Select Board — June 8, 2026
The meeting was largely procedural and focused on logistical planning and administrative management.
Public impact
SAU 65 Payment Schedule
See more
The board reviewed the current front-loaded payment schedule which requires a significant $700,000 outlay in July. They discussed the benefits of negotiating with the school district to equalize payments.
The board authorized a dialogue with the superintendent and business manager to discuss smoothing out the payments.
Floodplain Ordinance Revisions
See more
FEMA changes necessitate an ordinance update to protect resident flood insurance eligibility. Because this is a zoning matter, it typically requires a town meeting, which presents scheduling and cost challenges.
The board is investigating if a Planning Board hearing could satisfy the requirement or if extensions can be sought.
The board will wait for input from the Town Council and investigate alternative procedural routes.
Decisions logged
Topics discussed
▶ 00:00 Road Race and Community Event Planning
Updates regarding an upcoming road race, including route changes, fundraising, and ticket sales for a barbecue.
See more
The speaker detailed a more scenic race route involving Lake Todd and various trails to avoid multiple state route crossings. Discussion also covered barbecue ticket sales ($20), the addition of a kids' fun run, and necessary road closures on East Main Street.
The board discussed logistics and approved a motion to close East Main Street for the event.
A formal letter will be drafted to notify residents of the road closure.
▶ 05:41 Facilities Assessment Proposal
Review and approval of a proposal for a facilities assessment service.
See more
The board reviewed a $12,000 proposal from the Turner Group, which was the only bid received. Members noted that the scope matched the RFP and expressed confidence in the vendor.
The proposal was accepted.
▶ 07:01 Road Paving Bids
Comparison of multiple bids for road paving and culvert installation.
See more
The board compared bids from White's, United, Busby, and Pike. They analyzed the cost-effectiveness of hiring separate contractors for paving and culverts versus a single contractor for both.
The board decided to split the work, hiring Pike for paving and United for culverts to achieve the lowest combined cost.
▶ 16:01 Parks and Recreation Update
Update on garden maintenance, erosion control projects, and upcoming swim lessons.
See more
Reports included successful garden workdays, progress on the erosion control project at French's, and the hiring of a new park attendant. Plans for swim lessons and lifeguard recruitment were also discussed.
The department is moving forward with seasonal programming and maintenance.
The department is continuing to seek a lifeguard for swim lessons.
▶ 20:26 Joint Laws Management Committee
Proposal for the composition of a new Joint Laws Management Committee.
See more
A list of six members (three management, three staff) was proposed to satisfy RSA requirements for the committee structure.
The board approved the proposed names for the committee.
The committee needs to schedule its first meeting and elect a chairman.
▶ 2:20:40 Community Center (BACC) Governance
Discussion regarding the management and future governance of the BACC facility.
See more
Concerns were raised about the lack of staff to manage facility rentals and maintenance issues (e.g., plumbing). There was debate over whether to form a small governing board or wait for a larger community conversation.
The board decided to table the governance discussion until after a community conversation event on June 23rd.
A community conversation hosted by New Hampshire Humanities is scheduled for June 23rd.
▶ 5:19:00 SAU 65-2026-27 Payment Schedule
Review of the front-loaded school district payment schedule and potential cash flow impacts.
See more
The current schedule requires a large $700,000 payment in July. The board discussed negotiating with the school district to equalize payments to better manage town cash flow and interest earnings.
The board authorized a dialogue with the superintendent and business manager to discuss smoothing out payments.
▶ 6:50:40 Floodplain Ordinance Revisions
Discussion on the necessity of an emergency special town meeting to update floodplain ordinances due to FEMA changes.
See more
FEMA changes require an ordinance update to prevent residents from losing flood insurance by November 13th. Because it is a zoning matter, it requires a town meeting, which is costly and difficult to schedule quickly.
The board is exploring workarounds, such as a Planning Board hearing or reaching out to state/federal officials for an extension.
The board will wait for input from the Town Council and investigate if a Planning Board hearing can satisfy the requirement.
▶ 8:40:40 Intents to Cut and Logging Bonds
Review of logging requests and the potential reintroduction of road use bonds.
See more
The board discussed whether to require logging operations to post bonds to cover potential damage to roads and culverts, noting recent infrastructure wear.
The board tabled the current intents to cut until a plan for logging bonds is developed.
The board will seek clarification from the Town Council and potentially the Regional Planning Commission regarding bond requirements and assessment.
Controversy & dissent
Potentially controversial issues
Community Center (BACC) Governance
Floodplain Ordinance Revisions
Logging Bonds
Community vs. board tension
Action items
Notable statements
You use the oldest bread first. — Unidentified speaker · Regarding the strategy of drawing down expiring funds from last year before using current year's approved budget. ▶ 32:12
I don't want to put together a board today... Let's talk about a governance board [after the June 23rd meeting]. — Unidentified speaker · Arguing against forming a small, potentially exclusive committee for the community center until a larger community conversation has occurred. ▶ 5:09:40
Member positions
Positions marked ~ are inferred from context and may not reflect the member's explicitly stated position. UNCLEAR means the vote was split but the record did not name how this member voted — it is not a “yes.”
Public comment
Creating this report cost real money.
MeetingWatch attended, transcribed, and analyzed this meeting on its own dime. If this work is valuable to you, chip in to keep covering Bradford.
Follow Bradford
One email when a new report is published from the Select Board — or one weekly digest.
grok-4.3, gemma-4-26b, grok-4.20-0309-reasoning, grok-4-fast · analyzed 2026-06-10.