Select Board — June 18, 2026
Select Board holds significant off-agenda discussion on the legality of combined Treasurer/Administrator roles.
The meeting was primarily focused on administrative updates and procedural refinements, with no heated public debate recorded.
Questions about this meeting? Just ask.
Ask MeetingWatch answers from this meeting’s report, transcript, and records — with linked sources.
At the June 18 Select Board meeting, two significant topics were discussed that were not listed on the published public agenda, limiting the ability of residents to prepare for or specifically attend these discussions.
First, the Board held a high-significance discussion regarding the legality of combining the Treasurer and Town Administrator roles. This has been a point of ongoing community scrutiny. Vice Chairman Fenton presented research to argue that the arrangement is lawful under state statutes and that existing checks and balances, such as 'view-only' access for the Administrator, are sufficient. Because this was not on the agenda, residents were not given prior notice that this legal defense would be presented.
Second, the Board discussed a fundamental change to the Town Administrator’s performance evaluation process. Rather than using the existing scoring rubric, the Board is moving toward a 'narrative-based' approach. This change shifts how the town's top administrator is held accountable for meeting specific job requirements.
When major decisions regarding town oversight and governance are handled off-agenda, it reduces the transparency necessary for effective civic participation. We will continue to monitor how these changes are implemented.
Public impact
The bridge is currently under weight restrictions due to degraded steel and wood decking.
The Board received the status report and is awaiting technical details from a consulting engineer.
The matter is to be continued once technical details are available.
Topics discussed
Residents commended the Highway Supervisor for improvements in equipment, road conditions, and crew presence.
The Board noted that instead of a donation, the Town will coordinate with the Highway Supervisor to purchase the material from Mr. Champagne at a nominal rate of $1 per load to comply with RSA requirements.
The Board discussed revising the evaluation rubric to be more streamlined and aligned with the job description.
The Board decided to limit the current evaluation to Board members' input only, deferring staff input to a future cycle. They established a process of comparing individual member evaluations against the Administrator's self-assessment.
A Special Meeting is scheduled for Friday, June 26, 2026, at 9:00 AM to work on the rubric.
The Board reviewed feedback on the proposed strategic plan framework.
The Board agreed the document requires dedicated time to resolve outstanding questions and prepare it for publication on the Town website.
A Special Meeting is scheduled for Friday, July 10, 2026, at 9:00 AM to work on the strategic plan.
The Board reviewed the legality and financial safeguards of combining the Treasurer and Town Administrator roles.
The Board discussed existing financial checks and balances, such as the Town Administrator having only view-only access to the accounting system. No formal action was taken; the information was placed on the public record.
The Highway Supervisor provided updates on road maintenance, paving projects, and the Sam Hill Bridge.
The Board received the status report. Regarding the bridge, the Town Administrator is awaiting technical details from the consulting engineer.
The Sam Hill Bridge matter is to be continued.
Vice Chairman Fenton provided an update on the master plan and zoning ordinance compliance.
The Board discussed the importance of maintaining the distinction between the roles of the Planning Board and the Select Board. The camping ordinance rewrite is complete.
A local-ordinance enforcement policy for camping will be brought back to the Board.
Controversy & dissent
Potentially controversial issues
Combined Treasurer / Town Administrator Role
Town Administrator Performance Evaluation Process
Community vs. board tension
Public comment
Decisions logged
Action items
Member positions
Positions marked ~ are inferred from context and may not reflect the member's explicitly stated position. UNCLEAR means the vote was split but the record did not name how this member voted — it is not a “yes.”
Accountability flags
Agenda items not discussed
Topics discussed — not on agenda
Creating this report cost real money.
MeetingWatch attended, transcribed, and analyzed this meeting on its own dime. If this work is valuable to you, chip in to keep covering Andover.
Follow Andover
One email when a new report is published from the Select Board — or one weekly digest.
gemma-4-26b, grok-4.3, grok-4.20-0309-reasoning, grok-4-fast · analyzed 2026-06-22.
Members feature
Ask questions. Get answers with receipts.
Ask about anything covered on this page and get a plain-English answer that links to the report, the official records, and the exact moment in the meeting video.
Create a free accountFree with a MeetingWatch account — no card, no spam.
Already a member? Sign in
Ask questions about any meeting
Open a community, board, issue, or meeting and I can answer from its records — with links to the report, official documents, and the exact moment in the video.
Then reopen this button to start asking.
AI-generated from meeting records — verify against the linked sources. Conversations are stored (privacy).