Your area Not set — showing everywhere
Meeting report · Planning Board
Creating this report cost real money. Help fund coverage →

Planning Board — March 18, 2026

Abutters voiced targeted objections on noise, parking scale, and conservation commitments, but dialogue remained constructive with partial mitigations offered and no board division.

Date Wednesday, March 18, 2026 Duration 0.9h Speakers 10 Public comments 4 Decisions 2 Lively

Questions about this meeting? ⁠Just ask.

Ask MeetingWatch answers from this meeting’s report, transcript, and records — with linked sources.

Summary AI-generated to surface controversy & community impact without bias — always verify against the actual meeting before relying on it.

At its March 18 meeting, the Amherst Planning Board reviewed updated plans for the Buck Meadow Athletic Field and Parking Improvement Project. The presentation covered 242 parking spaces (mostly grass), wetland buffers, and removal of some courts, with changes made after a joint session with the Conservation Commission.

Abutters spoke against the parking lot's size and location, potential pickleball noise, and any permanent access through open space. The Conservation Commission confirmed no permanent road would be permitted. Board members asked about bus access and screening but took no action to reduce parking or add written limits.

Action items include a bus turning exhibit and one member donating time to review landscaping. No firm commitments were made to address the scale of impacts raised by neighbors.

Mar 18, 2026 0.9h long 10 speakers 4 public comments 2 decisions Lively
Notable statements Drag to browse

“Requested reconsideration of permanent secondary access from Stearns Road for public safety, especially for high school events and runners.”

— Unidentified speaker · Board discussion on emergency access ▶ 15:03

“Questioned need for 242 parking spaces and suggested relocating playground closer to fields and pickleball courts nearer to existing facilities with screening.”

— Unidentified speaker · Board feedback on site plan layout ▶ 20:34

“Permanent road through conserved open space would fragment grassland ecosystem and violate operating agreement; temporary grass path access acceptable for emergencies only.”

— Unidentified speaker · Conservation Commission position ▶ 16:16

“Supported recreation development per original purchase intent but requested plantings to screen parking and concerns over pickleball noise near homes.”

— Unidentified speaker · Abutter comment ▶ 27:52
This meeting — choose a section

Topics ⁠discussed

Each topic expands to quotes and full context.
Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

Called to order; welcomed new member Joe Broderick and re-elected member Tom Quinn. Deferred officer selection to next meeting due to absent member.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

Presentation by Sam Poiser (Meridian Land Services) on revised site plans addressing parking (242 spaces, mostly grass), stormwater, buffers, pickleball/basketball removal, fields 30ft from wetlands, emergency access, and DOT/AOT permits. Joint meeting with Conservation Commission informed changes to meet purchase agreement intent.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

Board questions on secondary access permanence, high school runner trails, parking volume, playground/pickleball locations, and bus access. Abutters raised concerns about parking visibility/impacts, pickleball noise, emergency access through conservation land, landscaping/screening, and adherence to prior commitments. Conservation Commission clarified no permanent road through open space.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

Approved March 4 minutes. Discussed pending alternate applications (including from Doug Jabinski and Megan Murray) and need to fill vacancies for next meeting.

Controversy & ⁠dissent

Where the board, the community, or the agenda diverged.

Potentially controversial issues

01

Buck Meadow Athletic Field and Parking Improvement Project

Abutters strongly object to 242-space parking lot scale, pickleball court relocation near residences (noise, visual impact), and any risk of permanent access roads through conserved open space, despite supporting the original recreation-conservation purchase intent.
Board position: Proceeding with revised plans (grass parking, wetland buffers, temporary emergency access only) while discussing mitigation options such as screening plantings.
medium concern

Community vs. board tension

Public ⁠comment

What residents said — verbatim, with timestamps.
4
Total speakers
2
Addressed
2
Partial
1
Not addressed
Linda Lucy
Partial
Abutter from Buck Meadow condos who recalled the original collaborative purchase for recreation and conservation. Supports the intended recreational use but strongly objects to relocating pickleball courts closer to homes due to noise, grading issues, and retaining walls; requests evergreen plantings for screening and supports emergency access without turning conservation land into a permanent road. Key concern
Noise and visual impact of pickleball courts near residences; preserving conservation values and natural aesthetic; adequate screening/landscaping for parking areas.
Board response
Chair (a speaker) and project team discussed potential landscaping, screening with evergreens, and sound barriers; noted operating agreement limits structures to maintain natural aesthetic; offered to work on landscaping design.
Board and presenter acknowledged concerns and discussed mitigation options like plantings and possible relocation, but no firm commitments or design changes were made during the meeting.
John Ryles
Partial
Abutter who agrees pickleball courts should remain far from homes due to documented noise complaints affecting property values. Recalled prior town commitments (no new driveways/parking lots beyond existing) from -1 meetings and expressed shock at the scale of proposed parking (240+ spaces). Key concern
Excessive parking expansion contradicting earlier town representations; noise from pickleball courts.
Board response
Presenter clarified grass/gravel parking to reduce visual impact; board noted the scale of parking was under discussion.
Presenter responded directly about parking surface materials and prior concepts; board did not address the alleged broken commitment or reduce parking numbers.
Jean Navariski
Not addressed
Abutter questioning frequency of large events requiring the full 240-space parking lot and whether the gate would remain closed otherwise. Expressed concern about constant car presence, grass parking wear turning to dirt/mud, and visual impact from condos; requested written commitments on usage limits and septic protection. Key concern
Ongoing visual/noise impact and durability of grass parking; lack of written commitments on event frequency and access.
Board response
Presenter and board noted parking would not be full at all times and that grass areas would be used primarily for tournaments; no specific frequency data or written commitments provided.
Board acknowledged the issue but provided no data on event frequency or formal written assurances.
Jeannie Lute
Addressed
Non-abutter resident recalling past concerns with lights at other fields; asked for confirmation there will be no field lights and requested it in writing. Also inquired about project funding sources and timeline. Key concern
Potential future installation of field lights; project funding and timeline transparency.
Board response
Presenter confirmed no plans for lights (per operating agreement) and detailed capital reserve + LWCF grant funding with construction possibly starting spring 2028; offered to provide operating agreement copy.
Clear verbal confirmation on lights with reference to operating agreement; funding details and timeline fully provided.
Linda Lucy
Addressed
Follow-up request to reconsider evergreen plantings to screen the existing clubhouse parking lot from the condos, noting prior town agreement that was delayed by COVID. Key concern
Visual screening of existing parking area.
Board response
Chair (a speaker, landscape architect) offered to donate time to develop effective landscaping/screening plan integrated with the project.
Chair directly engaged and committed personal time to address the landscaping request.

Decisions ⁠logged

Every recorded vote, with timestamps and dissents.
Approve minutes of March 4, 2026
Motion by a speaker, seconded; all in favor.
Approved
Adjourn meeting
Motion and second; all in favor.
Approved

Share ⁠this report

Drafts ready to post — click any block to copy.

X / Twitter — by angle

community concerns on Buck Meadow parking and pickleball impacts
At the March 18 Planning Board meeting, abutters again raised concerns about the Buck Meadow project's 242-space parking lot scale, pickleball noise near homes, and risks to conserved open space. The board acknowledged issues... https://meetingwatch.org/nh/amherst/planning-board/2026-03-18/ #MeetingWatch #AmherstNH
316/280 chars
conservation land protections and lack of binding mitigation
Amherst Planning Board discussed revised Buck Meadow plans March 18, including grass parking and temporary emergency access only. Conservation Commission stated no permanent road through open space will be allowed, yet abutters... https://meetingwatch.org/nh/amherst/planning-board/2026-03-18/ #MeetingWatch #AmherstNH
318/280 chars
lack of decisive action on resident objections
Board members at the March 18 meeting questioned the need for 242 parking spaces at Buck Meadow and suggested relocating pickleball courts. No votes were taken on changes; the project moves forward with only voluntary... https://meetingwatch.org/nh/amherst/planning-board/2026-03-18/ #MeetingWatch #AmherstNH
308/280 chars

X thread

1
Amherst Planning Board took public comments March 18 on the Buck Meadow Athletic Field project. Abutters objected to the 242-space lot's visibility and durability, pickleball noise near condos, and any chance of permanent roads through conserved land. #MeetingWatch #AmherstNH
276/280
2
The Conservation Commission clarified that only temporary grass paths would be allowed for emergencies. The board discussed screening plantings and possible court relocation but made no reductions to parking numbers or binding commitments on usage.
248/280
3
Residents have now raised the same concerns at multiple meetings. The board's response remains discussion of mitigations without firm changes, leaving the revised site plan on track for further review. https://meetingwatch.org/nh/amherst/planning-board/2026-03-18/
225/280

Facebook — long form

At its March 18 meeting, the Amherst Planning Board reviewed updated plans for the Buck Meadow Athletic Field and Parking Improvement Project. The presentation covered 242 parking spaces (mostly grass), wetland buffers, and removal of some courts, with changes made after a joint session with the Conservation Commission.

Abutters spoke against the parking lot's size and location, potential pickleball noise, and any permanent access through open space. The Conservation Commission confirmed no permanent road would be permitted. Board members asked about bus access and screening but took no action to reduce parking or add written limits.

Action items include a bus turning exhibit and one member donating time to review landscaping. No firm commitments were made to address the scale of impacts raised by neighbors. https://meetingwatch.org/nh/amherst/planning-board/2026-03-18/ #MeetingWatch #AmherstNH

Action ⁠items

Who owes what, by when.
Provide exhibit showing school bus turning maneuver on site plan
Assigned: Sam Poiser (Meridian)
Review and discuss alternate member applications at next meeting
Assigned: Planning Board · Due: 2026-04-01
Donate time to review landscaping for parking screening and aesthetics
Assigned: a speaker (Craig)
Email operating agreement copy to abutters upon request
Assigned: Irene Berry
Support coverage

Creating this report cost ⁠real money.

MeetingWatch attended, transcribed, and analyzed this meeting on its own dime. If this work is valuable to you, chip in to keep covering Amherst.

Report composed by grok-4.3, claude-opus-4-7 · analyzed 2026-05-27.