Accountability posts
Drafts ready to share. Click to copy, then post. Planning Board · Amherst, NH · March 19, 2025.
X / Twitter
Individual posts for different angles. Pick the one that fits your audience.
Community concern about repeated continuances and respect for residents' time
A resident at Amherst's 3/19 Planning Board raised a real concern: people rearrange schedules to attend hearings, then cases get continued — again. The Jacobson case has been running for months. The Chair said he would not recommend any limits on continuances.
260/280 chars
High-stakes upcoming application flagged by the board's own logistical response — public should be aware
Amherst Planning Board moved its April 16 meeting to the high school for expected large turnout on a County Road application. No details about the application were shared. If you live near County Road, start paying attention now.
229/280 chars
Board composition and voting eligibility concerns — procedural legitimacy issue
Amherst's Planning Board discussed membership vacancies, voting eligibility, and ex officio confusion at its 3/19 meeting. Multiple positions remain unfilled. Decisions made by an improperly constituted board can face legal challenges.
235/280 chars
Straightforward land use decision with reduced project scope
Amherst Planning Board unanimously found LaBelle Winery's site plan amendment — reducing parking and removing a proposed guest house — has no regional impact. Quick vote, no public opposition.
192/280 chars
X thread
Post these in sequence for maximum impact.
1
🧵 Amherst Planning Board met 3/19/25. It was a short, mostly procedural meeting — but there are a few things residents should know before April 16, when the real action starts. Thread:
184/280
2
1/ LaBelle Winery's site plan amendment — to reduce parking and remove a proposed guest house — was unanimously found to have no regional impact. A straightforward vote with no public opposition.
195/280
3
2/ A resident (Will, 3 School St.) raised a legitimate concern: long-running cases like Jacobson keep getting continued, costing community members time and giving them no clear endpoint. He asked for status updates on both Jacobson and Vorosa. The Chair confirmed he already provides Jacobson updates at every meeting but did not explicitly commit to the same for Vorosa.
371/280
4
3/ The Chair also said he would not recommend limiting continuances: 'I don't want to cut short an applicant's opportunity to present its case.' That's a reasonable principle — but no mechanism was offered to balance it against residents' time.
244/280
5
4/ The board discussed its own membership gaps and voting eligibility questions — including confusion over who can vote and who holds ex officio status. Multiple positions remain vacant, and the process to fill them is expected to take a couple of months.
255/280
6
5/ The board moved its April 16 meeting to the high school to handle expected large turnout for a County Road application. No details about that application were shared. If you're a neighbor or care about land use on County Road — that's the meeting to attend.
260/280
7
6/ All votes 3/19 were unanimous. The process concerns are about transparency and board composition — not outcomes. Mark April 16 on your calendar. 📍 Amherst high school. Time TBD.
180/280
Longer-form draft.
AMHERST PLANNING BOARD — March 19, 2025 Meeting Recap The meeting was short and all votes were unanimous, but there are a few things residents should know. First, a community concern that was only partially addressed: Resident Will (3 School Street) raised a frustration many neighbors likely share — hearings get continued repeatedly, people rearrange their schedules to attend, and long-running cases like Jacobson drag on without clear resolution. He asked for status updates on both the Jacobson and Vorosa applications. The Chair confirmed he already provides Jacobson updates at every meeting but did not explicitly make the same commitment for Vorosa. He also said he would not recommend limiting continuances, citing applicants' rights to present their cases. That's a reasonable principle — but the board offered no mechanism to balance it against residents' time and reasonable expectations. Second, the board spent time discussing its own membership vacancies, voting eligibility for new members, and confusion over ex officio status. These are consequential procedural matters — an improperly constituted board's decisions can face legal challenges. Multiple positions remain vacant, and the process to fill them through Select Board appointment and recruitment of alternates is expected to take a couple of months. Third, the LaBelle Winery site plan amendment — to reduce parking and remove a proposed guest house — was unanimously found to have no regional impact. A straightforward decision based on the reduced scope of the changes. Finally, mark your calendar: The Planning Board has already moved its April 16 meeting to the high school because it expects large public attendance for an upcoming County Road application. No details about that application were discussed at this meeting. If you live near County Road or care about land use decisions in that area, April 16 is the meeting to attend.