Your area Not set — showing everywhere
Meeting report · City Council
Creating this report cost real money. Help fund coverage →

City Council — July 13, 2026

The meeting was marked by internal disagreement among councilors regarding ethics, decorum, and the propriety of executive sessions.

Date Monday, July 13, 2026 Duration 1.2h Speakers 24 Public comments 2 Decisions 2 Lively

Questions about this meeting? ⁠Just ask.

Ask MeetingWatch answers from this meeting’s report, transcript, and records — with linked sources.

Summary AI-generated to surface controversy & community impact without bias — always verify against the actual meeting before relying on it.

At the July 13 Bangor City Council meeting, several high-stakes discussions took place that were not included on the public agenda, leaving residents without prior notice.

Specifically, the Council discussed the Ethics Board’s findings regarding Councilor Mallard and debated potential disciplinary actions following controversial remarks made by Councilor Leonard. These are significant matters of conduct and decorum, yet they were not listed for public review before the meeting began.

The meeting also highlighted growing divisions within the Council. While members reached a consensus on requiring training for Councilor Mallard, the debate over Councilor Leonard’s remarks was marked by criticism of the Chair's ability to maintain order and control of the meeting.

Furthermore, the Council entered an executive session to discuss the Amalgamated Transit Union Local 714 contract. Decisions regarding labor contracts directly impact city employees and the municipal budget, making transparency and public notice vital for taxpayer oversight.

Jul 13, 2026 1.2h long 24 speakers 2 public comments 2 decisions Lively
Notable statements Drag to browse

“I'm not going to baby my words around when we're all adults in the room.”

— Councilor Leonard · Defending his use of the term 'concentration camps' to describe ICE facilities. ▶ 51:16

“I think you lost control of the meeting, and I think you've been losing control of the meetings for quite a number of them at this point.”

— Councilor R · Criticizing Chair Haws' ability to moderate and maintain decorum during meetings. ▶ 1:01:39
This meeting — choose a section

Public ⁠impact

Issues from this meeting with documented community impact.
What was discussed

Negotiation of labor terms and compensation

What happened

The motion to enter executive session passed.

Topics ⁠discussed

Each topic expands to quotes and full context.
Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

The Council discussed the format and potential penalties following the Ethics Board's findings that Councilor Mallard violated the standard of conduct code.

What happened

The Council reached a consensus to move forward with a motion for staff to prepare an order following the Ethics Board's findings, specifically including a penalty of training with the legal department.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

A representative presented information regarding an upcoming waterfront event featuring tall ships and a rowing competition.

What happened

The Council noted the interest and the organizer will follow up via email.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

The Council discussed potential disciplinary action or referral to the Ethics Board regarding controversial remarks made by Councilor Leonard.

What happened

The Council decided to defer the full discussion to a future meeting or special workshop due to time constraints.

Controversy & ⁠dissent

Where the board, the community, or the agenda diverged.

Potentially controversial issues

01

Ethics Board Recommendations Regarding Councilor Mallard

The Council had to determine the appropriate penalty for a member found to have violated the standard of conduct code, debating between training, committee removal, or other sanctions.
Board position: The Council reached a consensus to require training with the Legal Department.
medium concern
02

Disciplinary Discussion Regarding Councilor Leonard's Remarks

Councilors debated whether Councilor Leonard's previous comments regarding ICE were partisan violations of the ethics code or protected speech, leading to questions about decorum and the Chair's leadership.
Board position: The Council deferred the full discussion to a future meeting or workshop due to time constraints.
Internal dissent
Councilors expressed differing views on how to handle the matter (open vs. executive session) and criticized the Chair's ability to maintain order.
medium concern

Public ⁠comment

What residents said — verbatim, with timestamps.
2
Speakers
2
Comments
2
Addressed
0
Partial
0
Not addressed
Paul Port Louis
Addressed
Paul discussed the North American Heritage Association's efforts to bring tall ships to local waters. He highlighted upcoming events like the Harvey Gamadge vessel and a six-person rowing canoe competition, inviting the council to participate. Key concern
To share information about maritime heritage events and invite council members to participate in a rowing contest.
Board response
Councilor L (Chair) acknowledged the email regarding the rowing competition and promised to resend the solicitation for interest to the council.
The board acknowledged the information and provided a clear next step regarding the invitation to the council members.
Councilor Leonard
Addressed
Councilor Leonard objected to the scope of a motion to enter executive session regarding his previous conduct. He argued that he has a legal right to a public hearing regarding his words and that an attorney consultation cannot be used to circumvent transparency laws. Key concern
Ensuring that any discussion or investigation regarding his specific comments from a previous meeting is conducted in an open session rather than behind closed doors.
Board response
The board discussed the legality and propriety of the session; Councilor K suggested conducting the session in open session for now, leading the Chair to withdraw the motion for executive session.
The board responded to his objection by withdrawing the motion to enter executive session, allowing for open discussion instead.

Decisions ⁠logged

Every recorded vote, with timestamps and dissents.
Motion to direct staff to prepare a council order following the Ethics Board's findings, including a penalty of appropriate training with the City of Bangor Legal Department regarding the use of titles and disclaimers.
The motion was made by Councilor Beck and seconded by a speaker (likely the City Solicitor/Manager), specifically targeting violations of 33-13-1 B and C.
Passed (implied by moving to next item after motion/second)
Motion to enter executive session to discuss the Amalgamated Transit Union Local 714 contract.
The motion was made pursuant to 1 MRSA section 405(6).
Passed

Agenda ⁠brief

What the posted agenda said before the meeting — a preview, not a record of what happened. See the other tabs for the actual report.

Council to consider housing flexibility, rental assistance, and ethics code amendments.

The Council will consider several housing-related measures, including an ordinance to allow more flexible development standards for manufactured home parks existing as of January 1, 2026, and the acceptance of over $1.1 million in HUD funds for the Bangor Rental Assistance Program. Additionally, the Council will review a $10,000 grant for housing ordinance implementation and a $30,000 grant for housing stabilization activities.

Other key items include a first reading of an ordinance to amend the City's Code of Ethics by establishing response deadlines for the Board of Ethics and procedures for handling advisory opinions. The Council will also discuss expanding the duties of the Legislative Committee to include engagement with political candidates and stakeholders.

Key items

  • Amending Land Development Code to provide flexibility for existing manufactured home parks
  • Accepting $1,144,879 in HUD grant funds for the Bangor Rental Assistance Program
  • First reading of an ordinance to amend the City's Code of Ethics regarding response deadlines
  • Expanding the duties and responsibilities of the Legislative Committee
  • Accepting $1,869,733 from the Maine DHHS for the Maine Prevention Network
  • Public hearings for four Special Amusement License applications

Why this matters

Decisions on land development and rental assistance funding will directly impact housing affordability and stability for residents. The proposed ethics code changes will affect how the City handles official misconduct investigations and advisory opinions.

Brief generated by litellm::gemma-4-26b on 2026-07-11. Not a substitute for attending or watching the meeting.

Share ⁠this report

Drafts ready to post — click any block to copy.

X / Twitter — by angle

Off-agenda controversial decisions
Transparency alert: At the July 13 Bangor City Council meeting, officials discussed ethics penalties for Councilor Mallard and potential discipline for Councilor Leonard—neither of these high-stakes items were on the public... https://meetingwatch.org/me/bangor/city-council/2026-07-13/ #MeetingWatch #BangorME
310/280 chars
Internal board divisions and decorum
Bangor City Council internal divisions were on display July 13. While Councilors reached consensus on an ethics penalty for Councilor Mallard, they remained split and contentious over how to handle Councilor Leonard’s recent... https://meetingwatch.org/me/bangor/city-council/2026-07-13/ #MeetingWatch #BangorME
311/280 chars
Executive session/lack of public oversight on labor
The Bangor City Council entered an executive session on July 13 to discuss the Amalgamated Transit Union Local 714 contract. Labor negotiations impact city employees and taxpayers alike, but these discussions happened behind... https://meetingwatch.org/me/bangor/city-council/2026-07-13/ #MeetingWatch #BangorME
311/280 chars

X thread

1
Bangor City Council held a meeting on July 13 that featured several high-significance discussions that were not listed on the public agenda. Here is what happened behind the scenes. 🧵 #MeetingWatch #BangorME
207/280
2
First, the Council discussed ethics penalties for Councilor Mallard and potential disciplinary action regarding Councilor Leonard’s recent remarks. Because these weren't on the agenda, residents couldn't prepare or attend specifically to weigh in.
247/280
3
The meeting also saw significant internal tension. While the Council agreed on training for Councilor Mallard, they were divided over Councilor Leonard's conduct and whether the Chair was maintaining proper decorum during proceedings.
234/280
4
Finally, the Council moved into executive session to discuss the Amalgamated Transit Union Local 714 contract. As taxpayer-funded labor deals are decided, the lack of agenda notice on these major topics matters. #Bangor #LocalGov https://meetingwatch.org/me/bangor/city-council/2026-07-13/
253/280

Facebook — long form

At the July 13 Bangor City Council meeting, several high-stakes discussions took place that were not included on the public agenda, leaving residents without prior notice. 

Specifically, the Council discussed the Ethics Board’s findings regarding Councilor Mallard and debated potential disciplinary actions following controversial remarks made by Councilor Leonard. These are significant matters of conduct and decorum, yet they were not listed for public review before the meeting began.

The meeting also highlighted growing divisions within the Council. While members reached a consensus on requiring training for Councilor Mallard, the debate over Councilor Leonard’s remarks was marked by criticism of the Chair's ability to maintain order and control of the meeting. 

Furthermore, the Council entered an executive session to discuss the Amalgamated Transit Union Local 714 contract. Decisions regarding labor contracts directly impact city employees and the municipal budget, making transparency and public notice vital for taxpayer oversight. https://meetingwatch.org/me/bangor/city-council/2026-07-13/ #MeetingWatch #BangorME

Action ⁠items

Who owes what, by when.
Prepare a proposed council order regarding the Ethics Board's findings for Councilor Mallard, including the training penalty.
Assigned: City Staff · Due: Next Council meeting (approx. 2 weeks)
Send emails to Councilors soliciting interest in participating in the waterfront rowing event.
Assigned: Robin (Staff)

Member ⁠positions

1 issues · 0 explicit · 0 inferred
Present
Discussion of Councilor Leonard's Remarks from June 22 Meeting
Defended his remarks as factual and non-partisan.
Present
Ethics Board Recommendations Regarding Councilor Mallard YES
Proposed the motion for staff to prepare a council order.

Positions marked ~ are inferred from context and may not reflect the member's explicitly stated position. UNCLEAR means the vote was split but the record did not name how this member voted — it is not a “yes.”

Accountability ⁠flags

Documented procedural gaps. Each item links to its source.

Agenda items not discussed

Topics discussed — not on agenda

Support coverage

Creating this report cost ⁠real money.

MeetingWatch attended, transcribed, and analyzed this meeting on its own dime. If this work is valuable to you, chip in to keep covering Bangor.

Report composed by grok-4.3, gemma-4-26b, grok-4.20-0309-reasoning, grok-4-fast · analyzed 2026-07-13.