Your area Not set — showing everywhere
Issue · Manchester, CT

Firewood Processing as Special Exception in RR Zones

Proposal would allow industrial-scale firewood operations on residential lots, raising noise, environmental, and neighborhood character concerns.

Overview

A zoning amendment to permit firewood processing and sale as an accessory use in RR zones was introduced to resolve enforcement against an existing Porter Street business. The proposal advanced from a 2026-04-06 pre-application review to a continued public hearing on 2026-06-01 after commissioners requested revised regulatory text addressing noise, buffers, and qualifying conditions.

Background

The issue arose from a cease-and-desist order issued to Rosemarie Chirico for operating a firewood business at 571 and 599 Porter Street in a Rural Residence (RR) zone, where such activity was not permitted. In a pre-application review on 2026-04-06, the applicant sought a zone change to RR combined with a regulatory amendment to legalize importing and processing logs as an accessory use, prompting initial commission discussion on whether the operation qualified as agriculture or constituted an incompatible industrial use.

This led directly to the filing of Zoning Regulation Amendment 27-2026, which proposed adding firewood processing and sale as a permitted accessory use in all RR zones. At the 2026-06-01 meeting, attorney Dori Riser presented the amendment to resolve the enforcement action against Chirico, citing similarities to nurseries and Christmas tree sales plus consistency with the POCD on local agriculture; the commission moved into public hearing and then continued it to allow revised text.

The continuation vote on the related zone change ZC-6-2026 (8-1) was explicitly tied to awaiting resolution of the regulation amendment, creating a causal sequence where the pre-application concerns shaped the formal hearing process. Opponents raised watershed, noise, and industrial-activity issues during testimony, while the board requested detailed conditions on sourcing radius, DEP certification, hours, and buffering before further action.

As of the close of the 2026-06-01 meeting, the amendment remains under active public hearing with no final vote taken, leaving the underlying enforcement action and potential zone change unresolved pending the June 15, 2026 continuation.

At the 2026-06-15 meeting the public hearing on the AA-to-RR zone change for 571/599 Porter Street was closed by a 7-2 roll-call vote after twelve residents testified against it, citing ongoing noise, clear-cutting, past violations, and the 2012 denial. The related text amendment 27-2026 was revised to a special-exception use with new lot-size and area-cap standards but was continued to July 6, 2026 by a 6-3 vote after commissioners expressed discomfort with the proposal and multiple motions failed.

How it unfolded
Pre-application review of zone change and amendment request to legalize firewood processing at Porter Street properties; commission discussed classification as agriculture versus industrial use and whether a broad regulatory update or specific carve-out was sought.
2026-04-06Planning Zoning Commission
Public hearing opened on Zoning Regulation Amendment 27-2026 to allow firewood processing and sale as accessory use in RR zones; commission heard testimony, requested revised text on buffers/hours/conditions, and voted to continue the hearing and the tied zone change ZC-6-2026 to June 15, 2026.
2026-06-01Planning Zoning Commission
Public hearing continued and then closed on zone change 0062026 (AA to RR) for Chirico properties by 7-2 roll call; text amendment 27-2026 revised from permitted accessory use to special exception with minimum lot size and 25% area cap, then continued to July 6 by 6-3 vote after failed motions and commissioner concerns over regulatory fit.
2026-06-15Planning Zoning Commission
Arguments in favor
The use is similar to already-permitted accessory activities such as nurseries and Christmas tree sales.
planning-zoning-commission 2026-06-01
For
It aligns with the POCD goals supporting local agriculture and small business.
planning-zoning-commission 2026-06-01
For
The operation is seasonal and can incorporate controls such as landscape buffers and limited hours to minimize neighbor impact.
planning-zoning-commission 2026-06-01
For
Most logs are sourced locally within 30 miles, supporting land preservation and reducing larger-scale trucking.
planning-zoning-commission 2026-06-01
For
Arguments against
Firewood processing introduces industrial-scale noise and activity incompatible with residential RR zones.
planning-zoning-commission 2026-06-01
Against
Potential negative impacts on watersheds and environmental quality from on-site operations.
planning-zoning-commission 2026-06-01
Against
The activity does not qualify as a true accessory use because examples like nurseries are typically primary uses.
planning-zoning-commission 2026-06-01
Against
Widespread application across RR lots could place operations near high-density housing without adequate separation.
planning-zoning-commission 2026-06-01
Against
The property has been clear-cut and turned into an industrial eyesore over seven years with constant chainsaw noise, lights, derelict vehicles, and lowered property values.
planning-zoning-commission 2026-06-15
Against
The 2012 denial occurred for similar reasons and no changed conditions exist to justify approval now; the applications seek to retroactively legalize violations.
planning-zoning-commission 2026-06-15
Against
The split zoning was intentional to buffer neighbors and environmental damage conflicts with the POCD.
planning-zoning-commission 2026-06-15
Against
Key voices
“Proposed adding firewood processing and sale as an accessory use in the RR zone to resolve a cease and desist order issued to applicant Rosemarie Chirico.”
Attorney Dori Riserplanning-zoning-commission 2026-06-01
“Questioned how the operation could be classified as 'accessory' when the examples provided (nurseries, farms) are typically primary uses and expressed concern that this might actually be an industrial operation.”
Board memberplanning-zoning-commission 2026-06-01
“Clarified that most firewood is sourced locally (within 30 miles) and confirmed that tree companies handling deliveries typically manage their own state certifications.”
Applicant representativeplanning-zoning-commission 2026-06-01
“Opposes any zoning changes at the Chirico property. Notes the property has been clear-cut and turned into an industrial eyesore over seven years. Warns that approval will lead to further expansion like roads and snowballing impacts.”
Residentplanning-zoning-commission 2026-06-15
“Opposes both applications, emphasizing 15 years of illegal firewood operations. Highlights the 2012 denial for similar reasons and argues the applications are an attempt to retroactively legalize violations rather than a legitimate request.”
Residentplanning-zoning-commission 2026-06-15
“Supports the amendments, arguing the business provides locally sourced wood and alternative energy.”
Residentplanning-zoning-commission 2026-06-15
What's next

Public hearing on zoning regulation amendment 27-2026 continued to July 6, 2026 regular meeting for applicant revisions and responses; commission will consider full record and POCD consistency before any vote on the zone change.

firewoodRR zonezoning amendmentPorter Streetaccessory use