Your area Not set — showing everywhere
Drafts ready to share

Accountability posts

Drafts ready to share. Click to copy, then post. Planning Board · Amherst, NH · July 2, 2025.

X / ⁠Twitter

Individual posts for different angles. Pick the one that fits your audience.

Developer attempting to shift oversight costs to taxpayers — board's firm rejection is the accountability win, but the ask is worth residents knowing about

A developer asked Amherst's Planning Board (7/2) to have TAXPAYERS pay ~$100,000 in inspection costs for roads the developer is building. Board rejected it. But the ask itself tells you something about how this negotiation is going.
232/280 chars

Repeated community concern about rural character destruction met with sympathetic words but no formal action

At 7/2 Planning Board, residents showed photos of clear-cutting from already-approved County Road development. The Chair said 'I'm going to do everything I can.' But no enforceable commitment was made. Same concern. Same answer. Watch the Aug 20 hearing.
254/280 chars

Split vote on impact fee fairness and precedent for other pre-existing lot owners

Amherst Planning Board voted 3-1 on 7/2 to deny a $14,000 impact fee waiver for a lot that was approved and taxed separately for 37 years — before impact fees existed. Owner says they got no notification. Sets precedent for other pre-existing lots.
248/280 chars

Unresolved public health concern about aquifer protection with no board action taken

A resident told Amherst's Planning Board on 7/2 that 70% of town residents drink from the aquifer beneath the County Road development site — and the wetland study being used is from 1980. The board thanked the speaker and moved on. No updated review ordered.
258/280 chars

X ⁠thread

Post these in sequence for maximum impact.
1
🧵 Amherst Planning Board met 7/2 on a 40-lot County Road subdivision. Here's what happened — and what didn't get resolved. Thread:
130/280
2
1/ The developer's attorney opened by offering to pay the FULL cost of County Road improvements — normally the town's burden. Sounds generous. The Chair immediately asked why. His read: it's a legal maneuver to neutralize the town's 'premature development' grounds for denial.
276/280
3
2/ Then the developer asked the town to pay ~$100,000 in third-party inspection and review costs for the roads and stormwater work. The Chair called it 'an open-ended blank check' inconsistent with every prior practice. Board members agreed. Request rejected.
259/280
4
3/ Residents showed the board photos of clear-cutting from an already-approved development on County Road. Asked: will this project look the same? The Chair said he'd 'use every authority available.' No formal protection was put in writing. No commitment on record.
265/280
5
4/ A resident flagged that 70% of Amherst residents rely on aquifer well water beneath this development site — and that the wetland delineation study on file is from 1980. A prior nearby project caused school flooding. The board thanked the speaker. No updated study ordered.
275/280
6
5/ Separately, the board voted 3-1 to deny a $14,000 impact fee waiver for a lot approved and taxed for 37 years before impact fees existed. Owner says they paid ~$90,000 in extra taxes and were never notified. One board member called fees unfair — then voted to enforce them anyway for consistency.
299/280
7
6/ Also flagged: an 18-unit workforce housing proposal on Camp Road included a 14-foot driveway. A board member noted fire lanes require 16 feet minimum. That's a life-safety issue for future residents — unresolved at conceptual stage.
235/280
8
7/ Next steps: Workshop July 16 at 7pm. Next public hearing Aug 20 at 7pm. The road deal, the stormwater approach, and the rural character protections are all still open. Show up or watch the recording. This is far from decided. /end
233/280

Facebook

Longer-form draft.
Here's what happened at Amherst's Planning Board meeting on July 2, 2025 — including several things that deserve more public attention before the next hearing on August 20.

The main item was a 40-lot residential subdivision proposed by Vonderosa Properties on County Road. The developer's attorney made what he called a 'generous' offer: the applicant would pay the full cost of designing and constructing County Road improvements — normally the town's financial burden — in exchange for regulatory concessions. The board chair publicly questioned the motive, noting that the offer appears designed to eliminate the town's legal basis for denying the application on 'premature development' grounds. The board also unanimously rejected a separate request from the developer to have town taxpayers cover roughly $100,000 in third-party inspection and review costs — the chair called it an 'open-ended blank check' unlike anything done in prior applications. A workshop is scheduled for July 16 at 7pm to continue deliberations.

Residents raised serious environmental concerns that the board has not yet formally acted on. Howard and Amy Muscott presented photographs showing that a current approved development on County Road resulted in extensive clear-cutting — and asked whether this project would produce the same outcome. Resident Sullivan told the board that 70% of Amherst residents depend on well water drawn from the aquifer directly beneath the development site, and that the wetland study on record dates to 1980 — 45 years ago. A prior nearby development was cited as having caused flooding at a local school. The board chair expressed personal concern and said he would 'use every authority available,' but no enforceable requirement for updated environmental review was established.

In a separate vote, the board denied 3-1 a request to waive a $14,000 impact fee for a lot at 4A Buckridge Drive that was approved and taxed independently for 37 years — well before impact fees were ever established in Amherst. The property owner argued they paid approximately $90,000 in extra taxes during that period and received no notification about the fee. The board majority voted to deny the waiver on grounds of consistent process, setting a precedent that no grandfather exemption exists for pre-existing lots regardless of their history. One board member dissented.

The next public hearing on the Vonderosa subdivision is August 20 at 7pm. A workshop session open to the public is scheduled for July 16 at 7pm. If the County Road development, the aquifer, or the impact fee precedent affects you, these are the meetings to attend.
← Back to full meeting report