Your area Not set — showing everywhere
How it works Support this town
Meeting report · City Council
Creating this report cost real money. Help fund coverage →

City Council — April 28, 2026

The meeting featured significant public interest in homelessness and ethics, resulting in split votes and spirited debate among council members.

Date Tuesday, April 28, 2026 Duration 2.7h Speakers 1 Public comments 17 Decisions 11 Lively
▶ Video
On-screen text: Identity authorization policy for city duties Video still
On-screen text: Identity authorization policy for city duties Frame from meeting video ▶ 1:23:11

Questions about this meeting? ⁠Just ask.

Ask MeetingWatch answers from this meeting’s report, transcript, and records — with linked sources.

Summary AI-generated to surface controversy & community impact without bias — always verify against the actual meeting before relying on it.

At the April 28 Bangor City Council meeting, several decisions were made that highlight deep divisions within the Council and raise questions about fiscal oversight.

One significant moment involved the Pike Development Agreement for 8 Harlow Street. While the main development order passed 9-0, a proposal to include a 'project recovery fee' to reimburse the city for the staff time required to restructure the deal was defeated in a 1-8 vote. This leaves the city potentially footing the bill for administrative work driven by developer requests.

Policy-wise, the Council remains deadlocked on the Immigration Enforcement Ordinance. A motion to include an exemption for the Bangor International Airport failed 4-5, forcing a postponement of the ordinance until May 11. This delay stems from concerns over whether the Council has completed sufficient due diligence regarding federal aviation regulations.

Lastly, the Council addressed the ethics of Councilor Malloy's recent remarks concerning non-English speaking students and immigration status. In an 8-0 vote, the Council decided to refer the matter to the Board of Ethics for an advisory opinion to determine if a violation of the City Code occurred.

Apr 28, 2026 2.7h long 1 speakers 17 public comments 11 decisions Lively
❝ Notable statements ↔ Drag to browse

“The ordinance makes explicit that Bangor does not operate its departments, programs, or public safety services for the purpose of enforcing federal civil immigration laws.”

— Councilor Beck · Explaining the intent of the proposed immigration ordinance. ▶ 53:59

“I am not in favor of any more substitutions right now. I really would like to hear from our department heads and finish our due diligence review.”

— Councilor Hayes · Opposing the immediate vote on the substituted immigration ordinance text. ▶ 59:10

“I would like to see some kind of recuperation for the staff's time... I feel better having as part of this agreement that it would now read... that it would include a project recovery fee.”

— Councilor Fish · Proposing an amendment to ensure the city is reimbursed for staff time spent restructuring a development deal. ▶ 2:01:04

“When an elected official openly dehumanizes members of the community he was elected to serve... the question is whether the Bangor City Council can credibly claim to represent all of Bangor's residents.”

— Katie Coe · Public comment regarding the ethics of Councilor Malloy's remarks. ▶ 2:21:53

“Emphasized that while individuals have First Amendment rights, they are not free from the repercussions of their words.”

— Councilor Lymburner · Debating the necessity of the ethics referral. ▶ 2:35:09

“Argued against the ethics referral on the grounds of protecting free speech and avoiding routine political retaliation.”

— Councilor Leonard · Expressing opposition to the motion. ▶ 2:35:48

“Expressed support for the referral to ensure a formal record of the conduct and noted work on clarifying post-referral procedures.”

— Councilor Dean · Discussing the value of the ethics process. ▶ 2:32:09
This meeting — choose a section

Public ⁠impact

Issues from this meeting with documented community impact.
What was discussed

Potential changes to how local law enforcement interacts with federal immigration authorities.

What happened

A motion to include the airport exemption failed, and the original ordinance was postponed.

What was discussed

Rezoning of 2.48 acres from government/institutional to shopping/personal service.

What happened

The ordinance passed unanimously 9-0.

Topics ⁠discussed

Each topic expands to quotes and full context.
Speakers: Unidentified speaker, Stacey Coventry, Councillor Fish
What was discussed

The Council presented two proclamations: National Therapy Animal Day and recognition of the work of warming shelters in Bangor.

What happened

Both proclamations were presented to community representatives.

Speakers: Brian Gatell, Unnamed Resident, Scott Party, Andrea Makov, Heideman, Evangeline White
What was discussed

Multiple residents provided testimony regarding the unhoused population, drug use, needle safety, and the effectiveness of city policies.

What happened

The Council listened to the comments without formal debate or response, per public comment policy.

Speakers: Councilor Beck, Councilor Hayes, Councilor Fish, Unidentified speaker, Councilor Carson, Katie Coe, Umbreen Rana
What was discussed

The Council discussed an ordinance to limit city involvement in federal civil immigration enforcement, specifically addressing the exemption of the airport.

What happened

The Council entered a debate regarding whether to vote on the motion to substitute the new text or wait for further departmental feedback. A motion to amend by substitution (to include the airport exemption) failed with a vote of 4-5. The original ordinance was then postponed to the May 11th meeting.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

Discussion regarding the rezoning of approximately 2.48 acres of property from government/institutional to shopping/personal service.

What happened

The ordinance received unanimous passage with a 9-0 vote.

Speakers: Councilor Walker, Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

A resolve to accept and appropriate $80,000 from Maine General Medical Center for HIV outpatient services.

What happened

The resolve passed with a 9-0 vote.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker, Zach Pike, Councilor Fish
What was discussed

Authorization for the City Manager to endorse an amendment to the development agreement for 8 Harlow Street to allow for new financing.

What happened

The motion to include a recovery fee failed 1-8. The main order passed with a 9-0 vote.

Speakers: Councilor Dean, Councilor Beck, Councilor Malloy (referenced), Katie Coe, Joshua Faye (referenced), Hillary Simmons, Councilor Carson, Councilor Leonard, Councilor Lymburner
What was discussed

The Council addressed controversial remarks made by Councilor Malloy regarding non-English speaking students and immigration status.

What happened

The resolve to clarify that his comments were personal passed 8-0 (after an amendment to strike the word 'necessarily'). The order to refer the matter to the Board of Ethics for an advisory opinion also passed 8-0. The matter will move to the Board of Ethics for formal review and investigation.

Controversy & ⁠dissent

Where the board, the community, or the agenda diverged.

Potentially controversial issues

01

Immigration Enforcement Ordinance

The ordinance seeks to limit city involvement in federal civil immigration enforcement. Debate centered on whether to include a specific exemption for the Bangor International Airport and whether the council had completed sufficient due diligence.
Board position: The board was split on whether to adopt a version of the ordinance that included an airport exemption.
Internal dissent
A motion to amend the ordinance by substitution to include the airport exemption failed with a vote of 4-5.
medium concern
02

Councilor Malloy Ethics Investigation

The council addressed controversial remarks made by Councilor Malloy regarding non-English speaking students and immigration status, involving debates over First Amendment rights versus professional conduct.
Board position: The council moved to clarify that the remarks were personal and referred the matter to the Board of Ethics.
Internal dissent
While the final votes to refer and clarify were 8-0, members engaged in a spirited debate regarding the appropriateness of an ethics referral and the protection of free speech.
high concern

Split votes

Motion to amend the immigration ordinance by substitution to include an airport exemption
4-5
Amendment to include a 'project recovery fee' in the Pike Development Agreement
1-8

Community vs. board tension

Public ⁠comment

What residents said — verbatim, with timestamps.
9
Speakers
17
Comments
1
Addressed
1
Partial
15
Not addressed
Stacey Coventry
▶ 12:37
Addressed
The speaker accepted a proclamation recognizing National Therapy Animal Day. She spoke about her therapy dog, Coda, who is retiring, and her new partner, Pigeon. Key concern
Acknowledgment of the work done by therapy animal teams in the community.
Board response
The chair thanked her for her service.
The board presented the proclamation and acknowledged her response.
Brian Gatell
▶ 12:33
Not addressed
Drawing from his own experience with homelessness and addiction, the speaker argued for clear boundaries regarding the unhoused population. He expressed concerns about needles and public safety and suggested a sanctioned encampment as a temporary solution. Key concern
The need for managed, safe solutions for the unhoused population and better management of public spaces.
Board response
The chair ended his comment due to the 3-minute time limit.
The board enforced time limits but did not provide a substantive response to his suggestions.
Unidentified speaker
▶ 25:54
Not addressed
The speaker expressed concern that the current situation with homelessness is negatively affecting the economic prosperity of the city. They suggested that 'sweeps' are inhumane and advocated for the Homeless Outreach Committee to find long-term solutions, such as sanctioned encampments. Key concern
The need for immediate, effective solutions to homelessness to protect the city's economic and social health.
Board response
The chair thanked the speaker.
The board acknowledged the speech but did not engage with the content.
Unidentified speaker
▶ 30:22
Not addressed
The speaker reminded the council that the homelessness committee aims to include people with lived experience. They argued that including these voices is essential to ensure city funds are not wasted on ineffective solutions. Key concern
Ensuring the Homelessness Committee includes members with lived experience.
Board response
The chair thanked the speaker.
No substantive response was given by the board.
Unidentified speaker
▶ 31:48
Not addressed
The speaker discussed the challenges of public hygiene and needle littering in the downtown area. They requested better enforcement of existing ordinances to improve the city for residents, businesses, and the unhoused alike. Key concern
Request for enforcement of ordinances regarding public hygiene and needle littering.
Board response
The chair thanked the speaker.
The board did not respond to the request for ordinance enforcement.
Norton
▶ 35:35
Not addressed
The speaker proposed that the city should work to attract film productions to Bangor to create economic opportunities. They contrasted the film industry with the issues caused by needle littering. Key concern
Request for the city to actively recruit film productions for economic development.
Board response
The chair thanked the speaker.
The board did not respond to the economic suggestion.
Unidentified speaker
▶ 38:26
Not addressed
The speaker raised concerns regarding the enforcement of public comment rules, noting inconsistencies in how residency and identity are verified. They also expressed concern about the installation and data privacy of Flock surveillance cameras. Key concern
Enforcement of public comment rules and transparency regarding Flock surveillance cameras.
Board response
The chair thanked the speaker.
The board acknowledged the comments but did not address the specific requests for rule enforcement or camera transparency.
Unidentified speaker
▶ 42:09
Not addressed
The speaker argued that current strategies to manage homelessness are failing and that the city should focus on actively prosecuting criminal behavior within the unhoused community. They suggested using saved resources to help the minority who are unhoused through no fault of their own. Key concern
A call for increased prosecution of crimes committed by the unhoused and more targeted resource allocation.
Board response
The chair thanked the speaker.
The board did not engage with the policy suggestions.
Unidentified speaker
▶ 45:48
Not addressed
The speaker criticized the city's approach to homelessness and drug use, questioning if leaders are merely 'managing' the crisis for political or financial gain. They demanded measurable outcomes and accountability for current policies. Key concern
Demanding measurable results and accountability for homelessness and drug use policies.
Board response
The chair thanked the speaker.
The board did not address the critique of their management strategies.
Scott Party
▶ 51:40
Not addressed
The speaker criticized the city's plan to patrol parks and shift gate hours as an expensive 'shell game' that relocates rather than solves homelessness. They also warned against increasing taxes to fund these reactive measures. Key concern
Opposition to reactive spending on park patrols and warnings against tax increases.
Board response
The chair thanked the speaker.
The board did not respond to the fiscal or policy critiques.
Unidentified speaker
▶ 55:50
Not addressed
The speaker argued that increasing police details in parks is a temporary bandage that fails to address the root causes of homelessness. They urged the city to prioritize sustainable solutions over relocation. Key concern
Criticism of park closures and increased police patrols as ineffective solutions.
Board response
The chair thanked the speaker.
The board did not address the criticism of the city manager's suggestion.
Unidentified speaker
▶ 58:47
Not addressed
The speaker shared their success in assisting individuals with housing and employment through well-funded programs. They noted that homeless services also contribute positively to the local economy by spending locally. Key concern
Advocating for continued support of well-funded, successful homeless service programs.
Board response
The chair thanked the speaker.
The board acknowledged the speech but did not respond to the advocacy.
Old Cape Part
▶ 1:03:41
Not addressed
The speaker requested city support for an urban garden tour, suggesting it is an environmental and community-building benefit. They asked for a response regarding how the city can support this event. Key concern
Request for city support for an urban garden tour.
Board response
The chair thanked the speaker.
The board did not respond to the request for support or contact information.
Andrea Makov
▶ 1:07:20
Not addressed
The speaker expressed a need for compassion toward all residents, including the unhoused. They suggested that property owners could contribute to the community by donating land for residences. Key concern
Advocating for compassion and the use of donated land for housing.
Board response
The chair thanked the speaker.
The board did not respond to the suggestion.
Heideman
▶ 1:10:09
Not addressed
The speaker, a supervisor of a specialized case management team, expressed interest in discussing a potential partnership involving the YMCA to create a zero-homelessness strategy. Key concern
Request for a discussion regarding a zero-homelessness strategy involving the YMCA.
Board response
The chair thanked the speaker.
The board did not address the request for a discussion.
Evangeline White
▶ 1:11:54
Partial
The speaker, a former homeless teen and current business owner, advocated for permanent housing solutions and suggested a rent cap to combat astronomical rent increases. They also defended the needle exchange as a life-saving resource. Key concern
Request for permanent housing solutions and the implementation of a rent cap.
Board response
The chair asked a follow-up question about cost of living and then thanked the speaker.
The chair engaged with the speaker via a follow-up question regarding cost of living, though the main request for a rent cap was not formally addressed.
Unidentified speaker
▶ 1:20:04
Not addressed
The speaker added to the discussion on cost of living, noting that they have had to cut off utilities in certain parts of their home due to high costs. They emphasized that working people can no longer afford to live in the area. Key concern
Highlighting the unaffordability of living in Bangor due to high rents and utilities.
Board response
The chair thanked the speaker.
The board did not provide a response to the additional comments.

Decisions ⁠logged

Every recorded vote, with timestamps and dissents.
Approval of the amended Consent Agenda (including the removal of item 26-144)
The consent agenda was approved after one item was moved to new business.
8 Yes, 0 No (after removal of 26-144)
Motion to amend the immigration ordinance by substitution (including airport exemption)
The motion to replace the original text with the version including the airport exemption was defeated.
Failed (4 Yes, 5 No)
Postponement of Council Order 26-095 to May 11th
The original immigration ordinance was postponed to the next full Council meeting.
Passed (5 Yes, 4 No)
Referral of ordinance amending downtown parking advisory committee and workforce development grant to committee and first reading
Items were referred to committee and received first reading.
9 Yes, 0 No
Ordinance 26-139 (Rezoning 355 Main Avenue)
Rezoning of 2.48 acres from government/institutional to shopping/personal service.
Passed (9 Yes, 0 No)
Resolve 26-140 (HIV Funding)
Accepting $80,000 for HIV intervention services.
Passed (9 Yes, 0 No)
Amendment to 26-143 to include a 'project recovery fee'
Proposed to add a fee to the development agreement for 8 Harlow Street to cover staff time.
Failed (1 Yes, 8 No)
Order 26-143 (Pike Development Agreement)
Authorized the city manager to endorse the subordination agreement and amendment for 8 Harlow Street.
Passed (9 Yes, 0 No)
Amendment to Resolve 26-153 to strike 'necessarily'
Changed the text to state his opinions 'do not reflect' rather than 'do not necessarily reflect' the Council.
Passed (8 Yes, 0 No)
Resolve 26-153 (Clarification of Councilor Malloy's remarks)
The resolve clarifying that Malloy's comments were his own passed.
Passed (8 Yes, 0 No)
Order 26-152 (Referral to Board of Ethics)
Directing the Board of Ethics to issue an advisory opinion regarding Malloy's conduct.
Passed (8 Yes, 0 No)

Share ⁠this report

Drafts ready to post — click any block to copy.

X / Twitter — by angle

fiscal responsibility and staff resource recovery
On April 28, the Bangor City Council voted 1-8 against a proposal to charge a 'project recovery fee' to developers. This would have reimbursed the city for staff time spent restructuring the 8 Harlow Street development deal... https://meetingwatch.org/me/bangor/city-council/2026-04-28/ #MeetingWatch #BangorME
310/280 chars
split votes and policy uncertainty
The Bangor City Council is split. On April 28, a 4-5 vote defeated a motion to include an airport exemption in the new immigration enforcement ordinance. The issue is now postponed until May 11. Watch this closely. https://meetingwatch.org/me/bangor/city-council/2026-04-28/ #MeetingWatch #BangorME
298/280 chars
official accountability and ethics proceedings
Bangor City Council update: Following controversial remarks regarding non-English speaking students, the Council voted 8-0 on April 28 to refer Councilor Malloy’s conduct to the Board of Ethics for an advisory opinion. https://meetingwatch.org/me/bangor/city-council/2026-04-28/ #MeetingWatch #BangorME
302/280 chars

X thread

1
What happened at the April 28 Bangor City Council meeting? From ethics investigations to missed revenue opportunities, there is much for residents to digest. 🧵 #MeetingWatch #BangorME
183/280
2
First, the Council missed a chance to recoup costs. A motion to add a 'project recovery fee' to the 8 Harlow Street development deal failed 1-8. This means the city may bear the staff costs for restructuring this deal without compensation.
239/280
3
Next, the Council is divided on the Immigration Enforcement Ordinance. A 4-5 vote defeated a version that would have exempted the Bangor International Airport. The ordinance is postponed to May 11th to allow for more due diligence.
231/280
4
Finally, the Council took formal action on Councilor Malloy’s recent comments regarding non-English speakers. An 8-0 vote referred the matter to the Board of Ethics for an advisory opinion on whether his conduct violated City Code. https://meetingwatch.org/me/bangor/city-council/2026-04-28/
255/280

Facebook — long form

At the April 28 Bangor City Council meeting, several decisions were made that highlight deep divisions within the Council and raise questions about fiscal oversight.

One significant moment involved the Pike Development Agreement for 8 Harlow Street. While the main development order passed 9-0, a proposal to include a 'project recovery fee' to reimburse the city for the staff time required to restructure the deal was defeated in a 1-8 vote. This leaves the city potentially footing the bill for administrative work driven by developer requests.

Policy-wise, the Council remains deadlocked on the Immigration Enforcement Ordinance. A motion to include an exemption for the Bangor International Airport failed 4-5, forcing a postponement of the ordinance until May 11. This delay stems from concerns over whether the Council has completed sufficient due diligence regarding federal aviation regulations.

Lastly, the Council addressed the ethics of Councilor Malloy's recent remarks concerning non-English speaking students and immigration status. In an 8-0 vote, the Council decided to refer the matter to the Board of Ethics for an advisory opinion to determine if a violation of the City Code occurred. https://meetingwatch.org/me/bangor/city-council/2026-04-28/ #MeetingWatch #BangorME

Action ⁠items

Who owes what, by when.
Determine whether to vote on the motion to substitute the immigration ordinance text or wait for departmental feedback.
Assigned: City Manager/Council · Due: Next meeting
Review facts of Councilor Malloy's March 31st conduct and issue an advisory opinion.
Assigned: Board of Ethics
Review a drafted list of enumerated next steps following an ethics referral to clarify repercussions and procedures.
Assigned: Unnamed Councilor (likely Councilor Dean)
Support coverage

Creating this report cost ⁠real money.

MeetingWatch attended, transcribed, and analyzed this meeting on its own dime. If this work is valuable to you, chip in to keep covering Bangor.

Report composed by grok-4.3, gemma-4-26b, grok-4.20-0309-reasoning, grok-4-fast · analyzed 2026-07-08.