Civilian Review Board — March 19, 2026
The meeting was professional and focused on establishing long-term operational frameworks, despite some singular instances of public frustration.
Questions about this meeting? Just ask.
Ask MeetingWatch answers from this meeting’s report, transcript, and records — with linked sources.
At the March 19 Aurora Civilian Review Board (CRB) meeting, several critical issues regarding transparency and community access were on the table.
One of the most pressing concerns came from the public. Resident Ash Dreymon pointed out that website issues are making it difficult for citizens to contact the board and requested clearer information on how CRB investigation timelines compare to police investigations. While the Chairperson offered to speak with the commenter individually, the recurring difficulty in accessing the board via digital platforms remains a hurdle for community engagement.
On the oversight front, the board is moving toward a more data-driven approach. Recognizing that simply having data isn't the same as understanding it, members discussed the need for structured data that allows for meaningful analysis. This includes exploring the use of academic researchers to provide objective, third-party insights into police-related data—a move that could significantly strengthen the board's ability to hold the department accountable.
Finally, the board addressed potential biases in the city's application process. Members noted that questions regarding political affiliation in municipal applications could create an 'old boy network' perception, which contradicts the CRB's mission. While they confirmed the question has been removed from the online application, the discussion highlights the ongoing effort to ensure the board remains impartial and focused on evidence rather than politics.
Public impact
Increased oversight through improved data extraction and academic analysis of police stops.
The board agreed that data analysis should be a standing item and decided to direct formal data 'asks' to the Chief and Deputy Chief.
Vice Chair Brown will distill the discussion into a formal 'ask' to be presented to the police leadership.
Topics discussed
The board reviewed and approved the minutes from the February 19, 2026, meeting.
The motion was approved by unanimous voice consent.
A member of the public, Ash Dreymon, provided comments regarding communication difficulties and timelines for investigations.
The Chairperson offered to speak personally with any public commenters after the meeting or via contact information provided.
Staff is directed to follow up with members of the public regarding concerns within the scope of the city's authority.
The board conducted a detailed review of Aurora Police Department Policy 401 regarding bias-based policing and profiling.
The board discussed potential feedback for the department, including recommendations on the timing of articulating stop reasons and the inclusion of communication resources for the hearing impaired.
The Chairperson will compile recommendations for the department, including feedback on the timing of articulation and communication tools.
The board discussed strategies for gathering and analyzing police-related data to better fulfill its mandate.
The board agreed that data analysis should be a standing item and discussed the need to engage the Chief and Deputy Chief regarding data access.
Vice Chair Brown will distill the discussion into a formal 'ask' to be presented to the Chief and Deputy Chief.
The board discussed the importance of data being structured in a way that allows for meaningful extraction and conclusion-drawing.
The board agreed that data requests should be handled through direct engagement with the Chief, Deputy Chief, and command staff rather than starting with administrative staff, once a consensus on the necessary data is reached.
The board will develop a list of data 'asks' to present to the police leadership.
The board reviewed draft content for a new trifold brochure and PowerPoint presentation intended for public outreach.
The board agreed to keep the printed material 'basic' and 'timeless' to ensure it remains useful even after current members' terms end, while using digital resources for more complex visuals like maps.
Ginger Ingram will edit the draft content and send it to the Chair, who will then send it to Brand, Marketing, and Strategy for a formal mock-up/prototype for the next meeting.
The board discussed the city's generic application process for boards and commissions, specifically regarding questions on political affiliation.
The board confirmed that the political affiliation question is no longer part of the application process, addressing the concern of potential bias.
The board explored various ways to increase public awareness, including attending neighborhood meetings and National Night Out.
The board decided to add 'CRB Engagement Ideas' as a formal agenda item for the next meeting to plan these activities.
The board will develop a long-term engagement plan in upcoming meetings.
Controversy & dissent
Potentially controversial issues
Bias-Based Policing Policy (Policy 401)
Board Application Process and Political Bias
Community vs. board tension
Public comment
Decisions logged
Action items
Member positions
Positions marked ~ are inferred from context and may not reflect the member's explicitly stated position. UNCLEAR means the vote was split but the record did not name how this member voted — it is not a “yes.”
Creating this report cost real money.
MeetingWatch attended, transcribed, and analyzed this meeting on its own dime. If this work is valuable to you, chip in to keep covering Aurora.
Follow Aurora
One email when a new report is published from the Civilian Review Board — or one weekly digest.
grok-4.3, gemma-4-26b, grok-4.20-0309-reasoning · analyzed 2026-06-07.
Members feature
Ask questions. Get answers with receipts.
Ask about anything covered on this page and get a plain-English answer that links to the report, the official records, and the exact moment in the meeting video.
Create a free accountFree with a MeetingWatch account — no card, no spam.
Already a member? Sign in
Ask questions about any meeting
Open a community, board, issue, or meeting and I can answer from its records — with links to the report, official documents, and the exact moment in the video.
Then reopen this button to start asking.
AI-generated from meeting records — verify against the linked sources. Conversations are stored (privacy).