Baboosic Greenway Rail Trail Project
Intense conflict between proposed trail connectivity and private property rights, easements, privacy, and environmental concerns.
The Baboosic Greenway Rail Trail Project moved from engineering presentation and public opposition in April 2026 through two postponements to a 3-1-1 no-build vote on 2026-05-11. Property-easement limits, BPAC conduct, and environmental-review gaps drove the outcome.
The Baboosic Greenway Rail Trail Project, also referred to as the North O2 project, first surfaced in public meetings through an engineering study presentation on segment constraints and costs. On 2026-04-13 the board received the DHB findings and heard initial public testimony on privacy, safety, property rights, and Bicycle Pedestrian Advisory Committee conduct, after which it entered an assessment phase tasked with endorsing alternatives and meeting stakeholders.
At the 2026-04-22 meeting the Bicycle Pedestrian Advisory Committee outlined the project's history and connectivity goals while the Conservation Commission raised unconsulted wetland and endangered-species concerns; the board postponed any build-versus-no-build decision to allow further consultation. This deferral directly set up the dedicated public-input session on 2026-05-05, where abutters including the Mayors and others detailed limited footpath easements and alleged BPAC overreach, prompting the board to signal a charter review.
The causal chain culminated on 2026-05-11 when consultant options for segments 1, 3, and 4 were presented alongside easement, budget, and environmental constraints; the board then voted 3-1-1 for a no-build outcome on all segments.
At the 2026-05-26 meeting a resident in the citizen forum attributed the Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee's mass resignation to governance confusion over the Baboosic Greenway project and called for clearer town leadership oversight of advisory bodies. The board then voted 5-0 to accept the resignations dated May 12, 2026, and formally disband the committee, citing the need for a structural overhaul before any successor is formed.
Board to review land use and easement rights and meet with abutters before any build decision.
Members feature
Ask questions. Get answers with receipts.
Ask about anything covered on this page and get a plain-English answer that links to the report, the official records, and the exact moment in the meeting video.
Create a free accountFree with a MeetingWatch account — no card, no spam.
Already a member? Sign in
Ask questions about any meeting
Open a community, board, issue, or meeting and I can answer from its records — with links to the report, official documents, and the exact moment in the video.
Then reopen this button to start asking.
AI-generated from meeting records — verify against the linked sources. Conversations are stored (privacy).