeth' to handle escalating activity. Key concern
Ensuring the new bylaw provides actual enforcement power.
Board response
The board discussed the enforcement mechanics (fines up to $1,000) and the role of police and other officers.
The board addressed the necessity of enforcement strength by discussing the bylaw's penalty provisions.
Unidentified speaker
Addressed
The speaker expressed a preference for the version of the bylaw that only applies to conservation land, arguing it reinforces existing rules without overreaching into other small parcels. Key concern
Limiting the scope of the bylaw to conservation land only.
Board response
The board debated the merits of both versions (all town land vs. conservation land) before ultimately deciding to go with the broader 'all town land' version.
The board heard the preference and deliberated on it as part of the decision-making process.
Unidentified speaker
Addressed
The speaker expressed concern about where people who currently shoot on Hutchinson Hill will go once they realize they can no longer shoot there. Key concern
Potential displacement of target shooters to other areas.
Board response
The board discussed the various tracts of town land and whether they might be suitable for such activities.
The board discussed the geographic implications of the bylaw in response to the concern.
Unidentified speaker
Addressed
The speaker asked if the new rule would be posted publicly and if it would apply to land with conservation easements rather than just town-managed land. Key concern
Public notice and the specific definition of covered lands.
Board response
The board (via the speaker's interaction with officials) clarified that it applies to land under the management of the Brookline Conservation Commission.
The speaker's questions were answered during the discussion regarding the bylaw's text.
Unidentified speaker
Addressed
The speaker suggested that if the goal is to solve irresponsible gun use, the rule should cover all town land to avoid confusion and ensure police have full authority. Key concern
Consistency of enforcement across all town-owned property.
Board response
The board discussed the potential confusion of having different rules for different plots of land and ultimately decided to adopt the version covering all town land.
The speaker's logic regarding consistency was a primary driver for the board's final decision.
Unidentified speaker
Addressed
The speaker voted 'no' on the adoption of the bylaw, reiterating their preference that the restriction be limited to conservation land only. Key concern
Objection to the scope of the bylaw.
Board response
The board recorded the dissent.
The board acknowledged and recorded the formal dissent.
John Schofield
Addressed
The speaker introduced himself as a bidder for the Town Hall project manager position and clarified his bidding model, explaining it is a flexible, hourly-based service rather than a fixed-price total. Key concern
Clarifying the nature of his proposal to the board.
Board response
The board listened to the clarification and acknowledged how the service would work in practice.
The speaker provided his clarification and the board acknowledged it.
Unidentified speaker
Partial
The speaker suggested that instead of a prorated stipend for a deceased member, the board should pay the full amount if the budget allows, arguing it is more proper. Key concern
Ethical approach to stipends for deceased officials.
Board response
The board debated the ethics, the existing compensation policy, and the need for consistency, ultimately deciding to revisit the policy at a later date rather than making a decision immediately.
The board heard the suggestion and engaged in debate but did not implement the suggestion or make a final decision on the stipend amount.
Unidentified speaker
Addressed
The speaker (representing the planning board) provided an update on the Mason Planning Board's upcoming decision regarding an annex application and warned about the 'builder's remedy' if no decision is made. Key concern
The potential for de facto approval of an application without conditions.
Board response
The board noted the update and discussed the desired outcome for the town.
The board acknowledged the information and discussed the necessary town response.
Unidentified speaker
Addressed
The speaker discussed the potential for Brookline to become responsible for all of Mason Road if the state continues to shed non-numbered roads. They also noted the poor condition of certain road sections in Brookline. Key concern
Long-term financial and maintenance implications of state road transfers.
Board response
The board discussed the possibility of renaming the road and acknowledged the potential maintenance burden.
The board engaged in discussion regarding the implications of the speaker's information.

Decisions ⁠logged

Every recorded vote, with timestamps and dissents.
Accept public minutes from Monday, June 8th, 2026, with an amendment to correct attendance.
Jerry Roche abstained; others approved.
Passed
Accept the warrants (including payroll and police detail).
Moved by Steve Dolfini, seconded by Ed Perry.
Passed
Adopt the proclamation recognizing the Brookline Fire and Ambulance services.
Moved by Jerry Roche, seconded by Steve Dolfini.
Passed
Notice the intention to appoint Buddy Doherty as Fire Ward.
Moved by Steve Dolfini, seconded by Ed Perry.
Passed
Send a letter to the state recommending the expansion of the Gathering Grounds liquor license to include outdoor seating.
Moved by Dan, seconded by Steve Dolfini.
Passed
Adopt the bylaw prohibiting target shooting on all town-owned lands.
Moved by Jerry Roche, seconded by Dan. Steve Dolfini voted No.
Passed
Authorize the Chair to sign the town planner's letter regarding Onyx gravel operations on behalf of the board.
Moved by Ed Perry, seconded by Steve Dolfini.
Unanimous
Authorize $9,115.00 to Warren Construction for Town Hall permanent shoring post exploration and demolition.
Moved by V, seconded by Jerry Roche.
Passed
Authorize $2,551.45 from the ambulance expendable trust fund for 50th anniversary apparel.
Moved by Jerry Roche, seconded by Ed Perry.
Passed
Motion to enter non-public session for legal/reputation purposes.
Motion made pursuant to RSA 91-A:III.2.C for reputation/legal reasons.
Passed (Unanimous roll call)

Share ⁠this report

Drafts ready to post — click any block to copy.

X / Twitter — by angle

Decision involving legal controversy and broad scope
At the 6/22 Select Board meeting, Brookline adopted a bylaw prohibiting target practice on ALL town-owned lands. Despite concerns regarding its legality under state law (RSA 159-26), the board chose a broad application over a... https://meetingwatch.org/nh/brookline/select-board/2026-06-22/ #MeetingWatch #BrooklineNH
318/280 chars
Internal board division over policy vs. ethics
The Select Board is delaying a decision on whether to pay a full stipend to the family of the late Mark Fesendon. The board is torn between following strict pro-rated policy and making an ethical exception for his years of... https://meetingwatch.org/nh/brookline/select-board/2026-06-22/ #MeetingWatch #BrooklineNH
315/280 chars
Board oversight of industrial/safety concerns
Brookline Select Board supports the town planner’s critique of the Onyx gravel traffic study, noting the study used questionable data. The Board authorized a letter to the state addressing road safety and environmental concerns. https://meetingwatch.org/nh/brookline/select-board/2026-06-22/ #MeetingWatch #BrooklineNH
318/280 chars

X thread

1
The June 22nd Select Board meeting revealed deep divisions over town policy and law. From new land restrictions to ethical debates over board stipends, here is what Brookline residents need to know. 🧵 #MeetingWatch #BrooklineNH
227/280
2
First: The Board adopted a bylaw prohibiting target practice on all town-owned lands. This followed a heated debate over whether the ban should be limited to conservation lands. One board member, Steve Dolfini, voted NO, citing concerns over the law's scope.
258/280
3
Second: A legal debate emerged regarding RSA 159-26. While some questioned if the bylaw is legally valid, the Board cited legal counsel stating the town's 'police powers' allow for restrictions on town property. This is a significant shift in land use.
252/280
4
Finally: The Board is stuck on a sensitive issue—the stipend for deceased member Mark Fesendon. Should they follow a strict pro-rated policy or pay the full amount as a gesture of respect? A decision is delayed pending research into past precedents. https://meetingwatch.org/nh/brookline/select-board/2026-06-22/
273/280

Facebook — long form

During the June 22nd Select Board meeting, several decisions were made that will have a lasting impact on Brookline residents, ranging from land use to town ethics.

Most notably, the Board voted to adopt a new bylaw prohibiting target practice on all town-owned lands. This decision came after significant debate regarding the legal validity of such a ban under state law (RSA 159-26). While some argued the restriction should be limited specifically to conservation lands to avoid legal overreach, the Board opted for a broader application across all town property. Member Steve Dolfini was the lone dissenting vote on this matter.

The Board also faced a difficult ethical dilemma regarding the stipend for the family of the late board member, Mark Fesendon. Discussion centered on whether to strictly adhere to the policy of pro-rating stipends or to grant the full amount in recognition of his service. The Board has delayed a final decision to research how past resignations or deaths were handled.

Finally, the Board stood behind the town planner’s assessment of the Onyx gravel operations, authorizing a letter to the state that criticizes the adequacy of recent traffic studies used to justify the project. Residents should continue to monitor these developments as the Board moves toward final decisions on these items. https://meetingwatch.org/nh/brookline/select-board/2026-06-22/ #MeetingWatch #BrooklineNH

Action ⁠items

Who owes what, by when.
Send two copies of the service recognition proclamation to the Fire and Ambulance departments for signatures.
Assigned: Board Member (unnamed)
Sign and dispatch the town planner's letter regarding Onyx operations.
Assigned: Chair/a speaker · Due: Next morning
Review Town Hall project manager bids and Pierce Pond dam removal bids.
Assigned: Board Members/Reviewers (including Scott and Andrea) · Due: Next meeting (two weeks)
Research past resignation and death payout precedents to determine consistency for the Fesendon stipend.
Assigned: Select Board
Revisit policy to potentially add distinctions between resignation and death for stipend purposes.
Assigned: Select Board · Due: Future meeting
Forward the email from Scott regarding road weight limits to the board.
Assigned: a speaker
Review items for next meeting: Pierce Pond, project manager applications, fire warden approval, Municipal Association delegate, and moving expenses.
Assigned: Select Board · Due: Next meeting

Member ⁠positions

10 issues · 21 explicit · 9 inferred · 1 unclear
A split vote in this meeting was recorded without naming the dissenter (e.g. a voice vote). Members whose individual vote could not be confirmed are marked UNCLEAR below — this is not the same as a “yes.” Named votes will be filled in if official minutes record them.
Brian Rater
Chair
Present
Approval of Minutes YES ~
Accept the warrants YES ~
Fire and Ambulance Service Proclamation YES ~
Fire Ward Appointment YES ~
Gathering Grounds Liquor License Extension YES ~
Bylaw Proposal: Target Practice on Town Lands UNCLEAR
Onyx Gravel Project Update YES
Town Hall Construction: Phase 1 Authorization YES ~
Authorize $2,551.45 from the ambulance expendable trust fund YES ~
Motion to enter non-public session YES
Ed Perry
Vice-Chair
Present
Approval of Minutes YES ~
Accept the warrants YES
Fire Ward Appointment YES
Bylaw Proposal: Target Practice on Town Lands NO
Argued that RSA 159-26 prevents the prohibition from being valid.
Onyx Gravel Project Update YES
Authorize $2,551.45 from the ambulance expendable trust fund YES
Motion to enter non-public session YES
Present
Approval of Minutes ABSTAIN
Fire and Ambulance Service Proclamation YES
Bylaw Proposal: Target Practice on Town Lands YES
Town Hall Construction: Phase 1 Authorization YES
Authorize $2,551.45 from the ambulance expendable trust fund YES
Present
Accept the warrants YES
Fire and Ambulance Service Proclamation YES
Fire Ward Appointment YES
Gathering Grounds Liquor License Extension YES
Bylaw Proposal: Target Practice on Town Lands NO
Voted against the adoption of the bylaw.
Onyx Gravel Project Update YES
Present
Gathering Grounds Liquor License Extension YES
Bylaw Proposal: Target Practice on Town Lands YES

Positions marked ~ are inferred from context and may not reflect the member's explicitly stated position. UNCLEAR means the vote was split but the record did not name how this member voted — it is not a “yes.”

Support coverage

Creating this report cost ⁠real money.

MeetingWatch attended, transcribed, and analyzed this meeting on its own dime. If this work is valuable to you, chip in to keep covering Brookline.

Report composed by gemma-4-26b, grok-4.3, grok-4-fast, grok-4.20-0309-reasoning · analyzed 2026-07-08.