Select Board — January 5, 2026
The meeting featured significant debate over new fees, tensions with the Affordable Housing Trust regarding transparency, and public criticism of how the board characterizes voter turnout.
Public impact
Community Housing Surcharge Implementation
Lex Media Funding Shortfall
Decisions logged
Topics discussed
▶ 00:46 Public Comment: MLK Day Events
Christina Lin (Human Rights Committee) and Sarah Shaikh (MLK Day of Service Chair) invited the community to the annual community conversation on race on January 19 and noted the extended MLK Day of Service week.
▶ 04:25 Town Manager's Report and Announcements
The Permanent Building Committee will discuss the Lexington High School design on January 8; Illumination Night is scheduled for Depot Square; and the MMA annual meeting is coming up in late January.
▶ 08:52 Town Election Logistics
Town Clerk Jill Eldredtti reviewed the December special election, noting high turnout (37%) but concerns regarding parking accessibility due to solar project construction at Cary Hall.
▶ 26:04 Street Acceptance and Layout
The Engineering Department presented the proposal to accept Willard Circle, Cart Path Lane, and Stagecoach Road as public ways following completed subdivision construction.
▶ 31:04 Lex Media Contract and Financing
The Communications Advisory Committee (CAC) discussed the projected revenue shortfall for Lex Media due to declining cable revenues and the need for town appropriations to maintain service levels. Further discussion covered the financial sustainability of Lex Media, including a deficit on the town side, declining commercial growth revenue, and the preference for a two-year contract renewal cycle rather than a six-year commitment.
▶ 1:05:52 Advocacy for Municipal Broadband/Cable Revenue
Board members discussed the need for coordinated advocacy at the state level to address revenue losses from the shift from cable to internet-based services.
▶ 1:14:00 Community Housing Surcharge for Commercial Development
A debate regarding the implementation of a non-residential surcharge on commercial development to fund affordable housing, weighing the need for revenue against concerns about economic conditions and developer friction. The Board debated the implementation date, initial rate, and annual adjustment mechanism for a new community housing surcharge on commercial development.
▶ 2:31:00 Review of 2026 Annual Town Meeting Draft Article List
The Board reviewed the preliminary list of articles for the upcoming 2026 Annual Town Meeting, including financial, capital, and citizen petition articles.
Controversy & dissent
Potentially controversial issues
Community Housing Surcharge for Commercial Development
Lex Media Financial Sustainability
Split votes
Community vs. board tension
Action items
Notable statements
The December debt exclusion turnout was 37%, which is higher than the 2024 March dual election turnout of 34.8%. — Jill Eldredtti · Reviewing election logistics performance. ▶ 09:53
Lex Media provides a vital resource by bringing government meetings into living rooms, serving as a source of transparency in the absence of local newspapers. — Jim Shaw · Discussing the importance of Lex Media services during contract negotiations. ▶ 50:30
The town is wrestling with a close to a half million dollar deficit on the town side, making the projected Lex Media deficit in five years a significant concern. — Steve Bartha · Responding to questions about budget sustainability and the Lex Media contract. ▶ 1:02:00
The preliminary health renewal hold of 15% is now down to a whopping 13.5%, which is still wildly unsustainable for the budget. — Speaker I (Town Manager) · Discussing the town's revenue and expenditure challenges. ▶ 1:00:45
I'm at a zero [fee]... If the economic conditions change, they'd be happy to implement the fee. — Speaker G (Douglas Lucente) · Expressing concern that a fee during high vacancy rates might discourage much-needed commercial development. ▶ 2:04:58
We were not given any notice that this [funding the Nexus study] was going to be a topic discussed tonight. — Speaker D (Affordable Housing Trust) · Expressing surprise and concern regarding the board's discussion of the Trust's future administrative responsibilities. ▶ 2:02:10
I actually think we're spending a lot of time discussing this without anything that's actually going to make a difference... we're probably not going to see a penny out of this based on the reality of the market conditions. — Unidentified speaker · Discussing the impact of the specific implementation date on revenue given current economic conditions. ▶ 2:22:06
I think $9 is a robust rate... it does provide the certainty that is needed in my research and outreach to some development teams who had built in Lexington below $10. — Matt Daggett · Providing public comment on the proposed surcharge rate in relation to development feasibility. ▶ 2:35:45
Member positions
Positions marked ~ are inferred from context and may not reflect the member's explicitly stated position.
Public comment
Accountability flags
Transcript vs. official minutes
Creating this report cost real money.
MeetingWatch attended, transcribed, and analyzed this meeting on its own dime. If this work is valuable to you, chip in to keep covering Lexington.
Follow Lexington
One email when a new report is published from the Select Board — or one weekly digest.
grok-4.3, gemma-4-26b, grok-4-fast, grok-4.20-0309-reasoning · analyzed 2026-05-30.