Select Board · Jun 23
Select Board weighed Landers Property preservation options and affordable housing definitions amid concerns over financial constraints and missed opportunities.
- First, the board held intense debates on the Landers property and board ethics—topics that were NOT on the public agenda. When high-stakes land deals and potential conflicts of interest are discussed without prior notice, residents lose their ability to prepare.
- Regarding Landers: The Board stood by its decision to waive the town's right of first refusal. Critics warned that the Memorandum of Understanding is too 'aspirational' and lacks enforceable protections against sand mining or high-density zoning. One board member formally dissented.
- Finally, fiscal concerns are mounting. Residents challenged the 4% inflation rate used in the town's 5-year budget forecast, calling it unrealistic and a mask for a deficit. The Board is now pivoting to monthly financial reporting to rebuild trust.
- Stay informed. Accountability matters.