MeetingWatch
Your area Not set — showing everywhere
Meeting report · Conservation Commission
Creating this report cost real money. Help fund coverage →

Conservation Commission — May 14, 2026

The meeting was professional and focused on standard regulatory business, permit approvals, and leadership transitions.

Date Thursday, May 14, 2026 Duration 2.4h Speakers 17 Public comments 6 Decisions 20 Routine

Public ⁠impact

Issues from this meeting with documented community impact.
01

Review of Performance Bonds and As-built Costs

Potential increase in surety bond amounts to ensure consistency and better coverage of project risks. Affected: Property owners and developers seeking construction permits.
fee change

Decisions ⁠logged

Every recorded vote, with timestamps and dissents.
Continue hearing for 11 Sears Street to May 28th.
Request to continue the hearing for John Muller regarding a dwelling demolition and construction.
5-0-0
Continue hearing for 85 Wilmington Road to May 28th.
Request to continue the hearing for Mick Gandhi regarding commercial construction and stormwater improvements.
5-0-0
Approve April 9, 2026 minutes.
Formal approval of the previous meeting minutes.
5-0-0
Approve April 23, 2026 minutes.
Approval with one abstention from a member who was not present.
4-0-1
Issue negative conditional determination for 9 Mooney Road.
Approval for construction of a farmer's porch with specific conditions regarding runoff and sediment control.
5-0-0
Grant waiver for 22 Ledgewood Drive for work in the 20-foot no disturb zone.
Waiver granted to allow for shed and tree removal near the wetland buffer.
5-0-0
Close hearing and issue permit for 22 Ledgewood Drive.
Approval of the Notice of Intent under Burlington Bylaw and State Wetlands Protection Act.
5-0-0
Require $2,500 surety bond for 22 Ledgewood Drive.
Formal requirement for a performance bond.
5-0-0
Close hearing on 36 Upland Road (DEP file -613)
Motion to close the hearing for the Rafina-Britto construction addition.
4-0-1
Approve findings under Burlington By-law Article 14 for 36 Upland Road
Approval of findings for DEP file -613.
4-0-1
Approve permit for 36 Upland Road
Approval of permit under Burlington By-law Article 14 and State Wetlands Protection Act.
4-0-1
Request performance surety for 36 Upland Road
Request for a $2,500 bond for the duration of the project.
4-0-1
Grant waiver for 8 Fred Street for work in the 20-foot no disturb zone.
Waiver granted to allow for mitigation planting in the rear of the yard.
4-0-1
Approve permit and findings for 8 Fred Street.
Approval under Burlington Bylaw and State Wetlands Protection Act.
4-0-1
Require $1,500 surety bond for 8 Fred Street.
A reduced bond amount based on the scale of the addition and plantings.
4-0-1
Issue enforcement order for 14 County Road
Formal enforcement order issued to Dominic Costa regarding violations.
5-0-0
Issue enforcement order for 16 County Road
Formal enforcement order issued to Andrea Calandriello regarding violations.
5-0-0
Approval to send a letter to state legislators regarding provisions that are adverse to local wetland and stormwater bylaws.
The letter will be sent to House and Senate leadership (including Speaker Mariano, Senate President Spilka, and local representatives) to advocate against amendments that undermine stricter local standards.
5-0-0
Election of Bill Boivin as Chair of the Conservation Commission.
Commissioner Boivin accepted the position after being nominated by the outgoing Chair.
5-0-0
Election of Larry Cohen as Vice Chair of the Conservation Commission.
Larry Cohen was nominated and seconded for the Vice Chair position.
Unanimous (implied)

Topics ⁠discussed

Click a topic to expand quotes and full context.
▶ 02:07 Agenda Review and Continuances

The commission reviewed the agenda, noting one withdrawn item and several requests for continuances for 11 Sears Street, 85 Wilmington Road, Wall Street, and 7A Street.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
▶ 04:49 Approval of Meeting Minutes

The commission reviewed and voted on the minutes from the April 9th and April 23rd, 2026 meetings.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
▶ 06:48 9 Mooney Road - Determination of Applicability

A request for a determination of applicability regarding the construction of a 6x32 foot farmer's porch within a 100-foot wetland buffer zone.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
▶ 16:45 22 Ledgewood Drive - Notice of Intent Public Hearing

A public hearing regarding the demolition of an existing dwelling and construction of a new single-family home, including tree removal and infiltration systems.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
▶ 66:39 36 Upland Road Construction Addition

Discussion of a notice of intent for a single-family home addition, including a deck, walkway, and stormwater infiltration system located within a riverfront area and wetland buffer. Continued hearing for a residential addition, deck, and walkway, including a review of updated plans, an alternatives analysis, and stormwater management.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
▶ 73:11 Violation at 14 and 16 County Road

Review of unauthorized vegetation removal and improper material disposal (wood chips and fill) in bordering vegetated wetlands on two adjacent properties.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
▶ 261:00 8 Fred Street - Continued Notice of Intent Public Hearing

A continued hearing for a residential addition, involving discussions about mitigation through native plantings due to a fence located in a wetland area.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
▶ 117:40 Planning Board Updates

Brief report on the status of projects at 85 Wilmington Road and 2 Wall Street, both of which are continued/pending.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
▶ 120:40 Environmental Bond Bill Opinion

Discussion regarding the Commission's opposition to proposed amendments in the environmental bond bill that would limit municipal enforcement of local bylaws exceeding state standards. The commission discussed drafting and sending a letter to state House and Senate leadership to oppose legislative amendments that would weaken local wetland and stormwater protection standards.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
▶ 135:41 Election of Commission Leadership

The commission held elections for the positions of Chair and Vice Chair for the upcoming year.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
▶ 139:00 Review of Performance Bonds and As-built Costs

A brief discussion occurred regarding the necessity of performance bonds versus the cost of as-built documentation to ensure consistency and fairness in fees.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker

Controversy & ⁠dissent

Where the board, the community, or the agenda diverged.

Potentially controversial issues

01

Environmental Bond Bill Opposition

The Commission is taking a political stance by opposing state legislative amendments that would limit municipal enforcement of local environmental bylaws. This represents a clash between state-level legislative lobbying and local control over wetland and stormwater protection.
Board position: Strongly opposed to the amendments; planning to send an official letter to state leadership to protect local standards.
medium concern
02

Violation at 14 and 16 County Road

Involves unauthorized vegetation removal and improper material disposal in protected wetlands. While the owners apologized, the 'egregious' nature of the violation (as noted by the board) creates tension regarding enforcement and environmental damage.
Board position: Issued formal enforcement orders and required remediation/restoration.
medium concern

Split votes

Approval of April 23, 2026 minutes
4-0-1
36 Upland Road: Close hearing, approve findings, approve permit, and request surety bond
4-0-1
8 Fred Street: Grant waiver, approve permit/findings, and require surety bond
4-0-1

Community vs. board tension

Action ⁠items

Who owes what, by when.
Update the 8 Fred Street decision document to correct the DEP file number from -611 to -611 (Note: Transcript shows both numbers, but staff noted a error) and adjust tree/shrub wording.
Assigned: Conservation Staff (Eileen/Lucy) · Due: Next meeting
Update the 9 Mooney Road determination to include specific conditions and formal issuance.
Assigned: Conservation Staff · Due: Tuesday of next week
Update 8 Fred Street decision wording regarding tree/shrub specifications and location.
Assigned: Conservation Staff · Due: Next meeting
Sign the enforcement orders and distribute to property owners.
Assigned: a speaker · Due: Tomorrow
Submit an updated restoration plan reflecting the agreed-upon number of trees (6 total) and shrubs (2 viburnums per lot) and updated date.
Assigned: a speaker (Mary Trudeau) · Due: By the end of the weekend
Complete all remediation/restoration work specified in the enforcement orders.
Assigned: Dominic Costa & Andrea Calandriello · Due: 2026-06-25
Sign and send the Commission's opinion letter regarding the environmental bond bill to House/Senate leadership.
Assigned: a speaker & a speaker (Bill)
Print the approved letter on official letterhead and find the appropriate mailing addresses for House and Senate leadership.
Assigned: a speaker (Eileen)
Compile data regarding the historical costs of bonds versus as-built documentation to inform future discussions on fees.
Assigned: a speaker (Lucy)
Research comparable towns to see if their bylaws include similar bond requirements.
Assigned: Staff

Notable ⁠statements

We've been discussing [bond amounts] recently and looking back at filings, we're feeling like we're not asking enough for bonds. — Unidentified speaker · Discussion regarding why bond amounts for residential additions have remained low over several years. ▶ 57:59
This was a pretty egregious violation... I am surprised their contractor did what they did. — Unidentified speaker · Discussing the severity of the unpermitted filling and wood chip dumping at the County Road properties. ▶ 83:03
The view that local environmental bylaws are not based on science is a fallacy. — Unidentified speaker · Responding to concerns about the environmental bond bill amendments that target local regulations. ▶ 124:00
We have enacted local bylaws... that go stricter than what the state requires... because the lobbyists on Beacon Hill are very effective. — Unidentified speaker · Explaining why the commission is pursuing legislative action to protect local environmental standards. ▶ 126:00
I don't believe that being chair of this commission is an institutional thing that needs to continue by me alone. — Unidentified speaker · Resigning from the Chair position after approximately 25 years of service. ▶ 136:40
I realized something that I don't have to be Larry Cohen. The knowledge, experience, and wisdom that he has resides in the man and not in the title. — Unidentified speaker · Accepting the new role of Chair and acknowledging the outgoing Chair's legacy. ▶ 138:00

Public ⁠comment

What residents said — verbatim, with timestamps.
6
Total speakers
6
Addressed
0
Partial
0
Not addressed
Alexandra Johnson
Addressed
The homeowner expressed interest in constructing a 6 by 32-foot farmer's porch at the front of her residence. She was present to present the application for a determination of applicability. Key concern
Requesting permission to build a front porch within a 100-foot buffer zone to bordering vegetative wetlands.
Board response
The board discussed drainage requirements and issued a negative conditional determination, allowing the project provided certain standard conditions and specific runoff management are met.
The board reviewed the application, addressed technical questions regarding gutters/downspouts, and voted to approve the project with conditions.
Maureen Herald
Addressed
Representing the client Kyle Cruby, she presented a notice of intent for a single-family dwelling project including a walkway, driveway, patio, and shed. She noted the resource area is located on an adjacent parcel and detailed the proposed erosion controls. Key concern
Notification of intent to construct a new dwelling and associated site improvements within a 100-foot buffer zone.
Board response
The board discussed tree replacement, infiltration system overflow, and grading. They granted a waiver for work within the 20-foot no-disturb zone and approved the permit with conditions including tree replacement.
The board addressed specific technical concerns regarding tree species/height, stormwater infiltration, and the removal of existing structures.
Jessica Sutherland
Addressed
The applicant stated she had no additional comments regarding her notice of intent for a home addition. She participated in a negotiation regarding wetland mitigation. Key concern
Requesting approval for a home addition near a wetland area and resolving the issue of an existing fence in the wetland.
Board response
The board proposed a 'quid pro quo' deal where she would not have to move the fence if she agreed to plant a native tree and shrub as mitigation.
The board and applicant reached a verbal agreement on a compromise regarding the fence and replacement plantings.
James Geary
Addressed
Representing homeowner Rufina Brito, he provided an update on a construction project, noting reductions in patio size and the addition of an infiltration system. He also submitted an alternative analysis as requested. Key concern
Providing updated plans and mitigation measures for a construction project in the riverfront area and wetland buffer.
Board response
The board expressed satisfaction with the updates and the clear memo provided, and subsequently moved to close the hearing and approve the permit with conditions.
The board reviewed the updated documentation and voted to approve the project based on the provided improvements.
Dominic Costa
Addressed
The property owner apologized for the unauthorized work performed on his and his neighbor's properties. He stated he was unaware of the violation and expressed a desire to fix the issue. Key concern
Addressing a violation involving vegetation removal and material placement within a wetland buffer zone.
Board response
The board accepted the apology and discussed the enforcement order and a proposed restoration plan involving manual removal of debris and replanting.
The board listened to the apology and worked with the consultant to finalize an enforcement order and a restoration plan.
Andrea Calandriello
Addressed
The property owner apologized for the violation, stating she was unaware she was entering a protected zone. She expressed a desire to correct the situation. Key concern
Addressing a violation involving unauthorized work and material placement within a wetland buffer zone.
Board response
The board accepted the apology and proceeded with the enforcement order and restoration plan discussion.
The board addressed the violation via an enforcement order and a restoration plan.
Support coverage

Creating this report cost ⁠real money.

MeetingWatch attended, transcribed, and analyzed this meeting on its own dime. If this work is valuable to you, chip in to keep covering Burlington.

Report composed by grok-4.3, gemma-4-26b, grok-4-fast, grok-4.20-0309-reasoning · analyzed 2026-05-30.