Your area Not set — showing everywhere
Meeting report · Planning Board
Creating this report cost real money. Help fund coverage →

Planning Board — December 4, 2024

Amherst Planning Board discussed unlisted Jacobson subdivision concerns on buffers, farmland ownership, and solar arrays at Dec 4 meeting

Routine procedural approvals contrasted with extended questioning and multiple public comments on density, buffers, and land use, leading to deferral rather than approval.

Date Wednesday, December 4, 2024 Duration 1.6h Speakers 12 Public comments 7 Decisions 5 Lively

Questions about this meeting? ⁠Just ask.

Ask MeetingWatch answers from this meeting’s report, transcript, and records — with linked sources.

Summary AI-generated to surface controversy & community impact without bias — always verify against the actual meeting before relying on it.

At its December 4 meeting the Amherst Planning Board heard public comments on the Jacobson subdivision application concerning wetland buffer reductions tied to density, whether the farmland should be placed in common ownership, and solar arrays on agricultural land. These topics were not on the public agenda. The board noted the comments, ordered engineering and fire reviews, and continued the matter to February 19 without resolving the issues or scheduling additional public input. Separately, the board discussed sidewalk access along Christian Hill and the counting of multi-bedroom senior housing units—again without prior agenda notice. All recorded motions passed without opposition.

Dec 4, 2024 1.6h long 12 speakers 7 public comments 5 decisions Lively
Notable statements Drag to browse

“Recommended requiring NH Dept. of Agriculture best management practices as enforceable conditions for farming activities via HOA”

— Unidentified speaker · Jacobson discussion ▶ 40:59

“Requested demonstration that the project still delivers the mix of housing benefits (single-bedroom, single-floor, etc.) that justified up to 39 dwelling units in the CUP approval”

— Unidentified speaker · Jacobson discussion ▶ 51:53

“Farming is already occurring on site with chicken tractors and haying at no cost.”

— Unidentified speaker · Response on farm viability ▶ 1:12:12

“The senior house counts as one of 37 units despite four bedrooms.”

— Unidentified speaker · Clarification on unit counting ▶ 1:15:08
This meeting — choose a section

Public ⁠impact

Issues from this meeting with documented community impact.
What was discussed

33 single-family lots plus farm/open space on significant acreage, with waivers and potential off-site road improvements

Topics ⁠discussed

Each topic expands to quotes and full context.
Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

Review of as-built non-residential site plan for substation expansion at 2 Hertz Drive; applicant proposed bonding ~$145k for delayed landscaping installation until spring.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

Discussion of final subdivision approval for 33 single-family lots plus farm and open space lots under the former Integrated Innovative Housing Ordinance; included CUP request, two waivers (cul-de-sac radius, roadway slope), stormwater design, and completeness determination.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

Discussion of potential sidewalk or path along Christian Hill to support walking to schools from the 39-unit development.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

Board members questioned ensuite bedrooms and whether a multi-bedroom senior house counts as one unit.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

Applicant described hiring consultant Ian McSweeney for a farm plan using 99-year leases, 1% transfer fee, and polyface/permaculture methods on ~4.5 acres.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

Questions on shared driveway serving ~6 properties at the cul-de-sac end.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

Residents and abutters commented on farmland ownership, wetland buffers, solar arrays, and housing types.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

Board discussed timeline for engineering review and continued the application; approved November minutes and adjourned.

Controversy & ⁠dissent

Where the board, the community, or the agenda diverged.

Potentially controversial issues

01

Jacobson subdivision buffers, farmland ownership, and solar compatibility

Abutters and residents raised concerns that buffer waivers result from over-density, that farmland should be collectively owned rather than controlled by applicant, and questioned solar array placement on agricultural land; these touch core values around open space preservation and rural character
Board position: Board recorded comments, requested engineering and fire reviews, and continued the application without resolving concerns
high concern

Community vs. board tension

Public ⁠comment

What residents said — verbatim, with timestamps.
7
Total speakers
2
Addressed
2
Partial
3
Not addressed
Jonathan Divine
Addressed
Represented Eversource as civil engineer and confirmed the site was built per the approved plan, except for landscaping which will be bonded and installed in spring. Key concern
Compliance hearing for site plan and request to bond landscaping.
Board response
Board asked clarifying questions on inspections and O&M manual, then approved the compliance with bonding condition.
Board directly addressed via questions and motion to confirm compliance with conditions.
Sam Boys
Partial
Presented the Jacobson subdivision application details including stormwater, waivers, farming plans, and open space on behalf of the applicant. Key concern
Approval of subdivision, conditional use permit, and two waivers.
Board response
Board asked extensive questions on stormwater, cul-de-sac, farming, sidewalks, and solar; deferred decision and continued to February 19.
Board engaged with questions and requested additional reviews but did not decide.
Carter Scott
Partial
Applicant explained farming plans, elder-friendly housing design, solar installations, and open space protections. Key concern
Clarify project benefits and respond to board questions on housing and farming.
Board response
Board questioned housing classification, farming viability, and requested follow-up on benefits mix.
Board engaged directly but deferred full resolution.
Unnamed resident
Not addressed
Resident who frequently walks/bikes Christian Hill Road supported a sidewalk or path and questioned whether the elder housing qualifies as single-family or is a co-op. Key concern
Pedestrian access from development and proper classification of proposed housing.
Board response
Board noted comments; chairman clarified no decision tonight and path issues already raised by board.
Comments recorded but no direct response or action taken during meeting.
Tom
Not addressed
Commented that farmland should be part of open space owned by all owners and that buffer waivers stem from trying to fit too many units. Key concern
Ownership of farmland and justification for buffer impacts.
Board response
None specific; meeting moved to next speaker.
Comment noted in record but not addressed by board.
Will
Addressed
Asked whether solar panels would be installed on the farmland lot and if arrays would be raised for animal grazing underneath. Key concern
Compatibility of solar and farming uses.
Board response
Applicant confirmed dual-use agrovoltaics are being considered.
Applicant directly answered during the hearing.
Sally Wilkins
Not addressed
As abutter and interested party, commented on housing mix, supported elder housing, and requested the town's solar regulations be made available. Key concern
Housing types and access to solar regulations.
Board response
None; chairman thanked speaker and closed public portion.
Comments recorded; solar regulations question not answered in meeting.

Decisions ⁠logged

Every recorded vote, with timestamps and dissents.
Confirmed Eversource site plan compliance with conditions precedent/subsequent and landscaping bonding
Motion by a speaker, seconded by a speaker; approved case PZ19826--1413 at Map 2 Lot 23
Motion carries (unanimous)
Determined both Jacobson subdivision and CUP applications complete
Motion by a speaker; board found no issues with completeness
Motion carries
Continue CUP and subdivision application to February 19 at 7pm
Applicant waives statutory deadlines; motion by H, seconded, all in favor.
Approved
Approve minutes of November 20, 2024 with correction on line 66
Motion by E, second by H, all in favor.
Approved
Adjourn meeting
Motion by H, second, all in favor.
Approved

Share ⁠this report

Drafts ready to post — click a block to copy, or use Share to post it.

X / Twitter — by angle

off-agenda controversial discussion of buffers, farmland ownership, and solar
At the Dec 4 Amherst Planning Board meeting, public comments on the Jacobson subdivision raised high-concern issues about wetland buffer reductions, collective farmland ownership, and solar arrays on agricultural land. None... https://meetingwatch.org/nh/amherst/planning-board/2024-12-04/ #MeetingWatch #AmherstNH
314/280 chars
community concerns raised but left unaddressed
Board heard abutters object that Jacobson subdivision density is driving buffer waivers and that farmland should stay in common open space, not applicant control. Comments noted, then application continued to Feb 19 with no... https://meetingwatch.org/nh/amherst/planning-board/2024-12-04/ #MeetingWatch #AmherstNH
314/280 chars
additional off-agenda items and board unity
Dec 4 meeting also covered unlisted topics including Christian Hill sidewalk needs for school access and whether multi-bedroom senior houses count as one unit under the old IIHO rules. All motions passed unanimously; no votes... https://meetingwatch.org/nh/amherst/planning-board/2024-12-04/ #MeetingWatch #AmherstNH
316/280 chars

X thread

1
Dec 4 Amherst Planning Board took public comments on the Jacobson subdivision about wetland buffer cuts, who controls the farmland, and solar arrays on ag land. None of these appeared on the published agenda, so residents could not prepare or attend... #MeetingWatch #AmherstNH
277/280
2
Abutters argued the 33-lot density forces buffer reductions and that the ~4.5 acres of farmland should be held in common open space rather than by the applicant. Board recorded the points, requested engineering and fire reviews, then continued the case to Feb 19 without acting on the concerns.
294/280
3
The same meeting also discussed Christian Hill walking access to schools and how multi-bedroom senior units are counted—neither listed on the agenda. All votes were unanimous; the application remains live with statutory deadlines waived by the applicant. https://meetingwatch.org/nh/amherst/planning-board/2024-12-04/
278/280

Facebook — long form

At its December 4 meeting the Amherst Planning Board heard public comments on the Jacobson subdivision application concerning wetland buffer reductions tied to density, whether the farmland should be placed in common ownership, and solar arrays on agricultural land. These topics were not on the public agenda. The board noted the comments, ordered engineering and fire reviews, and continued the matter to February 19 without resolving the issues or scheduling additional public input. Separately, the board discussed sidewalk access along Christian Hill and the counting of multi-bedroom senior housing units—again without prior agenda notice. All recorded motions passed without opposition. https://meetingwatch.org/nh/amherst/planning-board/2024-12-04/ #MeetingWatch #AmherstNH

Action ⁠items

Who owes what, by when.
Resend landscaping bond estimate paperwork to Gloria Norcross and copy Steve
Assigned: Applicant (Sam Boys/Meridian) · Due: Immediate
Perform full engineering/stormwater review of Jacobson plans and submit report to Gloria
Assigned: Steve Keach / town engineer · Due: Mid-January 2025
Review off-site road/drainage improvements needed on Christian Hill Road and Foundry/Boston Post Road intersection
Assigned: DPW Director (Eric) · Due: Prior to next hearing
Review cul-de-sac radius, cistern location, road/driveway widths for emergency access
Assigned: Fire Chief · Due: Prior to next hearing
Submit refinements and responses to comments
Assigned: Applicant · Due: Early January 2025

Accountability ⁠flags

Documented procedural gaps. Each item links to its source.

Topics discussed — not on agenda

Support coverage

Creating this report cost ⁠real money.

MeetingWatch attended, transcribed, and analyzed this meeting on its own dime. If this work is valuable to you, chip in to keep covering Amherst.

Report composed by grok-4.3, claude-opus-4-7 · analyzed 2026-05-27.