Historic Districts Commission — June 4, 2026

The shed had been previously approved for a different location, but safety concerns regarding sightlines for a bike path necessitated a move. There was a discussion regarding whether the shed's color should be changed to increase visibility for safety, though the Police Chief noted they had no specific color preference.

The commission approved the relocation of the shed.

The applicant may return for a separate hearing if they wish to change the color/stain of the shed.

This was a follow-up to an application that had previously been approved but had its application expire due to time constraints.

The commission approved the window replacements.

The application was for a blade sign. A commissioner questioned the inclusion of small mandatory text ('brokered by EXP Realty') on the sign, but the applicant noted it was a requirement.

The commission approved the blade sign.

The application was modified to remove a fence, change the light color temperature to 2700K, and move the light fixture from the bottom to the top of the sign to address glare and building commissioner feedback. Public comments were received regarding a proposed pavilion project, but the Chair clarified the commission was only considering the signage.

The commission approved the signage with the three specified changes.

The applicant presented two options for exterior lighting. The commission discussed the aesthetic differences between a colonial-style lantern and a craftsman-style fixture.

The commission approved 'Option 1' with the specifications of black finish and 2700K color temperature.

The project involves replacing existing gutters due to rot and adding one new gutter on the second floor on the municipal lot side.

The commission approved the gutter replacement.

Commissioners expressed concerns regarding the architectural style, noting the roof pitch did not match the existing Victorian/Colonial house. They also noted the application lacked detailed architectural drawings and a formal demolition plan for the existing garage and shed.

The hearing was continued to allow the applicant to provide more detailed drawings and a demolition plan.

Applicant to return next month with detailed architectural drawings, a demolition plan, and a site survey.

The applicant proposed replacing vinyl windows 'in kind' and upgrading porch decking to a composite material (Trex). One commissioner voted against approval, expressing discomfort with the use of vinyl windows in a historic district without clear evidence of prior approval. Technical typos regarding the address (1981 vs 1977 Mass Ave) were noted, along with wood rot repairs at the back porch and entry without changing architectural character.

The commission approved the application (majority, 1 No).

The applicant (Mike) will receive a Certificate of Appropriateness from the administrator (C King).

The applicant presented significant design revisions including simplified roof lines, reduced brick in favor of clapboard, and new color palettes. Commissioners debated brick usage on Clarke Street elevations and requested higher-resolution details on trim, gable/rake boards, mansard/flat roof intersections, gutter/fascia, and window casings. The applicant's counsel noted cost and contractual limits on providing full construction details. Public comments raised concerns about visual scale, electric poles, and rooftop amenities; the Chair clarified the Commission's scope excludes electrical lines, tree placement, and building height. Four specific unresolved items were enumerated for submission.

No final vote taken. Hearing continued to July 9th (unanimous 7-0) pending submission of requested details.

Applicant to submit detailed information and physical samples on the four items at least two weeks prior to the July 9th hearing.