Meeting report · Planning Board
Creating this report cost real money.
Help fund coverage →
Planning Board — March 18, 2026
Abutters voiced targeted objections on noise, parking scale, and conservation commitments, but dialogue remained constructive with partial mitigations offered and no board division.
Decisions logged
Every recorded vote, with timestamps and dissents.
Topics discussed
Click a topic to expand quotes and full context.
▶ 00:03 Meeting Opening and Member Welcome
Called to order; welcomed new member Joe Broderick and re-elected member Tom Quinn. Deferred officer selection to next meeting due to absent member.
Speakers: Unidentified speaker
▶ 02:25 Buck Meadow Athletic Field and Parking Improvement Project
Presentation by Sam Poiser (Meridian Land Services) on revised site plans addressing parking (242 spaces, mostly grass), stormwater, buffers, pickleball/basketball removal, fields 30ft from wetlands, emergency access, and DOT/AOT permits. Joint meeting with Conservation Commission informed changes to meet purchase agreement intent.
Speakers: Unidentified speaker
▶ 25:03 Board and Public Comments on Buck Meadow Plan
Board questions on secondary access permanence, high school runner trails, parking volume, playground/pickleball locations, and bus access. Abutters raised concerns about parking visibility/impacts, pickleball noise, emergency access through conservation land, landscaping/screening, and adherence to prior commitments. Conservation Commission clarified no permanent road through open space.
Speakers: Unidentified speaker
▶ 51:50 Minutes Approval and Board Membership
Approved March 4 minutes. Discussed pending alternate applications (including from Doug Jabinski and Megan Murray) and need to fill vacancies for next meeting.
Speakers: Unidentified speaker
Controversy & dissent
Where the board, the community, or the agenda diverged.
Potentially controversial issues
01
Buck Meadow Athletic Field and Parking Improvement Project
Abutters strongly object to 242-space parking lot scale, pickleball court relocation near residences (noise, visual impact), and any risk of permanent access roads through conserved open space, despite supporting the original recreation-conservation purchase intent.
Board position: Proceeding with revised plans (grass parking, wetland buffers, temporary emergency access only) while discussing mitigation options such as screening plantings.
medium concern
Community vs. board tension
Ready to share? AI-written accountability posts about this meeting's controversies.
View posts →
Action items
Who owes what, by when.
Provide exhibit showing school bus turning maneuver on site plan
Assigned: Sam Poiser (Meridian)
Review and discuss alternate member applications at next meeting
Assigned: Planning Board · Due: 2026-04-01
Donate time to review landscaping for parking screening and aesthetics
Assigned: a speaker (Craig)
Email operating agreement copy to abutters upon request
Assigned: Irene Berry
Notable statements
Requested reconsideration of permanent secondary access from Stearns Road for public safety, especially for high school events and runners. — Unidentified speaker · Board discussion on emergency access ▶ 25:17
Questioned need for 242 parking spaces and suggested relocating playground closer to fields and pickleball courts nearer to existing facilities with screening. — Unidentified speaker · Board feedback on site plan layout ▶ 34:08
Permanent road through conserved open space would fragment grassland ecosystem and violate operating agreement; temporary grass path access acceptable for emergencies only. — Unidentified speaker · Conservation Commission position ▶ 26:55
Supported recreation development per original purchase intent but requested plantings to screen parking and concerns over pickleball noise near homes. — Unidentified speaker · Abutter comment ▶ 45:50
Public comment
What residents said — verbatim, with timestamps.
4
Total speakers
2
Addressed
2
Partial
1
Not addressed
Linda Lucy
Partial
Abutter from Buck Meadow condos who recalled the original collaborative purchase for recreation and conservation. Supports the intended recreational use but strongly objects to relocating pickleball courts closer to homes due to noise, grading issues, and retaining walls; requests evergreen plantings for screening and supports emergency access without turning conservation land into a permanent road.
Key concern
Noise and visual impact of pickleball courts near residences; preserving conservation values and natural aesthetic; adequate screening/landscaping for parking areas.
Board responseChair (a speaker) and project team discussed potential landscaping, screening with evergreens, and sound barriers; noted operating agreement limits structures to maintain natural aesthetic; offered to work on landscaping design.
Board and presenter acknowledged concerns and discussed mitigation options like plantings and possible relocation, but no firm commitments or design changes were made during the meeting.
John Ryles
Partial
Abutter who agrees pickleball courts should remain far from homes due to documented noise complaints affecting property values. Recalled prior town commitments (no new driveways/parking lots beyond existing) from -1 meetings and expressed shock at the scale of proposed parking (240+ spaces).
Key concern
Excessive parking expansion contradicting earlier town representations; noise from pickleball courts.
Board responsePresenter clarified grass/gravel parking to reduce visual impact; board noted the scale of parking was under discussion.
Presenter responded directly about parking surface materials and prior concepts; board did not address the alleged broken commitment or reduce parking numbers.
Jean Navariski
Not addressed
Abutter questioning frequency of large events requiring the full 240-space parking lot and whether the gate would remain closed otherwise. Expressed concern about constant car presence, grass parking wear turning to dirt/mud, and visual impact from condos; requested written commitments on usage limits and septic protection.
Key concern
Ongoing visual/noise impact and durability of grass parking; lack of written commitments on event frequency and access.
Board responsePresenter and board noted parking would not be full at all times and that grass areas would be used primarily for tournaments; no specific frequency data or written commitments provided.
Board acknowledged the issue but provided no data on event frequency or formal written assurances.
Jeannie Lute
Addressed
Non-abutter resident recalling past concerns with lights at other fields; asked for confirmation there will be no field lights and requested it in writing. Also inquired about project funding sources and timeline.
Key concern
Potential future installation of field lights; project funding and timeline transparency.
Board responsePresenter confirmed no plans for lights (per operating agreement) and detailed capital reserve + LWCF grant funding with construction possibly starting spring 2028; offered to provide operating agreement copy.
Clear verbal confirmation on lights with reference to operating agreement; funding details and timeline fully provided.
Linda Lucy
Addressed
Follow-up request to reconsider evergreen plantings to screen the existing clubhouse parking lot from the condos, noting prior town agreement that was delayed by COVID.
Key concern
Visual screening of existing parking area.
Board responseChair (a speaker, landscape architect) offered to donate time to develop effective landscaping/screening plan integrated with the project.
Chair directly engaged and committed personal time to address the landscaping request.
Support coverage
Creating this report cost real money.
MeetingWatch attended, transcribed, and analyzed this meeting on its own dime. If this work is valuable to you, chip in to keep covering Amherst.
Follow Amherst
One email when a new report is published from the Planning Board — or one weekly digest.
Report composed by
grok-4.3, claude-opus-4-7 · analyzed 2026-05-27.