Your area Not set — showing everywhere
Meeting report · Select Board Minutes-only
Creating this report cost real money. Help fund coverage →

Select Board — March 19, 2026

The temperature was elevated by a split vote on equipment and the significant, off-agenda discussion regarding the legal status of town boards.

Date Thursday, March 19, 2026 Public comments 1 Decisions 4 Lively

Questions about this meeting? ⁠Just ask.

Ask MeetingWatch answers from this meeting’s report, transcript, and records — with linked sources.

Summary AI-generated to surface controversy & community impact without bias — always verify against the actual meeting before relying on it.

Transparency Alert: During the March 19 Select Board meeting, a significant governance issue was discussed that was not included on the public agenda.

While the Board was ostensibly reviewing volunteer applications, the conversation shifted to a substantive discussion regarding eleven expired positions on various town boards and committees. Most concerning was the discussion regarding the 'de facto doctrine' and the legal status of these boards. Because this was not on the agenda, residents were denied the opportunity to prepare for or participate in a discussion that directly impacts the legitimacy of our local government.

In addition to this off-agenda discussion, the Board showed internal division regarding procurement procedures. A 2-1 vote on the purchase of a highway department hotbox highlighted a disagreement over whether the town followed proper protocol regarding the requirement for three quotes versus Town Meeting approval.

As taxpayers, we rely on the Select Board to follow transparent processes. When major discussions about the validity of town leadership happen without public notice, it undermines community trust and accountability.

Mar 19, 2026 1 public comments 4 decisions Lively
Notable statements Drag to browse

“Formal approval is not necessary for minutes.”

— Sieburg · Discussion regarding the lack of a quorum for the March 5, 2026, minutes.

“One of his pet peeves is lack of strategic planning.”

— Fenton · Discussing the importance of setting deadlines for Select Board goals.
This meeting — choose a section

Public ⁠impact

Issues from this meeting with documented community impact.
What was discussed

Significant concerns regarding town cash flow for monthly installments of the school assessment.

Topics ⁠discussed

Each topic expands to quotes and full context.
Speakers: Robart, Stewart, Teach, Cowdrey, Fenton
What was discussed

The Conservation Commission proposed creating a walking trail on the McDonough property using hand tools, running from Dyers Crossing to the Koron property.

Speakers: Duclos, Sieburg, Cowdrey, Fenton, Brule, Stewart
What was discussed

The Board reviewed the minutes from March 5 and March 11, 2026, including a discussion regarding the de facto doctrine and the status of expired board terms.

Speakers: Cornell, Stewart, Cowdrey, Hanson, Sieburg, Fenton
What was discussed

Discussions regarding quotes for a hotbox (Article 5), a new highway equipment trailer, and the purchase of a new welder.

Speakers: Fenton, Sieburg, Duclos
What was discussed

The Board discussed the eleven expired positions on town boards and committees and the application process for new members.

Speakers: Stewart, Cowdrey
What was discussed

The Board discussed replacing a dead maple tree on the town green, with a proposal for a sponsorship.

Speakers: Fenton, Cowdrey, Stewart, Champagne, Brule
What was discussed

Review of suggested goals such as road inventory, master plan, and the town website.

Speakers: Sieburg, Fenton, Reed
What was discussed

Review of the estimated 2026–2027 school assessment and concerns regarding town cash flow for monthly installments.

Controversy & ⁠dissent

Where the board, the community, or the agenda diverged.

Potentially controversial issues

01

Town Board Vacancies and De Facto Doctrine

The Board discussed eleven expired positions on town boards and committees and the legal status of boards operating under the 'de facto doctrine.' This is an aggravated transparency failure as the topic was discussed off-agenda, meaning residents had no opportunity to prepare or respond to a potential governance crisis.
Board position: The board acknowledged the high number of expired terms and the necessity of addressing the application process.
medium concern
02

Highway Department Hotbox Purchase

The purchase was subject to debate regarding whether the town required three quotes or if it could proceed based on Town Meeting approval.
Board position: The board approved the purchase despite the procedural debate.
Internal dissent
One member voted against the purchase due to the debate over quote requirements.
low concern

Split votes

Purchase of a hotbox (Article 5)
2-1

Community vs. board tension

Public ⁠comment

What residents said — verbatim, with timestamps.
1
Total speakers
0
Addressed
0
Partial
1
Not addressed
Robart
Not addressed
Robart expressed gratitude toward Highway Supervisor Jeremy Cornell. She specifically thanked him for his work plowing the ballfield parking lot on Lawrence Street. Key concern
Recognition of Highway Supervisor Jeremy Cornell's work.
The speaker was offering thanks/praise rather than raising a concern or request for action, so the board did not need to respond.

Decisions ⁠logged

Every recorded vote, with timestamps and dissents.
00:00
Support the Conservation Commission walking trail project on the McDonough property.
The trail will run from Dyers Crossing to the Koron property and include a bench.
Passed unanimously
Accept the March 11, 2026, meeting minutes.
The minutes included a summary of the de facto doctrine.
Passed unanimously
Purchase of a hotbox.
The motion to allow the purchase was made despite debates regarding the requirement for three quotes versus the Town Meeting approval.
Passed 2 in favor, 1 against
Sponsor a maple tree for the town green.
To replace a tree that had died last year.
Passed unanimously

Share ⁠this report

Drafts ready to post — click any block to copy.

X / Twitter — by angle

Off-agenda controversial decision regarding town governance/validity of boards
Transparency Alert: At the March 19 Select Board meeting, officials discussed the legal status of 11 expired town board positions and the 'de facto doctrine'—a major governance issue that was NOT on the public agenda. Residents... https://meetingwatch.org/nh/andover/select-board/2026-03-19/ #MeetingWatch #AndoverNH
316/280 chars
Split vote and procedural disagreement regarding procurement
The Andover Select Board split 2-1 on a motion to purchase a highway department hotbox. The dissent centered on whether the town followed proper procedure regarding the requirement for three quotes versus Town Meeting approval... https://meetingwatch.org/nh/andover/select-board/2026-03-19/ #MeetingWatch #AndoverNH
315/280 chars
Fiscal impact and community concern regarding school assessments
Andover taxpayers: The Select Board is reviewing the 2026–2027 school assessment. Key concerns were raised regarding the town's cash flow and its ability to manage monthly installments for these significant payments. Stay tuned... https://meetingwatch.org/nh/andover/select-board/2026-03-19/ #MeetingWatch #AndoverNH
316/280 chars

X thread

1
Andover Select Board transparency issue: On March 19, the Board held a substantive discussion regarding a potential governance crisis that was not listed on the public agenda. 🧵 #MeetingWatch #AndoverNH
202/280
2
While reviewing volunteer applications, the Board shifted into a discussion about 11 expired town board positions and the legal 'de facto doctrine.' This affects the very validity of our local government, yet residents were given no prior notice.
246/280
3
When major questions about the legality of town boards are discussed off-agenda, the public loses its ability to participate in the conversation. We deserve transparency on how our town is being governed.
204/280
4
The Board also split 2-1 on a highway equipment purchase (a hotbox) due to concerns over whether the town met quote requirements. Between off-agenda governance talks and procurement disputes, residents need to stay vigilant. https://meetingwatch.org/nh/andover/select-board/2026-03-19/
248/280

Facebook — long form

Transparency Alert: During the March 19 Select Board meeting, a significant governance issue was discussed that was not included on the public agenda. 

While the Board was ostensibly reviewing volunteer applications, the conversation shifted to a substantive discussion regarding eleven expired positions on various town boards and committees. Most concerning was the discussion regarding the 'de facto doctrine' and the legal status of these boards. Because this was not on the agenda, residents were denied the opportunity to prepare for or participate in a discussion that directly impacts the legitimacy of our local government.

In addition to this off-agenda discussion, the Board showed internal division regarding procurement procedures. A 2-1 vote on the purchase of a highway department hotbox highlighted a disagreement over whether the town followed proper protocol regarding the requirement for three quotes versus Town Meeting approval.

As taxpayers, we rely on the Select Board to follow transparent processes. When major discussions about the validity of town leadership happen without public notice, it undermines community trust and accountability. https://meetingwatch.org/nh/andover/select-board/2026-03-19/ #MeetingWatch #AndoverNH

Action ⁠items

Who owes what, by when.
Review and discuss adjustments to the -1 school payment schedule and strategies for the -1 assessment.
Assigned: Select Board
Submit suggestions for 2026 Select Board goals.
Assigned: Delaney and Swenson
Issue $15,000 check to Concord Coach / Historical Society per Warrant Article 14.
Assigned: Town Administrator · Due: 2026-04-03

Member ⁠positions

7 issues · 0 explicit · 15 inferred
Dana Swenson
Chair
Unknown
Conservation Commission Walking Trail YES ~
Supported the project
Approval of Meeting Minutes YES ~
Accepted the minutes
Highway Department Equipment YES ~
Approved hotbox purchase
Town Green Maple Trees YES ~
Supported tree sponsorship
Present
Conservation Commission Walking Trail YES ~
Supported the project
Approval of Meeting Minutes YES ~
Accepted the minutes
Highway Department Equipment YES ~
Approved hotbox purchase
Town Green Maple Trees YES ~
Supported tree sponsorship
2026 Select Board Goals
Participated in goal review
Unknown
2026 Select Board Goals
Tasked with submitting goal suggestions
Present
Conservation Commission Walking Trail YES ~
Supported the project
Approval of Meeting Minutes YES ~
Accepted the minutes
Highway Department Equipment YES ~
Approved hotbox purchase
Town Board Vacancies
Discussed expired positions and application process
2026 Select Board Goals
Emphasized importance of strategic planning
Preliminary School Payment Discussion
Discussed assessment and cash flow concerns
Present
Conservation Commission Walking Trail YES ~
Supported the project
Approval of Meeting Minutes YES ~
Accepted the minutes
Highway Department Equipment YES ~
Approved hotbox purchase
Town Green Maple Trees YES ~
Supported tree sponsorship
2026 Select Board Goals
Participated in goal review

Positions marked ~ are inferred from context and may not reflect the member's explicitly stated position. UNCLEAR means the vote was split but the record did not name how this member voted — it is not a “yes.”

Accountability ⁠flags

Documented procedural gaps. Each item links to its source.

Agenda items not discussed

Topics discussed — not on agenda

Transcript vs. official minutes

Support coverage

Creating this report cost ⁠real money.

MeetingWatch attended, transcribed, and analyzed this meeting on its own dime. If this work is valuable to you, chip in to keep covering Andover.

Report composed by grok-4.3, grok-4.20-0309-reasoning, gemma-4-26b · analyzed 2026-06-01.