MeetingWatch
Your area Not set — showing everywhere
Affordable Housing Trust member

Elaine Tung

Chair Active member Since 2024-07-01
4
Meetings tracked
75%
Attendance
12
Votes on record
17
Positions tracked
Vote breakdown: 12 YES

Meeting ⁠history

Every recorded vote and position, oldest to newest.
Present
Officer Elections YES
Approved the current slate of officers.
Draft Letter regarding Select Board Engagement
Believes all stakeholders should be engaged before policy reaches Select Board level.
Motion to enter Executive Session YES
Motion to adjourn meeting YES
Unknown
Present
Approval of Meeting Minutes YES ~
Metro West Rental Assistance Program Implementation YES ~
Supported proceeding with pilot program following Select Board endorsement.
Article 25 – Housing Surcharge Revenue Mechanism YES
Supported but raised concern about funding adequacy for required studies.
Executive Session for MBTA Multifamily Development Buy-Downs YES ~
Achieving True 10% Affordable Housing – Need for 502 Additional Deed-Restricted Units ~
Receptive to affordable housing overlay districts; no formal commitment made.
Present
Meeting Minutes Approval YES
Town Meeting Warrant Article 25 - Redevelopment Surcharge
Supportive of concept; strongly wants to minimize overhead costs so funds go directly to housing.
$1 Million Trust Commitment to LEXAB (LexHAB Development Project) YES
Strongly supportive; praised LEXAB's creative ADU approach and led motion framing.
Authorized chair to write commitment letter to LEXAB for state application YES
Approved; chair designated to draft formal commitment letter for EOHLC application.
Authorized chair to write support letter for Lexington Wood project YES
Approved; chair designated to draft support letter to EOHLC.
Moved to executive session under Exemption 6 for MBTA multifamily development negotiations YES
Voucher Funding as Condition
Moderated toward softening voucher condition to avoid risking state application approval.
Washer/Dryer Policy Debate ~
Supported compromise: requiring LEXAB to conduct a policy review rather than mandating inclusion.

Positions marked ~ are inferred from context and may not reflect the member's explicitly stated position. Positions marked ✓ are from recorded votes or direct statements.