MeetingWatch
Your area Not set — showing everywhere
Meeting report · Zoning Board of Adjustment
Creating this report cost real money. Help fund coverage →

Zoning Board of Adjustment — March 17, 2026

The meeting was procedural and calm, featuring only one public speaker who expressed support for the project rather than opposition.

Date Tuesday, March 17, 2026 Public comments 1 Decisions 2 Routine

Public ⁠impact

Issues from this meeting with documented community impact.
01

Commercial expansion at 4 Mill Rd

Change from wood storage to active commercial/hospitality use (brewery/restaurant) likely increasing local traffic and activity. Affected: Local residents and abutters near Mill Road
zoning change

Decisions ⁠logged

Every recorded vote, with timestamps and dissents.
Approval of Brian Mackenzie's Special Exception Application for 4 Mill Rd.
The application was approved contingent upon the receipt of all required state permits.
Passed (Unanimous)
Approval of February 17, 2026, meeting minutes.
Minutes were accepted as amended.
Passed (Unanimous, with Dickinson abstaining from the original meeting in question)

Topics ⁠discussed

Click a topic to expand quotes and full context.
Public Hearing: Brian Mackenzie Special Exception Application

A request to enclose and expand an existing wood storage structure at 4 Mill Rd to accommodate commercial uses including a brewery, restaurant, bakery, and function hall.

Speakers: Jon Warzocha, Brian Mackenzie, Jeff Dickinson, Jeff Newcomb, Anne Drueding
Review and Approval of Minutes

The board reviewed the amended minutes from the February 17, 2026, meeting.

Speakers: Christine Vigenault, Jeff Newcomb, Jeff Dickinson

Controversy & ⁠dissent

Where the board, the community, or the agenda diverged.

Potentially controversial issues

01

Brian Mackenzie Special Exception Application (4 Mill Rd)

The application seeks to convert a wood storage structure into a multi-use commercial hub (brewery, restaurant, bakery, function hall), which typically raises concerns regarding noise, traffic, and land use changes in residential or semi-rural areas.
Board position: The board approved the application contingent upon state permits.
low concern

Action ⁠items

Who owes what, by when.
Obtain all required state permits to fulfill the conditions of the special exception approval.
Assigned: Brian Mackenzie

Notable ⁠statements

Approval of the application would require a unanimous vote. — Jon Warzocha · Noting that only three board members were present for the hearing.
Stated that she fully supports the refinery and their desire to expand the facility. — Anne Drueding · Public comment as a property abutter during the hearing.
Noted that even before the location was home to the refinery, the lot was used regularly by lumber yards and accessed regularly by trucks. — Jeff Newcomb · Discussion regarding anticipated increases in traffic to the property.

Member ⁠positions

2 issues · 0 explicit · 4 inferred
Jon Warzocha
Chair
Present
Public Hearing: Brian Mackenzie Special Exception Application YES ~
Supported approval contingent on state permits
Review and Approval of Minutes YES ~
Approved the amended minutes
Jeff Dickinson
Vice Chair
Present
Public Hearing: Brian Mackenzie Special Exception Application YES ~
Supported approval contingent on state permits
Review and Approval of Minutes YES
Approved the amended minutes
Andrew Guptill
Alternate
Absent

Positions marked ~ are inferred from context and may not reflect the member's explicitly stated position.

Public ⁠comment

What residents said — verbatim, with timestamps.
1
Total speakers
1
Addressed
0
Partial
0
Not addressed
Anne Drueding
07:20
Addressed
Ms. Drueding spoke as a property abutter regarding the special exception application. She expressed her full support for the refinery and their intention to expand the facility. Key concern
Support for the applicant's expansion project.
Board response
The board acknowledged the public hearing phase and moved to evaluate the application against the five required criteria, ultimately approving the application.
The speaker provided testimony of support, and the board proceeded to review the application criteria and grant the approval she supported.
Support coverage

Creating this report cost ⁠real money.

MeetingWatch attended, transcribed, and analyzed this meeting on its own dime. If this work is valuable to you, chip in to keep covering Andover.

Report composed by grok-4.3, gemma-4-26b, grok-4.20-0309-reasoning · analyzed 2026-06-01.