Your area Not set — showing everywhere
Meeting report · Planning and Zoning Commission
Creating this report cost real money. Help fund coverage →

Planning and Zoning Commission — March 2, 2026

The meeting transitioned from a routine industrial approval to a speculative and somewhat tense discussion regarding residential growth and zoning legality.

Date Monday, March 2, 2026 Duration 1.3h Speakers 20 Public comments 3 Decisions 3 Lively

Questions about this meeting? ⁠Just ask.

Ask MeetingWatch answers from this meeting’s report, transcript, and records — with linked sources.

Summary AI-generated to surface controversy & community impact without bias — always verify against the actual meeting before relying on it.

At the March 2, 2026, Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, a significant debate emerged regarding the future of the 12-acre Hillstone Road property. The discussion centered on a pre-application review for Trivik Buildings LLC, which is weighing two very different development paths: a high-density Planned Regional Development (PRD) featuring approximately 60 apartment units, or a lower-density cluster subdivision of about 22 single-family homes.

Local residents attended the meeting to express direct opposition to the high-density option, citing concerns over increased traffic congestion and the impact on the existing rural residential character of the neighborhood. While the Commission acknowledged these concerns, they stated that because this was a non-binding pre-application discussion, no formal decisions or votes were taken to address the community's input.

Internal divisions were also evident. Commissioner Kennedy raised specific concerns regarding the legality of the high-density proposal, questioning whether such a move would constitute 'spot zoning' by placing high-density housing in an area otherwise characterized by rural residential tracts. As the town balances its goal of addressing the housing crisis with the preservation of neighborhood infrastructure, the Hillstone Road development remains a high-stakes issue for Manchester residents.

Mar 2, 2026 1.3h long 20 speakers 3 public comments 3 decisions Lively
Notable statements Drag to browse

“The Commission has approved several applications in the past year... signaling the town's commitment to solving the housing crisis.”

— Commissioner Reichelt · Discussion during the Trivik Buildings pre-application review regarding housing density. ▶ 1:06:49

“Changing a rural residential tract to PRD... all surrounded by rural residential... conjures up spot zoning concerns.”

— Commissioner Kennedy · Feedback regarding the high-density apartment proposal for the Hillstone Road property. ▶ 51:46
This meeting — choose a section

Public ⁠impact

Issues from this meeting with documented community impact.
What was discussed

Potential shift from rural residential to high-density multi-family or cluster subdivisions, impacting traffic and local infrastructure.

Topics ⁠discussed

Each topic expands to quotes and full context.
Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

A request for a modification to allow a 68,000 square foot building addition on the east side of the existing industrial facility, including parking relocation and stormwater/sewer improvements.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

A non-binding discussion regarding two development options for 12 acres on Hillstone Road: a high-density Planned Regional Development (PRD) with approximately 60 apartment units, or a lower-density cluster subdivision of approximately 22 single-family homes.

Speakers: Unidentified speaker
What was discussed

Updates on upcoming training sessions, regulation amendment meetings, and the status of various pending applications.

Controversy & ⁠dissent

Where the board, the community, or the agenda diverged.

Potentially controversial issues

01

Trivik Buildings LLC Hillstone Road Development

The proposal involves a choice between high-density apartments (60 units) or low-density single-family homes. This pits the town's stated goal of solving the housing crisis against resident concerns regarding traffic, neighborhood character, and potential 'spot zoning'.
Board position: The board signaled a cautious approach, expressing technical concerns about zoning legality and infrastructure (septic/wells) while acknowledging the broader housing mandate.
Internal dissent
While no formal vote was taken (pre-application review), Commissioner Kennedy expressed specific reservations regarding the legality of 'spot zoning' for a high-density project in a rural residential area.
medium concern

Community vs. board tension

Public ⁠comment

What residents said — verbatim, with timestamps.
3
Total speakers
1
Addressed
1
Partial
1
Not addressed
Ron Bauminger
Addressed
Presented the application for the Allied Building expansion, which includes a 68,000 square foot addition on the east side of the property. He detailed the project's compliance with stormwater, utility, and erosion control requirements, noting it is a seamless expansion of the existing industrial use. Key concern
Requesting approval for the special exception modification and site/erosion plans for the building expansion.
Board response
The board asked several clarifying questions regarding erosion control, proximity to a daycare, and traffic distribution, and ultimately voted unanimously to approve the modification and the erosion control plan.
The board engaged with the presenter's technical details and granted the requested approvals.
Harikupparaj
Partial
Presented a pre-application review for a potential development on 12 acres of land near the Glastonbury town line. He proposed two options: a high-density apartment project (approx. 60 units) using septic and community wells, or a lower-density cluster subdivision of single-family homes. Key concern
Seeking honest feedback from the Commission on the feasibility of two different development options to address the housing shortage.
Board response
Commissioners provided extensive feedback, raising concerns about zoning changes (spot zoning), density, lack of public water/sewer, and the technical requirements for cluster subdivisions.
The board provided the requested feedback and engaged in a discussion regarding the feasibility of both options, though no formal decision was made as it was a non-binding pre-application review.
Unidentified speaker
Not addressed
Stated they live off Hillstone Road and are not supportive of either proposed application. They expressed concerns regarding increased traffic, neighborhood compatibility, and the high density of the apartment proposal. Key concern
Opposition to the development due to traffic congestion and density/neighborhood compatibility issues.
Board response
The board listened to the comment; the Chair noted that it is difficult to predict neighbor reactions but acknowledged the concerns regarding traffic and density.
As this was a pre-application meeting, the board could not act on the opposition, but they acknowledged the resident's perspective in the context of future public hearings.

Decisions ⁠logged

Every recorded vote, with timestamps and dissents.
Approval of Special Exception Modification for Allied Printing Services at 1046 Tollin Turnpike (noted as 1046 R Town Turnpike in transcript) for a 68,000 sq ft building addition and associated infrastructure.
Approved with modifications specified in an email from Deputy Director Renata Bertati dated March 2, 2026.
Unanimously approved
Certification of the Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan for Allied Printing Services.
Relates to the 68,000 sq ft building addition and associated site improvements.
Unanimously approved
Approval of minutes from the February 18, 2026, public hearing and business meeting.
Unanimously approved

Share ⁠this report

Drafts ready to post — click any block to copy.

X / Twitter — by angle

Community concerns raised but deferred
At the 3/2 Planning & Zoning meeting, the Commission discussed a potential major shift for Hillstone Road: choosing between 60 apartments or 22 homes. Residents raised concerns about traffic and character, but no formal... https://meetingwatch.org/ct/manchester/planning-zoning-commission/2026-03-02/ #MeetingWatch #ManchesterCT
328/280 chars
Board internal division and legal/zoning implications
Is it 'spot zoning'? During the 3/2 P&Z meeting, Commissioner Kennedy raised legal concerns about approving high-density apartments in a rural residential area on Hillstone Road. A major decision on Manchester’s density is... https://meetingwatch.org/ct/manchester/planning-zoning-commission/2026-03-02/ #MeetingWatch #ManchesterCT
331/280 chars
Factual reporting of industrial approval
Manchester P&Z approved a 68,000 sq ft addition for Allied Printing Services on 3/2. The modification includes parking relocation and infrastructure changes at 1046 Tollin Turnpike. This was a unanimous decision. https://meetingwatch.org/ct/manchester/planning-zoning-commission/2026-03-02/ #MeetingWatch #ManchesterCT
318/280 chars

X thread

1
The future of Hillstone Road is at a crossroads, and the March 2nd Planning & Zoning meeting revealed a growing tension between housing mandates and neighborhood character. 🧵 #MeetingWatch #ManchesterCT
202/280
2
Trivik Buildings LLC presented two options for 12 acres: a high-density project with ~60 apartments (PRD) or a lower-density cluster of ~22 single-family homes. This choice will fundamentally change the area.
208/280
3
Local residents attended to voice concerns over traffic congestion and neighborhood compatibility. While the Commission listened, they noted that because this was a pre-application review, no formal action could be taken yet.
225/280
4
The debate isn't just about density; it's about legality. Commissioner Kennedy raised concerns about 'spot zoning'—the idea of placing high-density housing in the middle of a rural residential tract. This remains a key point of contention. https://meetingwatch.org/ct/manchester/planning-zoning-commission/2026-03-02/
263/280

Facebook — long form

At the March 2, 2026, Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, a significant debate emerged regarding the future of the 12-acre Hillstone Road property. The discussion centered on a pre-application review for Trivik Buildings LLC, which is weighing two very different development paths: a high-density Planned Regional Development (PRD) featuring approximately 60 apartment units, or a lower-density cluster subdivision of about 22 single-family homes.

Local residents attended the meeting to express direct opposition to the high-density option, citing concerns over increased traffic congestion and the impact on the existing rural residential character of the neighborhood. While the Commission acknowledged these concerns, they stated that because this was a non-binding pre-application discussion, no formal decisions or votes were taken to address the community's input.

Internal divisions were also evident. Commissioner Kennedy raised specific concerns regarding the legality of the high-density proposal, questioning whether such a move would constitute 'spot zoning' by placing high-density housing in an area otherwise characterized by rural residential tracts. As the town balances its goal of addressing the housing crisis with the preservation of neighborhood infrastructure, the Hillstone Road development remains a high-stakes issue for Manchester residents. https://meetingwatch.org/ct/manchester/planning-zoning-commission/2026-03-02/ #MeetingWatch #ManchesterCT

Action ⁠items

Who owes what, by when.
Consult with staff and determine the most feasible development scenario (PRD, cluster subdivision, or standard subdivision) based on Commission feedback.
Assigned: Trivik Buildings LLC
Provide POCD update on April 16.
Assigned: Renata Bertati (Staff) · Due: 2026-04-16
Support coverage

Creating this report cost ⁠real money.

MeetingWatch attended, transcribed, and analyzed this meeting on its own dime. If this work is valuable to you, chip in to keep covering Manchester.

Report composed by grok-4.3, gemma-4-26b, grok-4.20-0309-reasoning · analyzed 2026-05-30.