Planning Board — December 4, 2024
Routine procedural approvals contrasted with extended questioning and multiple public comments on density, buffers, and land use, leading to deferral rather than approval.
Public impact
Jacobson subdivision and CUP under former IIHO/PRD rules
Decisions logged
Topics discussed
▶ 00:53 Eversource (Public Service of New Hampshire) Compliance Hearing
Review of as-built non-residential site plan for substation expansion at 2 Hertz Drive; applicant proposed bonding ~$145k for delayed landscaping installation until spring.
▶ 12:18 Jacobson Revocable Trust Subdivision Application
Discussion of final subdivision approval for 33 single-family lots plus farm and open space lots under the former Integrated Innovative Housing Ordinance; included CUP request, two waivers (cul-de-sac radius, roadway slope), stormwater design, and completeness determination.
▶ 1:02:22 Sidewalk and walking access
Discussion of potential sidewalk or path along Christian Hill to support walking to schools from the 39-unit development.
▶ 1:03:30 Housing unit design and senior housing
Board members questioned ensuite bedrooms and whether a multi-bedroom senior house counts as one unit.
▶ 1:04:45 Farming plans and land management
Applicant described hiring consultant Ian McSweeney for a farm plan using 99-year leases, 1% transfer fee, and polyface/permaculture methods on ~4.5 acres.
▶ 1:09:33 Cul-de-sac and density
Questions on shared driveway serving ~6 properties at the cul-de-sac end.
▶ 1:19:09 Public comments
Residents and abutters commented on farmland ownership, wetland buffers, solar arrays, and housing types.
▶ 1:25:08 Case scheduling and minutes approval
Board discussed timeline for engineering review and continued the application; approved November minutes and adjourned.
Controversy & dissent
Potentially controversial issues
Jacobson subdivision buffers, farmland ownership, and solar compatibility
Community vs. board tension
Action items
Notable statements
Recommended requiring NH Dept. of Agriculture best management practices as enforceable conditions for farming activities via HOA — Unidentified speaker · Jacobson discussion ▶ 21:00
Requested demonstration that the project still delivers the mix of housing benefits (single-bedroom, single-floor, etc.) that justified up to 39 dwelling units in the CUP approval — Unidentified speaker · Jacobson discussion ▶ 28:25
Farming is already occurring on site with chicken tractors and haying at no cost. — Unidentified speaker · Response on farm viability ▶ 1:12:12
The senior house counts as one of 37 units despite four bedrooms. — Unidentified speaker · Clarification on unit counting ▶ 1:15:08
Public comment
Accountability flags
Topics discussed — not on agenda
Creating this report cost real money.
MeetingWatch attended, transcribed, and analyzed this meeting on its own dime. If this work is valuable to you, chip in to keep covering Amherst.
Follow Amherst
One email when a new report is published from the Planning Board — or one weekly digest.
grok-4.3, claude-opus-4-7 · analyzed 2026-05-27.