Your area Not set — showing everywhere
Issue · Amherst, NH

Baboosic Greenway Rail Trail Project

Intense conflict between proposed trail connectivity and private property rights, easements, privacy, and environmental concerns.

Overview

The Baboosic Greenway Rail Trail Project moved from engineering presentation and public opposition in April 2026 through two postponements to a 3-1-1 no-build vote on 2026-05-11. Property-easement limits, BPAC conduct, and environmental-review gaps drove the outcome.

Background

The Baboosic Greenway Rail Trail Project, also referred to as the North O2 project, first surfaced in public meetings through an engineering study presentation on segment constraints and costs. On 2026-04-13 the board received the DHB findings and heard initial public testimony on privacy, safety, property rights, and Bicycle Pedestrian Advisory Committee conduct, after which it entered an assessment phase tasked with endorsing alternatives and meeting stakeholders.

At the 2026-04-22 meeting the Bicycle Pedestrian Advisory Committee outlined the project's history and connectivity goals while the Conservation Commission raised unconsulted wetland and endangered-species concerns; the board postponed any build-versus-no-build decision to allow further consultation. This deferral directly set up the dedicated public-input session on 2026-05-05, where abutters including the Mayors and others detailed limited footpath easements and alleged BPAC overreach, prompting the board to signal a charter review.

The causal chain culminated on 2026-05-11 when consultant options for segments 1, 3, and 4 were presented alongside easement, budget, and environmental constraints; the board then voted 3-1-1 for a no-build outcome on all segments.

At the 2026-05-26 meeting a resident in the citizen forum attributed the Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee's mass resignation to governance confusion over the Baboosic Greenway project and called for clearer town leadership oversight of advisory bodies. The board then voted 5-0 to accept the resignations dated May 12, 2026, and formally disband the committee, citing the need for a structural overhaul before any successor is formed.

How it unfolded
Greg Backus presented the engineering study; extensive public comment raised property-rights, connectivity, and BPAC-transparency objections; board entered assessment phase.
2026-04-13Board Of Selectmen
BPAC and Conservation Commission presented; board postponed the rail-trail decision to permit further ACC and abutter consultation.
2026-04-22Board Of Selectmen
Dedicated public-input meeting addressed easement limits, BPAC oversight, and trespass concerns; board deferred build decision while acknowledging need to review land rights.
2026-05-05Board Of Selectmen
Consultant presented segment options; board voted 3-1-1 for no-build on all segments citing easements, budget, and environmental issues.
2026-05-11Board Of Selectmen
Resident addressed mass resignation of Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee tied to Baboosic Greenway governance issues; board voted 5-0 to accept resignations and disband the committee, with staff to determine future structure.
2026-05-26Board Of Selectmen
Arguments in favor
Project offers long-term community mobility and safety benefits with a documented history of planning.
board-of-selectmen 2026-04-13
For
Serves as a needed connector linking local trails to the state rail-trail system.
board-of-selectmen 2026-04-22
For
Requires improved but predictable community-engagement processes to realize connectivity goals.
board-of-selectmen 2026-04-22
For
Arguments against
Existing easements permit only a narrow footpath, so a full bike path constitutes unlawful overreach and trespass.
board-of-selectmen 2026-05-05
Against
Project lacks meaningful connectivity, functions as a passion project, and wastes taxpayer resources.
board-of-selectmen 2026-05-05
Against
BPAC has operated without transparency, used deceptive mapping, and caused repeated unpermitted surveys on private land.
board-of-selectmen 2026-05-05
Against
Environmental impacts on wetlands and potential endangered species require prior Conservation Commission consultation that never occurred.
board-of-selectmen 2026-04-22
Against
Key voices
“Town rights are limited to a narrow footpath and non-existent footbridge; the project is an unlawful overreach causing trespass.”
Resident Clinton (on behalf of the Mayors)board-of-selectmen 2026-05-05
“Project lacks connectivity and is a passion project; board should vote no-build to avoid wasting resources.”
Resident Lucciboard-of-selectmen 2026-05-05
“Shocked by unauthorized surveying; BPAC acted without transparency and used private identities to influence opinion.”
Resident Robinsonboard-of-selectmen 2026-05-05
“The issue was not a failure of the committee, but rather a lack of clear governance and oversight from town leadership.”
Residentboard-of-selectmen 2026-05-26
What's next

Board to review land use and easement rights and meet with abutters before any build decision.

rail trailgreenwayNorth O2bike pedestrian