Your area Not set — showing everywhere
Meeting report · Conservation Commission
Creating this report cost real money. Help fund coverage →

Conservation Commission — June 10, 2026

The meeting atmosphere became spirited when the board addressed procedural concerns regarding an applicant presenting unreviewed plans during a public hearing.

Date Wednesday, June 10, 2026 Duration 1.6h Speakers 17 Public comments 3 Decisions 14 Lively

Decisions ⁠logged

Every recorded vote, with timestamps and dissents.
Move to executive session
Motion to temporarily close the hearing and move to executive session.
Passed
Reopen public session
Motion to reopen the session after executive session.
Passed
Continue 38 Squibnocket Drive hearing
Continue notice of intent hearing until July 1st.
Passed
Continue Mass DEP violation hearing
Continue enforcement order hearing until July 1st.
Passed
Negative Determination: Town of Falmouth Engineering Department
Work is within a protected area but will not remove, fill, dredge, or alter it.
Passed
Negative Determination: Massachusetts Coastal Railroad
Work is within a protected area but meets exemption requirements and will not alter the area.
Passed
Negative Determination: 56 Field Street
Work is within a protected area but will not remove, fill, dredge, or alter it.
Passed
Continue 178 Edgewood Drive East RDA
Continue RDA until July 15th.
Passed
Close hearing and take under advisement: 86 Edgewater Drive East
Hearing closed for consideration.
Passed
Continue 65 Walker Street hearing
Continue hearing until June 24th.
Passed
Close hearing and take under advisement: 39 Pinebank Road
Hearing closed for consideration.
Passed
Issue Order of Conditions: 380 Wild Harbor Road
Issue order as discussed, contingent on revised plan with additional mitigation.
Passed
Issue Order of Conditions: 29 Miami Ave
Issue order of conditions as discussed.
Passed
Adjourn meeting
Final motion to adjourn the meeting.
Passed

Topics ⁠discussed

Click a topic to expand quotes and full context.
▶ 00:00 Administrative Procedures and Executive Session

The commission managed technical issues with meeting links and formally moved into executive session.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
See more
What was discussed

The meeting began with discussion regarding technical difficulties with shared links and meeting access. The board then formally moved to enter an executive session.

What happened

The commission successfully entered executive session and subsequently returned to open session.

▶ 46:57 Request for Continuance: 38 Squibnocket Drive

The applicant requested more time regarding a Notice of Intent for piling replacement and retaining wall construction.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
See more
What was discussed

David and Marcy Barnes requested a continuance for their project involving piling replacement, retaining walls, and patio construction.

What happened

The motion to continue the hearing until July 1st passed.

What's next

Hearing rescheduled for July 1st.

▶ 47:59 Request for Continuance: Mass DEP Violation

A matter regarding a violation of an order of conditions was continued.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
See more
What was discussed

The commission addressed a violation of an order of conditions (Mass DEP number 25-4519). The resident requested a continuance.

What happened

The motion to continue the hearing until July 1st passed.

What's next

Hearing rescheduled for July 1st.

▶ 49:03 RDA: Town of Falmouth Engineering Department

The commission reviewed drainage improvements for Turner Road and Thomas B Landers Road.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
See more
What was discussed

Staff recommended a negative determination under both state and bylaw because, while the work is in a protected area, it will not involve removing, filling, or altering the resource area.

What happened

The commission issued a negative determination.

▶ 50:58 RDA: Massachusetts Coastal Railroad

The commission reviewed a request for vegetation management in the railroad right of way.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
See more
What was discussed

Staff recommended a negative determination, noting that the work meets specific exemptions under the WPA for vegetation management.

What happened

The commission issued a negative determination.

▶ 52:26 RDA: 56 Field Street

Review of a request to install a new Title V sewage disposal system.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
See more
What was discussed

Staff recommended a negative determination as the project takes place in an AE flood zone but does not involve altering the resource area.

What happened

The commission issued a negative determination.

▶ 53:23 RDA: 178 Edgewood Drive East

The applicant requested a continuance for a pier repair project.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
See more
What was discussed

Laura Nungesser requested more time regarding permission to repair an existing pier.

What happened

The motion to continue the RDA until July 15th passed.

What's next

Hearing rescheduled for July 15th.

▶ 55:00 Notice of Intent: 86 Edgewater Drive East

Discussion of house renovations, including a second-story addition and porch.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
See more
What was discussed

Mike Borselli (engineer) presented plans for renovations. A key point was that replacing crushed shells with bark mulch would negate the need for mitigation regarding increased impervious surfaces. The board discussed the replacement of deceased mitigation plants.

What happened

The hearing was closed and the matter was taken under advisement.

▶ 1:15:30 Notice of Intent: 65 Walker Street

A proposal to demolish an existing structure and build a new three-bedroom home.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
See more
What was discussed

The applicant (Zach Pasinski) presented a revised plan during the hearing. The commission expressed concern that the board had not reviewed the revised plan prior to the meeting, violating open meeting principles. Furthermore, the proposed increase to a three-bedroom system conflicts with local regulations regarding design flow increases within 100 feet of a wetland.

What happened

The hearing was continued to June 24th to allow for staff review of the new plan and for the applicant to file with the Board of Health.

What's next

Hearing rescheduled for June 24th.

▶ 1:28:30 Notice of Intent: 39 Pinebank Road

A proposal to rebuild a single-family home and install a new septic system.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
See more
What was discussed

The project involves rebuilding a home and installing a new denitrification septic system. Discussion centered on the reduction of impervious area via a smaller driveway and the replanting of vegetation around the new septic area.

What happened

The hearing was closed and the matter was taken under advisement.

▶ 1:34:13 Order of Conditions: 380 Wild Harbor Road

The commission reviewed an order of conditions for a project involving a driveway.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
See more
What was discussed

The commission reviewed plans from Tim. They determined that a revised plan including additional mitigation for the dirt driveway is required.

What happened

The commission voted to issue an order of conditions, contingent upon a revised plan including additional mitigation.

▶ 1:35:43 Order of Conditions: 29 Miami Ave

Review of a project to raise and rebuild a house with a pool.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
See more
What was discussed

The project includes a house rebuild, invasive species removal, and restoration. Staff confirmed the revised plan satisfied previous concerns.

What happened

The commission voted to issue an order of conditions as discussed.

Controversy & ⁠dissent

Where the board, the community, or the agenda diverged.

Potentially controversial issues

01

65 Walker Street Revised Plan Submission

The applicant presented a revised plan during the hearing without prior staff review, which the board flagged as a violation of open meeting principles. Additionally, the proposed increase to a three-bedroom septic system directly conflicts with local wetland regulations regarding design flow.
Board position: The board refused to move forward with the plan due to procedural irregularities and regulatory conflicts.
medium concern

Community vs. board tension

Action ⁠items

Who owes what, by when.
Submit revised plan for 65 Walker Street and file for variance with the Board of Health.
Assigned: Zach Pasinski (Bracken Engineering) · Due: By June 24th
Submit revised plan for 380 Wild Harbor Road including additional mitigation for the driveway.
Assigned: Tim (Applicant)

Notable ⁠statements

We specifically asked Bracken Engineering not to submit a revised plan the night of a hearing to the Commission without the board reviewing it first. — Speaker K (Jen) · Addressing the applicant presenting a new plan during the hearing without prior staff review. ▶ 1:19:00
Whether or not the Board of Health agrees with that, our local wetland regulations say that... an increase in design flow just can't happen within a hundred feet of that wetland. — Speaker K (Jen) · Clarifying that CONCOM regulations regarding design flow are independent of Board of Health decisions. ▶ 1:21:01

Public ⁠comment

What residents said — verbatim, with timestamps.
3
Total speakers
2
Addressed
1
Partial
0
Not addressed
Mike Borselli
Addressed
Representing the applicant for 86 Edgewater Drive East, he presented plans for house renovations including a second-story addition and porch. He stated that the project will not increase impervious surfaces and will replace deceased mitigation plants. Key concern
To obtain approval for renovations that do not increase impervious surfaces or bedroom count.
Board response
The board asked clarifying questions regarding the replacement of crushed shells and the success of previous plantings, then moved to close the hearing and take the matter under advisement.
The board engaged with the presenter, clarified technical details regarding mitigation, and moved the application into the formal deliberation phase (under advisement).
Zach Pasinski
Partial
Representing the applicants for 65 Walker Street, he presented a plan to replace an existing home with a new three-bedroom structure. He noted improvements such as a new nitrogen-reducing septic system and updated mitigation plantings. Key concern
To present a revised plan that addresses previous staff concerns regarding structure size and mitigation separation.
Board response
The board expressed frustration that a revised plan was flashed on screen without prior review, noted that a three-bedroom system violates local regulations regarding design flow near wetlands, and voted to continue the hearing to June 24th.
While the board received the information, they did not grant approval or complete the review because the plan was not provided in advance for study, and regulatory conflicts (bedroom count/flow) remain.
Zach Pasinski
Addressed
Representing the applicants for 39 Pinebank Road, he presented a plan to demolish an existing house and build a new four-bedroom home. He highlighted a reduction in impervious area and the installation of a new denitrification septic system. Key concern
To present a project that includes both required and optional mitigation plantings and complies with FEMA codes.
Board response
The board asked questions regarding the driveway reduction, hardscape calculations, and the location/requirement of mitigation plantings, then moved to close the hearing and take it under advisement.
The board engaged in a detailed Q&A session regarding the site plan and technical details before moving the matter to the advisement stage.
Support coverage

Creating this report cost ⁠real money.

MeetingWatch attended, transcribed, and analyzed this meeting on its own dime. If this work is valuable to you, chip in to keep covering Falmouth.

Report composed by gemma-4-26b, grok-4.20-0309-reasoning, grok-4-fast · analyzed 2026-06-13.